以质量求发展,以服务铸品牌

Journal of Nursing ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (20): 60-64.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.20.060

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Construction of Risk Prediction Model for Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation in Patients after Cardiac Surgery

HU Kai-li, YANG Si-yu, WU Qian-sheng, ZHOU Yan-rong   

  1. Dept. of Cardiovascular Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
  • Received:2022-04-21 Published:2022-11-08

Abstract: Objective To explore the risk factors of prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV) in patients after cardiac surgery, and to construct a risk prediction model. Methods A total of 471 patients were selected from July, 2020 to May, 2021 in department of cardiovascular surgery in a tertiary grade-A hospital in Wuhan, and divided into PMV group (n=357) and non-PMV group (n=114) according to the mechanical ventilation time. The risk factors of PMV were screened out, and the risk prediction model was constructed through logistic regression. Eight-one patients from June to November, 2021 were selected to verify the predictive value of the model. A nomogram was developed by R software and validated to predict the risk factors of PMV. Results Age (OR=1.035), BMI (OR=1.143), neutrophil count before surgery (OR=1.979), intraoperative use of antibiotic (OR=0.520), length of operation (OR=1.548), and duration of cardiopulmonary bypass (OR=1.291) were the independent risk factors of PMV. A prediction model was constructed by these 6 factors, which was internally verified by the modeling group. The calibration curve of the calibration chart was close to the ideal curve. The area under the ROC curve was 0.848. The sensitivity and specificity were 0.772, and 0.790. respectively. The external verification showed that the calibration curve of the calibration chart was near the ideal curve, and the area under the ROC curve was 0.822. The sensitivity and specificity were 0.766 and 0.824, respectively. Conclusion The risk prediction model for PMV in patients after cardiac surgery has good discrimination and accuracy. It can provide scientific guidance for individualized prevention of PMV.

Key words: cardiac surgery, prolonged mechanical ventilation, nomogram, nursing

CLC Number: 

  • R473.6
[1] 梅翔,夏宇,梁贵友.心脏外科术后长时间机械通气危险因素的研究进展[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志, 2018,25(12):1073-1079. DOI: 10.7507/1007-4848.201801021.
[2] American College of Surgeons. User Guide for the2016 ACS NSQIP Participant Use Data File(PUF)[EB/OL]. [2022-07-10].https://www.facs.org/-/media/files/quality-programs/nsqip/nsqip_puf_userguide_2016.ashx.
[3] Suarez-Pierre A, Fraser CD, et al.Predictors of Operative Mortality Among Cardiac Surgery Patients with Prolonged Ventilation[J]. J Card Surg, 2019, 34(9):759-766. DOI:10.1111/jocs.14118.
[4] 李栩亭,莫红平,张美芬.开胸心脏术后机械通气时间延长影响因素分析[J].护理学杂志,2019,34(13):18-21. DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2019.13.018.
[5] Hessels L, Coulson Tg, Seevanayagam S, et al.Development and Validation of a Score to Identify Cardiac Surgery Patients at High Risk of Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation[J]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2019, 33(10):2709-2716. DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2019.03.009.
[6] 徐艺,余海. 心脏手术加速康复外科理念与进展[J]. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2020,27(12):1479-1484. DOI:10.7507/1007-4848.202002090.
[7] 崔朝妹,刘静,庄欣,等. ICU成人患者有创机械通气撤机的最佳证据总结[J].护理学报, 2021,28(6):27-32.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.06.027.
[8] Dennis DM, Bharat C, Paterson T.肥胖患病率及其对患者机械通气时间和在重症监护室住院时间的影响:单中心观察研究[J].中国护理管理, 2017, 17(5):720.DOI:10.1016/j.aucc.2016.07.003.
[9] 李源,方进博,陈秒.主动脉瓣膜病高危老年患者经心尖介入主动脉瓣植入术后并发症护理[J].护理学报, 2018,25(9):60-63. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2018.09.060.
[10] Engelman DT, Ben Ali W, Williams JB, et al.Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Cardiac Surgery: Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Society Recommendations[J]. JAMA Surg, 2019, 154(8):755-766. DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2019.1153.
[11] Shao D, Straub J, Matrka L.Obesity as a Predictor of Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,2020,163(4):750-754.DOI:10.1177/0194599820923601.
[12] 郭滢琦,蒋玥芾,甘林望, 等.成人体外循环心脏手术后急性肾损伤发生的危险因素及其早期预测价值[J].中国急救医学,2021, 41(2):149-153.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-1949.2021.02.012.
[13] 王浩,陈玉红.体外循环手术患者胸部物理治疗的研究进展[J].中华现代护理杂志,2016,22(26):3841-3845. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2016.26.040.
[1] LIU Lu, ZHU Yu, CAO Yi, ZHANG Hua, PENG Yu-na. Effect of target temperature management strategy on intraoperative temperature management in patients undergoing hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2025, 32(4): 59-63.
[2] GONG Zu-hua, SUN Li, TAN Xuan, ZHANG Yue, SHI Dan, CHENG Juan-juan. Effect of basic sign collection-comparison-recognition model for occult change after hepatobiliary surgery [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2025, 32(4): 74-78.
[3] LI Miao-miao, XIONG Li-juan, QI Lei, LI Min, XIANG Yu-ting. Application of diagnosis-related group based on Ridit analysis and rank sum ratio method in nursing performance management [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2025, 32(3): 22-26.
[4] LI Ruo-Yu, LIU Xin, LIN Ping, CHEN Dan, LIN Hua. Best evidence summary for medication safety management for discharged patients [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2025, 32(3): 50-55.
[5] YANG Xiao-juan, MAO Xiao-rong, WANG Jing, JIANG Hua, LI Rong, FAN Yu, WEN Qing, LI Lin-zhang, CHEN Xiao-rong. Best evidence summary for early enteral nutrition management in adults with severe burns [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2025, 32(3): 56-61.
[6] ZHU Tian-shun, ZHU Ke-ke, XUE Hui-yuan, JIAO Cong-cong, WEI Chang-hui, WANG He. Application of message framing theory in health management: a scoping review [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2025, 32(2): 44-49.
[7] LIU Shuo-yi, XIONG Li-juan, LI Ling, WANG Yu-mei, HE Jia, LI Xin, YUAN Shi-lei, GUO Xue-qin, WANG Yang-jing, ZHANG Hui-juan. Quality evaluation and content analysis of clinical practice guidelines for prevention and management of frailty in elderly hospitalized patients [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2025, 32(2): 50-55.
[8] SUN Juan, LI Ya-li, MA An-na, WANG Hua, ZHANG Hui-min. Experience of nursing postgraduates on ideological and political teaching in community nursing practice: a qualitative study [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2025, 32(1): 19-23.
[9] LI Ge-ge, WANG Wan-er, PU Jiang-feng, XIE Zhang-hao, YANG Niu, HUANG Hui-gen. Evaluation of allocation of nursing human resource in Guangdong Province based on entropy weight TOPSIS combined with RSR method [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2025, 32(1): 29-33.
[10] HE Fang, WEN Xiu-lan, LIN Yan, SUN Li, WANG Xiao-jie, YU Xin, LIU Hui, GUO Xiao-ping, ZHOU Yan. Establishment and practice of online neonatal nursing consultation clinic based on mobile healthcare [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(9): 20-23.
[11] CHEN Jie, MENG Qing-tong, LIU Jing-jin, WU Yan-ni. Development of guideline-based exercise rehabilitation handbook for patients with chronic heart failure [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(9): 36-41.
[12] FU Lu-lu, XIE Yi-xuan, WANG Yue, WEI Wei, ZHANG Chuan-ying, ZHU Yu. Evidence summary for auditory stimulation intervention for procedural pain in neonates [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(9): 42-47.
[13] CHEN Jie, LAI Jing, WANG Cheng-yue, XU Liang-ying, YAN Juan, LUO Xue. Construction of humanistic care quality evaluation index system of ICU nursing based on Three-dimensional Quality Structure Theory [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(9): 54-59.
[14] MU Xiao-ying, ZHOU Fen, FAN Ying-yi, YUAN Ting, WANG Yu-xi, LV Yun-peng, RONG Hong-guo. Patients' preferences for internet-based sharing nursing service of breast massage based on discrete choice experiment [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(9): 72-78.
[15] CHEN Si-qi, LIU Ning, HOU Xiao-min, LU Shu-ying. Best evidence summary for perioperative nursing management of enhanced recovery after surgery in robotic surgery for gastric cancer [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(8): 31-36.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!