Effect of basic sign collection-comparison-recognition model for occult change after hepatobiliary surgery

GONG Zu-hua, SUN Li, TAN Xuan, ZHANG Yue, SHI Dan, CHENG Juan-juan

Journal of Nursing ›› 2025, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (4) : 74-78.

PDF(847 KB)
PDF(847 KB)
Journal of Nursing ›› 2025, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (4) : 74-78. DOI: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2025.04.074

Effect of basic sign collection-comparison-recognition model for occult change after hepatobiliary surgery

  • GONG Zu-huaa, SUN Lib, TAN Xuanb, ZHANG Yuea, SHI Dana, CHENG Juan-juana
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective To observe the effect of basic sign collection-comparison-recognition model for early identification of occult change in patients with postoperative?electrocardiogram monitoring after hepatobiliary surgery. Methods A total of 269 patients who met the criteria from February 2024 to May 2024 were selected, with 136 cases in control group given conventional nursing care, and 133 cases in observation group given nursing care with basic sign collection-comparison-recognition model. Preoperative baseline indexes such as heart rate, blood pressure, etc. were recorded as references for postoperative signs. WPS form calculator with assignment operation was used to identify fluctuations. Once the fluctuations exceeded the range of early warning, structured assessment manual constructed by the evidence-based nursing was used to identify the hazards. The difference between the two groups of patients in terms of the incidence of postoperative pain, fever, nausea and vomiting, abnormal infusion rate, abdominal distension, chest tightness and shortness of breath, and bleeding tendency was compared. Results The identification rate of occult complications and overt symptoms in the observation group was higher than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Patients in the observation group performed better in terms of postoperative pain score, nausea and vomiting, abdominal distension, dyspnea, infusion rate abnormality, bleeding tendency and difficulty in breathing (P<0.05), showing statistical significance. Conclusion Basic sign collection-comparison-recognition mode is effective for recognizing the occult changes of vital signs after hepatobiliary surgery, and can effectively prevent and control the occurrence and development of complications in postoperative patients.

Key words

occult change / basal signs / postoperative nursing / hepatobiliary surgery

Cite this article

Download Citations
GONG Zu-hua, SUN Li, TAN Xuan, ZHANG Yue, SHI Dan, CHENG Juan-juan. Effect of basic sign collection-comparison-recognition model for occult change after hepatobiliary surgery[J]. Journal of Nursing. 2025, 32(4): 74-78 https://doi.org/10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2025.04.074

References

[1] 王熔,周海琴,蔡英华,等. 肺移植患者术后早期症状评估量表的编制及信度、效度检验[J]. 现代临床护理,2024,23(5):1-9. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-8283.2024.05.001.
[2] 葛均波,王辰.内科学[M].10版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2024∶169-354.
[3] 《成人非心脏手术围术期血压监测与管理指南》撰写组,中国老年医学学会医疗照护分会.成人非心脏手术围术期血压评估与管理指南[J].中华保健医学杂志,2023,25(2):121-128. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-3245.2023.02.001.
[4] 董双国. CT引导下放射介入栓塞联合岩黄连注射液治疗中晚期肝癌对患者血清IL-2、IFN-γ、TNF-α表达水平影响[J].CT理论与应用研究,2024,33(S1):47-50.
[5] 高血压心率管理多学科共识组. 中国高血压患者心率管理多学科专家共识(2021年版)[J].中国全科医学,2021,24(20):2501-2507;2519. DOI:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2021.00.595.
[6] 欧敏行,薛亚男,张秀杰. 《ESH高血压管理指南2023》解读[J]. 护理研究,2024,38(15):2633-2640. DOI:10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2024.15.001.
[7] Mancia Chairperson G, Brunström M, Burnier M, et al.2023 ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension Endorsed by the European Renal Association (ERA) and the International Society of Hypertension (ISH)[J]. J Hypertens,2023,41(12):1874-2071. DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003480.
[8] Nohra E, Appelbaum RD, Farrell MS, et al.Fever and infections in surgical intensive care: an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Critical Care Committee clinical consensus document[J]. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open, 2024,9(1):e001303. DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2023-001303.
[9] 高血压精准化诊疗专家共识组,老年心脑血管病教育部重点实验室,曾春雨,等. 高血压精准化诊疗中国专家共识(2024)[J]. 中华高血压杂志,2024,32(6):505-519. DOI:10.16439/j.issn.1673-7245.2024.06.002.
[10] 王惠琴,雷建国,蔡炜,等. 3、4级非心脏手术患者围手术期发生主要心脏并发症的危险因素分析[J]. 现代临床医学,2023, 49(4):241-245. DOI:10.11851/j.issn.1673-1557.2023.04.001.
[11] 黄雯,宗敏,关晓楠,等. 非心脏外科手术患者围手术期心房颤动的临床特点及危险因素分析[J]. 中国临床医生杂志,2022, 50(7):810-812.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-8552.2022.07.016.
[12] Alonso-Coello P,Cook D,Xu S C,et al.Predictors, prognosis, and management of new clinically important atrial fibrillation after noncardiac surgery: a prospective cohort study[J]. Anesth Analg, 2017,125(1):162-169.DOI:10.1213/ANE.0000000000002111.
[13] 孙宁玲. 《中国高血压患者心率管理多学科专家共识(2021年版)》解读[J]. 中华高血压杂志,2021,29(10):908-913. DOI:10.16439/j.issn.1673-7245.2021.10.003.
[14] 中国高血压联盟《夜间高血压管理中国专家共识》委员会. 夜间高血压管理中国专家共识[J]. 中华高血压杂志,2023,31(7):610-618. DOI:10.16439/j.issn.1673-7245.2023.07.003.
[15] 付同,侯宇,韩明明,等. 围术期经皮穴位电刺激对妇科腹腔镜手术患者术后恢复质量的影响[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2023,39(8):789-794. DOI:10.12089/jca.2023.08.001.
[16] 张炜,徐珉杰,潘龙,等.术前Glasgow-Blatchford和AIMS65评分对介入治疗非静脉曲张性上消化道出血患者的预后评估[J]. 介入放射学杂志,2024,33(9):1005-1008. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-794X.2024.09.015.
[17] 付洁,邱红丽.基于程序的整体干预在胸腔镜手术治疗老年肺癌中的运用效果[J].医药论坛杂志, 2024, 45(21):2293-2297.DOI:10.20159/j.cnki.jmf.2024.21.012.
[18] 郑璇,李贵,陈舒玲,等. 心悸人群分布特点及动态心电图分析[J]. 实用心电学杂志,2018, 27(1):49-52. DOI:10.13308/j.issn.2095-9354.2018.01.011.
[19] 刘宝伟. 右美托咪定预处理对肝癌射频消融患者应激反应的影响[D].新乡:新乡医学院, 2019.DOI:10.27434/d.cnki.gxxyc.2019.000270.
PDF(847 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/