以质量求发展,以服务铸品牌

Journal of Nursing ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (12): 6-10.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.12.006

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Construction of Nursing Early Warning Model for Acute Pancreatitis Based on Simple Bedside Indicators

LI Bei1,2, LIN Jun2, ZHAI Hui-min1   

  1. 1. School of Nursing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China;
    2. Affiliated Xiaolan Hospital, Southern Medical University, Zhongshan 528415, China
  • Received:2021-11-05 Online:2022-06-25 Published:2022-07-07

Abstract: Objective To construct a nursing early warning model for acute pancreatitis based on simple bedside indicators, to make validation and to discuss its predictive value when the disease condition changes. Methods We conducted a retrospective study with data of 378 acute pancreatitis cases from a tertiary grade-A Hospital in Guangdong. Cases were categorized into the training set (n=244) and further subdivided into severe acute pancreatitis cases and non-severe cases; the remaining cases were categorized into the validation set (n=134). Risk factors in the validation set and two non-severe groups in the training set were comparatively analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was adopted to construct a warning model. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) was calculated to test the discrimination of the model, and Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test was performed to test the accuracy. The validation set was used to test the warning performance of the model, which was compared with the BISAP and APACHE II scoring methods. Results Seven indicators were identified and included in the warning model, including heart rate (OR=1.040), respiratory (OR=1.269), pulse oxygen saturation (OR=0.824), weak bowel sounds (OR=2.383), disappearance of bowel sounds (OR=3.227), pulmonary auscultation (OR=2.185) and peritoneal irritation (OR=2.097). the p-value in Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test was 0.278. ROC-AUC was 0.840 (95%CI:0.788~0.892,P<0.001); maximized Youden index 0.541, sensitivity 68.3% and specificity 85.8%. In the validation set, the ROC-AUC was 0.802(95%CI:0.714~0.891,P<0.001), and maximized Youden index 0.605. The sensitivity (70.5% vs 84.1% vs 79.5%) and accuracy (78.4% vs 85.1% vs 82.1%) were lower than those by BISAP and APACHE II scoring methods, while the specificity was higher (90.0% vs 84.4% vs 83.3%). Conclusion The model in the study is easy to establish and convenient and exhibits good performance equivalent to the recognized BISAP and APACHE II scores in predicting acute pancreatitis severity. It also shows advantages in rapid bedside evaluation, and can be a supplement to evaluation system of acute pancreatitis.

Key words: acute pancreatitis, warning model, rapid bedside care, nursing

CLC Number: 

  • R473
[1] Gezer NS, Bengi G, Baran A, et al.Comparison of Radiological Scoring S-ystems, Clinicalscores, Neutrophil-lymphocyte Ratio and Serum C-reactive Protein Level for Severity and Mortality Inacute Pancreatitis[J]. Rev AssocMed Bras (1992). 2020,66(6):762-770. DOI:10.1590/1806-9282.66.6.762.
[2] Yasuda H, Horibe M, Sanui M, et al.Etiologyand Mortality in Severe Acu-te Pancreatitis: Amulticenter Study in Japan[J]. Pancreatology,2020,20(3):307-317. DOI:10.1016/j.pan.2020.03.001.
[3] Crockett SD, Wani S, Gardner TB, et al.American Gastroenterological Ass-ociation Institute Guideline on Initial Management of AcutePancreatitis[J]. Gastroenterolog,2018,154(4):1096-1101. DOI:10.1053/j.gastro.2018.01.032.
[4] Hagjer S, Kumar N.Evaluation of the BISAP Scoring System in Prognost-ication of Acute Pancreatitis-A Prospective Observational Study[J]. Int J Su-rg,2018,54(Pt A):76-81. DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.04.026.
[5] 中华医学会消化病学分会胰腺疾病学组.中国急性胰腺炎诊治指南(2019,沈阳)[J].中华胰腺病杂志,2019,19(5):321-331.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-1935.2019.05.001.
[6] 高永祥,张晋昕.Logistic回归分析的样本量确定[J].循证医学,2018,12(2):122-124.DOI:10.12019/j.issn.1671-5144.2018.02.015.
[7] 张洋,胡继盛, 孙备.重症急性胰腺炎器官功能维护重要性及实施方案[J].临床外科杂志,2019, 27(12):1015-1017. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2019.12.001.
[8] Tan C, Yang L, Shi F, et al.Early Systemic Inflammatory Response Synd-rome Duration Predicts Infected Pancreatic Necrosis[J]. J Gastrointest Surg,2020,24(3):590-597. DOI:10.1007/s11605-019-04149-5.
[9] 陈其奎. 急性胰腺炎与全身炎性反应综合征、多器官功能衰竭的关系及其防治策略[J].中华消化杂志,2016,36(10):656-658. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1432.2016.10.005.
[10] 何文华,郑西,祝荫,等.基于大样本数据库比较APACHE II、Ranson、BISAP和CTSI评分在早期预测急性胰腺炎病情严重程度的价值[J].中华胰腺病杂志,2019,19(3):172-176. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-1935.2019.03.004.
[11] 王兴鹏,曾悦.肠道微生态在急性胰腺炎发病和治疗中的研究进展[J].中华消化杂志,2016,36(10):658-661. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1432.2016.10.005.
[12] 马小华,李兰,金涛,等.入院时无害性急性胰腺炎评分可预测轻症急性胰腺炎[J].南方医科大学学报, 2020,40(2):190-195. DOI:10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2020.02.09.
[13] 樊冬杰,曾彦博,董元航,等.急性胃肠损伤评分对急性胰腺炎患者病情严重程度及预后评估的价值[J].中华胰腺病杂志,2021,21(2):89-93. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115667-20201210-00200.
[14] 旷小羿,侯惠如.基于电子病历数据的风险预测模型在临床护理中的应用现状[J].护理学报,2020,27(16):21-24.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.16.021.
[1] LIU Lu, ZHU Yu, CAO Yi, ZHANG Hua, PENG Yu-na. Effect of target temperature management strategy on intraoperative temperature management in patients undergoing hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2025, 32(4): 59-63.
[2] GONG Zu-hua, SUN Li, TAN Xuan, ZHANG Yue, SHI Dan, CHENG Juan-juan. Effect of basic sign collection-comparison-recognition model for occult change after hepatobiliary surgery [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2025, 32(4): 74-78.
[3] LI Miao-miao, XIONG Li-juan, QI Lei, LI Min, XIANG Yu-ting. Application of diagnosis-related group based on Ridit analysis and rank sum ratio method in nursing performance management [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2025, 32(3): 22-26.
[4] LI Ruo-Yu, LIU Xin, LIN Ping, CHEN Dan, LIN Hua. Best evidence summary for medication safety management for discharged patients [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2025, 32(3): 50-55.
[5] YANG Xiao-juan, MAO Xiao-rong, WANG Jing, JIANG Hua, LI Rong, FAN Yu, WEN Qing, LI Lin-zhang, CHEN Xiao-rong. Best evidence summary for early enteral nutrition management in adults with severe burns [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2025, 32(3): 56-61.
[6] ZHU Tian-shun, ZHU Ke-ke, XUE Hui-yuan, JIAO Cong-cong, WEI Chang-hui, WANG He. Application of message framing theory in health management: a scoping review [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2025, 32(2): 44-49.
[7] LIU Shuo-yi, XIONG Li-juan, LI Ling, WANG Yu-mei, HE Jia, LI Xin, YUAN Shi-lei, GUO Xue-qin, WANG Yang-jing, ZHANG Hui-juan. Quality evaluation and content analysis of clinical practice guidelines for prevention and management of frailty in elderly hospitalized patients [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2025, 32(2): 50-55.
[8] SUN Juan, LI Ya-li, MA An-na, WANG Hua, ZHANG Hui-min. Experience of nursing postgraduates on ideological and political teaching in community nursing practice: a qualitative study [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2025, 32(1): 19-23.
[9] LI Ge-ge, WANG Wan-er, PU Jiang-feng, XIE Zhang-hao, YANG Niu, HUANG Hui-gen. Evaluation of allocation of nursing human resource in Guangdong Province based on entropy weight TOPSIS combined with RSR method [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2025, 32(1): 29-33.
[10] HE Fang, WEN Xiu-lan, LIN Yan, SUN Li, WANG Xiao-jie, YU Xin, LIU Hui, GUO Xiao-ping, ZHOU Yan. Establishment and practice of online neonatal nursing consultation clinic based on mobile healthcare [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(9): 20-23.
[11] CHEN Jie, MENG Qing-tong, LIU Jing-jin, WU Yan-ni. Development of guideline-based exercise rehabilitation handbook for patients with chronic heart failure [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(9): 36-41.
[12] FU Lu-lu, XIE Yi-xuan, WANG Yue, WEI Wei, ZHANG Chuan-ying, ZHU Yu. Evidence summary for auditory stimulation intervention for procedural pain in neonates [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(9): 42-47.
[13] CHEN Jie, LAI Jing, WANG Cheng-yue, XU Liang-ying, YAN Juan, LUO Xue. Construction of humanistic care quality evaluation index system of ICU nursing based on Three-dimensional Quality Structure Theory [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(9): 54-59.
[14] MU Xiao-ying, ZHOU Fen, FAN Ying-yi, YUAN Ting, WANG Yu-xi, LV Yun-peng, RONG Hong-guo. Patients' preferences for internet-based sharing nursing service of breast massage based on discrete choice experiment [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(9): 72-78.
[15] CHEN Si-qi, LIU Ning, HOU Xiao-min, LU Shu-ying. Best evidence summary for perioperative nursing management of enhanced recovery after surgery in robotic surgery for gastric cancer [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(8): 31-36.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!