以质量求发展,以服务铸品牌

Journal of Nursing ›› 2021, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (17): 1-5.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.17.001

    Next Articles

Systematic Review/Meta-analysis of Intervention Published in Nursing Journal of Chinese Science Citation Database in Recent 5 Years

CHI Jun-ting1,2, CHEN Fei2, LI Si-yan2, ZHANG Jing2, TAO Hong-xia2, RUAN Hai-hui2, NIU Xiao-dan2, WANG Yan-hong2   

  1. 1. The First People's Hospital of Yunnan, Kunming 650034, China;
    2. School of Nursing, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
  • Received:2021-01-25 Published:2021-10-12

Abstract: Objectives To evaluate the reporting quality of interventional systematic reviews/meta-analyses (SRs/MAs) published in nursing journals included in the Chinese Science Citation Database in the past 5 years, to standardize the research process and reporting methods and to improve the quality of SRs/MAs. Methods CNKI、VIP、CBM and Wanfang electronically searched to collect interventional SRs/MAs published in nursing journals included in Chinese Science Citation Database from January 2015 to June 2020. Two researchers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the reporting quality using preferred reporting items for SRs/Mas. Excel 2019, and Stata15.0 software were then used for statistical analysis. Results A total of 176 SRs/MAs were included and their PRISMA scores ranged from 14.5 to 24.5 (20.17±2.00), including 1 study with a score ≤15 and serious information missing, 122 scoring from 15 to 21 showing some reporting defects; and 53 scoring from 21 to 27 with relatively complete reporting. The poor quality of reports was mainly manifested as structured summary (0/176), protocol and registration (0/176), search strategy reports (55/176), risk of bias in individual studies (26/176) and incomplete reporting of funding (0/176). Subgroup analysis showed that the quality of SRs/MAs could be significantly improved by funding, authors working in hospitals and only one unit(P<0.05); the number of authors had no significant effect on the quality of SRs/MAs (P>0.05). Conclusion Currently, the reporting quality of interventional SRs/MAs in the field of nursing varies greatly in China. Therefore, it is necessary to take corresponding measures to increase the publicity and popularity of PRISMA and promote its citation in nursing journal manuscripts. Researchers should strictly follow PRISMA related items and reports in a normative and detailed way. Editors and reviewers of nursing journals should also strictly follow PRISMA guidelines during peer review so as to improve the quality of SRs/MAs.

Key words: systematic review, Meta-analysis, nursing, reporting quality, PRISMA

CLC Number: 

  • R47
[1] 梁莉,葛龙,周为文,等. 我国诊断性试验系统评价/Meta分析的检索情况调查分析[J].中华医学图书情报杂志, 2013, 22(5):9-16. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-3982.2013.05.002.
[2] Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al.Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses:The Prisma Statement[J].PLoS Med, 2009, 6(7):e1000097. DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
[3] Jin YH, Ma ET,Gao WJ,et al.Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews or Meta-analyses in Nursing Field in China[J]. Int J Nurs Pract, 2014, 20(1):70-78. DOI:10.1111/ijn.12123.
[4] 魏洪悦,靳英辉,谢雨露,等. 2012~2015年我国护理领域系统评价/Meta分析的报告学质量评价[J].护理学杂志, 2016, 31(16):95-97. DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2016.16.095.
[5] 靳英辉,马恩婷,花巍,等. 国内护理领域系统评价/Meta分析的方法学与报告质量评价[J].中国循证医学杂志, 2012, 12(9):1148-1155.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2531.2012.09.019.
[6] Yang M, Jiang L,Wang A,et al.Epidemiology Characteristics, Reporting Characteristics,and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses on Traditional Chinese Medicine Nursing Interventions Published in Chinese Journals[J]. Int J Nurs Pract, 2017, 23(1):e12498. DOI:10.1111/ijn.12498.
[7] Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, et al.Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: Elaboration and Explanation[J]. BMJ, 2015, 350:g7647. DOI:10.1136/bmj.g7647.
[8] Tian J, Zhang J, Ge L, et al.The Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews from China and the USA are Similar[J]. J Clin Epidemiol,2017, 85:50-58. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.12.004.
[9] 杨克虎. 系统评价指导手册[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2010.
[10] Ge L, Tian JH, Li YN, et al.Association Between Prospective Registration and Overall Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews: A Meta-epidemiological Study[J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2018, 93:45-55. DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.10.012.
[11] Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, et al.Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 Statement[J]. Syst Rev, 2015, 4(1):1-9. DOI:10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.
[12] Kolychev AP, Terpilovskii MA, Uversky VN.Sequential and Asynchronous Strengthening of the Influence of Temperature on the Endo-and Exocytosis of Insulin in the Isolated Vertebrata Hepatocytes: Summing up Previous Studies[J]. Curr Protein Pept Sci, 2020,21(1):22-35.DOI:10.2174/1389203720666190325101804.
[13] De Vries RBM, Hooijmans CR, Langendam MW, et al.A Protocol Format for the Preparation, Registration and Publication of Systematic Reviews of Animal Intervention Studies[J]. Evidence-based Preclinical Medicine, 2015, 2(1): e00007. DOI:10.1002/ebm2.7.
[14] Dwan K, Altman DG, Arnaiz JA, et al.Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias[J]. PLoS One, 2008, 3(8):e3081. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0003081.
[15] 熊俊,陈日新. 系统评价/Meta分析方法学质量的评价工具AMSTAR[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2011, 11(9):1084-1089. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2531.2011.09.017.
[16] 詹思延. 第一讲:如何报告系统综述和Meta分析——国际报告规范QUOROM和MOOSE解读[J]. 中国循证儿科杂志, 2010, 5(1):60-63. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-5501.2010.01.009.
[1] LIU Lu, ZHU Yu, CAO Yi, ZHANG Hua, PENG Yu-na. Effect of target temperature management strategy on intraoperative temperature management in patients undergoing hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2025, 32(4): 59-63.
[2] GONG Zu-hua, SUN Li, TAN Xuan, ZHANG Yue, SHI Dan, CHENG Juan-juan. Effect of basic sign collection-comparison-recognition model for occult change after hepatobiliary surgery [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2025, 32(4): 74-78.
[3] LI Miao-miao, XIONG Li-juan, QI Lei, LI Min, XIANG Yu-ting. Application of diagnosis-related group based on Ridit analysis and rank sum ratio method in nursing performance management [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2025, 32(3): 22-26.
[4] LI Ruo-Yu, LIU Xin, LIN Ping, CHEN Dan, LIN Hua. Best evidence summary for medication safety management for discharged patients [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2025, 32(3): 50-55.
[5] YANG Xiao-juan, MAO Xiao-rong, WANG Jing, JIANG Hua, LI Rong, FAN Yu, WEN Qing, LI Lin-zhang, CHEN Xiao-rong. Best evidence summary for early enteral nutrition management in adults with severe burns [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2025, 32(3): 56-61.
[6] ZHU Tian-shun, ZHU Ke-ke, XUE Hui-yuan, JIAO Cong-cong, WEI Chang-hui, WANG He. Application of message framing theory in health management: a scoping review [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2025, 32(2): 44-49.
[7] LIU Shuo-yi, XIONG Li-juan, LI Ling, WANG Yu-mei, HE Jia, LI Xin, YUAN Shi-lei, GUO Xue-qin, WANG Yang-jing, ZHANG Hui-juan. Quality evaluation and content analysis of clinical practice guidelines for prevention and management of frailty in elderly hospitalized patients [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2025, 32(2): 50-55.
[8] SUN Juan, LI Ya-li, MA An-na, WANG Hua, ZHANG Hui-min. Experience of nursing postgraduates on ideological and political teaching in community nursing practice: a qualitative study [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2025, 32(1): 19-23.
[9] LI Ge-ge, WANG Wan-er, PU Jiang-feng, XIE Zhang-hao, YANG Niu, HUANG Hui-gen. Evaluation of allocation of nursing human resource in Guangdong Province based on entropy weight TOPSIS combined with RSR method [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2025, 32(1): 29-33.
[10] HE Fang, WEN Xiu-lan, LIN Yan, SUN Li, WANG Xiao-jie, YU Xin, LIU Hui, GUO Xiao-ping, ZHOU Yan. Establishment and practice of online neonatal nursing consultation clinic based on mobile healthcare [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(9): 20-23.
[11] CHEN Jie, MENG Qing-tong, LIU Jing-jin, WU Yan-ni. Development of guideline-based exercise rehabilitation handbook for patients with chronic heart failure [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(9): 36-41.
[12] FU Lu-lu, XIE Yi-xuan, WANG Yue, WEI Wei, ZHANG Chuan-ying, ZHU Yu. Evidence summary for auditory stimulation intervention for procedural pain in neonates [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(9): 42-47.
[13] CHEN Jie, LAI Jing, WANG Cheng-yue, XU Liang-ying, YAN Juan, LUO Xue. Construction of humanistic care quality evaluation index system of ICU nursing based on Three-dimensional Quality Structure Theory [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(9): 54-59.
[14] MU Xiao-ying, ZHOU Fen, FAN Ying-yi, YUAN Ting, WANG Yu-xi, LV Yun-peng, RONG Hong-guo. Patients' preferences for internet-based sharing nursing service of breast massage based on discrete choice experiment [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(9): 72-78.
[15] CHEN Si-qi, LIU Ning, HOU Xiao-min, LU Shu-ying. Best evidence summary for perioperative nursing management of enhanced recovery after surgery in robotic surgery for gastric cancer [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(8): 31-36.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!