以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

Journal of Nursing ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (9): 42-46.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.09.042

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Scoping Review of Readability Assessment of Breast Cancer-related Health Education Materials

ZOU Zi-yu1, TANG Hong-mei2, WU Li1, CHEN Rong-feng2, MEI Hua2   

  1. 1. Graduate School, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 200120, China;
    2. School of Nursing and Health Management, Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences 201318, China
  • Received:2021-12-22 Online:2022-05-10 Published:2022-06-09

PDF (PC)

498

Like

Abstract: Objective To conduct a scoping review of the readability of breast cancer related health education materials. Methods We collected Chinese and English literature in Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, VIP, Wangfang Data, and CBM from the inception to April 2022. Two researchers extracted and summarized the literature. Results A total of 3,028 pieces of literature were retrieved, and 13 eligible were collected. The readability of most of the materials was above the recommended level of sixth grade. Conclusion There is fewer literature on readability assessment of breast cancer related health education materials. Limited evidence indicates that most health education materials are difficult to read, and there is still inadequate research on readability of breast cancer related health education materials in China.

Key words: readability, breast cancer, health education material, scoping review

CLC Number: 

  • R473.73
[1] Gopal S, Sharpless NE.Cancer as a Global Health Priority[J]. JAMA,2021,15(8):198-207. DOI:10.1001/jama.2021.12778.
[2] 中国政府网.健康中国行动(2019-2030)[EB/OL].(2019-07-15)[2020-07-20].http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2019-07/15/content_5409694.htm.
[3] Rababah JA, Al-Hammouri MM, Drew BL, et al.Health Literacy: Exploring Disparities among College Students[J]. BMC Public Health, 2019,19(1):1401-1410. DOI:10.1186/s12889-019-7781-2.
[4] Hoffmann T,Worrall L.Designing Effective Written Health Education Materials: Considerations for Health Professionals[J]. Disabil Rehabil,2004,26(19):1166-1173. DOI:10.1080/09638280410001724816.
[5] 汪秋伊,谢伦芳,王蕾,等. 健康教育材料可读性测评工具的研究进展[J]. 中国健康教育,2019, 35(1):66-71. DOI:10.16168/j.cnki.issn.1002-9982.2019.01.016.
[6] Wilcox L,Feiner S,Elhadad N,et al.Patient-Centered Tools for Medication Information Search[J]. Int Conf Pervasive Comput Technol Healthc, 2014,39(14):49-56. DOI:10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth.2014.254975.
[7] Manchaiah V, Kelly-Campbell RJ, Bellon-Harn ML,et al.Quality, Readability, and Suitability of Hearing Health-related Materials:A Descriptive Review[J]. Am J Audiol,2020,29(3):513-527. DOI:10.1044/2020_aja-19-00040.
[8] 吴丽, 陈荣凤, 邹自玉,等.问题提示列表在乳腺癌患者中临床应用效果的系统评价[J]. 护理学报,2022, 29(2):45-50. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.02.045.
[9] Papadakos JK, Hasan SM, Barnsley J, et al.Health Literacy and Cancer Self-management Behaviors:A Scoping Review[J]. Cancer,2018,124(21):4202-4210. DOI:10.1002/cncr.31733.
[10] Sadigh G, Singh K,Gilbert K,et al.Mammography Patient Information at Hospital Websites: Most neither Comprehensible nor Guideline Supported[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol,2016,207(5):947-951. DOI:10.2214/ajr.16.16436.
[11] Cox N,Bowmer C,Ring A.Health Literacy and the Provision of Information to Women with Breast Cancer[J]. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol), 2011, 23(3):223-227. DOI:10.1016/j.clon.2010.11.010.
[12] Choudhery S,Xi Y,Chen H,et al.Readability and Quality of Online Patient Education Material on Websites of Breast Imaging Centers[J]. J Am Coll Radiol,2020,17(10):1245-1251. DOI:10.1016/j.jacr.2020.04.016.
[13] Cortez S,Milbrandt M,Kaphingst K,et al.The Readability of Online Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tools[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat,2015,154(1):191-199.DOI:10.1007/s10549-015-3601-2.
[14] Alkhalili R, Shukla PA, Patel RH,et al.Readability Assessment of Internet-based Patient Education Materials Related to Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening[J]. Acad Radiol,2015,22(3):290-295. DOI:10.1016/j.acra.2014.10.009.
[15] Warner ET, Kennedy M, Maschke A,et al.Evaluation of Existing Patient Educational Materials and Development of a Brochure for Women with Dense Breasts[J].Breast,2020,50(7):81-84. DOI:10.1016/j.breast.2020.02.001.
[16] Del Valle DD, Pardo JA, Maselli AM, et al.Evaluation of Online Spanish and English Health Materials for Preventive Mastectomy.Are We Providing Adequate Information?[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat,2021,187(1):1-9. DOI:10.1007/s10549-021-06171-1.
[17] Powell LE,Andersen ES,Pozez AL.Assessing Readability of Patient Education Materials on Breast Reconstruction by Major US Academic Hospitals as Compared with Nonacademic Sites[J]. Ann Plast Surg,2021,86(6):610-614. DOI:10.1097/sap.0000000000002575.
[18] Tran BNN,Singh M,Singhal D,et al.Readability,complexity,and Suitability of Online Resources for Mastectomy and Lumpectomy[J]. J Surg Res,2017,212(2):214-221. DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2017.01.012.
[19] Seth AK,Vargas CR,Chuang DJ,et al.Readability Assessment of Patient Information about Lymphedema and Its Treatment[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg,2016,137(2):287e-295e. DOI:10.1097/01.prs.0000475747.95096.ab.
[20] Parker PD,Heiney SP,Friedman DB,et al.The Experience of Chemotherapy Teaching and Readability of Chemotherapy Educational Materials for Women with Breast Cancer[J]. J Cancer Educ,2021,36(1):47-55. DOI:10.1007/s13187-019-01596-1.
[21] Parker PD, Prabhu AV, Su LJ, et al.What’s in Between the Lines: Assessing the Readability, Understandability, and Actionability in Breast Cancer Survivorship Print Materials[J].J Cancer Educ,2021,42(6):136-145. DOI:10.1007/s13187-021-02003-4.
[22] Li Y, Zhou X,Zhou Y,et al.Evaluation of the Quality and Readability of Online Information about Breast Cancer in China[J]. Patient Educ Couns,2021,104(4):858-864. DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2020.09.012.
[23] Eltorai AE, P Thomas N, Yang H, et al. Readability of Trauma-related Patient Education Materials from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons[J]. Trauma Mon,2016,21(1):e20141. DOI:10.5812/traumamon.20141.
[24] Shoemaker SJ,Wolf MS,Brach C.Development of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT): A New Measure of Understandability and Actionability for Print and Audiovisual Patient Information[J]. Patient Educ Couns,2014,96(3):395-403.DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2014.05.027.
[25] Sun W,Luo A,Bian Z,et al.Assessing the Quality of Online Health Information about Breast Cancer from Chinese Language Websites: Quality Assessment Survey[J]. JMIR Cancer,2021,7(4):e25783. DOI:10.2196/25783.
[26] Yan L,Xingtong Z,Yidong Z,et al.Evaluation of the Quality and Readability of Online Information about Breast Cancer in China[J]. Patient Educ Couns, 2020,104(4):858-864. DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2020.09.012.
[27] Sung YT, Chen JL,Cha JH,et al.Constructing and Validating Readability Models: The Method of Integrating Multilevel Linguistic Features with Machine Learning[J].Behav Res Methods, 2015, 47(2):340-354. DOI:10.3758/s13428-014-0459-x.
[28] 张宁志. 汉语教材语料难度的定量分析[J].世界汉语教学,2000,14(3):83-88.DOI:10.13724/j.cnki.ctiw.
[29] 汪秋伊,谢伦芳,王蕾,等. 系统性红斑狼疮平面健康教育材料的可读性评价[J]. 医学与社会,2020,33(8):20-24. DOI:10.13723/j.yxysh.
[30] 王蕾,汪秋伊,李星,等. 系统性红斑狼疮网络健康信息的可读性评估[J].护理研究,2020,34(24):4344-4349.
[31] 王芝为,方媛媛,汪秋伊,等. 高血压健康教育平面材料的可读性评估[J].中国健康教育, 2020, 36(12):1122-1125+1167. DOI:10.16168/j.cnki.issn.1002-9982.2020.12.014.
[32] Alaofi RK,Nassif MO,Al-Hajeili MR.Prophylactic Mastectomy for the Prevention of Breast Cancer: Review of the Literature[J]. Avicenna J Med,2018,8(3):67-77. DOI:10.4103/ajm.AJM_21_18.
[33] Schramm J.Health Literacy: Economic and Other Intricate Problems[J]. World Neurosurg,2016,85(6):28-29. DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2015.08.049.
[34] Baker S, Malone E, Graham L, et al.Patient-Reported Health Literacy Scores are Associated with Readmissions Following Surgery[J]. Am J Surg,2020,220(5):1138-1144. DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.06.071.
[35] Park NH,Song MS,Shin SY, et al.The Effects of Medication Adherence and Health Literacy on Health-related Quality of Life in Older People with Hypertension[J]. Int J Older People Nurs,2018,13(3):e12196. DOI:10.1111/opn.12196.
[36] 厉锦巧, 张邢炜, 张伟,等. 冠心病网络健康信息的质量、可理解性和可实施性评估[J]. 中华护理教育, 2019, 16(3):173-177.
[37] 彭丽,唐广,杨欢,等. 泛在网络环境下高血压病健康信息的质量评价[J]. 现代预防医学, 2017, 44(20):3727-3730.
[38] 夏得月,陈珮,黄敏,等. 国内外阿尔茨海默病协会发布患者在线教育材料的现状与分析[J].中国健康教育,2020,36(2):182-185. DOI:10.16168/j.cnki.issn.1002-9982.2020.02.020.
[39] 吴超,郭瑞卿,吕树泉,等. 中国互联网网站关于糖尿病健康信息的质量评价[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2019, 19(10):1250-1254.
[40] Fahimuddin FZ,Sidhu S,Agrawal A.Reading Level of Online Patient Education Materials from Major Obstetrics and Gynecology Societies[J]. Obstet Gynecol,2019,133(5):987-993. DOI:10.1097/aog.0000000000003214.
[41] Morony S,Flynn M,Mccaffery KJ,et al.Readability of Written Materials for CKD Patients: A Systematic Review[J].Am J Kidney Dis,2015,65(6):842-850.DOI:10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.11.025.
[42] Samuel D, Vilardo N, Isani SS, et al.Readability Assessment of Online Gynecologic Oncology Patient Education Materials from Major Governmental, non-Profit and Pharmaceutical Organizations[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2019,154(3):616-621. DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.06.026.
[1] CHEN En-lin, MO Feng-ling, ZHUANG Ze-ming, ZHANG Ming-zhe, ZHOU Jia-kun, HUANG Li-fang, JI Long-fei, ZHANG Li-fang. Assessment tools for unilateral spatial neglect after stroke: a scoping review [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2025, 32(3): 43-49.
[2] ZHU Tian-shun, ZHU Ke-ke, XUE Hui-yuan, JIAO Cong-cong, WEI Chang-hui, WANG He. Application of message framing theory in health management: a scoping review [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2025, 32(2): 44-49.
[3] LI Ke, HE Yu-qiong, LI Yu-wei, CHANG Ying. Intervention programs for fear of falling in stroke patients: a scoping review [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2025, 32(1): 50-55.
[4] LI Ding-ding, WANG Shuai-you, ZHU Shan-shan, GUO Xin, ZHANG Hui-min, WANG Hong-ru, PAN Qin. Supportive care needs assessment tools for stroke patients: a scoping review [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(9): 48-53.
[5] HUA Jing, ZHANG Qing-yue, WANG Yan, CHENG Chang, ZHANG Xiu-li, ZHANG Ai'ai. Application of question prompt list in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(8): 18-22.
[6] GUO Jun-chen, LIU Chao-yi, DAI Yun-yun, JIANG Si-shan, YANG Suo, CHEN Yong-yi. Virtual reality technology in patients at end of life: a scoping review [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(7): 40-45.
[7] LI Wei, WANG Xiang, PEI Li, GAO Qing-qing, HUANG Hai-chao. Symptom clusters among women during late pregnancy: a scoping review [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(3): 51-56.
[8] WANG Yue, LIU Guo-qing, NIU Cong-ying, ZHANG Zhen-wei, SUN Jian, CHU You-ai, QIN Han-zhi. Risk prediction models of 30-day mortality after surgery in patients with hip fractures: a scoping review [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(24): 51-56.
[9] WANG Ai, ZHOU Bing-qian, CAO Hong. Application of Fracture Liaison Service in Patients with Osteoporotic Hip Fracture：a Scoping Review [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(22): 48-53.
[10] WU Ping, YU Wan-chen, LIU Jia-yi, WANG Shan-shan, HU Yan. Social support among prediabetes population: a scoping review [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(21): 49-54.
[11] DAI Mei-fen, LIANG Yu-zhen, YANG Jing, YOU Yan-yan, YANG Qing, CHANG Guang-ting, OU Xing-ying, HUANG Chuan-qiang, CHEN Zhi-xing, OU Jie-fen. Construction of nursing protocol for cancer-related fatigue in breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy based on evidence-based practice and theory of chinese medicine [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(15): 34-38.
[12] GUO Shi-hong, BAI Xiao-ling, LOU Ting, YU Na, YANG Zeng-zhen, NIU Yu-tian, LI Hui. Assessment tools for oral frailty: a scoping review [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(14): 52-56.
[13] DENG Ying-yi, CHENG Lu-ying, GONG Xi-yan, WANG Min, LIAO Dong-xia, ZHANG Cui-cui, DING Juan, GU Qing-lu, LIAO Chang-ju. Evidence-based practice of clinical nursing handover: a scoping review [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(14): 57-62.
[14] LI Ling-yu, CAO Ying, LIAO Ling, WANG Quan-ru, TAN Min. Human pain sensitivity assessment tools: a scoping review [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(11): 35-41.
[15] SHI Ting-ting, LI Ting, HUANG You-peng, ZHAO Yuan, ZHU Xiao-li, ZHOU Meng-juan, CHEN Yun-mei. Risk prediction model of oteoporosis in patients with type 2 diabetes: a scoping review [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(1): 52-57.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!