以质量求发展,以服务铸品牌

Journal of Nursing ›› 2023, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (3): 11-15.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.03.011

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Translation of Health Promoting Behavior for Bloating scale for patients with functional abdominal distension and its reliability and validity

DONG Shi-pan1, LIANG Xiao-ying1, HUANG Lan-yi1, LIANG Shan-ying2, LIANG Jin-bo1, DAI wei1, ZHAO Yu-ling2, HUANG yi2   

  1. 1. School of Nursing, Guangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanning 530001, China;
    2. The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanning 530023, China
  • Received:2022-09-23 Online:2023-02-10 Published:2023-03-14

Abstract: Objective To translate the Health Promoting Behavior for Bloating scale (HPB-Bloat) for patients with functional abdominal distension, and to test its reliability and validity. Methods According to Brislin's translation model, the scale was translated, back-translated, culturally adjusted and pre-tested to form the Chinese version of the scale. Convenient sampling method was used to select 404 patients with functional abdominal distension in the Department of Spleen and Stomach Diseases of a tertiary grade-A hospital in Nanning from January to June 2022 to evaluate the health promoting behavior. SPSS 26.0 and Mplus 8.3 were used to complete the project analysis, reliability and validity and equivalence test of the scale. Results The translated HPB-Bloat for patients with functional abdominal distension consisted of 4 dimensions and 11 items. Item analysis showed that the scale items had good discrimination and homogeneity. Content validity index of the scale was 0.949, and the content validity index of each item ranged from 0.875 to 1.000. Exploratory factor analysis extracted 4 factors (diet, physical activity, stress management, health and treatment awareness), and cumulative variance contribution rate was 51.4%. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the model fitting data was ideal. Criterion-related validity of the scale was 0.687; Cronbach α coefficient of the scale 0.796, and the test-retest reliability after 2 weeks 0.824. In cross-gender equivalence test, △CFI was≤0.010; and △RMSEA≤0.015. Conclusion The Chinese version of HPB-Bloat for patients with functional abdominal distension has good reliability and validity and cross-gender measurement equivalence, which can be used as an evaluation tool for the health promoting behavior of patients with functional abdominal distension in China.

Key words: functional abdominal distension, health promoting behavior, reliability, validity

CLC Number: 

  • R47
[1] Pessarelli T, Sorge A, Elli L, et al.The low-FODMAP diet and the gluten-free diet in the management of functional abdominal bloating and distension[J].Front Nutr, 2022, 9:1007716.DOI:10.3389/fnut.2022.1007716.
[2] 刘静, 李伦兰, 甘玉云,等.健康行为相关测评工具的研究进展[J].中国全科医学,2019, 22(13):1632-1636.DOI:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2019.00.199.
[3] Abdullah N, Kueh YC, Kuan G, et al.Development and validation of the Health Promoting Behaviour for Bloating (HPB-Bloat) scale[J]. PeerJ, 2021,9:e11444.DOI:10.7717/peerj.11444.
[4] 黄穗平, 孟立娜, 唐旭东,等.消化系统常见病功能性腹胀中医诊疗指南(基层医生版)[J].中华中医药杂志,2019,34(9):4148-4154.
[5] 曹文君, 郭颖, 平卫伟, 等.HPLP-Ⅱ健康促进生活方式量表中文版的研制及其性能测试[J]. 中华疾病控制杂志,2016,20(3):286-289.DOI:10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2016.03.018.
[6] Machado RDS, Fernandes A, Oliveira A, et al.Cross-cultural adaptation methods of instruments in the nursing area[J].Rev Gaucha Enferm,2018, 39:e20170164.DOI:10.1590/1983-1447.2018.2017-0164.
[7] Graeff MDS, Almeida MA, Porcel-Gálvez AM, et al.Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of instrument to measure nursing care dependency[J]. Rev Gaucha Enferm,2022,43:e20210135.DOI:10.1590/1983-1447.2022.20210135.en.
[8] 叶孝灵, 周春兰, 黄丛萍, 等.脑卒中后失能综合评估量表的汉化与信效度检验[J].护理学报, 2022,29(11):65-69.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.11.065.
[9] 陈艺华,金童林,乌云特娜.肥胖恐惧量表中文版测评女大学生的效度和信度[J].中国心理卫生杂志, 2022, 36(12):1063-1067.
[10] 王舟强, 吴小琴,王扬勇.基于平行分析法的医疗工作质量小样本数据分析研究[J].现代预防医学, 2021,48(18):3341-3344.
[11] 杨丽潇, 周春兰, 屠燕, 等.老年慢性病患者健康赋能需求评估量表的研制及信效度检验[J].护理学报,2022,29(3):67-71.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.03.067.
[12] 陈维, 杨涛, 高荣芬, 等.Connor-Davidson心理韧性量表简版在大学生中的信效度检验和跨性别等值性[J].西南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2021, 46(11):38-45.DOI:10.13718/j.cnki.xsxb.2021.11.006.
[13] Wang J, Li C, Meng X, et al.Validation of the chinese version of the procrastination at work scale[J]. Front Psychol,2021,12:726595.DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.726595.
[14] Liu J, Zheng Z, Ge L, et al.Reliability and validity of the Mandarin version of the Trust in Nurses Scale[J]. J Nurs Manag,2022, 30(5):1366-1375.DOI:10.1111/jonm.13623.
[15] Naye F, Décary S, Tousignant-Laflamme Y.Development and content validity of a rating scale for the pain and disability drivers management model[J]. Arch Physiother,2022,12(1):14.DOI:10.1186/s40945-022-00137-2.
[16] Revuelta J, Ximénez C, Minaya N.Overfactoring in rating scale data: a comparison between factor analysis and item response theory[J]. Front Psychol,2022,13:982137.DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.982137.
[17] Uljarevic M, Richdale AL, McConachie H, et al.The hospital anxiety and depression scale: factor structure and psychometric properties in older adolescents and young adults with autism spectrum disorder[J].Autism Res,2018,11(2):258-269.DOI:10.1002/aur.1872.
[18] 胡鹏, 路红,马子程.验证性因子分析中允许误差相关的可行性与条件性[J].统计与决策,2018,34(19):37-41.DOI:10.13546/j.cnki.tjyjc.2018.19.008.
[19] 项佳莲, 宁丽, 陈雨静, 等.肺癌生存者自我管理行为评估量表的编制及信效度检验[J].中华护理杂志,2022,57(21):2615-2621.
[20] Sakaluk JK, Quinn-Nilas C, Fisher AN, et al.Sameness and difference in psychological research on consensually non-monogamous relationships: the need for invariance and equivalence testing[J]. Arch Sex Behav,2021, 50(4):1341-1365.DOI:10.1007/s10508-020-01794-9.
[21] 柴晓运, 李晓燕, 曹娟, 等.中国青少年积极发展量表(简版)的编制:基于一个大样本数据[J].心理与行为研究,2020,18(5):631-637.
[22] Liang L, Yang J, Yao S.Measurement equivalence of the SDQ in chinese adolescents: a horizontal and longitudinal perspective[J]. J Affect Disord,2019,257:439-444.DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2019.06.049.
[23] Tibubos AN, Otten D, Zöller D, et al.Bidimensional structure and measurement equivalence of the patient health questionnaire-9: sex-sensitive assessment of depressive symptoms in three representative German cohort studies[J].BMC Psychiatry,2021,21(1):238.DOI:10.1186/s12888-021-03234-x.
[1] ZHANG Xi, HUANG Jing, WANG Tian-hua, LI Yan, CAO Yuan, LI Ming-hui, YU Li-ping. Translation of Parenting Resilience Elements Questionnaire and its validation [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2025, 32(4): 6-11.
[2] DING Xin-shu, SUN Le-fei, GAO Wei, LU Qi, YAN Chang, LIU De-shan. Reliability and validity of Ambivalent Ageism Scale in community-dwelling older adults [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(7): 12-16.
[3] TAN Ru-yi, LONG Xiu-hong, MA Hong-li, CHEN Lan. Development of TCM Rehabilitation Health Information Seeking Behavior Scale for patients with lumbar disc herniation and its reliability and validity [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(5): 67-72.
[4] ZHANG Yu-lin, ZHU Xiang-wei, HONG Hui-fang, LU Gen-di. Development of Ethical Dilemma Scale for Nurses in major infectious disease emergencies and its reliability and validity [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(4): 1-6.
[5] ZHANG Guo-chun, LI Hai-yun, CHU Liang-liang, CHENG Xue, WANG Jun-zhi. Development of Knowledge, Belief and Practice Scale for perinatal palliative care of obstetric nurses and its reliability and validity [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(2): 6-11.
[6] LUO Duo-lin, YANG Chun-qing, GAO Ping, HU Qing-wen, XU Xiao-qun. Localization of type 2 diabetes distress assessment system and its reliability and validity [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(19): 24-30.
[7] ZHU Ya-jin, WANG Zhao-hui, DAI Ming-zhu, WANG Lin, SUN Ying-ying. Translation of Cultural Competence Scale for Clinical Nurses and its reliability and validity [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(17): 46-50.
[8] ZHANG Yu-xia, FAN Xiao-hui, WANG Xue-jiao, LIU Yu-an, LI Le-zhi. Translation of Mindful Self-care Scale and its reliability and validity in ICU nurses [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(15): 46-51.
[9] YANG Chen, SONG Hui-juan, QIN Cheng-he, YANG Jing-hua, GONG Xue, HUANG Wen-yan. Development of Discharge Readiness Assessment Scale for patient with bone transport and its reliability and validity [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(14): 1-5.
[10] MEI Ling-han, ZHOU Yan-rong, ZHANG Duo, WANG Xiao-xiao, WANG Lan, ZHAO Ya, ZHAO Rui-yi. Localization of Brief Differentiation of Self Inventory-Revised Scale in patients with aortic dissection and its reliability and validity [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(11): 1-5.
[11] HOU Ying-ge, LI Hao-zheng, HOU Yun-xia, WANG Zi-han, LI Jing, WANG Song-mei, ZHAO Ya-jie, YAN Ling. Development and psychometric testing of self-management scale for gastroesophageal reflux in patients after surgery for esophageal cancer [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2023, 30(5): 12-17.
[12] MA Zhu-yue, YAO Shan-shan, SHI Yan-yan, LU Ning-ning, ZHU Ping, CHENG Fang. Development of risk perception questionnaire in women with breast-cancer-related lymphedema and its reliability and validity [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2023, 30(4): 1-5.
[13] SHE Jia-chen, ZHANG Jin-yan, ZHANG Rui-xing, MEI Yong-xia, LI Hong-feng. Translation of Ethical Leadership at Work Questionnaire in nurses and its validity and reliability [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2023, 30(23): 29-34.
[14] YU Zhen-wei, BAI Xue, LU Yu, HUANG Jie, MAO Jing. Chinese Localization of Metacognitive Ability Scale for nursing students and its reliability and validity [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2023, 30(21): 13-17.
[15] ZHANG Yi, WANG Ai-hong, CHEN Jing. Reliability and Validity of Chinese version of Fatalism Scale in Patients with hematologic malignancies [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2023, 30(20): 54-57.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!