以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

Journal of Nursing ›› 2023, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (4): 1-5.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.04.001

    Next Articles

Development of risk perception questionnaire in women with breast-cancer-related lymphedema and its reliability and validity

MA Zhu-yue1, YAO Shan-shan2a, SHI Yan-yan1, LU Ning-ning1, ZHU Ping2b, CHENG Fang1   

  1. 1. School of Nursing, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211100,China;
    2 a. Dept. of Breast Surgery; b. Dept. of Nursing Administration, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210009,China
  • Received:2022-08-15 Online:2023-02-25 Published:2023-03-14

PDF (PC)

757

Like

Abstract: Objective To develop a risk perception questionnaire in women with breast-cancer-related lymphedema, and to test its reliability and validity. Methods With dual process model, through literature review, semi-structured interviews, and expert correspondence, the risk perception questionnaire for women with breast-cancer-related lymphedema was preliminarily developed, and the questionnaire was adjusted and revised through pre-survey. A total of 377 breast cancer patients were selected to test the reliability and validity. Results The risk perception questionnaire for women with breast-cancer-related lymphedema consisted of 22 items in 3 dimensions. The overall consistency content validity index (S-CVI/UA) was 0.864, and content validity index (I-CVI) for each entry ranged from 0.830 to 1.000. Exploratory factor analysis identified 3 principal factors, which accumulatively explained of 58.511% of total variance. Cronbach α coefficient of the questionnaire was 0.745 and split-half reliability of the questionnaire was 0.885;Cronbach α coefficient of 3 dimensions ranged from 0.870 to 0.893 and split-half reliability of 3 dimensions from 0.870 to 0.880. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated good model fit. Conclusion Risk perception questionnaire in women with breast-cancer-related lymphedema has good reliability and can be used to assess their perceived risk level of lymphedema.

Key words: breast cancer, lymphedema, risk perception, questionnaire, reliability, validity

CLC Number: 

  • R47
[1] 杨璇, 张海林, 孙文雯. 乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿发病风险的研究进展[J]. 护理学杂志, 2018, 33(23):98-101.DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2018.23.98.
[2] Aycock DM, Clark PC, Araya S.Measurement and outcomes of the perceived risk of stroke: a review[J]. West J Nurs Res,2019,41(1):134-154.DOI:10.1177/0193945917747856.
[3] Li M, Huang W, Zhang X, et al.Illness perceptions and adherence to breast cancer-related lymphedema risk management behaviours among breast cancer survivors[J]. Eur J Oncol Nurs,2022,58:102144.DOI:10.1016/j.ejon.2022.102144.
[4] Cipolletta S, Andreghetti GR, Mioni G.Risk perception towards COVID-19: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2022, 19(8): 4649.DOI:10.3390/ijerph19084649.
[5] 黄蕾, 何若莹, 毕军. 健康风险感知研究进展[J]. 环境卫生学杂志, 2018, 8(3):226-231.DOI:10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2018.03.011.
[6] Maffei S, Meloni A, Deidda M, et al.Cardiovascular risk perception and knowledge among italian women: lessons from IGENDA protocol[J]. J Clin Med , 2022, 11(6): 1695.DOI:10.3390/jcm11061695.
[7] Janssen E, Van Osch L, De Vries H, et al.Measuring risk perceptions of skin cancer: reliability and validity of different operationalizations[J]. Br J Health Psychol, 2011, 16(Pt 1): 92-112.DOI: 10.1348/135910710X514120.
[8] Lifshitz R, Nimrod G, Bachner Y G.Measuring risk perception in later life: the perceived risk scale[J]. J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc,2016,22(6):469-474.DOI:10.1177/1078390316659910.
[9] NLN Medical Advisory Committee. Lymphedema risk reduction praction practices[EB/OL].(2012-05-01)[2015--07-15].http://www.lymphnet.org.
[10] Martinelli M, Veltri G A.Do cognitive styles affect vaccine hesitancy? A dual-process cognitive framework for vaccine hesitancy and the role of risk perceptions[J]. Soc Sci Med, 2021, 289: 114403.DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114403.
[11] 王琦, 李领侠, 和巾杰, 等. 医护人员低血糖症知信行问卷的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 28(9):9-13.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.09.009.
[12] 刘砚燕. 患者报告结局测量信息系统:儿童报告版和父母报告版癌症相关简表的测量学研究[D]. 上海:第二军医大学, 2016.
[13] 郑卫军,何凡.现况调查的样本量计算方法[J].预防医学,2020,32(6):647-648. DOI:10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2020.06.028
[14] Tao L, Hu X, Chen H, et al.Factors influencing the burden on spousal caregivers of breast cancer survivors[J]. Support Care Cancer, 2022, 16.DOI:10.1007/s00520-022-07130-2.
[15] 徐立敏,钱志刚. 临床带教教师隐性知识共享量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2022,29(15): 24-27.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.15.024
[16] 吴明隆. 问卷统计分析实务[M].重庆大学出版社,2010:158-298.
[17] Kaufman A R, Twesten J E, Suls J, et al.Measuring cigarette smoking risk perceptions[J]. Nicotine Tob Res, 2020, 22(11): 1937-1945.DOI:10.1093/ntr/ntz213.
[18] 刘恒, 樊英怡, 裴晓华. 裴晓华分期防治乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿经验[J]. 北京中医药, 2020, 39(6):572-574.DOI:10.16025/j.1674-1307.2020.06.013.
[19] Cella D, Hughens C, Peterman A, et al. A brief assessment of concerns associated with genetic testing for cancer: the Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment (MICRA) questionnaire[J]. Health psychol, 2002, 21(6): 564-572.PMID: 12433008.
[20] Stolt M, Kottorp A, Suhonen R.The use and quality of reporting of rasch analysis in nursing research: A methodological scoping review[J]. Int J Nurs Stud, 2022, 132: 104244.DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104244.
[1] ZHANG Xi, HUANG Jing, WANG Tian-hua, LI Yan, CAO Yuan, LI Ming-hui, YU Li-ping. Translation of Parenting Resilience Elements Questionnaire and its validation [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2025, 32(4): 6-11.
[2] HUA Jing, ZHANG Qing-yue, WANG Yan, CHENG Chang, ZHANG Xiu-li, ZHANG Ai'ai. Application of question prompt list in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(8): 18-22.
[3] DING Xin-shu, SUN Le-fei, GAO Wei, LU Qi, YAN Chang, LIU De-shan. Reliability and validity of Ambivalent Ageism Scale in community-dwelling older adults [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(7): 12-16.
[4] TAN Ru-yi, LONG Xiu-hong, MA Hong-li, CHEN Lan. Development of TCM Rehabilitation Health Information Seeking Behavior Scale for patients with lumbar disc herniation and its reliability and validity [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(5): 67-72.
[5] ZHANG Yu-lin, ZHU Xiang-wei, HONG Hui-fang, LU Gen-di. Development of Ethical Dilemma Scale for Nurses in major infectious disease emergencies and its reliability and validity [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(4): 1-6.
[6] WANG Ting-ting, SHEN Wen-bin, LI Wen-rong, CHEN Ying-ying, SHI Jia-jing, ZHANG Rui, WEI Ya-pei. Evaluation on the construction and operation effect of lymphatic rehabilitation nursing studio construction and practice of lymphatic rehabilitation nursing studio [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(23): 45-48.
[7] ZHANG Guo-chun, LI Hai-yun, CHU Liang-liang, CHENG Xue, WANG Jun-zhi. Development of Knowledge, Belief and Practice Scale for perinatal palliative care of obstetric nurses and its reliability and validity [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(2): 6-11.
[8] LUO Duo-lin, YANG Chun-qing, GAO Ping, HU Qing-wen, XU Xiao-qun. Localization of type 2 diabetes distress assessment system and its reliability and validity [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(19): 24-30.
[9] ZHU Ya-jin, WANG Zhao-hui, DAI Ming-zhu, WANG Lin, SUN Ying-ying. Translation of Cultural Competence Scale for Clinical Nurses and its reliability and validity [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(17): 46-50.
[10] DAI Mei-fen, LIANG Yu-zhen, YANG Jing, YOU Yan-yan, YANG Qing, CHANG Guang-ting, OU Xing-ying, HUANG Chuan-qiang, CHEN Zhi-xing, OU Jie-fen. Construction of nursing protocol for cancer-related fatigue in breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy based on evidence-based practice and theory of chinese medicine [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(15): 34-38.
[11] ZHANG Yu-xia, FAN Xiao-hui, WANG Xue-jiao, LIU Yu-an, LI Le-zhi. Translation of Mindful Self-care Scale and its reliability and validity in ICU nurses [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(15): 46-51.
[12] YANG Chen, SONG Hui-juan, QIN Cheng-he, YANG Jing-hua, GONG Xue, HUANG Wen-yan. Development of Discharge Readiness Assessment Scale for patient with bone transport and its reliability and validity [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(14): 1-5.
[13] MEI Ling-han, ZHOU Yan-rong, ZHANG Duo, WANG Xiao-xiao, WANG Lan, ZHAO Ya, ZHAO Rui-yi. Localization of Brief Differentiation of Self Inventory-Revised Scale in patients with aortic dissection and its reliability and validity [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(11): 1-5.
[14] HU Yu-lan, CHEN Ying, YU Gen-zhen, WANG Meng-yue. Development of questionnaire of attitude of pediatric nurses toward transitional nursing of children with chronic diseases and its reliability and validity [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(10): 64-69.
[15] HOU Ying-ge, LI Hao-zheng, HOU Yun-xia, WANG Zi-han, LI Jing, WANG Song-mei, ZHAO Ya-jie, YAN Ling. Development and psychometric testing of self-management scale for gastroesophageal reflux in patients after surgery for esophageal cancer [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2023, 30(5): 12-17.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!