以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

Journal of Nursing ›› 2023, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (22): 56-62.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.22.056

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Measurement property of traditional Chinese medicine clinical effectiveness evaluation scales for lung cancer: a systematic review

WEI Jia-hao1,2, BU Meng-ru1, BAI Zi-ye1,2, ZHOU Jin1   

  1. 1. Dept. of Nursing Administration, Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510280, China;
    2. School of Nursing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
  • Received:2023-06-28 Online:2023-11-25 Published:2023-12-07

PDF (PC)

352

Like

Abstract: Objective To systematically evaluate the measurement properties of TCM clinical efficacy assessment tools for lung cancer and the methodological quality of related studies, and to provide evidence-based reference for healthcare professionals to select high-quality assessment tools. Methods A systematic search was conducted in multiple databases, including PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, China Biomedical Literature Database, China Knowledge Network, Wanfang Database, and VIP. The retrieval period was from the inception of the databases to June 2023. The methodological quality and measurement properties of the identified tools were assessed using the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN-RoB) and Scale Measurement Performance Evaluation Criteria, respectively. Based on these evaluations, final recommendations were made. Results Eight TCM clinical efficacy evaluation tools for lung cancer were finally included, and no measurement error, cross-cultural validity and measurement equivalence were reported. Conclusion The existing evidence suggests that TCM clinical efficacy evaluation tools for lung cancer could not provide comprehensive assessment, and the overall research methodology quality is low. Relatively, the research quality and performance evaluation of Quality of Life Assessment System for Cancer based on Traditional Chinese Medicine- Lung Cancer (QLASTCM-Lu) is still acceptable. In the future, the existing tools should be further improved and validated, or a new TCM clinical efficacy measurement tool for lung cancer with low-bias risk and high-applicability should be constructed.

Key words: lung cancer, traditional Chinese medicine, assessment tool, measurement property, systematic review

CLC Number: 

  • R473.73
[1] Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al.Global cancer statistics 2020: globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3): 209-249. DOI:10.3322/caac.21492.
[2] Wei Z, Chen J, Zuo F, et al.Traditional chinese medicine has great potential as candidate drugs for lung cancer: a review[J]. J Ethnopharmacol, 2023(300): 115748. DOI:10.1016/j.jep.2022.115748.
[3] 李凯, 张俊华, 张明妍, 等.中医药核心指标集(COS-TCM)研究现状[J]. 世界科学技术-中医药现代化, 2021, 23(8): 2556-2562. DOI:10.11842/wst.20210525013.
[4] 于长禾, 孙亚男, 何丽云, 等. 中医普适性生活质量量表的系统评价[J]. 中华中医药杂志, 2016, 31(2): 432-437.
[5] 张艳宏,刘保延,刘志顺,等. PRO与中医临床疗效评价[J]. 中医杂志,2007(8):680-682.DOI:10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2007.08.003.
[6] 包瑜, 张培彤. 原发性支气管肺癌中医证候研究现状评述[J]. 环球中医药, 2022, 15(7): 1273-1279.
[7] Prinsen CAC, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM, et al.COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures[J]. Qual Life Res, 2018, 27(5): 1147-1157. DOI:10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3.
[8] Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL,et al.Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist[J].Qual Life Res, 2012,21(4):651-657.DOI:10.1007/s11136
-011-9960-1.
[9] Terwee CB, Bot S DM, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires[J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2007, 60(1):34-42.DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012.
[10] Terwee CB, Prinsen CAC Chiarotto A, et al.COSMIN methodology for assessing the content validity of PROMs user manual v1.pdf[EB/OL].[2023-06-20]. https://cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/COSMIN-methodology-for-content-validity-user-manual-v1.pdf.
[11] McHorney CA, Tarlov AR. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate?[J]. Qual Life Res, 1995, 4(4):293-307. DOI:10.1007/BF01593882.
[12] 陈祎婷, 沈蓝君, 彭健, 等. 改良版定量系统评价证据分级方法对患者报告结局测量工具的评价[J]. 解放军护理杂志, 2020, 37(10):57-60. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2020.10.014.
[13] 于莉, 张会永, 王佳楠, 等. 基于患者报告结局的气虚证中医疗效评价量表考评[J]. 上海中医药杂志, 2020, 54(9): 60-64. DOI:10.16305/j.1007-1334.2020.1910103.
[14] 陈玉招. 气虚证自评量表的初步研制及考评[D]. 福州:福建中医药大学, 2016.
[15] Wan C, You S, Quan P, et al. Development and validation of the quality-of-life assessment system for lung cancer based on traditional chinese medicine[J]. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med, 2012(2012): 945910.0. DOI: 10.1155/2012/945910.
[16] Wang TT, He LY, Zhang M, et al.Development of improved version of quality of life assessment instrument for lung cancer patients based on traditional chinese medicine (QLASTCM-Lu)[J]. Chin J Integr Med, 2019, 25(11): 831-836. DOI:10.1007/s11655-018-2991-5.
[17] 刁佳. 中晚期肺癌患者中医生存质量量表(QOL-AL)的研究[D]. 南京:南京中医药大学, 2007.
[18] 张星辉. 肺系病证自评量表的初步研制及考评[D]. 福州:福建中医药大学, 2016.
[19] 杨可鑫. 阴虚证中医疗效评价量表的研制与考评[D]. 沈阳:辽宁中医药大学, 2018.
[20] 熊丽枚. 阴虚证自评量表的初步研制及考评[D]. 福州:福建中医药大学, 2016.
[21] 施月仙, 张海明, 黄亚琪, 等. 选择健康测量工具的共识标准(COSMIN)偏倚风险评价清单的解读[J]. 中国护理管理,2021,21(7):1053-1057.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2021.07.018.
[22] Terwee CB, Prinsen Ca.C, Chiarotto A, et al. COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study[J]. Qual Life Res, 2018, 27(5): 1159-1170. DOI:10.1007/s11136-018-1829-0.
[23] 陈祎婷, 彭健, 沈蓝君, 等. COSMIN方法介绍:结合一项系统评价实例进行解读[J].护理研究, 2021, 35(9): 1505-1510. DOI:10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2021.09.001.
[24] 徐孟娇, 金潇, 袁文雯, 等. 基于贝叶斯网络与关联规则探讨下肢动脉硬化闭塞症的中医临床疗效评价条目[J]. 中医杂志, 2023, 64(12):1218-1224. DOI:10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2023.12.007.
[25] 王寅, 吴朝旭, 王玥, 等. 基于现代医学诊疗模式的非小细胞肺癌中医证型梳理与浅析[J]. 天津中医药, 2020, 37(10): 1195-1200. DOI:10.11656/j.issn.1672-1519.2020.10.25.
[26] 张成果, 孙小玲, 卢山, 等. 患者重症监护体验测量工具的范围综述[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(18): 53-58.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.18.053.
[27] 彭健, 沈蓝君, 陈祎婷, 等. 对COSMIN-RoB清单中测量工具稳定性、测量误差和效标效度研究偏倚风险的清单解读[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2020, 20(11): 1340-1344.
[28] Moreira RSL, Bassolli L, Coutinho E, et al.Reproducibility and reliability of the quality of life questionnaire in patients with atrial fibrillation[J]. Arq Bras Cardiol, 2016, 106(3): 171-181. DOI: 10.5935/abc.20160026.
[29] Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use(5th edition)[J].Aust N Z J Public Health, 2016, 40(3): 294-295. DOI:10.1111/1753-6405.12484.
[30] 高云, 赵俊峰, 徐丽丽, 等. COSMIN 操作指南对中文版电子健康素养量表的评价[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2020, 40(9): 1968-1973.
[31] 茅范贞, 韩耀风, 方亚. 量表条目的统计学筛选方法研究进展[J]. 现代预防医学, 2015, 42(1): 1-3.
[32] Edelen MO, Reeve BB.Applying item response theory (IRT) modeling to questionnaire development, evaluation,refinement[J]. Qual Life Res, 2007, 16 Suppl 1(1): 5-18. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-007-9198-0.
[33] Mokkink LB, de Vet HCW, Prinsen Ca.C, et al. COSMIN risk of bias checklist for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures[J]. Qual Life Res, 2018, 27(5): 1171-1179. DOI:10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4.
[1] CHEN En-lin, MO Feng-ling, ZHUANG Ze-ming, ZHANG Ming-zhe, ZHOU Jia-kun, HUANG Li-fang, JI Long-fei, ZHANG Li-fang. Assessment tools for unilateral spatial neglect after stroke: a scoping review [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2025, 32(3): 43-49.
[2] LI Ding-ding, WANG Shuai-you, ZHU Shan-shan, GUO Xin, ZHANG Hui-min, WANG Hong-ru, PAN Qin. Supportive care needs assessment tools for stroke patients: a scoping review [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(9): 48-53.
[3] ZHOU Yue, ZHANG Jie, PAN Yu-fan, DAI Yu, SUN Yu-jian, XIAO Yi, YU Yu-feng. Prediction models for risk of acquired weakness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(6): 56-61.
[4] WU Lin-mei, LIANG Zhi-jin, LIU Rui-jie, ZHONG Jing-jing, QIU Yu-hua. Barriers to and facilitators of exercise rehabilitation in patients with COPD: a CFIR-based systematic review [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(5): 44-49.
[5] WANG Wei, ZHOU Yan-ling, XUE Wen-ping, ZHANG Lin-lin, LIN Shu-qiu. Frailty assessment tools for elderly patients with hip fracture [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(4): 42-47.
[6] YANG Li-na, HUANG Rong, YAO Mei-qi, WANG Zhu-qing, XU Yi-Ting, XIE Pei-min. Risk prediction models for postpartum breastfeeding behavior interruption: a systematic review [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(23): 59-65.
[7] LIU Jia, CHEN Zhi-mei, TANG Fang, ZHANG Li-wen, XU Cai-juan, YANG Shu-fen, LONG Ye-yun. Construction of evaluation index system of nighttime TCM nursing clinics based on Delphi method and three-dimensional quality model [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(19): 42-46.
[8] ZHANG Yi-ran, WANG Kang-mei, ZHU Sheng-cai, ZHU Lu, HUANG Yi. COSMIN guideline-based systematic review of Chinese version of self-management assessment tool for hypertension patients [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(19): 52-57.
[9] DAI Qi, LI Fang, ZHU Yuan, ZHANG Xiao-tong. Intelligent care need of patients undergoing lung cancer surgery based on KANO model [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(17): 57-60.
[10] GUO Shi-hong, BAI Xiao-ling, LOU Ting, YU Na, YANG Zeng-zhen, NIU Yu-tian, LI Hui. Assessment tools for oral frailty: a scoping review [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(14): 52-56.
[11] YANG Jian, ZHANG Ying, CHEN Xiao-yan, FENG Bi-long, HE Xue-yu. Doctor-nurse-patient accelerated rehabilitation clinical nursing pathway in patients with thoracoscopic resection of lung cancer [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(13): 73-78.
[12] LI Li-xiang, LIU Qiong-ling, WAN Chong-hua, WANG Li-ping, LIN Hua-min, ZHU Xiao-jia, CHEN Zhen-fei, LIANG Wen-xin, LI Qi-zhen. Mediating effect of resourcefulness between family resilience and anticipatory grief in patients with advanced lung cancer [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(12): 54-58.
[13] ZHU Ming-yue, DING Xiao-tong, SHI Ji-yuan, Li Zheng. Effects of self-perception of aging on cognitive function in elderly people: a systematic review [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2023, 30(8): 52-57.
[14] ZHENG Jing, GUAN Yu-xiang, ZHANG Ying, XU Juan, ZOU Ran, WANG Chao. Influencing factors of transformational leadership of head nurses in Hospitals of Traditional Chinese Medicine in Anhui Province: a 873-case study [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2023, 30(7): 16-19.
[15] YE Lei, ZHANG Ai-qin, RONG Yun, XIA Guang-hui. Risk prediction models for postoperative delirium in elderly patients with hip fracture: a systematic review [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2023, 30(7): 48-52.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!