以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (11): 1-5.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2024.11.001

• 研究生园地 •    下一篇

简版自我分化量表的汉化及其在主动脉夹层患者中应用的信效度检验

梅凌寒1,2, 周雁荣1, 张舵1, 王萧萧1, 王兰1, 赵娅1, 赵睿怡1,2   

  1. 1.华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院 护理部,湖北 武汉 430000;
    2.华中科技大学同济医学院 护理学院,湖北 武汉 430000
  • 收稿日期:2023-09-01 出版日期:2024-06-10 发布日期:2024-07-10
  • 通讯作者: 周雁荣（1970-）,女,湖北武汉人,本科学历,主任护师,外科总护士长。E-mail:1002406585@qq.com
  • 作者简介:梅凌寒（1997-）,女,湖北黄冈人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读。
  • 基金资助:
    湖北省卫生健康委员会2023-2024年度科研项目（WJ2023M007）; 中华医学会杂志社2022-2023年护理学科研究课题（CMAPH-NRI2022063）; 2023年同济医院科研基金护理专项（HL202309）

Localization of Brief Differentiation of Self Inventory-Revised Scale in patients with aortic dissection and its reliability and validity

MEI Ling-han1,2, ZHOU Yan-rong1, ZHANG Duo1, WANG Xiao-xiao1, WANG Lan1, ZHAO Ya1, ZHAO Rui-yi1,2   

  1. 1. Dept. of Nursing Administration, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430000, China;
    2. School of Nursing, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430000, China
  • Received:2023-09-01 Online:2024-06-10 Published:2024-07-10

PDF (PC)

127

赞

摘要： 目的 对简版自我分化量表进行汉化,并在主动脉夹层患者中进行信效度检验,为临床患者测量自我分化提供有效工具。方法 基于Brislin翻译模式,对简版自我分化量表进行汉化、跨文化调适和预调查,形成中文版简版自我分化量表。方便抽样选取417例主动脉夹层患者进行问卷调查,分析中文版量表的信效度。结果 中文版简版自我分化量表共5个维度,19个条目,Cronbach α系数为0.879,重测信度为0.949,折半信度为0.833。KMO值为0.825,Bartlett’s球形检验χ2值为961.691。总量表的内容效度指数为0.960,探索性因子分析提取5个公因子,总方差累积贡献率为52.807%;验证性因子分析结果显示一阶模型各拟合指标均达标;二阶模型卡方自由度值（χ2/df）为1.506,近似误差均方根值为0.050,比较拟合指数为0.905,增值拟合指数为0.908,简约规范拟合指数为0.656,简约适配度指数为0.773,表明二阶模型拟合度良好。结论 中文版简版自我分化量较为简便且实用性强,信效度指标均在可接受的范围内,可较好地评估我国主动脉夹层患者的自我分化情况。

关键词: 自我分化, 鲍温家庭系统理论, 主动脉夹层, 信度, 效度

Abstract: Objective To localize the Brief Differentiation of Self Inventory-Revised Scale and to test its reliability and validity among patients with aortic dissection and their family members, so as to provide an effective tool for measuring self-differentiation of clinical patients. Methods Based on Brislin’s translation model, the Chinese version of the Brief Differentiation of Self Inventory-Revised Scale was formed through translation, cultural adaptation and pre-experimentation. Convenient sampling was used to select 417 patients with aortic dissection and their family members for the survey, and the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the scale was analyzed. Results The Chinese version of the scale had 5 dimensions and 19 items, with a Cronbach’s α coefficient of 0.879, a retest reliability of 0.949, and a split-half reliability of 0.833. The KMO value was 0.825; the χ2 value of Bartlett’s spherical test 961.691, and the average of All I-CVIs on the scale 0.960. The exploratory factor numerator extracted 5 common factors, and the cumulative contribution rate of total variance was 52.807%. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the first-order model met the criteria for fit indicators; the second-order model had a χ2/df of 1.506, an RMSEA of 0.050, a CFI of 0.905, an IFI of 0.908, a PNFI of 0.656, and a PCFI of 0.773, which showed the second-order model fit indicators being good. Conclusion The Chinese version of the Brief Differentiation of Self Inventory-Revised Scale is simple and practical, and the reliability indicators are all within an acceptable range, which could better assess the self-differentiation of patients and their family members in China.

Key words: differentiation of self, Bowen family systems theory, aortic dissection, reliability, validity

中图分类号: 

  • R473.54
[1] Bowen M.Theory in the practice of psychotherapy.Journal of Family therapy: theory and practice[M]. New York: Gardner Press, 1953:65-69.
[2] Haefner J.An application of Bowen family systems theory[J]. Issues Ment Health Nurs,2014,35(11):835-841.DOI:10.3109/01612840.2014.921257.
[3] 刘冠琳,陈健鹏,宋开兰,等.三级联动联合家属赋能模式在7例居家安宁疗护患者突发症状中的应用[J].护理学报,2023,30(11):13-16.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.11.013.
[4] 张洁琼,张春,蔡闵敏,等.基于跨理论模型的家庭赋权心脏康复管理在中青年PCI术后患者中的应用[J].护理学杂志,2021,36(21):73-77.DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2021.21.073.
[5] 赵宏宇,王例铭,王秀蓉,等.基于信息-动机-行为技巧模型脑卒中患者家庭照顾者延续护理方案的构建[J]. 护理学报,2022,29(17):65-69.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.17.065.
[6] Skowron EA, Friedlander ML.The differentiation of self inventory: Development and initial validation[J]. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1998,45:235-246.
[7] Major S, Miranda C, M. Rodríduez-GONZáLEZ, et al. Portuguese adaptation of the Differentiation of Self Inventory-Revised (DSI-R):An exploratory study[J].Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnostico y Evaluacion Psicologica, 2014, 1(37):99-121.
[8] Kudo K.An Additional Consideration of Reliability and Validity of the Differentiation of Self Scale in Two Domains[J].Psychology, 2018, 9(10):2411-2421.DOI:10.4236/psych.2018.910138.
[9] De Clercq B, De Fruyt F, De Bolle M,et al.The hierarchical structure and construct validity of the PID-5 trait measure in adolescence[J].Journal of Personality, 2014, 82(2):158-169.DOI:10.1111/jopy.12042.
[10] Lam CM, Chan-So PCY.Validation of the Chinese Version of Differentiation of Self Inventory(C-DSI)[J].Journal of Marital & Family Therapy,2013,41(1):86-101.DOI:10.1111/jmft.12031.
[11] 吴煜辉,王桂平.大学生自我分化量表的初步修订[J].心理研究,2010,3(4):40-45.
[12] Sloan D, Dierendonck DV.Item selection and validation of a brief, 20-item version of the Differentiation of Self Inventory—Revised[J]. Personality and Individual Differences, 2016, 97:146-150. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.037.
[13] Erbel R,Aboyans V,Boileau C,et al.2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases:Document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult. The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Aortic Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)[J]. Eur Heart J,2014,35(41):2873-2926.DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu281.
[14] 史静琤,莫显昆,孙振球. 量表编制中内容效度指数的应用[J].中南大学学报(医学版),2012,37(2):152-155. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7347.2012.02.007.
[15] 金瑜. 心理测量[M].2版.上海:华东师范大学出版社,2005:208-216.
[16] 蒋艳,沈宁,邹树芳.护理研究中量表研制及测量学特征的评定方法[J].中华护理教育,2005(4):174-176.
[17] Polit DF, Beck CT.The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? critique and recommendations[J]. Wiley, 2006(5):489-497. DOI:10.1002/NUR.20147.
[18] Hu LT, Bentler PM.Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives[J].Structural Equation Modeling, 1999, 6(1):1-55.DOI:10.1080/10705519909540118.
[1] 张玺, 黄静, 汪天华, 李燕, 曹沅, 李明惠, 余立平. 发育障碍儿童养育心理韧性量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 6-11.
[2] 丁心舒, 孙乐菲, 高伟, 鲁琦, 闫畅, 刘德山. 矛盾年龄歧视量表在社区老年人中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 12-16.
[3] 袁华君, 段功香, 陈路桥, 王慧清. 癌症终末期患者救护意愿量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(6): 73-78.
[4] 谭如意, 龙秀红, 马红利, 陈兰. 腰椎间盘突出症患者中医康复健康信息获取行为量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(5): 67-72.
[5] 张钰琳, 朱向伟, 洪慧芳, 卢根娣. 重大传染病突发事件中护士伦理困境量表的研制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(4): 1-6.
[6] 宋彩妮, 郑尧, 宋英, 刘丽华. 癌症照顾者信息隐瞒量表的汉化及在肺癌患者照顾者中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(3): 17-20.
[7] 张国春, 李海云, 褚梁梁, 程雪, 王君芝. 产科护士围产期姑息照护知信行量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(2): 6-11.
[8] 罗铎麟, 杨春清, 高萍, 胡清文, 徐小群. 2型糖尿病心理痛苦量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(19): 24-30.
[9] 简称苹, 张汉卿, 王丽英, 田海艳, 彭向东, 张亚楠, 蔡德芳. 本科护生自我调节学习策略量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(18): 12-15.
[10] 王晓宁, 缪群芳, 李培清, 辛思莹, 黄姚姚. 自杀公众污名量表的汉化及在中国公众人群中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(17): 1-7.
[11] 朱亚晋, 王朝辉, 代明珠, 王琳, 孙莹莹. 临床护士文化能力量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(17): 46-50.
[12] 张玉霞, 樊晓辉, 王雪皎, 刘雨安, 李乐之. 正念自我照护量表的汉化及其在ICU护士中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(15): 46-51.
[13] 陶伏莹, 蒋佳男, 付东英, 田莹莹. 基于保护动机理论手术室护士外科手术烟雾防护意愿量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(15): 73-78.
[14] 杨晨, 宋慧娟, 覃承诃, 杨静华, 龚雪, 黄文嫣. 骨搬运患者出院准备度评估量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(14): 1-5.
[15] 项倩妹, 唐惠艳, 王建新, 张慧慧, 刘欣雨, 李春辉. 儿科专科护士核心能力量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(14): 74-78.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!