以质量求发展,以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (4): 1-6.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2024.04.001

• 研究生园地 •    下一篇

重大传染病突发事件中护士伦理困境量表的研制及信效度检验

张钰琳, 朱向伟, 洪慧芳, 卢根娣   

  1. 上海中医药大学附属曙光医院,上海 201203
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-20 出版日期:2024-02-25 发布日期:2024-03-07
  • 通讯作者: 卢根娣(1964-),女,上海人,硕士,教授,中医护理学研究所主任。E-mail:lugd2016@126.com
  • 作者简介:张钰琳(1998-),女,上海人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读,护士。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金一般项目(22BZX024)

Development of Ethical Dilemma Scale for Nurses in major infectious disease emergencies and its reliability and validity

ZHANG Yu-lin, ZHU Xiang-wei, HONG Hui-fang, LU Gen-di   

  1. Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201203, China
  • Received:2023-10-20 Online:2024-02-25 Published:2024-03-07

摘要: 目的 编制重大传染病突发事件中护士伦理困境量表,并检验其信度效度。方法 基于护理伦理原则,通过文献研究法、访谈法、专家咨询法形成初版量表。对全国6个省市大型三级综合医院842名参与重大传染病突发事件的一线护士进行调查,检验其信效度。结果 重大传染病突发事件中护士伦理困境量表共包括4个维度27个条目。量表总体的内容效度为0.914,各条目的内容效度为0.833~1.000;探索性因子分析共提取4个公因子,累积方差贡献率69.636%;量表总Cronbach α系数为0.929,折半信度为0.866;各维度的 Cronbach α系数为 0.800~0.907之间,量表整体的重测信度为0.943。结论 重大传染病突发事件中护士伦理困境量表具有良好的信度效度,可有效评估重大传染病突发事件中护士的伦理困境水平。

关键词: 重大传染病突发事件, 一线护士, 伦理困境, 信度, 效度

Abstract: Objective To develop a scale of ethical dilemma for nurses in major infectious disease emergencies and test its reliability and validity. Methods Based on the principles of nursing ethics, the initial scale was formed by literature review, interview and expert consultation. A total of 842 nurses involved in major infectious disease emergencies in tertiary general hospitals in 6 provinces and cities were investigated for reliability and validity test. Results The ethical dilemma scale for nurses in major infectious disease emergencies consisted of 27 items in 4 dimensions. The overall content validity of the scale was 0.914, and the content validity of each item ranged from 0.833 to 1.000. Four common factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis, and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 69.636%. The total Cronbach α coefficient of the scale was 0.929, and the half-folded reliability was 0.866. The Cronbach α coefficient of each dimension ranged from 0.800 to 0.907, and the overall test-retest reliability of the scale was 0.943. Conclusion The scale has good reliability and validity, and can effectively evaluate the level of nurses’ ethical dilemma in major infectious disease emergencies.

Key words: major infectious disease emergency, nurses at the front line, ethical dilemma, reliability, validity

中图分类号: 

  • R473.51
[1] 陈汝婕,王毅欣,刘晶晶,等.基于LDA主题分析模型的突发重大传染病事件医院抗逆力建设分析——以上海市为例[J].军事护理,2023,40(4):60-62;74.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.2023.04.015.
[2] Norman SB, Feingold JH, Kaye-Kauderer H, et al.Moral distress in frontline healthcare workers in the initial epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States: relationship to PTSD symptoms, burnout, and psychosocial functioning[J]. Depress Anxiety,2021,38(10):1007-1017. DOI:10.1002/da.23205.
[3] Austin CL, Saylor R, Finley PJ.Moral distress in physicians and nurses: impact on professional quality of life and turnover[J].Psychol Trauma, 2017,9(4):399-406.DOI:10.1037/tra0000201.
[4] Epstein EG, Whitehead PB, Prompahakul C, et al.Enhancing understanding of moral distress: the measure of moral distress for health care professionals[J].AJOB Empir Bioeth, 2019,10(2):113-124. DOI:10.1080/23294515.2019.1586008.
[5] Cramer E, Smith J, Rogowski J, et al.Measuring moral distress in nurses during a pandemic: development and validation of the COVID-MDS[J]. Res Nurs Health, 2022,45(5):549-558. DOI:10.1002/nur.22254.
[6] Villa M, Balice-Bourgois C, Tolotti A, et al.Ethical conflict and its psychological correlates among hospital nurses in the pandemic: a cross-sectional study within Swiss COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 Wards[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health,2021,18(22):12012. DOI:10.3390/ijerph182212012.
[7] Smallwood N, Pascoe A, Karimi L, et al.Moral distress and perceived community views are associated with mental health symptoms in frontline health workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health,2021,18(16):8723. DOI:10.3390/ijerph18168723.
[8] Sperling D.Ethical dilemmas, perceived risk, and motivation among nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic[J]. Nurs Ethics,2021,28(1):9-22. DOI:10.1177/0969733020956376.
[9] Hossain F,Clatty A.Self-care strategies in response to nurses’ moral injury during COVID-19 pandemic[J]. Nurs Ethics,2021,28(1):23-32.DOI:10.1177/0969733020961825.
[10] Dunham AM, Rieder TN, Humbyrd CJ.A bioethical perspective for navigating moral dilemmas amidst the COVID-19 pandemic[J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg,2020,28(11):471-476. DOI:10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-00371.
[11] Evans AM, Jonas M, Lantos J.Pediatric palliative care in a pandemic: role obligations, moral distress, and the care you can give[J]. Pediatrics,2020,146(1):e20201163. DOI:10.1542/peds.2020-1163.
[12] Sriharan A, West KJ, Almost J, et al.COVID-19-related occupational burnout and moral distress among nurses: a rapid scoping review[J]. Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont), 2021,34(1):7-19.DOI:10.12927/cjnl.2021.26459.
[13] 郑卫军,何凡.现况调查的样本量计算方法[J].预防医学,2020,32(6):647-648.DOI:10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2020.06.028.
[14] Schadewaldt V, McElduff B, D’Este C, et al. Validating the Alberta Context Tool in a multi-site Australian Emergency Department nurse population[J]. PLoS One, 2019,14(4):e0215153. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0215153.
[15] 马珠月,姚珊珊,史妍妍,等.女性乳腺癌患者淋巴水肿风险感知评估问卷的编制及信效度检验[J].护理学报,2023,30(4):1-5.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.04.001.
[16] 刘丽萍,周春兰,吴艳妮,等.情绪抑制量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(8):6-10. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.08.006.
[17] 雷阳, 张静平.中文版Connor-Davidson心理弹性量表在糖尿病患者中的信效度研究[J].中国全科医学, 2016, 19(10):1188-1193.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2016.10.017.
[18] Forbat L, Mnatzaganian G, Barclay S.The Healthcare Conflict Scale: development, validation and reliability testing of a tool for use across clinical settings[J]. J Interprof Care,2019,33(6):680-688.DOI:10.1080/13561820.2019.1593117.
[19] 史静琤, 莫显昆, 孙振球.量表编制中内容效度指数的应用[J].中南大学学报(医学版),2012,37(2): 49-52. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7347.2012.02.007.
[20] Park S, Choi M, Kim S.Validation of the Resilience Scale For Nurses(RSN)[J]. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2019,33(4):434-439.DOI:10.1016/j.apnu.2018.12.004.
[21] Sasaki M, Ogata Y, Fujinami K, et al.Development of a Shortened Version of the Nurse Managers’ Empowering Behavioral Scale for staff nurses[J]. Healthcare(Basel), 2022,10(10):2112. DOI:10.3390/healthcare10102112.
[22] Yuwanich N, Akhavan S, Nantsupawat W, et al.Development and psychometric properties of the Stressor Scale for emergency nurses[J]. Int Emerg Nurs,2018,39:77-88. DOI:10.1016/j.ienj.2018.01.005.
[23] 胡雁,王志稳.护理研究[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2017: 120-132.
[24] Mattisson M, Johnson C, B?rjeson S, et al. Development and content validation of the Telenursing Interaction and Satisfaction Questionnaire (TISQ)[J]. Health Expect, 2019,22(6):1213-1222.DOI:10.1111/hex.12945.
[25] Cabarkapa S, Nadjidai SE, Murgier J, et al.The psychological impact of COVID-19 and other viral epidemics on frontline healthcare workers and ways to address it:a rapid systematic review[J]. Brain Behav Immun Health,2020,8:100144. DOI:10.1016/j.bbih.2020.100144.
[26] Chen X, Arber A, Gao J, et al.The mental health status among nurses from low-risk areas under normalized COVID-19 pandemic prevention and control in China: a cross-sectional study[J]. Int J Ment Health Nurs,2021,30(4):975-987. DOI:10.1111/inm.12852.
[27] 潘绍山,张金钟,张新庆,等. 《护士伦理准则》的起草、研究经过[J]. 中国医学伦理学,2014,27(4):471-473.
[28] 潘绍山,张金钟,张新庆,等. 《护士伦理准则》内容解读[J]. 中国医学伦理学,2014,27(4):468-470.
[29] 谢红珍,袁长蓉,沈园园,等. 《中国护士伦理准则》内容解读[J]. 中国医学伦理学,2020,33(10):1234-1242. DOI:10.12026/j.issn.1001-8565.2020.10.14.
[1] 张玺, 黄静, 汪天华, 李燕, 曹沅, 李明惠, 余立平. 发育障碍儿童养育心理韧性量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 6-11.
[2] 丁心舒, 孙乐菲, 高伟, 鲁琦, 闫畅, 刘德山. 矛盾年龄歧视量表在社区老年人中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 12-16.
[3] 袁华君, 段功香, 陈路桥, 王慧清. 癌症终末期患者救护意愿量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(6): 73-78.
[4] 谭如意, 龙秀红, 马红利, 陈兰. 腰椎间盘突出症患者中医康复健康信息获取行为量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(5): 67-72.
[5] 宋彩妮, 郑尧, 宋英, 刘丽华. 癌症照顾者信息隐瞒量表的汉化及在肺癌患者照顾者中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(3): 17-20.
[6] 张国春, 李海云, 褚梁梁, 程雪, 王君芝. 产科护士围产期姑息照护知信行量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(2): 6-11.
[7] 罗铎麟, 杨春清, 高萍, 胡清文, 徐小群. 2型糖尿病心理痛苦量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(19): 24-30.
[8] 简称苹, 张汉卿, 王丽英, 田海艳, 彭向东, 张亚楠, 蔡德芳. 本科护生自我调节学习策略量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(18): 12-15.
[9] 王晓宁, 缪群芳, 李培清, 辛思莹, 黄姚姚. 自杀公众污名量表的汉化及在中国公众人群中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(17): 1-7.
[10] 朱亚晋, 王朝辉, 代明珠, 王琳, 孙莹莹. 临床护士文化能力量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(17): 46-50.
[11] 张玉霞, 樊晓辉, 王雪皎, 刘雨安, 李乐之. 正念自我照护量表的汉化及其在ICU护士中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(15): 46-51.
[12] 陶伏莹, 蒋佳男, 付东英, 田莹莹. 基于保护动机理论手术室护士外科手术烟雾防护意愿量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(15): 73-78.
[13] 杨晨, 宋慧娟, 覃承诃, 杨静华, 龚雪, 黄文嫣. 骨搬运患者出院准备度评估量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(14): 1-5.
[14] 项倩妹, 唐惠艳, 王建新, 张慧慧, 刘欣雨, 李春辉. 儿科专科护士核心能力量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(14): 74-78.
[15] 詹述琴, 郑智慧, 黄宝英, 许嘉显, 詹珊珊. 认知信任量表的汉化及在医务人员中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(13): 30-34.
Viewed
Full text
237
HTML PDF
Just accepted Online first Issue Just accepted Online first Issue
0 0 0 0 0 237

  From Others local
  Times 56 181
  Rate 24% 76%

Abstract
165
Just accepted Online first Issue
0 0 165
  From Others local
  Times 158 7
  Rate 96% 4%

Cited

Web of Science  Crossref   ScienceDirect  Search for Citations in Google Scholar >>
 
This page requires you have already subscribed to WoS.
  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!