以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2): 6-11.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2024.02.006

• 研究生园地 • 上一篇    下一篇

产科护士围产期姑息照护知信行量表的编制及信效度检验

张国春, 李海云, 褚梁梁, 程雪, 王君芝   

  1. 山东第一医科大学第一附属医院 护理部,山东 济南 250014
  • 收稿日期:2023-08-18 出版日期:2024-01-25 发布日期:2024-02-20
  • 通讯作者: 王君芝（1967-）,女,山东济南人,本科学历,主任护师,科护士长,硕士研究生导师。E-mail：3307962366@qq.com
  • 作者简介:张国春（1996-）,女,山西大同人,硕士,护师。

Development of Knowledge, Belief and Practice Scale for perinatal palliative care of obstetric nurses and its reliability and validity

ZHANG Guo-chun, LI Hai-yun, CHU Liang-liang, CHENG Xue, WANG Jun-zhi   

  1. Dept.of Nursing, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Jinan 250014, China
  • Received:2023-08-18 Online:2024-01-25 Published:2024-02-20

PDF (PC)

417

赞

摘要： 目的 编制适合我国文化背景的产科护士围产期姑息照护知信行量表,检验量表信效度。方法 根据知信行理论,依据文献及德尔菲专家函询编制量表初稿,调查604名产科护士以检验量表的信效度,形成正式版量表。结果 产科护士围产期姑息照护知信行量表包括3个维度,11个因子,共51个条目;量表总体Cronbach α系数是0.959,重测信度Cronbach α系数是0.976,内容效度是0.980;探索性因子分析提取11个公因子,累积方差贡献率为87.745%,验证性因子分析显示,量表模型拟合度良好。结论 产科护士围产期姑息照护知信行量表具有良好的信度和效度,并有一定的推广价值,可作为评估量表应用于临床实践。

关键词: 围产期, 姑息照护, 德尔菲法, 知信行, 量表, 信度, 效度

Abstract: Objective To develop a knowledge, belief and practice (KPA) scale for perinatal palliative care of obstetric nurses suitable for domestic cultural background, and to test its reliability and validity. Methods According to the theory of KAP, the draft of the scale was developed after literature review. Expert consultation was conducted with Delphi method and 604 obstetric nurses were investigated to test the reliability and validity of the scale, and the final version of the scale was formed. Results The KPA scale of perinatal palliative care of obstetric nurses included 3 dimensions, 11 factors, and 51 items. The coefficient was 0.959, and the retest reliability 0.976, and the content validity 0.980; The exploratory factor analysis proposed 11 common factors, with the cumulative variance contribution rate of 87.745%. The confirmatory factor analysis showed that the scale model had a good fit. Conclusion The KPA scale for perinatal palliative care of obstetric nurses has good reliability and validity, and can be used in clinical practice as an evaluation scale.

Key words: perinatal period, palliative care, Delphi method, knowledge,attitude,and practice, scale, reliability, validity

中图分类号: 

  • R473.71
[1] Lefkowits C, Solomon C.Palliative care in obstetrics and gynecology[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2016,128(6):1403-1420. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001739.
[2] Knighting K, Kirton J, Silverio SA, et al.A network approach to neonatal palliative care education: impact on knowledge, efficacy, and clinical practice[J]. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs,2019,33(4):350-360.DOI:10.1097/JPN.0000000000000437.
[3] Ratislavova K, Buzgova R, Vejvodova J.Perinatal palliative care education: an integrative review[J]. Nurse Educ Today, 2019,82:58-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.08.003.
[4] Wool C, Northam S.The Perinatal Palliative Care Perceptions and Barriers Scale Instrument(c): development and validation[J]. Adv Neonatal Care, 2011,11(6):397-403. DOI: 10.1097/ANC.0b013e318233809a.
[5] Stenekes S, Penner JL, Harlos M, et al.Development and implementation of a survey to assess health-care provider's competency, attitudes, and knowledge about perinatal palliative care[J]. J Palliat Care, 2019,34(3):151-159. DOI: 10.1177/0825859718790627.
[6] Hammond J, Wool C, Parravicini E.Assessment of healthcare professionals' self-perceived competence in perinatal/neonatal palliative care after a 3-day training course[J]. Front Pediatr, 2020,8:571335. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2020.571335.
[7] Swanson JM, Chenitz C, Zalar M, et al.A critical review of human immunodeficiency virus infection and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-related research:the knowledge, attitudes, and practice of nurses[J]. J Prof Nurs, 1990,6(6):341-355.DOI:10.1016/s8755-7223(05)80127-9.
[8] Gemechu H, Monenus E, Feyissa B.Assessment of knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP): public health and economic burden of tuberculosis in Jarso District of West Wollega Zone, Oromia, Western Ethiopia[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2022:3314725. DOI:10.1155/2022/3314725.
[9] 王琦,李领侠,和巾杰,等.医护人员低血糖症知信行问卷的编制及信效度检验[J].护理学报,2021,28(9):9-13.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.09.009.
[10] 信博, 赵秋利, 王楠楠, 等. 消化系统癌症高危人群预防主动行为测评量表的编制与信效度评价[J]. 护理学报, 2021,28(5):6-11. DOI: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.05.006.
[11] 罗伯特·F·德威利斯. 量表编制[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社: 2016.0-231.
[12] 李峥,刘宇. 护理学研究方法[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2018.
[13] 程雪, 许翠萍, 王君芝, 等. 基于计划行为理论无痛分娩意向自评量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2022,37(6):540-546.DOI:10.16821/j.cnki.hsjx.2022.06.012.
[14] 刘凯莉,罗艳艳,姚桂英,等.晚期癌症患者安宁疗护态度量表的汉化及信效度分析[J].护理学报,2022,29(16):11-16.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.16.011.
[15] 李洪成,张茂军,马广斌. SPSS数据分析实用教程[M].北京:人民邮电出版社,2017.
[16] 张萌, 崔倩, 朱长才. 医护人员职业倦怠影响因素的结构方程模型分析[J]. 中华疾病控制杂志, 2022,26(7):808-814. DOI:10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2022.07.011.
[17] 俞舒舒,徐芊芊,王彦林.新筛查模式下出生缺陷发生趋势及产前诊断结果分析[J].中国计划生育学杂志,2022,30(5):1179-1182;1186.
[18] 庄思敏, 李燕, 肖光红, 等. 医疗保健人员围产期姑息照护知识、技能、态度评估工具的研究进展[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2021,27(36):5036-5040.
[19] 谢煜. 基于系统评价与Delphi法构建骨科大手术患者深静脉血栓的护理预防策略研究[D].南京:南京中医药大学,2017.
[1] 郭林芳, 张培莉, 侯晓雅, 李滢, 曹敏, 高超越. 肝癌化疗患者线上线下结合营养干预方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 1-5.
[2] 张玺, 黄静, 汪天华, 李燕, 曹沅, 李明惠, 余立平. 发育障碍儿童养育心理韧性量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 6-11.
[3] 田美雨, 王翠玲, 高若男, 田佳, 刘怡. 妇科肿瘤科护士性健康照护培训方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 18-23.
[4] 全伊萍, 陈霞, 胡琼丹. 脑心健康管理师核心胜任力评价指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(9): 5-9.
[5] 陈芮, 王梅, 唐晓霞, 朱傲雪, 毛惠娜. 基于ERG理论的免疫检查点抑制剂治疗癌症患者护理需求方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 1-5.
[6] 丁心舒, 孙乐菲, 高伟, 鲁琦, 闫畅, 刘德山. 矛盾年龄歧视量表在社区老年人中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 12-16.
[7] 袁华君, 段功香, 陈路桥, 王慧清. 癌症终末期患者救护意愿量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(6): 73-78.
[8] 谭如意, 龙秀红, 马红利, 陈兰. 腰椎间盘突出症患者中医康复健康信息获取行为量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(5): 67-72.
[9] 张钰琳, 朱向伟, 洪慧芳, 卢根娣. 重大传染病突发事件中护士伦理困境量表的研制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(4): 1-6.
[10] 宋彩妮, 郑尧, 宋英, 刘丽华. 癌症照顾者信息隐瞒量表的汉化及在肺癌患者照顾者中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(3): 17-20.
[11] 陈坚, 项丽君, 罗彦嗣, 陈建辉, 崔艳丽, 廖琳, 颜明玉, 张晓梅. 脑卒中后吞咽障碍患者“互联网+”延续性康复管理方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(24): 1-6.
[12] 杨晓燕, 王静, 杨亚平. 上海市护理院护士失禁相关性皮炎知信行的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(24): 18-22.
[13] 李小梅, 陶明, 李茜茜, 李琳琳, 李春. 基于症状管理理论神经源性膀胱患者自我管理干预方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(22): 61-66.
[14] 关亚萍, 郑薇亮, 孙丽军, 陈媛, 丁洁莹, 许佳佳. 护士主导的心脏直视术后患者早期四级活动方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(22): 67-72.
[15] 邹兆华, 卿伟, 朱茂才, 张继权, 易子涵, 胡秀. 连续性肾脏替代治疗护理敏感质量指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(2): 70-74.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!