以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (16): 11-16.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.16.011

• 研究生园地 • 上一篇    下一篇

晚期癌症患者安宁疗护态度量表的汉化及信效度分析

刘凯莉1, 罗艳艳1, 姚桂英1, 朱智玲2a, 郭华2b, 杜诣深1, 秦立伟1, 吴慧敏1, 李佳波1   

  1. 1.新乡医学院 护理学院,河南 新乡 453000;
    2.新乡市中心医院 a.护理部;b.肿瘤内科二,河南 新乡 453000
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-18 出版日期:2022-08-25 发布日期:2022-09-07
  • 通讯作者: 罗艳艳（1965-）,女,河南新乡人,硕士,教授,新乡医学院护理学院院长。E-mail:13937315599@163.com
  • 作者简介:刘凯莉（1997-）,女,河南夏邑人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读。
  • 基金资助:
    2021年河南省研究生教育改革与质量提升工程项目（YJS2021KC23）

Translation of Palliative Care Attitudes Scale and Its Reliability and Validity

LIU Kai-li1, LUO Yan-yan1, YAO Gui-ying1, ZHU Zhi-ling2a, GUO Hua2b, DU Yi-shen1, QIN Li-wei1, WU Hui-min1, LI Jia-bo1   

  1. 1. School of Nursing, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang 453000,China;
    2a. Dept. of Nursing Administration; 2b. Dept. of Oncology, Xinxiang Central Hospital, Xinxiang 453000, China
  • Received:2022-03-18 Online:2022-08-25 Published:2022-09-07

PDF (PC)

568

赞

摘要： 目的 对安宁疗护态度量表（Palliative Care Attitudes Scale,PCAS-9）进行汉化,并检验其信效度。方法 通过Brislin模型汉化量表,经过文化调适后,选取440名癌症晚期患者进行测试,检验量表的信度效度。结果 中文版安宁疗护态度量表共有9个条目,探索性因子分析提取3个公因子,累积方差贡献率为81.518%。验证性因子分析显示模型的各项指标均达到标准,模型拟合良好。总量表的Cronbach α系数为0.863,各个分量表的Cronbach α系数分别为0.875、0.901、0.872;2周后量表总的重测信度为0.862,各个分量表的重测信度为0.762、0.747、0.910。结论 中文版安宁疗护态度量表具有较好的信效度,可用于测评晚期癌症患者对安宁疗护的态度。

关键词: 晚期癌症患者, 安宁疗护态度量表, 信度, 效度

Abstract: Objective To translate the Palliative Care Attitudes Scale (PCAS-9) and to test the reliability and validity. Methods The PCAS-9 was translated according to the Brislin translation model. After cultural adjustment, 440 patients with advanced cancer were selected to complete the scale to test the reliability and validity. Results The Chinese version of the scale consisted of 9 items. Exploratory factor analysis was used to extract three common factors, and the factor cumulative variance contribution rate was 81.518%. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that all the indicators of the model reached the criteria and the model fitted well. The Cronbach's α coefficient of the total scale was 0.863, and the Cronbach's α coefficient of each subscale 0.875, 0.901, and 0.872, respectively. After 2 weeks, the total retest reliability of the scale was 0.862, and the retest reliability of each subscale was 0.762, 0.747, and 0.910 respectively. Conclusion The Chinese version of PCAS-9 had good reliability and validity and could be used to evaluate the attitudes toward palliative care in advanced cancer patients.

Key words: patient with advanced cancer, Palliative Care Attitudes Scale, reliability, validity

中图分类号: 

  • R473.73
[1] Kavalieratos D, Corbelli J, Zhang D, et al.Association Between Palliative Care and Patient and Caregiver Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis[J]. JAMA, 2016, 316(20):2104-2114. DOI:10.1001/jama.2016.16840.
[2] Fulton JJ, Leblanc TW, Cutson TM, et al.Integrated Outpatient Palliative Care for Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis[J]. Palliat Med, 2019, 33(2):123-134. DOI:10.1177/0269216318812633.
[3] Gaertner J, Siemens W, Meerpohl JJ, et al.Effect of Specialist Palliative Care Services on Quality of Life in Adults with Advanced Incurable Illness in Hospital, Hospice, or Community Settings: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis[J]. BMJ, 2017, 357: j2925. DOI:10.1136/bmj.j2925.
[4] Szekendi MK, Vaughn J, Lal A, et al.The Prevalence of Inpatients at 33 U.S. Hospitals Appropriate for and Receiving Referral to Palliative Care[J]. J Palliat Med, 2016, 19(4): 360-372. DOI:10.1089/jpm.2015.0236.
[5] Shalev A, Phongtankuel V, Kozlov E, et al.Awareness and Misperceptions of Hospice and Palliative Care: A Population-based Survey Study[J]. Am J Hosp Palliat Care, 2018, 35(3):431-439. DOI:10.1177/1049909117715215.
[6] Colins A, Mclachlan SA, Philip J.Initial Perceptions of Palliative Care:An Exploratory Qualitative Study of Patients with Advanced Cancer and Their Family Caregivers[J]. Palliat Med, 2017, 31(9):825-832. DOI:10.1177/0269216317696420.
[7] Omilion-hodges LM,Swords NM. The Grim Reaper, Hounds of Hell, and Dr. Death:The Role of Storytelling for Palliative Care in Competing Medical Meaning Systems[J]. Health Commun, 2017, 32(10):1272-1283.DOI:10.1080/10410236.2016.1219928.
[8] Heydari H, Hojjat-assari S, Almasian M, et al. Exploring Health Care Providers' Perceptions about Home-based Palliative Care in Terminally Ill Cancer Patients[J]. BMC Palliat Care,2019,18(1):66.DOI:10.1186/s12904-019-0452-3.
[9] Wang LP, Li YJ, Yan WZ, et al.Development and Psychometric Testing Chinese Version of the Frommelt Attitude Toward Care of the Dying Scale, form B in Nurses and Nursing Students[J]. J Cancer Educ, 2016, 31(1):123-130. DOI:10.1007/s13187-015-0810-7.
[10] Bushunow V, Alamgir L, Arnold RM, et al.Palliative Care Attitudes and Experiences among Resident Physicians at Historically Black Colleges and Universities[J]. J Pain Symptom Manage, 2022, 63(1):106-111. DOI:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.07.005.
[11] Milne D, Aranda S, Jefford M, et al.Development and Validation of a Measurement Tool to Assess Perceptions of Palliative Care[J]. Psychooncology, 2013, 22(4):940-946.DOI: 1 0.1002/pon.3071.
[12] Perry LM, Hoerger M, Malhotra S, et al.Development and Validation of the Palliative Care Attitudes Scale (PCAS-9): A Measure of Patient Attitudes toward Palliative Care[J]. J Pain Symptom Manage, 2020, 59(2):293-301.DOI:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.09.008.
[13] Santo RM, Ribeiro-ferreira F, Alves MR, et al. Enhancing the Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation Process: Linguistic and Psychometric Testing of the Brazilian-portuguese Version of a Self-report Measure for Dry Eye[J]. J Clin Epidemiol,2015,68(4):370-378.DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.07.009.
[14] 侯艳, 张云, 高蓉, 等. 恶性肿瘤患者疼痛认知量表的汉化和信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(4):62-66. DOI: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.04.062.
[15] 李铮, 刘宇. 护理学研究方法[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2012.
[16] Mosier CI, Mcquitty JV.Methods of Item Validation and Abacs for Item-test Correlation and Critical Ratio of Upper-lower Difference[J]. Psychometrika,1940,5(1):57-65.DOI: 10.1007/BF02288561.
[17] Grant J, Davis L, Health. Selection and Use of Content Experts for Instrument Development[J].Res Nurs Health, 1997, 20(3): 269-274. DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199706)20:33.0.CO;2-G.
[18] 刘丽萍, 周春兰, 吴艳妮, 等. 情绪抑制量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(8):6-10. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.08.006.
[19] Bentler P, Bonett douglas G. Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures[J]. Psychol Bull, 1980, 88(3):588-606. DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588.
[20] Barbaranelli C, Lee C S, Vellone E, et al.The Problem with Cronbach's Alpha[J]. Nurs Res, 2015, 64(2):140-145.DOI:10.1097/NNR.0000000000000079.
[21] Polit D F, Beck CT, Owen SV.Is the CVI an Acceptable Indicator of Content Validity? Appraisal and Recommendations[J]. Res Nurs Health, 2007, 30(4): 459-467. DOI: 10.1002/nur.20199.
[22] 邱皓政. 量化研究与统计分析:SPSS中文视窗版数据分析范例解析[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2009.
[23] 李冬, 余丽丽, 张维, 等. 中文版医疗社会支持量表应用于不孕症患者的信效度分析[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(20): 66-70. DOI: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.20.066.
[24] 吴明隆. 问卷统计分析实务:SPSS操作与应用[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2010.
[25] 史静琤, 莫显昆, 孙振球. 量表编制中内容效度指数的应用[J]. 中南大学学报(医学版), 2012, 37(2):152-155. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7347.2012.02.007.
[26] Field A.Discovering Statistics Using SPSS[M]. United Kingdom:Sage Publications Ltd, 2005.
[27] Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guilemin F.Guidelines for the Process of Cross-cultural Adaptation of Self-report Measures[J]. Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 2000, 25(24):3186-3191. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014.
[28] Brislin R.Back-translation for Cross-cultural Research[J]. J Crosscult Psychol,1970, 1(3):185-216.DOI:10.1177/135910457000100301.
[29] 信博, 赵秋利, 王楠楠, 等. 消化系统癌症高危人群预防主动行为测评量表的编制与信效度评价[J].护理学报, 2021, 28(5):6-11. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.05.006.
[30] 王琦, 李领侠, 和巾杰, 等. 医护人员低血糖症知信行问卷的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(9):9-13. DOI: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.09.009.
[1] 张玺, 黄静, 汪天华, 李燕, 曹沅, 李明惠, 余立平. 发育障碍儿童养育心理韧性量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 6-11.
[2] 丁心舒, 孙乐菲, 高伟, 鲁琦, 闫畅, 刘德山. 矛盾年龄歧视量表在社区老年人中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 12-16.
[3] 袁华君, 段功香, 陈路桥, 王慧清. 癌症终末期患者救护意愿量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(6): 73-78.
[4] 谭如意, 龙秀红, 马红利, 陈兰. 腰椎间盘突出症患者中医康复健康信息获取行为量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(5): 67-72.
[5] 张钰琳, 朱向伟, 洪慧芳, 卢根娣. 重大传染病突发事件中护士伦理困境量表的研制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(4): 1-6.
[6] 宋彩妮, 郑尧, 宋英, 刘丽华. 癌症照顾者信息隐瞒量表的汉化及在肺癌患者照顾者中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(3): 17-20.
[7] 张国春, 李海云, 褚梁梁, 程雪, 王君芝. 产科护士围产期姑息照护知信行量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(2): 6-11.
[8] 罗铎麟, 杨春清, 高萍, 胡清文, 徐小群. 2型糖尿病心理痛苦量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(19): 24-30.
[9] 简称苹, 张汉卿, 王丽英, 田海艳, 彭向东, 张亚楠, 蔡德芳. 本科护生自我调节学习策略量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(18): 12-15.
[10] 王晓宁, 缪群芳, 李培清, 辛思莹, 黄姚姚. 自杀公众污名量表的汉化及在中国公众人群中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(17): 1-7.
[11] 朱亚晋, 王朝辉, 代明珠, 王琳, 孙莹莹. 临床护士文化能力量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(17): 46-50.
[12] 张玉霞, 樊晓辉, 王雪皎, 刘雨安, 李乐之. 正念自我照护量表的汉化及其在ICU护士中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(15): 46-51.
[13] 陶伏莹, 蒋佳男, 付东英, 田莹莹. 基于保护动机理论手术室护士外科手术烟雾防护意愿量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(15): 73-78.
[14] 杨晨, 宋慧娟, 覃承诃, 杨静华, 龚雪, 黄文嫣. 骨搬运患者出院准备度评估量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(14): 1-5.
[15] 项倩妹, 唐惠艳, 王建新, 张慧慧, 刘欣雨, 李春辉. 儿科专科护士核心能力量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(14): 74-78.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!