以质量求发展,以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (15): 24-27.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.15.024

• 护理教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

临床带教教师隐性知识共享量表的编制及信效度检验

徐立敏1a, 钱志刚1b   

  1. 1.蚌埠医学院 a.护理学院; b.发展规划处,安徽 蚌埠 233030
  • 收稿日期:2022-02-28 出版日期:2022-08-10 发布日期:2022-09-07
  • 通讯作者: 钱志刚(1968-),男,安徽池州人,博士,教授,硕士研究生导师。E-mail:qianzg666@sina.com
  • 作者简介:徐立敏(1995-),女,安徽淮南人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读。E-mail:1969639776@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    安徽省蚌埠医学院研究生科研创新计划项目(Byycxz1029)

Construction of Clinical Teachers' Tacit Knowledge Sharing Scale and Its Reliability and Validity

XU Li-mina, Qian Zhi-gangb   

  1. a. School of Nursing; b. Development and Planning Division, Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu 233030, China
  • Received:2022-02-28 Online:2022-08-10 Published:2022-09-07

摘要: 目的 编制适用于临床教学领域的隐性知识共享量表并检验其信效度。方法 查阅相关文献以SECI模型为理论框架,辅以质性访谈汇总主题形成量表条目池,经过专家函询和预调查形成临床带教教师隐性知识共享的测试量表。于2021年11月—2022年2月采用便利抽样法,选取安徽省三级甲等综合性医院的325名临床带教教师进行问卷调查并检验量表的信效度。结果 结构效度检验中探索性因子分析共提取2个公因子,各因子载荷均>0.500,累计方差贡献率为61.428%;验证性因子分析中各模型拟合指标良好;内容效度检验中2次专家函询中的平均内容效度指数分别为0.930、0.986。信度检验中量表的 Cronbach α 系数为0.761,折半信度系数为 0.775,重测信度系数为0.996。结论 临床带教教师隐性知识共享量表信效度较好,分为2个维度和8个条目,可作为临床带教教师评估隐性知识共享水平的测评工具。

关键词: 临床带教教师, 隐性知识共享, 量表编制, 信度, 效度

Abstract: Objective To construct a tacit knowledge sharing scale for clinical teaching and test its reliability and validity. Methods With the SECI model as the theoretical framework, combined with literature review and semi-structured interviews, the initial item pool was formed, and the test scale of tacit knowledge sharing of clinical teachers was formed after expert consultation and pre-investigation. Convenience sampling was used to conduct a questionnaire survey among 325 clinical teachers in tertiary grade-A general hospitals in Anhui Province from November 2021 to February 2022, and the reliability and validity were tested. Results In validity test, exploratory factor analysis extracted two common factors with factor load greater than 0.500, and cumulative variance contribution rate was 61.428%; in confirmatory factor analysis, the fitting indexes of each model were good. The average content validity index of the two-round expert consultation in the content validity test was 0.930 and 0.986, respectively. Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.761; split-half reliability coefficient 0.775, and the test-retest reliability coefficient 0.996. Conclusion The constructed clinical teachers' tacit knowledge sharing scale consists of two dimensions and eight items. The scale has good reliability and validity and can be used as a tool to evaluate tacit knowledge sharing in clinical teachers.

Key words: clinical teacher, tacit knowledge sharing, scale construction, reliability, validity

中图分类号: 

  • R47
[1] Yoo KH, Zhang YA, Yun EK. Registered Nurses (RNs)' Knowledge Sharing and Decision-making: The Mediating Role of Organizational Trust[J].Int Nurs Rev, 2019, 66(2):234-241.DOI: 10.1111/inr.12488.
[2] Lunden A, Teräs M, Kvist T,et al.A Systematic Review of Factors Influencing Knowledge Management and the Nurse Leaders' Role[J].J Nurs Manag, 2017,25(6):407-420.DOI: 10.1111/jonm.12478.
[3] Wong CSY, Chan HYL, Aboo G, et al.Associations of Preceptors' Training Needs with Clinical Teaching Experience and Training Received[J].Contin Educ Nurs, 2022, 53(4):165-170.DOI:10.3928/00220124-20220311-06.
[4] Rodrigues NG, Han CQY, Devi KM, et al.Perspectives of Nurse Preceptors on a Web-based Clinical Pedagogy Program and Clinical Teaching: A Descriptive Qualitative Study[J].Nurs Health Sci, 2022, 24(1):214-223.DOI:10.1111/nhs.12916.
[5] Van Den Heuvel SCGH, Goossens PJJ, Terlouw C,et al.Self-Management Education for Bipolar Disorders: A Hermeneutic-phenomenological Study on the Tacit Knowledge of Mental Health Nurses[J].Issues Ment Health Nurs, 2019,40(11):942-950.DOI:10.1080/01612840.2019.1636166.
[6] 郑雯,丑安,张礼宾,等.高职护生隐性知识能力评价体系的构建研究[J].护理学报,2018,25(20):31-36.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2018.20.031.
[7] 李晓霞,周春兰,胡明钰,等.基于在线沟通的护理硕士研究生对临床带教需求的质性研究[J].护理学报,2019,26(11):24-27.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2019.11.024.
[8] 吴明隆. 问卷统计分析实务-SPSS 操作与应用[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社, 2010:181-244.
[9] 何红艳,周体,曾登芬,等.临床护理教师胜任力评价量表的研制及信效度检验[J].护理学报,2020,27(24):11-14.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.24.011.
[10] 刘瑜,周春兰,周君桂,等.神经源性膀胱患者自我管理量表的编制及信效度检验[J].护理学报,2021,28(07):64-68.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.07.064.
[11] 吴明隆. 结构方程模型-AMOS 的操作与应用[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社, 2010:37-62.
[12] Humphrey-Murto S, Varpio L, Wood TJ, et al.The Use of the Delphi and Other Consensus Group Methods in Medical Education Research: A Review[J].Acad Med, 2017, 92(10):1491-1498.DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000001812.
[13] 唐鹤,乔宇,朱佳美,等.中文版老年人睡眠类药物使用情况调查问卷的跨文化调适[J].护理学报,2021,28(17):11-14.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.17.011.
[14] 李玉,刘俐惠,石增霞,等.中文版肿瘤信息满意度量表在头颈肿瘤患者中的信效度分析[J].护理学报, 2019,26(9):10-15.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2019.09.010.
[15] 鄢建军,杨建国,江燕,等.临床护理人员创新能力评价量表的构建及信效度检验[J].中华护理杂志, 2018, 53(10):1213-1217.DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2018.10.011.
[1] 张玺, 黄静, 汪天华, 李燕, 曹沅, 李明惠, 余立平. 发育障碍儿童养育心理韧性量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 6-11.
[2] 丁心舒, 孙乐菲, 高伟, 鲁琦, 闫畅, 刘德山. 矛盾年龄歧视量表在社区老年人中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 12-16.
[3] 袁华君, 段功香, 陈路桥, 王慧清. 癌症终末期患者救护意愿量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(6): 73-78.
[4] 谭如意, 龙秀红, 马红利, 陈兰. 腰椎间盘突出症患者中医康复健康信息获取行为量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(5): 67-72.
[5] 张钰琳, 朱向伟, 洪慧芳, 卢根娣. 重大传染病突发事件中护士伦理困境量表的研制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(4): 1-6.
[6] 宋彩妮, 郑尧, 宋英, 刘丽华. 癌症照顾者信息隐瞒量表的汉化及在肺癌患者照顾者中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(3): 17-20.
[7] 张国春, 李海云, 褚梁梁, 程雪, 王君芝. 产科护士围产期姑息照护知信行量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(2): 6-11.
[8] 罗铎麟, 杨春清, 高萍, 胡清文, 徐小群. 2型糖尿病心理痛苦量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(19): 24-30.
[9] 简称苹, 张汉卿, 王丽英, 田海艳, 彭向东, 张亚楠, 蔡德芳. 本科护生自我调节学习策略量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(18): 12-15.
[10] 王晓宁, 缪群芳, 李培清, 辛思莹, 黄姚姚. 自杀公众污名量表的汉化及在中国公众人群中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(17): 1-7.
[11] 朱亚晋, 王朝辉, 代明珠, 王琳, 孙莹莹. 临床护士文化能力量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(17): 46-50.
[12] 张玉霞, 樊晓辉, 王雪皎, 刘雨安, 李乐之. 正念自我照护量表的汉化及其在ICU护士中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(15): 46-51.
[13] 陶伏莹, 蒋佳男, 付东英, 田莹莹. 基于保护动机理论手术室护士外科手术烟雾防护意愿量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(15): 73-78.
[14] 杨晨, 宋慧娟, 覃承诃, 杨静华, 龚雪, 黄文嫣. 骨搬运患者出院准备度评估量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(14): 1-5.
[15] 项倩妹, 唐惠艳, 王建新, 张慧慧, 刘欣雨, 李春辉. 儿科专科护士核心能力量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(14): 74-78.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!