以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (9): 10-15.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2019.09.010

• 研究生园地 • 上一篇    下一篇

中文版肿瘤信息满意度量表在头颈肿瘤患者中的信效度分析

李玉1, 刘俐惠2a, 石增霞2b, 亢东琴3, 陈志琦1, 王自盼1, 王璟1, 郭红1, 岳树锦1   

  1. 1.北京中医药大学 护理学院,北京 102488;
    2.北京世纪坛医院 a.护理部;b.耳鼻喉头颈外科,北京 100038;
    3.北京大学肿瘤医院暨北京市肿瘤防治研究所 护理部,北京 100142
  • 收稿日期:2018-10-21 发布日期:2020-07-17
  • 通讯作者: 岳树锦（1976-）,女,山东聊城人,博士,副教授,硕士研究生导师。E-mail:yueliang874@126.com
  • 作者简介:李 玉（1992-）,女,山东淄博人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读。

Reliability and Validity of Chinese Version of Satisfaction with Cancer Information Profile inPatients with Head and Neck Cancer

LI Yu1, LIU Li-hui, SHI Zeng-xia, KANG Dong-qin3, CHEN Zhi-qi1, WANG Zi-pan1, WANG Jing1, GUO Hong1, YUE Shu-jin1   

  1. 1. School of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 102488, China;
    2a. Dept.of Nursing Administration;
    2b. Dept. of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Beijing 100038, China;
    3. Dept. of Nursing Administration, Beijing University Cancer Hospital, Beijing Institute of Cancer Research, Beijing 100142, China
  • Received:2018-10-21 Published:2020-07-17

PDF (PC)

286

赞

摘要： 目的 本研究对肿瘤信息满意度量表进行跨文化调试,并在头颈肿瘤患者中验证了量表的信效度。方法 采用Brislin翻译步骤对量表进行翻译与引进。本研究采用Cronbach α系数评价量表内部一致性,通过内容效度、集合效度、区别效度和探索性因子分析评价量表效度。结果 量表的内容效度为0.875~1.000,肿瘤信息满意度分量表A的集合效度为0.649~0.787,区别效度为0.118~0.422,各因子间的相关系数r的范围为0.458~0.557;探索性因子分析中KMO值为0.809,共提取出3个公因子：不良反应,长远影响,社会/经济影响;累积解释总变异的 54.92%;肿瘤信息满意度分量表A与B的Cronbach α系数分别为 0.826、0.947。结论 中文版肿瘤信息满意度量表具有良好的信度和效度,适合作为评估头颈肿瘤患者信息满意度的测评工具。

关键词: 头颈肿瘤, 信息满意度, 信度, 效度

Abstract: Objective To conduct cross-cultural adaptation and analyze the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Satisfaction with Cancer Information Profile (SCIP) in patients with head and neck cancer. Methods Brislin's translation steps were used to translate and introduce the scale. The internal consistency of the scale was evaluated with Cronbach α coefficient and the validity of the scale by content validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity and exploratory factor analysis. Results The content validity of the scale was 0.875~1.000. The convergent validity of subscale SCIP-A was 0.649~0.787; the distinguishing validity 0.118~0.422, and the range of correlation coefficient 0.458~0.557. In exploratory factor analysis, the KMO value was 0.809. Three common factors (side effect, long-term effect, social / economic impact) were extracted, and 54.92% of the total variation was explained. The Cronbach α coefficients of SCIP-A and SCIP-B were 0.826 and 0.947, respectively. Conclusion The Chinese version of SCIP has good reliability and validity and is suitable for monitoring information satisfaction of head and neck cancer patients.

Key words: head and neck tumor, satisfaction with cancer information, reliability, validity

中图分类号: 

  • R473.73
[1] 武燕燕,郑一宁,赵立新,等.癌症患者医疗信息满意度研究进展[J].中国护理管理杂志, 2012, 12(5):84-87.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2012.05.027.
[2] Iconomou G, Viha A, Koutras A, et al.Impact of Providing Booklets about Chemotherapy to Newly Presenting Patients with Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial[J]. Ann Oncol, 2006,17(3):515-520.DOI:10.1093/annonc/mdj098.
[3] Griggs J J, Sorbero M E, Mallinger J B, et al.Vitality, Mental Health, and Satisfaction with Information after Breast Cancer[J]. Patient Educ Couns, 2007,66(1):58-66.DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2006.10.008.
[4] Longacre M L.Cancer Caregivers Information Needs and Resource Preferences[J]. J Cancer Educ, 2013, 28(2):297-305.DOI:10.1007/s13187-013-0472-2.
[5] Koizumi A, Matsushima E, Mochizuki Y, et al.Changes in the Psychological Characteristics of Oral Cancer Patients in the Perioperative Period: A Quantitative Evaluation[J]. J Med Dent Sci,2013,60(1):41-53.DOI:10.11480/jmds.600105.
[6] Wells M, Cunningham M, Lang H, et al.Distress, Concerns and Unmet Needs in Survivors of Head and Neck Cancer: A Cross-sectional Survey[J]. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl),2015,24(5):748-760.DOI:10.1111/ecc.12370.
[7] Henry M, Habib L A,Morrison M,et al.Head and Neck Cancer Patients Want Us to Support Them Psychologically in the Posttreatment Period: Survey Results[J]. Palliat Support Care,2014,12(6):481-493.DOI:10.1017/S1478951513000771.
[8] Nekhlyudov L, Lacchetti C, Davis N B, et al.Head and Neck Cancer Survivorship Care Guideline: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Endorsement of the American Cancer Society Guideline[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2017, 35(14):1606-1621.DOI:10.1200/JCO.2016.71.8478.
[9] Bower J E, Bak K, Berger A, et al.Screening, Assessment, and Management of Fatigue in Adult Survivors of Cancer: An American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Adaptation[J]. J Clin Oncol,2014,32(17):1840-1850.DOI:10.1200/JCO.2013.53.4495.
[10] Harrison J D, Young J M, Price M A,et al.What Are the Unmet Supportive Care Needs of People with Cancer? A Systematic Review[J]. Support Care Cancer, 2009,17(8):1117-1128.DOI:10.1007/s00520-009-0615-5.
[11] Fang C Y, Heckman C J.Informational and Support Needs of Patients with Head and Neck Cancer: Current Status and Emerging Issues[J]. Cancers Head Neck,2016(1):15.DOI: 10.1186/s41199-016-0017-6.
[12] Hankins M C, Llewellyn C D.Is the Satisfaction with Cancer Information Profile (SCIP) Valid for Tailoring Information for Patients with Head and Neck Cancer?[J]. BMC Cancer,2008(8):164.DOI:10.1186/1471-2407-8-164.
[13] Llewellyn C D, Mcgurk M, Weinman J.How Satisfied Are Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) Patients with the Information They Receive Pre-treatment? Results from the Satisfaction with Cancer Information Profile (SCIP)[J]. Oral Oncol, 2006, 42(7):726-734.DOI:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2005.11.013.
[14] Llewellyn C D, Horne R, Mcgurk M,et al.Development and Preliminary Validation of a New Measure to Assess Satisfaction with Information among Head and Neck Cancer Patients: The Satisfaction with Cancer Information Profile (SCIP)[J]. Head Neck, 2006, 28(6):540-548.DOI:10.1002/hed.20450.
[15] Cha E S, Kim K H, Erlen J A.Translation of Scales in Cross-cultural Research: Issues and Techniques[J]. J Adv Nurs ,2007,58(4):386-395.DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04242.x.
[16] Martin J S, Vincenzi C, Spirig R.Principles and Methods of Good Practice for the Translation Process for Instruments of Nursing Research and Nursing Practice[J]. Pflege, 2007,20(3):157-163.DOI:10.1024/1012-5302.20.3.157.
[17] Hankins M C, Llewellyn C D.Is the Satisfaction with Cancer Information Profile (SCIP) Valid for Tailoring Information for Patients with Head and Neck Cancer?[J]. BMC Cancer,2008,8:164.DOI:10.1186/1471-2407-8-164.
[18] 史静琤,莫显昆,孙振球. 量表编制中内容效度指数的应用[J].中南大学学报(医学版),2012,37(2):49-52.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7347.2012.02.007.
[19] 吴明隆. 问卷统计分析实务--SPSS操作与应用[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2014:216-244.
[20] 倪宗珊. 医学统计学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2003.
[21] 陈维,黄程琰,毛天欣,等.多维测评工具聚敛和区分效度的SEM分析--以领悟社会支持量表为例[J].西南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2016,41(2):136-140.DOI:10.13718/j.cnki.xsxb.2016.02.024.
[22] 吴静芬,罗阳.口腔颌面部肿瘤患者身心康复影响因素及护理现状分析[J].护理学报,2010,17(10B):16-20.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9969.2010.20.006.
[23] 梁赛,谌永毅,许湘华,等.头颈部肿瘤患者生存质量与应对方式及社会支持的相关性研究[J].护理学报,2017,24(10):62-66. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2017.10.062.
[1] 张玺, 黄静, 汪天华, 李燕, 曹沅, 李明惠, 余立平. 发育障碍儿童养育心理韧性量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 6-11.
[2] 丁心舒, 孙乐菲, 高伟, 鲁琦, 闫畅, 刘德山. 矛盾年龄歧视量表在社区老年人中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 12-16.
[3] 袁华君, 段功香, 陈路桥, 王慧清. 癌症终末期患者救护意愿量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(6): 73-78.
[4] 谭如意, 龙秀红, 马红利, 陈兰. 腰椎间盘突出症患者中医康复健康信息获取行为量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(5): 67-72.
[5] 张钰琳, 朱向伟, 洪慧芳, 卢根娣. 重大传染病突发事件中护士伦理困境量表的研制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(4): 1-6.
[6] 宋彩妮, 郑尧, 宋英, 刘丽华. 癌症照顾者信息隐瞒量表的汉化及在肺癌患者照顾者中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(3): 17-20.
[7] 张国春, 李海云, 褚梁梁, 程雪, 王君芝. 产科护士围产期姑息照护知信行量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(2): 6-11.
[8] 罗铎麟, 杨春清, 高萍, 胡清文, 徐小群. 2型糖尿病心理痛苦量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(19): 24-30.
[9] 简称苹, 张汉卿, 王丽英, 田海艳, 彭向东, 张亚楠, 蔡德芳. 本科护生自我调节学习策略量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(18): 12-15.
[10] 王晓宁, 缪群芳, 李培清, 辛思莹, 黄姚姚. 自杀公众污名量表的汉化及在中国公众人群中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(17): 1-7.
[11] 朱亚晋, 王朝辉, 代明珠, 王琳, 孙莹莹. 临床护士文化能力量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(17): 46-50.
[12] 张玉霞, 樊晓辉, 王雪皎, 刘雨安, 李乐之. 正念自我照护量表的汉化及其在ICU护士中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(15): 46-51.
[13] 陶伏莹, 蒋佳男, 付东英, 田莹莹. 基于保护动机理论手术室护士外科手术烟雾防护意愿量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(15): 73-78.
[14] 杨晨, 宋慧娟, 覃承诃, 杨静华, 龚雪, 黄文嫣. 骨搬运患者出院准备度评估量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(14): 1-5.
[15] 项倩妹, 唐惠艳, 王建新, 张慧慧, 刘欣雨, 李春辉. 儿科专科护士核心能力量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(14): 74-78.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!