以质量求发展,以服务铸品牌

Journal of Nursing ›› 2021, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (4): 67-72.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.04.067

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Construction of Early Warning Assessment Scale for High-risk Pregnant Women and Its Reliability and Validity

XIA Jie1,2, DUAN Xia3, ZHANG Jia-nan4, YU Chan5, WANG Ke-ke4   

  1. 1. School College of Medicine, TongjiUniversity, Shanghai 200092, China;
    2. Shanghai Jian QiaoUniversity, Shanghai 201306,China;
    3. Maternal and Infant Health Care Hospital Affiliated to TongjiUniversity, Shanghai 201204, China;
    4. the 10th People's Hospital Affiliated to TongjiUniversity, Shanghai 200072, China;
    5. Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai 200080, China
  • Received:2020-07-15 Online:2021-02-25 Published:2021-03-12

Abstract: Objective To develop an early warning assessment scale for high-risk pregnant women, and to test the reliability and validity and explore its predictive value. Methods With literature review and Delphi expert consultation method, the draft of early warning assessment scale for high-risk pregnant women was formed. The reliability and validity of the scale were tested in 150 high-risk hospitalized pregnant women, and the predictive efficacy of the scale for the occurrence of serious/critical disease in high-risk pregnant women was analyzed. Results The early warning assessment scale for high-risk pregnant women consisted of 4 dimensions and 23 items. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.905, and the 95% confidence interval (CI) ranged from 0.855 to 0.945. The average content validity ratio (CVR) was 0.96 and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and Jordan index were 92.5%, 68.2%, 51.4%, 97.4%, 18.00, 0.53 and 0.61 respectively, and AUROC of the assessment scale was 0.803. AUROC of predicting severe/critical disease was 0.719 and the sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio were 85.7%, 58.1%, 10.23, and 0.64 respectively. Conclusion The early warning assessment scale for high-risk pregnant women constructed in this study has good reliability and validity. It can predict the occurrence of acute obstetric events and critical obstetric diseases. The scale can be used as a tool to evaluate the condition of high-risk pregnant women and provide basis for early warning and evaluation of high-risk pregnant women.

Key words: high-risk pregnant women, early warning, assessment, reliability, validity

CLC Number: 

  • R473.71
[1] WHO Media Centre. Maternal Mortality[EB/OL].(2016-11-20)[2020-06-30].http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs348/zh/.
[2] 吴茜,龚美芳,孙晓,等.住院患者护理高危风险预警预控体系构建与运作[J].护理学报,2015,22(1):16-20.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2015.01.016.
[3] 黄彦清,叶桂香.护理预警在妇产科门诊分诊中的应用[J].护理学报,2016,23(12):27-29.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2016.12.027.
[4] Arora KS, Shields LE, Grobman WA,et al.Triggers,Bundles,Protocols and Checklists-what Every Maternal Care Provider Needs to Know[J].AM J Obstet Gynecol,2016,214(4):444-451.DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2015.10.011.
[5] American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Patient Safety and Quality Improvement.Committee Opinion No.590:Preparing for Clinical Emergencies in Obstetrics and Gynecology[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2014,123(3):722-725.DOI:10.1097/01.AOG.0000444442.04111.c6.
[6] Plante L A. Practice Bulletin No.170:Critical Care in Pregnancy[J].Obstet Gynecol,2016,128(4):e147-e154.DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000001710.
[7] Committee on Practice Bulletins-obstetrics.Practice Bulletin No.183:Postpartum Hemorrhage[J].Obstet Gynecol,2017,130(4):e168-e186.DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000002351.
[8] American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.ACOG Practice Bulletin No.202:Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia[J].Obstet Gynecol,2019,133(1):e1-e25.DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000003018.
[9] American Diabetes Association.Management of Diabetes in Pregnancy:Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2020[J].Diabetes Care, 2020, 43(Suppl 1):S183-S192.DOI:10.2337/dc20-S014.
[10] Regitz-zagrosek V, Roos-hesselink JW,Bauersachs J,et al.2018 ESC Guidelines for the Management of Cardiovascular Diseases During Pregnancy[J]. Eur Heart J, 2018,39(34):3165-3241.DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy340.
[11] Society for Maternal-fetal Medicine(SMFM). Amniotic Fluid Embolism:Diagnosis and Management[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol,2016,215(2):B16-24.DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2016.03.012.
[12] Bowyer L, Robinson HL, Barrett H,et al.SOMANZ Guidelines for the Investigation and Management Sepsis in Pregnancy[J].Aust NZ J Obstet Gyn,2017,57(5):540-551.DOI:10.1111/ajo.12646.
[13] American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.ACOG Practice Bulletin No.196: Thromboembolism in Pregnancy:Correction[J]. Obstet Gynecol,2018,132(4):1068.DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000002923.
[14] 韩微,樊雅静,黄翠琴,等.改良早期预警评分在危重孕产妇护理中的应用效果评价[J].上海护理,2016,16(2):9-12.DOI:1009-8399(2016)02-0009-04.
[15] Singh S, Mcglennan A,England A,et al.A Validation Study of the CEMACH Recommended Modified Early Obstetric Warning System(MEOWS)[J].Anaesthesia,2012,67(1):12-18.DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06896.x.
[16] Paternina-caicedo A, Miranda J, Bourjeily G, et al.Performance of the Obstetric Early Warning Score in Critically Ill Patients for the Prediction of Maternal Death[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol,2017,216(1):58.e1-58.e8.DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2016.09.103.
[17] Hedriana HL, Wiesner S,Downs BG,et al.Baseline Assessment of a Hospital-specific Early Warning Trigger System for Reducing Maternal Morbidity[J].Int J Gynaecol Obstet,2015,132(3):337-341.DOI:10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.07.036.
[18] 岳丽红,郭锦丽.妊娠晚期潜在危重孕妇预警指标体系的构建[J].中国临床护理,2018,10(6):31-35.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-3768.2018.06.007.
[19] 厉跃红,郭娜菲,庄薇.国外产科早期预警系统发展现状及对我国的启示[J].中华围产医学杂志,2017,20(12):855-858.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-9408.2017.12.003.
[20] 吴明隆. 问卷统计分析实务-SPSS操作与应用[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2010:158-265.
[21] Mhyre JM, D’Oria R,Hameed AB,et al.The Maternal Early Warning Criteria:A Proposal from the National Partnership for Maternal Safety[J].J Obst Gyn Neo,2014, 43(6):771-779.DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000000480.
[22] Ryan HM, Jones MA,Payne BA,et al.Validating the Performance of the Modified Early Obstetric Warning System Multivariable Model to Predict Maternal Intensive Care Unit Admission[J].J Obstet Gynaecol Can,2017,39(9):728-733.DOI:10.1016/j.jogc.2017.01.028.
[23] 张灵芳,赵明利,张雪葳,等.待产孕妇风险预警评估工具的构建及评试[J].中国生育健康杂志,2019,30(3):211-214.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-878X.2019.03.003.
[24] 黄晓波,韦琴,文燕,等.早产儿早期预警评分表的编制及信效度检验[J].护理学报,2018,24(15):1-5. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2018.15.001.
[25] 曾欣. 改良早期预警评分在危重孕产妇护理中的应用效果[J].医疗装备,2018,31(12):176-177.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-2376.2018.12.128.
[26] 赵小军. 改良早期预警评分在高危孕产妇护理中的应用价值研究[J].基层医学论坛,2019, 23(15):2111-2112.DOI:10.19435/j.1672-1721.2019.15.023.
[1] ZHANG Xi, HUANG Jing, WANG Tian-hua, LI Yan, CAO Yuan, LI Ming-hui, YU Li-ping. Translation of Parenting Resilience Elements Questionnaire and its validation [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2025, 32(4): 6-11.
[2] CAI Ying-ying, LING Chen, LIU Mian-zhu, ZHOU Jie, ZHANG Jun-feng, CHEN Lian-hua, TIAN Xiao-fei, LUO Bin, CHEN Meng-yun. Methodological quality assessment of guidelines for assessment and management of adult cancer pain [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2025, 32(4): 34-40.
[3] CHEN En-lin, MO Feng-ling, ZHUANG Ze-ming, ZHANG Ming-zhe, ZHOU Jia-kun, HUANG Li-fang, JI Long-fei, ZHANG Li-fang. Assessment tools for unilateral spatial neglect after stroke: a scoping review [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2025, 32(3): 43-49.
[4] LIU Shuo-yi, XIONG Li-juan, LI Ling, WANG Yu-mei, HE Jia, LI Xin, YUAN Shi-lei, GUO Xue-qin, WANG Yang-jing, ZHANG Hui-juan. Quality evaluation and content analysis of clinical practice guidelines for prevention and management of frailty in elderly hospitalized patients [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2025, 32(2): 50-55.
[5] LI Ding-ding, WANG Shuai-you, ZHU Shan-shan, GUO Xin, ZHANG Hui-min, WANG Hong-ru, PAN Qin. Supportive care needs assessment tools for stroke patients: a scoping review [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(9): 48-53.
[6] DING Xin-shu, SUN Le-fei, GAO Wei, LU Qi, YAN Chang, LIU De-shan. Reliability and validity of Ambivalent Ageism Scale in community-dwelling older adults [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(7): 12-16.
[7] TAN Ru-yi, LONG Xiu-hong, MA Hong-li, CHEN Lan. Development of TCM Rehabilitation Health Information Seeking Behavior Scale for patients with lumbar disc herniation and its reliability and validity [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(5): 67-72.
[8] ZHANG Yu-lin, ZHU Xiang-wei, HONG Hui-fang, LU Gen-di. Development of Ethical Dilemma Scale for Nurses in major infectious disease emergencies and its reliability and validity [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(4): 1-6.
[9] WANG Wei, ZHOU Yan-ling, XUE Wen-ping, ZHANG Lin-lin, LIN Shu-qiu. Frailty assessment tools for elderly patients with hip fracture [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(4): 42-47.
[10] ZHANG Guo-chun, LI Hai-yun, CHU Liang-liang, CHENG Xue, WANG Jun-zhi. Development of Knowledge, Belief and Practice Scale for perinatal palliative care of obstetric nurses and its reliability and validity [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(2): 6-11.
[11] LUO Duo-lin, YANG Chun-qing, GAO Ping, HU Qing-wen, XU Xiao-qun. Localization of type 2 diabetes distress assessment system and its reliability and validity [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(19): 24-30.
[12] ZHANG Yi-ran, WANG Kang-mei, ZHU Sheng-cai, ZHU Lu, HUANG Yi. COSMIN guideline-based systematic review of Chinese version of self-management assessment tool for hypertension patients [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(19): 52-57.
[13] ZHU Ya-jin, WANG Zhao-hui, DAI Ming-zhu, WANG Lin, SUN Ying-ying. Translation of Cultural Competence Scale for Clinical Nurses and its reliability and validity [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(17): 46-50.
[14] DAI Qi, LI Fang, ZHU Yuan, ZHANG Xiao-tong. Intelligent care need of patients undergoing lung cancer surgery based on KANO model [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(17): 57-60.
[15] ZHANG Yu-xia, FAN Xiao-hui, WANG Xue-jiao, LIU Yu-an, LI Le-zhi. Translation of Mindful Self-care Scale and its reliability and validity in ICU nurses [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(15): 46-51.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!