以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (18): 6-10.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.18.006

• 研究生园地 • 上一篇    下一篇

膝关节骨性关节炎患者日常生活困难评估量表的汉化及信效度检验

侯爱琳1, 宁宁1,2, 陈佳丽1,2, 李佩芳2, 张林2, 谢艳1, 朱红彦2, 屈俊宏2   

  1. 1.四川大学华西护理学院,四川 成都 610041;
    2.四川大学华西医院 骨科,四川 成都 610041
  • 收稿日期:2023-03-14 出版日期:2023-09-25 发布日期:2023-10-11
  • 通讯作者: 宁宁（1964-）,女,四川遂宁人,本科学历,主任护师,硕士研究生导师,护理学科主任。E-mail：gkningning@126.com
  • 作者简介:侯爱琳（1996-）,女,陕西汉中人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读,护师。
  • 基金资助:
    四川省科学技术厅重点研发项目（2021YFS0068）

Translation of Difficulties in Daily Life of Patients with Osteoarthritis of the Knee Scale and its reliability and validity

HOU Ai-lin1, NING Ning1,2, CHEN Jia-li1,2, LI Pei-fang2, ZHANG Lin2, XIE Yan1, ZHU Hong-yan2, QU Jun-hong2   

  1. 1. West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University,Chengdu 610041, China;
    2. Dept. of Orthopedic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University,Chengdu 610041, China
  • Received:2023-03-14 Online:2023-09-25 Published:2023-10-11

PDF (PC)

390

赞

摘要： 目的 汉化膝关节骨性关节炎患者日常生活困难评估量表并检验信效度。方法 依据Brislin翻译方法对量表进行翻译、回译、跨文化调适;采用便利抽样法对2022年4—12月成都市某三级甲等医院骨科的 450例膝关节骨性关节炎患者进行调查,运用SPSS 25.0 和AMOS 24.0完成量表的项目分析、信效度检验。结果 中文版膝关节骨性关节炎患者日常生活困难评估量表共包含3个维度14个条目,条目的内容效度指数为0.818~1.000,量表的内容效度指数为 0.909,探索性因子分析提取3个公因子,累计方差贡献率为 60.019%;验证性因子分析结果显示,模型拟合可接受,具有较好的结构效度。中文版量表Cronbach α系数为0.891,折半信度为0.861,2周重测信度为0.764,各维度Cronbach α系数为0.779~0.818。结论 中文版膝关节骨性关节炎患者日常生活困难评估量表具备良好的信效度,可作为我国膝关节骨性关节炎患者日常生活困难的有效评估工具。

关键词: 膝关节, 骨性关节炎, 日常生活困难评估量表, 信度, 效度

Abstract: Objective To translate Difficulties in the Daily Life of Patients with Osteoarthritis of the Knee Scale (DDLKOS) into Chinese and to test its reliability and validity. Methods The scale was translated, back-translated, and cross-culturally adapted according to Brislin translation model. A total of 450 patients with knee osteoarthritis in a tertiary grade-A hospital in Chengdu were selected using convenience sampling from April to December 2022 to analyze the reliability and validity of the scale, and the item analysis and reliability and validity test were completed by using SPSS 25.0 and AMOS 24.0. Results The Chinese version of DDLKOS consisted of 14 items in 3 dimensions. Content validity index at the item level was 0.818~1.000, and that at the scale level 0.909. Exploratory factor analysis extracted 3 common factors with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 60.019%. Validation factor analysis showed that model fitting was good and had good structural validity. Cronbach a coefficient of the scale was 0.891, with a half Cronbach α of 0.861 and a 2-week retest reliability of 0.764. Cronbach α coefficient of each dimension ranged from 0.779 to 0.818. Conclusion The Chinese version of DDLKOS has good reliability and validity, and can be used for the assessment of difficulties in the daily life of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee in China.

Key words: knee, osteoarthritis, Difficulties in the Daily Life of Patients with Osteoarthritis of the Knee Scale, reliability, validity

中图分类号: 

  • R473.6
[1] 李慕聪,吴婵媛,冷晓梅.小症状,大负担:骨关节炎流行病学概述[J]. 中华临床免疫和变态反应杂志,2022,16(3):331. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-8705.2022.03.024.
[2] Turner MN, Hernandez DO, Cade W, et al.The role of resistance training dosing on pain and physical function in individuals with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review[J]. Sports Health, 2020, 12(2):200-206.DOI:10.1177/1941738119887183.
[3] Van Doormaal MCM, Meerhoff GA, Vliet Vlieland TPM, et al.A clinical practice guideline for physical therapy in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis[J]. Musculoskeletal Care, 2020, 18(4):575-595. DOI: 10.1002/msc.1492.
[4] Xie F, Li SC, Goeree R, et al.Validation of Chinese Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) in patients scheduled for total knee replacement[J]. Qual Life Res.2008,17(4):595-601.DOI:10.1007/s11136-008-9340-7.
[5] 徐守宇,姚新苗,吴燕,等. 汉化版日本膝关节骨关节炎功能评估量表的信度研究[J]. 中国康复医学杂志,2014,29(8):723-725. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2014.08.006.
[6] Zhao R, Ji Y, Li JJ, et al.Pain empathy and its association with the clinical pain in knee osteoarthritis patients[J]. J Pain Res. 2022, 15:4017-4027. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S379305.[7] Vitaloni M, Botto-van Bemden A, Sciortino Contreras RM, et al. Global management of patients with knee osteoarthritis begins with quality of life assessment: a systematic review[J]. BMC musculoskeletal disord, 2019,20(1):1-12.DOI10.1186/s12891-019-2895-3.
[8] Tanimura C, Morimoto M, Hiramatsu K, et al.Difficulties in the daily life of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: scale development and descriptive study[J]. J Clin Nurs.2011,20(5-6):743-753. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03536.x.
[9] Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al.Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures[J]. Spine,2000,25(24):3186-3191.DOI:10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014.
[10] 叶孝灵,周春兰,黄丛萍,等.脑卒中后失能综合评估量表的汉化与信效度检验[J].护理学报,2022,29(11):65-69. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.11.065.
[11] 王文娜,张振香,张杜杜,等. 照顾者对脑卒中患者自我护理贡献量表的编制及信效度检验[J].中华护理杂志,2023,58(1):39-45. DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2023.01.005.
[12] Ali MU, Harkness K, Vellone E, et al.The Caregiver Contribution to Heart Failure Self-care Instrument: further psychometric testing in a European sample[J]. J Cardiovasc Nurs,2022, 37(6):E187-E196.DOI:10.1097/JCN.0000000000000860.
[13] 罗伯特. F. 德威利斯. 量表编制:理论与应用[M]. 席仲恩, 杜珏,译. 3版. 重庆:重庆大学出版社,2016:61-167.
[14] 刘凯莉,罗艳艳,姚桂英,等. 晚期癌症患者安宁疗护态度量表的汉化及信效度分析[J]. 护理学报,2022,29(16):11-16. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.16.011.
[15] Alavi M, Visentin DC, Thapa DK, et al.Exploratory factor analysis and principal component analysis in clinical studies: which one should you use[J]. J Adv Nurs. 2020, 76(8):1886-1889.DOI: 10.1111/jan.14377.
[16] Shi D, DiStefano C, Maydeu-Olivares A, et al. Evaluating SEM Model fit with small degrees of freedom[J].Multivariate Behav Res. 2022, 57(2-3):179-207. DOI:10.1080/00273171.2020.1868965.
[17] 邱皓政,林碧芳. 结构方程模型的原理与应用[M]. 北京:中国轻工业出版社, 2019:91-99.
[18] 钟海燕,殷锋. IBM SPSS 统计分析与应用[M]. 北京:中国经济出版社, 2018:205-217.
[19] Izquierdo I, Olea J, Abad FJ.Exploratory factor analysis in validation studies:uses and recommendations[J]. Psicothema, 2014,26(3):395-400.DOI:10.7334/psicothema2013.349.
[20] Iheme L, Hirdes JP, Geffen L, et al.Psychometric properties, feasibility, and acceptability of the self-reported interRAI check-up assessment[J].J Am Med Dir Assoc,2022,23(1):117-121. DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2021.06.008.
[21] 朱清,彭兰雅,彭一,等. 医务人员医患沟通能力及防御性医疗行为影响因素的结构方程模型研究[J]. 中国卫生质量管理,2023,30(1):56-61. DOI:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2023.30.1.13.
[22] 查慧贤,严红云,刘扣英,等. 公众健康积极指数量表汉化及在慢性病患者中的信效度研究[J]. 护理学杂志,2023,38(2):104-107.DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2023.02.104.
[23] Pereira D, Severo M, Ramos E, et al.Potential role of age, sex, body mass index and pain to identify patients with knee osteoarthritis[J]. Int J Rheum Dis, 2017, 20(2):190-198. DOI:10.1111/1756-185X.12611.
[24] Deshpande BR, Katz JN, Solomon DH, et al.Number of persons with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis in the US: impact of race and ethnicity, age, sex, and obesity[J]. Arthritis Care Res, 2016, 68(12):1743-1750. DOI:10.1002/acr.22897.
[25] 张琬婷,王红. 中国45岁及以上年龄城乡社区居民的听力残疾患病率调查[J]. 听力学及言语疾病杂志, 2021,29(3):243-247. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7299.2021.03.002.
[26] 刘艳君. 社区50岁以上人群眼健康筛查的结果分析[J]. 中国卫生标准管理,2020, 11(22):17-20. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-9316.2020.22.007.
[27] 刘晴,黄哲宙,郭雁飞,等. 中国50岁及以上人群心脑血管疾病和认知功能的关联[J]. 中华疾病控制杂志,2021,25(3):295-299. DOI:10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2021.03.009.
[1] 张玺, 黄静, 汪天华, 李燕, 曹沅, 李明惠, 余立平. 发育障碍儿童养育心理韧性量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 6-11.
[2] 李亚可, 苏晴晴, 吕静, 李琪, 娄琳彤, 李海燕. 全膝关节置换患者疼痛与睡眠质量纵向关联的组基础模型双轨迹分析[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 6-11.
[3] 丁心舒, 孙乐菲, 高伟, 鲁琦, 闫畅, 刘德山. 矛盾年龄歧视量表在社区老年人中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 12-16.
[4] 袁华君, 段功香, 陈路桥, 王慧清. 癌症终末期患者救护意愿量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(6): 73-78.
[5] 谭如意, 龙秀红, 马红利, 陈兰. 腰椎间盘突出症患者中医康复健康信息获取行为量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(5): 67-72.
[6] 张钰琳, 朱向伟, 洪慧芳, 卢根娣. 重大传染病突发事件中护士伦理困境量表的研制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(4): 1-6.
[7] 宋彩妮, 郑尧, 宋英, 刘丽华. 癌症照顾者信息隐瞒量表的汉化及在肺癌患者照顾者中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(3): 17-20.
[8] 张国春, 李海云, 褚梁梁, 程雪, 王君芝. 产科护士围产期姑息照护知信行量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(2): 6-11.
[9] 罗铎麟, 杨春清, 高萍, 胡清文, 徐小群. 2型糖尿病心理痛苦量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(19): 24-30.
[10] 简称苹, 张汉卿, 王丽英, 田海艳, 彭向东, 张亚楠, 蔡德芳. 本科护生自我调节学习策略量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(18): 12-15.
[11] 王晓宁, 缪群芳, 李培清, 辛思莹, 黄姚姚. 自杀公众污名量表的汉化及在中国公众人群中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(17): 1-7.
[12] 朱亚晋, 王朝辉, 代明珠, 王琳, 孙莹莹. 临床护士文化能力量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(17): 46-50.
[13] 张玉霞, 樊晓辉, 王雪皎, 刘雨安, 李乐之. 正念自我照护量表的汉化及其在ICU护士中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(15): 46-51.
[14] 陶伏莹, 蒋佳男, 付东英, 田莹莹. 基于保护动机理论手术室护士外科手术烟雾防护意愿量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(15): 73-78.
[15] 杨晨, 宋慧娟, 覃承诃, 杨静华, 龚雪, 黄文嫣. 骨搬运患者出院准备度评估量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(14): 1-5.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!