以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (9): 47-51.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.09.047

• 调查研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

患者安全胜任力自评量表的汉化及其在实习护生中的信效度评价

李慧1, 潘玲2, 李博3, 刘晓辉4   

  1. 1.郑州卫生健康职业学院,河南 郑州 450199;
    2.郑州铁路职业技术学院,河南 郑州 450000;
    3.河南大学 护理与健康学院,河南 开封 475000;
    4.河南省中医药大学第二附属医院,河南 郑州 450000
  • 收稿日期:2021-11-30 出版日期:2022-05-10 发布日期:2022-06-09
  • 通讯作者: 李博（1977-）,男,河南焦作人,博士,副教授,硕士研究生导师。E-mail：10210022@vip.henu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:李慧（1986-）,女,河南郑州人,硕士,讲师。
  • 基金资助:
    河南省医学教育研究项目（Wjlx2021128）; 河南省医学教育研究项目（Wjlx2020150）; 河南省中医药文化与管理研究项目（TCM 2019017）

Translation of Patient Safety Competency Self-rating Scale and Its Reliability and Validity

LI Hui1, PAN Ling2, LI Bo3, LIU Xiao-hui4   

  1. 1. Zhengzhou Health Vocational College, Zhengzhou 450199, China;
    2. Zhengzhou Railway Vocational & Technical College, Zhengzhou 450000, China;
    3. School of Nursing and Health, Henan University, Kaifeng 475000, China;
    4. The Second Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou 450000, China
  • Received:2021-11-30 Online:2022-05-10 Published:2022-06-09

PDF (PC)

535

赞

摘要： 目的 汉化患者安全胜任力自评量表,并在实习护生中应用以检验其信效度。方法 遵循 Brislin 翻译指南对量表进行汉化,采用德尔菲专家函询法进行跨文化调适,并于2020年9—11月采用便利抽样的方法选择河南省4家学校或医院501名实习的护生作为研究对象,采用中文版患者安全胜任力自评量表对其进行调查,评价量表的信度和效度。结果 探索性因子分析共提取出7个公因子,累计方差贡献率为69.813%。7个公因子分别命名为安全护理认知、不良事件报告与应对、不良事件沟通、信息与循证护理实践、安全护理实践、安全护理职责、不良事件报告态度,共40个条目。中文版患者安全胜任力自评量表的内容效度指数为0.980,量表总Cronbach α系数为0.948,各维度的Cronbach α系数为0.870~0.916。不同性别、培养层次、实习医院级别的实习护生,其患者安全胜任力总分比较,差异均有统计学意义（P<0.01）。结论 中文版患者安全胜任力自评量表具有良好的信度和效度,可作为评估实习护生患者安全胜任力的有效工具。

关键词: 患者安全, 胜任力, 信度, 效度

Abstract: Objective To translate patient safety competency self-rating scale (PSCSS) into Chinese and test its reliability and validity in nursing students. Methods We followed the Brislin translation guidelines to translate the scale and adopted the Delphi method to conduct cultural adjustment. From September to November 2020, 501 nursing students from 4 colleges or hospitals in Henan province were selected as the research objects to evaluate the reliability and validity of the scale. Results Seven common factors were extracted after exploratory factor analysis, which were named as safe nursing perception, adverse event reporting and response, adverse event communication, information and evidence-based nursing practice, safe nursing practice, safe nursing responsibility, and adverse event reporting attitude. The Chinese version of the scale consisted of 40 items, and the content validity index was 0.980. Exploratory factor analysis showed that the cumulative variance contribution rate was 69.813%; the Cronbach α coefficient of the total scale 0.948, and that of each dimension ranged from 0.870 to 0.916. There were statistically significant differences in the total scores of patient safety competency among trainee nursing students of different genders, training levels, and trainee hospital levels (P<0.01). Conclusion The Chinese version of PSCSS has good reliability and validity, and can be used as an effective tool to evaluate the patient safety competency of nursing students.

Key words: patient safety, competency, reliability, validity

中图分类号: 

  • R47
[1] WHO. 10 Facts on Patient Safety.Geneva: WHO Press, 2018[EB/OL].(2018-03-01)[2020-10-21].http://www.who.int/patientsafety/education/curriculum/en/index.html.
[2] 王青. 患者安全胜任力护士评价量表的编制[D]. 北京:北京协和医学院, 2018.
[3] 童晓菲,周璇,宗雨晴,等. 上海市三级甲等医院护理不良事件的调查[J]. 解放军护理杂志,2016,33(18):22-25. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2016.18.006.
[4] García-Gámez M, Morales-Asencio JM, García-Mayor S, et al.Adverse Events Encountered During Clinical Placements by Undergraduate Nursing Students in Spain[J]. Nurse Educ Today, 2020, 91, 104480. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104480.[5] Stevanin S, Bressan V, Bulfone G, et al. Knowledge and Competence with Patient Safety as Perceived by Nursing Students: The Findings of a Aross-sectional Study[J]. Nurse Educ Today,2015, 35(8):926-934.DOI10.1016/j.nedt.2015.04.002.
[6] 陈洁,薄海欣,张蒙.低年资护士患者安全胜任力的现状调查及分析[J].中国实用护理杂志,2018,34(18):1411-1414. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088.2018.18.012.
[7] 卞薇,吴燕,周明芳,等.患者安全胜任力护理人员自评量表的编制及信效度评价[J].第三军医大学学报, 2016,38(7):776-780. DOI:10.16016/j.1000-5404.201508128.
[8] 郭颖达,姜安丽.护士患者安全胜任力框架的构建[J].解放军护理杂志, 2015, 32(7):64-67.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2015.07.022.
[9] Lee NJ, An JY, Song TM, et al.Psychometric Evaluation of a Patient Safety Competency Self-evaluation Tool for Nursing Students[J]. J Nurs Educ, 2014,53(10):550-562. DOI:10.3928/01484834-20140922-01.
[10] Kim YM, Yoon YS, Hong HC, et al.Effects of a Patient Safety Course Using a Flipped Classroom Approach Among Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Quasi-experimental study[J]. Nurse Educ Today,2019,79:180-187.DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2019.05.033.
[11] Lee SE, Lee MH, Peters AB, et al.Assessment of Patient Safety and Cultural Competencies among Senior Baccalaureate Nursing Students[J].Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2020,17(12):4225. DOI:10.3390/ijerph17124225.
[12] Brislin RW.Back-translation for Cross-cultural Research[J]. J Cross Cult Psychol,1970, 1(3):185-216.DOI:10.1177/135910457000100301.
[13] 中国医院协会. 中国医院质量安全管理[EB/OL]. (2018-05-01)[2020-12-05].http://www.cha.org.cn/uploads/soft/200625.pdf.
[14] 李峥,刘宇. 护理学研究方法[M]. 2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2020.
[15] 徐涓萍,郑洁,周春华.中文版4条目NASA任务负荷量表在ICU护士中的应用与信效度评价[J].护理学报,2018,25(22):55-58.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2018.22.055.
[16] 胡鹏, 路红, 马子程.验证性因子分析中允许误差相关的可行性与条件性[J]. 统计与决策, 2018, 34(19):37-41.DOI:10.13546/j.Cnki.Tjyjc.2018.19.00.
[17] 朱红兵. 问卷调查及统计分析方法:基于SPSS[M].北京:电子工业出版社, 2019.
[18] 胡宇翔,李慧,孔祥萍,等. 实习护生患者安全态度和职业素养的调查[J]. 中国护理管理,2019,19(12):1854-1860. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2019.12.019.
[19] Li H, Kong X, Sun L,et al.Major Educational Factors Associated with Nursing Adverse Events by Nursing Students Undergoing Clinical Practice: A Descriptive Study[J]. Nurse Educ Today, 2021, 98:104738. DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104738.
[20] 杜艳丽,王璐,廖雨风,等.临床情境模拟结合标准化病人教学法在培养护生压疮风险评估能力的应用[J].护理学报,2021, 28(15):10-14. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.15.010.
[21] 郭杰敏,林芳,王晓,等.基于标准化病人的情境模拟教学对本科护生非技术性技能的影响[J].护理学报,2019,26(16):9-12.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2019.16.009.
[22] Kuo SY, Wu JC, Chen HW, et al.Comparison of the Effects of Simulation Training and Problem-based Scenarios on the Improvement of Graduating Nursing Students to Speak up about Medication Errors: A Quasi-experimental Study[J]. Nurse Educ Today, 2020, 87:104359.DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104359.
[23] 王颖,尹世玉,郭晓贝,等.住院患者预防跌倒安全屏障的建立与实践[J].护理学报,2019, 26(15):14-17.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2019.15.014.
[1] 张玺, 黄静, 汪天华, 李燕, 曹沅, 李明惠, 余立平. 发育障碍儿童养育心理韧性量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 6-11.
[2] 陈燕华, 冯梅, 胡佩欣. 粤港联合个案管理师临床实践培训体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(1): 24-28.
[3] 全伊萍, 陈霞, 胡琼丹. 脑心健康管理师核心胜任力评价指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(9): 5-9.
[4] 丁心舒, 孙乐菲, 高伟, 鲁琦, 闫畅, 刘德山. 矛盾年龄歧视量表在社区老年人中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 12-16.
[5] 袁华君, 段功香, 陈路桥, 王慧清. 癌症终末期患者救护意愿量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(6): 73-78.
[6] 罗霞, 刘玉萍, 帅平, 关华, 杨华, 姚晓琴. 体检护士能力绩效考核方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(5): 30-33.
[7] 谭如意, 龙秀红, 马红利, 陈兰. 腰椎间盘突出症患者中医康复健康信息获取行为量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(5): 67-72.
[8] 张钰琳, 朱向伟, 洪慧芳, 卢根娣. 重大传染病突发事件中护士伦理困境量表的研制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(4): 1-6.
[9] 宋彩妮, 郑尧, 宋英, 刘丽华. 癌症照顾者信息隐瞒量表的汉化及在肺癌患者照顾者中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(3): 17-20.
[10] 张国春, 李海云, 褚梁梁, 程雪, 王君芝. 产科护士围产期姑息照护知信行量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(2): 6-11.
[11] 刘慧敏, 姜蕾. 深圳市助产士核心胜任力培训优化策略的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(2): 40-43.
[12] 罗铎麟, 杨春清, 高萍, 胡清文, 徐小群. 2型糖尿病心理痛苦量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(19): 24-30.
[13] 简称苹, 张汉卿, 王丽英, 田海艳, 彭向东, 张亚楠, 蔡德芳. 本科护生自我调节学习策略量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(18): 12-15.
[14] 王晓宁, 缪群芳, 李培清, 辛思莹, 黄姚姚. 自杀公众污名量表的汉化及在中国公众人群中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(17): 1-7.
[15] 朱亚晋, 王朝辉, 代明珠, 王琳, 孙莹莹. 临床护士文化能力量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(17): 46-50.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!