以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

Journal of Nursing ›› 2025, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (2): 56-62.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2025.02.056

Previous Articles     Next Articles

  

  • Received:2024-08-18 Online:2025-01-25 Published:2025-02-20

PDF (PC)

39

Like

CLC Number: 

  • R473.6
[1] 邢丽华, 邹其云, 陈传波. 肺癌术后患者恐动症研究进展[J]. 广东医学, 2021, 42(2):134-137. DOI:10.13820/j.cnki.gdyx.20193234.
[2] 伍思俐. 肺癌术后患者恐动症与护理对策研究进展[J]. 中外医学研究, 2022, 20(21):181-184. DOI:10.14033/j.cnki.cfmr.2022.21.046.
[3] French D, France C, Vigneau F, et al.Fear of movement/(re)injury in chronic pain: a psychometric assessment of the original English version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK)[J]. Pain, 2007, 127(1):42-51. DOI:10.1016/j.pain.2006.07.016.
[4] Prinsen CAC, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM, et al.COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures[J]. Qual Life Res, 2018, 27(5):1147-1157. DOI:10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3.
[5] 陈祎婷, 彭健, 沈蓝君, 等. COSMIN方法介绍:制作患者报告结局测量工具的系统评价[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2021, 36(8):699-703. DOI:10.16821/j.cnki.hsjx.2021.08.005.
[6] 张璐嘉, 李顺平. COSMIN系统综述指南应用简介[J]. 中国药物经济学, 2020, 15(1):5-7. DOI:10.12010/j.issn.1673-5846.2020.01.001.
[7] 施月仙, 张海明, 黄亚琪, 等. 选择健康测量工具的共识标准(COSMIN)偏倚风险评价清单的解读[J]. 中国护理管理, 2021, 21(7):1053-1057. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2021.07.018.
[8] 陈祎婷, 沈蓝君, 彭健, 等. 改良版定量系统评价证据分级方法对患者报告结局测量工具的评价[J]. 解放军护理杂志, 2020,37(10):57-60.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2020.10.014.
[9] Bisson EJ, Katz L, Vader K, et al.Pain-related fear in adults living with chronic pain: development and psychometric validation of a brief form of the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2022,103(5):875-881.e1. DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2021.09.001.
[10] Gómez-Pérez L,López-Martínez AE,Ruiz-Párraga GT.Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK)[J]. J Pain, 2011, 12(4):425-435. DOI:10.1016/j.jpain.2010.08.004.
[11] Hapidou EG, O'Brien MA, Pierrynowski MR, et al. Fear and avoidance of movement in people with chronic pain: psychometric properties of the 11-item Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-11)[J]. Physiother Can, 2012, 64(3):235-241. DOI:10.3138/ptc.2011-10.
[12] Roelofs J, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MH, et al.Fear of movement and (re)injury in chronic musculoskeletal pain: evidence for an invariant two-factor model of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia across pain diagnoses and Dutch, Swedish, and Canadian samples[J]. Pain, 2007, 131(1-2):181-190. DOI:10.1016/j.pain.2007.01.008.
[13] Rusu AC, Kreddig N, Hallner D, et al.Fear of movement/(Re)injury in low back pain: confirmatory validation of a German version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2014,15(1):280. DOI:10.1186/1471-2474-15-280.
[14] Salvador EMES, Franco KFM, Miyamoto GC, et al.Analysis of the measurement properties of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia-11 in patients with fibromyalgia[J]. Braz J Phys Ther, 2021, 25(2):168-174. DOI:10.1016/j.bjpt.2020.05.004.
[15] Swinnen TW, Vlaeyen JWS, Dankaerts W, et al.Activity limitations in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: a role for fear of movement and (re)injury beliefs[J]. J Rheumatol, 2018, 45(3):357-366. DOI:10.3899/jrheum.170318.
[16] Tkachuk GA, Harris CA.Psychometric properties of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia-11 (TSK-11)[J]. J Pain, 2012, 13(10):970-977. DOI:10.1016/j.jpain.2012.07.001.
[17] Woby SR, Roach NK, Urmston M, et al.Psychometric properties of the TSK-11: a shortened version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia[J]. Pain, 2005, 117(1-2):137-144. DOI:10.1016/j.pain.2005.05.029.
[18] Youngcharoen P, Saraboon Y, Aree-Ue S, et al.Psychometric properties of the Thai Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia among older people with knee osteoarthritis[J]. J Med Assoc Thai, 2021, 104(8):1317-1325. DOI:10.35755/jmedassocthai.2021.08.12901.
[19] Houben RM, Leeuw M, Vlaeyen JW, et al.Fear of movement/injury in the general population: factor structure and psychometric properties of an adapted version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia[J]. J Behav Med,2005, 28(5):415-424. DOI:10.1007/s10865-005-9011-x.
[20] Haugen AJ, Gr?vle L, Keller A, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Norwegian version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2008, 33(17):E595-E601. DOI:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817c6c4b.
[21] Cordeiro N, Pezarat-Correia P, Gil J, et al.Portuguese language version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia [13 items][J]. J Musculoskelet Pain, 2013, 21(1):58-63. DOI:10.3109/10582452.2012.762966.
[22] Damsgård E, Fors T, Anke A, et al.The Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia: a Rasch analysis of its properties in subjects with low back and more widespread pain[J]. J Rehabil Med, 2007, 39(9):672-678. DOI:10.2340/16501977-0125.
[23] Monticone M, Giorgi I, Baiardi P, et al.Development of the Italian version of the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK-I): cross-cultural adaptation, factor analysis, reliability, and validity[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2010, 35(12):1241-1246. DOI:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181bfcbf6.
[24] Monticone M, Ambrosini E, Rocca B, et al.Responsiveness of the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia in Italian subjects with chronic low back pain undergoing motor and cognitive rehabilitation[J]. Eur Spine J, 2016, 25(9):2882-2888. DOI:10.1007/s00586-016-4682-2.
[25] Wei X, Xu X, Zhao Y, et al.The Chinese version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia was cross-culturally adapted and validated in patients with low back pain[J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2015,68(10):1205-1212. DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.07.003.
[26] Areeudomwong P, Buttagat V.Reliability and validity of the cross-culturally adapted Thai version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia in knee osteoarthritis patients[J]. Malays J Med Sci, 2017, 24(2):61-67. DOI:10.21315/mjms2017.24.2.8.
[27] Georgoudis G, Raptis K, Koutserimpas C.Cognitive assessment of musculoskeletal pain: validity and reliability of the Greek version of the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia in patients suffering from chronic low back pain[J]. Maedica (Bucur), 2022,17(4):826-832. DOI:10.26574/maedica.2022.17.4.826.
[28] Huang H, Nagao M, Arita H, et al.Reproducibility, responsiveness and validation of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia in patients with ACL injuries[J]. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2019, 17(1):150. DOI:10.1186/s12955-019-1217-7.
[29] Juweid M, Farah K, Hawamdeh Z, et al.Fear of movement/[re]injury among Arabic low back pain patients: establishing the validity of the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-Arabic version[J]. Myopain, 2017, 23(3/4):134-142. DOI:10.1080/24708593.2017.1303014.
[30] Koho P, Aho S, Kautiainen H, et al.Test-retest reliability and comparability of paper and computer questionnaires for the Finnish version of the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia[J]. Physiotherapy, 2014,100(4):356-362.DOI:10.1016/j.physio.2013.11.007.
[31] Lamé IE, Peters ML, Kessels AG, et al.Test--retest stability of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale and the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia in chronic pain over a longer period of time[J]. [J] Health Psychol. 2008,13(6):820-826. DOI:10.1177/1359105308093866.
[32] Lundberg MKE, Styf J, Carlsson SG.A psychometric evaluation of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia-from a physiotherapeutic perspective[J]. Physiother Theory Pract, 2004, 20(2):121-133. DOI:10.1080/09593980490453002.
[33] Nigbur K, Rusu AC, Hallner D, et al.Fear of movement/(re) injury in chronic pain: preliminary validation of a German version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia[J]. Eur J Pain, 2009, 13(S1):S239. DOI:10.1016/S1090-3801(09)60838-7.
[34] Yona T, Yaniv M, Rom J, et al.Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and reliability of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee form and the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia(TSK) into Hebrew[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2023, 143(5):2629-2640. DOI:10.1007/s00402-022-04548-5.
[35] 胡文. 简体中文版TSK和FABQ量表的文化调适及其在退行性腰腿痛中的应用研究[D]. 上海: 第二军医大学, 2012.
[36] 詹述琴, 郑智慧, 黄宝英, 等. 认知信任量表的汉化及在医务人员中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(13):30-34. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2024.13.030.
[37] 宋彩妮, 郑尧, 宋英, 等. 癌症照顾者信息隐瞒量表的汉化及在肺癌患者照顾者中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(3):17-20. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2024.03.017.
[1] XIA Bi-yun, Chen Yu, WU Yan-yan, Hu Yan. Evidence-based practice to reduce incidence of radial artery occlusion in elderly patients after transradial coronary intervention [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2025, 32(2): 37-43.
[2] NIU Qing-mei, YU Ying, ZHANG Qian, JIA Ya-tian, TIAN Yu. Construction of follow-up management evaluation index system for patients with lower extremity atherosclerotic occlusive disease based on “three-dimensional quality structure” model [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2025, 32(2): 70-73.
[3] YAN Ya-ling, LE Mei-ni, YAO Tao-qin, WANG Xue-lian, JIANG Jian-ling, XIN Yi. Construction of perioperative frailty management program for elderly patients with gastrointestinal tumors [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2025, 32(2): 74-78.
[4] BI Ya-xin, DUAN Ye, HE Li-jun, XU Miao, GONG Rong-hua. Best evidence summary for prevention and management of osteoporosis after metabolic, bariatric surgery [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2025, 32(1): 44-49.
[5] LI Ke, HE Yu-qiong, LI Yu-wei, CHANG Ying. Intervention programs for fear of falling in stroke patients: a scoping review [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2025, 32(1): 50-55.
[6] . [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(24): 27-32.
[7] WANG Yue, LIU Guo-qing, NIU Cong-ying, ZHANG Zhen-wei, SUN Jian, CHU You-ai, QIN Han-zhi. Risk prediction models of 30-day mortality after surgery in patients with hip fractures: a scoping review [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(24): 51-56.
[8] WANG Ai, ZHOU Bing-qian, CAO Hong. Application of Fracture Liaison Service in Patients with Osteoporotic Hip Fracture：a Scoping Review [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(22): 48-53.
[9] GUAN Ya-ping, ZHENG Wei-liang, SUN Li-jun, CHEN Yuan, DING Jie-ying, XU Jia-jia. Construction of four-level nurse-led early mobilization program for patients after open heart surgery [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(22): 67-72.
[10] . [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(20): 50-54.
[11] GUAN Yan, CHEN Chen, SU Yun-yan, JIN Hua, XIE Xiao-li, HU Yue-xiu, WANG Zhe-yun. Construction of training program for cardiac surgery nurse specialists based on Taylor model [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(18): 67-72.
[12] . [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(17): 35-39.
[13] DAI Qi, LI Fang, ZHU Yuan, ZHANG Xiao-tong. Intelligent care need of patients undergoing lung cancer surgery based on KANO model [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(17): 57-60.
[14] YU Feng-xia, YU Yuan. Expert consensus on surgical nursing in enhanced recovery after surgery for esophageal cancer during perioperative period [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(17): 61-65.
[15] . [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(17): 66-68.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!