以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (22): 58-64.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.22.058

• 调查研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

卫生保健相关后悔应对量表的汉化及其在实习护生中的信效度检验

罗忠琛1, 唐娇2,3, 郑艺平4, 胡少锦5, 范纪莉2, 余静雅2   

  1. 1.贵州医科大学 护理学院,贵州 贵阳 550025;
    2.重庆医科大学 护理学院,重庆 400016;
    3.重庆医科大学附属第一医院护理部,重庆 400016;
    4.漳州市龙海区程溪卫生院,福建 漳州 363112;
    5.贵州医科大学大学城医院,贵州 贵阳 550025
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-05 出版日期:2022-11-25 发布日期:2022-12-07
  • 通讯作者: 唐娇（1992-）,女,四川德阳人,博士研究生在读,讲师。E-mail:tangjiao9209@cqmu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:罗忠琛（1990-）,女,贵州贵阳人,布依族,硕士,讲师。
  • 基金资助:
    2023年度贵州省卫生健康委科学技术基金项目（jzwkj2023-532）; 2022年重庆市教育委员会人文社会科学研究规划项目（22SKGH062）; 重庆医科大学护理学院2020年度教育教学改革项目（HLJY202013）

Translation of Regret Coping Scale for Health-care Professionals and Its Reliability and Validity in Nursing Interns

LUO Zhong-chen1, TANG Jiao2,3, ZHENG Yi-ping4, HU Shao-jin5, FAN Ji-li2, YU Jing-ya2   

  1. 1. School of Nursing, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550025, China;
    2. School of Nursing, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China;
    3. Dept. of Nursing Administration, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Chongqing 400016, China;
    4. Chengxi Health Center, Zhangzhou 363112, China;
    5. University Town Hospital, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550025, China
  • Received:2022-07-05 Online:2022-11-25 Published:2022-12-07

PDF (PC)

228

赞

摘要： 目的 汉化卫生保健相关后悔应对量表,并检验其在实习护生中的信效度。方法 采用Brislin 双人直译-回译法、专家评议、预调查对量表进行文化调适,于2021年9月—2022年8月采用便利抽样法选取529名实习护生（295名本科生和234名专业学位硕士研究生）进行正式调查,评价量表的信度和效度。结果 删除条目2后形成了具有3个维度、共14个条目的中文版卫生保健相关后悔应对量表。量表水平的内容效度指数为1.000,条目水平的内容效度指数均为1.000。探索性因子分析提取了3个公因子,累计方差贡献率为72.25%;验证性因子分析显示,量表的模型适配良好（χ2/df=2.309,RMSEA=0.075,GFI=0.911,CFI=0.955,TLI=0.940,IFI=0.955,NFI=0.924）。量表各维度的平均方差抽取量分别为0.464、0.521及0.685,组合信度分别为0.775、0.844及0.915;平均方差抽取量平方根值为0.681~0.828大于各维度间相关系数绝对值0.406~0.584（P<0.01）;护理专业学位硕士研究生的总量表、各维度得分均显著高于本科实习护生水平（t=2.468~3.568,P<0.05）。总量表、问题应对策略维度、适应性情绪应对策略维度及不良情绪应对策略维度的Cronbach α系数分别为0.905、0.827、0.876及0.918;折半信度系数分别为0.847、0.849、0.792和0.863;ICC值分别为0.909、0.813、0.787和0.767。结论 中文版卫生保健相关后悔应对量表具有较好的信效度,可用于测评我国实习护生的卫生保健相关后悔应对策略现状。

关键词: 实习护生, 卫生保健相关后悔应对量表, 信度, 效度

Abstract: Objective To translate the regret coping scale for health-care professionals (RCS-HCP) into Chinese and test its reliability and validity in nursing interns. Methods RCS-HCP was translated based on Brislin translation model and cross-cultural adaptation, expert review and pre-survey were performed successively. A total of 295 nursing undergraduates and 234 nursing postgraduates from September 2021 to August 2022 were selected by convenience sampling method to test the reliability and validity of the scale. Results The Chinese version of RCS-HCP consisted of 3 dimensions, involving 14 items after 1 item was removed. All item-level content validity index was 1.000, and the scale-level content validity index was also 1.000. Exploratory factor analysis extracted 3 common factors, accounting for 72.25% of the cumulative contribution of variance. Confirmatory factor analysis suggested that the model fitted well (χ2/df=2.309, RMSEA=0.075, GFI=0.911, CFI=0.955, TLI=0.940, IFI=0.955, NFI=0.924). The average variance extracted of each dimension were 0.464, 0.521 and 0.685, respectively, and composite reliability was 0.775, 0.844 and 0.915, respectively. The square root of average variance extracted ranged from 0.681 to 0.828, which were greater than the absolute value of the correlation coefficient (r=0.406~0.584,P<0.01) among the dimensions. The total score of the RCS-HCP and the score of each dimension of nursing postgraduates were significantly higher than those of nursing undergraduates (t=2.468~3.568,P<0.05). The Cronbach’s α coefficient of the total scale and each dimension were 0.905,0.827,0.876 and 0.918 respectively. The split-half reliability was 0.847, 0.849, 0.792 and 0.863 respectively, and the test-retest reliability coefficient 0.909, 0.813, 0.787 and 0.767 respectively. Conclusion The Chinese version of RCS-HCP is reliable and valid, which can be used as an instrument for assessing the coping strategies among nursing interns in China.

Key words: nursing intern, Regret Coping Scale for Health-care Professionals, reliability, validity

中图分类号: 

  • R47
[1] Courvoisier DS, Agoritsas T, Perneger TV, et al.Regrets Associated with Providing Healthcare: Qualitative Study of Experiences of Hospital-based Physicians and Nurses[J]. PLoS One,2011, 6(8):e23138.DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0023138.
[2] Courvoisier DS, Cullati S, Ouchi R, et al.Validation of a 15-item Care-related Regret Coping Scale for Health-care Professionals (RCS-HCP)[J]. J Occup Health, 2014,56(6):430-443. DOI: 10.1539/joh.14-0060-OA.
[3] MacKinnon KR, Ashley F, Kia H, et al. Transition "Regret": An Institutional Ethnography of Gender-affirming Medical Care Assessment Practices in Canada[J]. Soc Sci Med, 2021,291:114477. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114477.
[4] Cheval B, Cullati S, Pihl-Thingvad J, et al.Impact of CAre-Related Regret Upon Sleep (ICARUS) Cohort Study: Protocol of a 3-Year Multicentre, International, Prospective Cohort Study of Novice Healthcare Professionals[J]. BMJ Open,2018,8(3):e022172.DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022172.
[5] Cullati S, Cheval B, Schmidt RE, et al.Self-Rated Health and Sick Leave among Nurses and Physicians: The Role of Regret and Coping Strategies in Difficult Care-related Situations[J]. Front Psychol, 2017,8:623. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00623.
[6] Cheval B, Mongin D, Cullati S, et al.Associations of Emotional Burden and Coping Strategies with Sick Leave among Healthcare Professionals:A Longitudinal Observational Sstudy[J]. Int J Nurs Stud, 2021,115:103869. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103869.
[7] Shapiro J, Astin J, Shapiro SL, et al.Coping with Loss of Control in the Practice of Medicine[J]. Fam Syst Health, 2011, 29(1):15-28. DOI: 10.1037/a0022921.
[8] Saposnik G, Del Río B, Bueno-Gil G, et al.Behavioral Aspects of Nurse Practitioners Associated with Optimal Multiple Sclerosis Care in Spain[J]. PLoS One,2021,16(12):e0261050. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261050.
[9] Saposnik G, Díaz-Abós P, Sánchez-Menéndez V, et al.Therapeutic Decisions Under Uncertainty for Spinal Muscular Atrophy: The DECISIONS-SMA Study Protocol[J]. PLoS One,2022,17(2):e0264006.DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0264006.
[10] Cheval B, Cullati S, Mongin D, et al.Associations of Regrets and Coping Strategies with Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intention:International Prospective Cohort Study of Novice Healthcare Professionals[J]. Swiss Med Wkly, 2019,149:w20074. DOI: 10.4414/smw.2019.20074.
[11] Lee KC, Ho CH, Yu CC, et al.The Development of a Six-station OSCE for Evaluating the Clinical Competency of the Student Nurses Before Graduation:A Validity and Reliability Analysis[J]. Nurse Educ Today,2020, 84:104247.DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.104247.
[12] 朱颀娜,王爱敏,李婷,等.不同生源护理专业学位硕士研究生临床实践现状[J]. 护理研究,2017,31(3):289-293. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6493.2017.03.011.
[13] 孙建萍,贾敏敏,杨支兰.护理本科生问题解决能力的影响因素及护理对策[J]. 全科护理, 2019,17(19):2403-2405. DOI:10.12104/j.issn.1674-4748.2019.19.041.
[14] 康凤英,杨洋,李颖芬,等. 护理硕士研究生实习前后临床实践能力的调查分析[J]. 中华现代护理杂志,2014,20(20):2554-2557. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2014.20.035.
[15] 刘萍,尤奥林,刘姝,等.我国护理硕士专业学位研究生就读期间培养体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报,2021,28(7):35-42. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.07.035.
[16] 黄霞,石钰,彭红梅,等.护理硕士研究生临床实践体验的Meta整合[J]. 中华现代护理杂志,2021,27(32):4386-4392. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20210518-02157.
[17] Richner SC, Cullati S, Cheval B, et al.Validation of the German Version of Two Scales (RIS, RCS-HCP) for Measuring Regret Associated with Providing Healthcare[J]. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2017,15(1):56. DOI:10.1186/s12955-017-0630-z.
[18] Pihl-Thingvad J, Jacobsen CW, Brandt LPA, et al.The Regret Coping Scale for Health-care Professionals (RCS-HCP): A Validation Study with Danish Social Educators[J]. Work, 2018,60(3):401-410. DOI: 10.3233/WOR-182756.
[19] Brislin RW.Back-translation for Cross-cultural Research[J]. J Cross Cult Psychol, 1970,1(3):185-216. DOI:10.1177/ 135910457000100301.
[20] 赵秋利. 护理测评工具的开发与应用[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2014:8-18.
[21] 吴明隆. 问卷统计分析实务-SPSS操作与应用[M]. 重庆:重庆大学出版社,2010:166-188.
[22] 李冬,余丽丽,张维,等.中文版医疗社会支持量表应用于不孕症患者的信效度分析[J]. 护理学报,2020,27(20):66-70. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.20.066.
[23] 张正敏,左倩倩,冯现刚,等. ICU护士职业死亡回避量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报,2022,29(1):53-57. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.01.053.
[24] 吴明隆. 结构方程模型:AMOS 的操作与应用[M]. 2版.重庆:重庆大学出版社,2010:212-260.
[25] 叶孝灵,周春兰,黄丛萍,等.脑卒中后失能综合评估量表的汉化与信效度检验[J]. 护理学报,2022,29(11):65-69. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.11.065.
[26] 卢岳华. 医患关系紧张的社会根源探寻与对策[J]. 湖南师范大学社会科学学报,2017,46(3):115-122.DOI:10.19503/j.cnki.1000-2529.2017.03.017.
[27] 高文慧,张新庆,李闪闪,等.九省份45家医院临床科室医务人员对医患关系紧张状况的认知分析[J]. 东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018,20(4):124-129,145. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-511X .2018.04.014.
[28] 田冰洁,王红红.利己视角下我国医患关系紧张的现状和对策[J]. 解放军护理杂志,2016,33(8):46-49. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2016.08.011.
[1] 张玺, 黄静, 汪天华, 李燕, 曹沅, 李明惠, 余立平. 发育障碍儿童养育心理韧性量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 6-11.
[2] 丁心舒, 孙乐菲, 高伟, 鲁琦, 闫畅, 刘德山. 矛盾年龄歧视量表在社区老年人中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 12-16.
[3] 袁华君, 段功香, 陈路桥, 王慧清. 癌症终末期患者救护意愿量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(6): 73-78.
[4] 谭如意, 龙秀红, 马红利, 陈兰. 腰椎间盘突出症患者中医康复健康信息获取行为量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(5): 67-72.
[5] 张钰琳, 朱向伟, 洪慧芳, 卢根娣. 重大传染病突发事件中护士伦理困境量表的研制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(4): 1-6.
[6] 张许婷, 罗彩凤, 魏兰芝, 邵校, 尚彬, 卞泽坤, 吕妃, 孙炜怡. 实习护生体面劳动感的潜在剖面分析及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(3): 12-16.
[7] 宋彩妮, 郑尧, 宋英, 刘丽华. 癌症照顾者信息隐瞒量表的汉化及在肺癌患者照顾者中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(3): 17-20.
[8] 黄璜, 钟可琪, 钟丽华, 李惠卿, 吴春华, 许梅. 199名实习护生人文关怀能力现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(24): 64-67.
[9] 张国春, 李海云, 褚梁梁, 程雪, 王君芝. 产科护士围产期姑息照护知信行量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(2): 6-11.
[10] 梁晓珊, 林丽娜, 林娟, 邓玲, 林佳清. 趣味性扑克牌教学法在内分泌科实习护生胰岛素理论知识培训的应用[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(2): 36-39.
[11] 罗铎麟, 杨春清, 高萍, 胡清文, 徐小群. 2型糖尿病心理痛苦量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(19): 24-30.
[12] 简称苹, 张汉卿, 王丽英, 田海艳, 彭向东, 张亚楠, 蔡德芳. 本科护生自我调节学习策略量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(18): 12-15.
[13] 胡杏娟, 张伦, 高钰琳, 高春凤, 陈妙燕, 李晓君, 陈烯琳, 洪笃云, 梁业基. 生成式人工智能辅助混合式教学在实习护生皮内针技术感染预防教学中的应用[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(18): 21-25.
[14] 王晓宁, 缪群芳, 李培清, 辛思莹, 黄姚姚. 自杀公众污名量表的汉化及在中国公众人群中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(17): 1-7.
[15] 朱亚晋, 王朝辉, 代明珠, 王琳, 孙莹莹. 临床护士文化能力量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(17): 46-50.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!