以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (11): 16-19.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.11.016

• 护理教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

粤港澳大湾区助产本科师资核心胜任力评价指标体系的构建

李瑶1, 黄美凌1, 章雪玲2a, 邓海娴2b   

  1. 1.广州医科大学 护理学院,广东 广州 510030;
    2.广州医科大学附属第三医院 a.产房;b.护理部,广东 广州 510145
  • 收稿日期:2021-10-20 出版日期:2022-06-10 发布日期:2022-07-07
  • 通讯作者: 黄美凌（1963-）,女,广东广州人,本科学历,博士研究生导师,教授,主任护师。E-mail：hmlgysy@126.com
  • 作者简介:李瑶（1999-）,女,江西萍乡人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读。
  • 基金资助:
    广州医科大学校级教育科学规划课题[广医大发（2019）178号]; 广州市教育科学规划2020年度课题（202012557）; 广州医科大学2021年度本科教学质量与教学改革工程建设项目[广医大发（2021）160号]

Construction of Core Competency Evaluation Index System for Teachers of Midwifery Undergraduates in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area

LI Yao1, HUANG Mei-ling1, ZHANG Xue-ling2a, DENG Hai-xian2b   

  1. 1. School of Nursing ,Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510030, China;
    2a. Obstetrics II; 2b. Dept. of Nursing Administration, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510145, China
  • Received:2021-10-20 Online:2022-06-10 Published:2022-07-07

PDF (PC)

197

赞

摘要： 目的 构建粤港澳大湾区助产本科师资核心胜任力评价指标体系,为培养本科助产教师提供参考。方法 通过德尔菲法确立粤港澳大湾区助产本科师资核心胜任力评价指标体系,经层次分析法设置核心胜任力评价指标体系权重。结果 德尔菲法专家权威系数0.85~1.0,2轮德尔菲总协调系数分别为0.394,0.410,P<0.05,2轮专家协调性较好,层次分析法中一致性检验CI<0.1,所得权重具有一致性。最终构建由3个一级指标、9个二级指标、30个三级指标构成的粤港澳大湾区助产本科师资核心胜任力指标体系。结论 通过德尔菲法和层次分析法,最终确立的粤港澳大湾区助产本科师资核心胜任力指标体系具有较好的科学性、可靠性和实用性,对粤港澳地区培养助产本科教师具有参考性。

关键词: 助产师资, 核心胜任力, 德尔菲法, 粤港澳大湾区

Abstract: Objective To construct an evaluation index system of core competency for teachers of midwifery undergraduates in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay area, and to provide reference for the training of teachers of midwifery undergraduates. Methods The core competency evaluation index system for teachers of midwifery undergraduates in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay area was established by Delphi method, and the weight of each index was determined by analytic hierarchy process. Results The expert authority coefficient ranged from 0.85 to 1.0, and the total coordination coefficient of two-round consultation was 0.394 and 0.410, respectively (P<0.05), showing good expert coordination. The consistency test CI of AHP was <0.1, indicating consistent weight. The final core competency index system for teachers of midwifery undergraduates in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area consisted of 3 first-level, 9 second-level and 30 third-level indicators. Conclusion The evaluation index system of core competence for teachers of midwifery undergraduates established through Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process in the study is reliable and practical and it provides reference for the training of teachers of midwifery undergraduate in Guangdong, Hong Kong and Macao.

Key words: midwifery teacher, core competence, Delphi method, Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area

中图分类号: 

  • R47
[1] 中华人民共和国国家卫生计生委妇幼司.关于加强生育全程基本医疗保健服务的若干意见[EB/OL].(2016—10—25). http://www.nhc.gov.cn/fys/s3581/201610/9bb93dff07c54ebb84572f0d2a866495.shtml.
[2] 姜梅,齐芮宁. 基于德尔菲法构建不同级别助产士核心胜任力评价指标体系[J].中华现代护理杂志, 2021,27(13):1701-1705.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20200925-05545.
[3] WHO. Strengthening Midwifery Toolkit.Module6. Developing Effective Programs for Preparing Midwife Teachers [EB/OL]. (2011-02-11).http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/44645/9789241501965_module6_eng.pdf;jsessionid=B17CBA64A89DDD22814508F8A298C2AD?sequence=6.
[4] WHO.Midwifery Educator Core Competencies[EB/OL]. (2013-04-17). https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/midwifery-educator-core-competencies.
[5] ICM. Position Statement Qualifications and Competencies of Midwifery Educations[EB/OL].[2021-09-20]. https://www.internationalmidwives.org/assets/files/statement-files/2018/04/qualifications-and-competencies-of-midwifery-educators-eng.pdf
[6] Barger MK, Hackley B, Bharj KK, et al.Knowledge and use of the ICM Global Standards for Midwifery Education[J]. Midwifery,2019,79:102534.DOI:10.1016/j.midw.2019.102534.
[7] Fullerton J, Butler M, Aman C, et al.Global Competencies for Midwives: External Cephalic Version; Ultrasonography, and Tobacco Cessation Intervention[J]. Women Birth, 2019,32(3):e413-e420.
[8] 关欣,王蕾,戴雪松,等. 基于结构过程结果评价模式护理质量评价体系的构建[J].中华现代护理杂志, 2015,21(20):2365-2368.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2015.20.003.
[9] 苏婷,唐万珍. 德尔菲法构建护理硕士专业学位研究生临床培养目标体系的研究[J].中国医药导报, 2018,15(25):173-177.
[10] 叶腾飞,张兵.基于层次分析法构建新时代幸福医院内涵建设指标体系的研究[J].职业卫生与应急救援, 2021,39(4):398-401. DOI:10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2021.04.007.
[11] 翟巾帼,胡晓琪,张宏玉,等.核心素养视域下助产学本科课程的设置探索[J].护理学报,2021, 28(12):1-5.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.12.001.
[12] 尹燕雯,柳韦华,慕家邑,等. 助产学教育标准的研究进展[J].护士进修杂志,2021,36(12):1071-1074. DOI:10.16821/j.cnki.hsjx.2021.12.004.
[13] 何珊. 浅谈顶岗实践对助产专业教师的影响[J].广东职业技术教育与研究,2018(1):165-167. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2744.2018.01.058.
[14] 杨杰. 教师临床实践有助于高职助产专业课程的建设[J]. 文化创新比较研究,2018, 2(10):143-144. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2096-4110.2018.10.079.
[15] 徐培培,路红春.实习助产士临床带教模式的进展[J].科学大众(科学教育),2021(7):164-165.
[16] Dyer JM, Latendresse G.Identifying and Addressing Problems for Student Progression in Midwifery Clinical Education[J]. J Midwifery Womens Health, 2016,61(S1):28-36. DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.12507. PMID: 27880865.
[1] 郭林芳, 张培莉, 侯晓雅, 李滢, 曹敏, 高超越. 肝癌化疗患者线上线下结合营养干预方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 1-5.
[2] 田美雨, 王翠玲, 高若男, 田佳, 刘怡. 妇科肿瘤科护士性健康照护培训方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 18-23.
[3] 陈燕华, 冯梅, 胡佩欣. 粤港联合个案管理师临床实践培训体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(1): 24-28.
[4] 全伊萍, 陈霞, 胡琼丹. 脑心健康管理师核心胜任力评价指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(9): 5-9.
[5] 陈芮, 王梅, 唐晓霞, 朱傲雪, 毛惠娜. 基于ERG理论的免疫检查点抑制剂治疗癌症患者护理需求方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 1-5.
[6] 陈坚, 项丽君, 罗彦嗣, 陈建辉, 崔艳丽, 廖琳, 颜明玉, 张晓梅. 脑卒中后吞咽障碍患者“互联网+”延续性康复管理方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(24): 1-6.
[7] 李小梅, 陶明, 李茜茜, 李琳琳, 李春. 基于症状管理理论神经源性膀胱患者自我管理干预方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(22): 61-66.
[8] 关亚萍, 郑薇亮, 孙丽军, 陈媛, 丁洁莹, 许佳佳. 护士主导的心脏直视术后患者早期四级活动方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(22): 67-72.
[9] 张国春, 李海云, 褚梁梁, 程雪, 王君芝. 产科护士围产期姑息照护知信行量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(2): 6-11.
[10] 刘慧敏, 姜蕾. 深圳市助产士核心胜任力培训优化策略的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(2): 40-43.
[11] 邹兆华, 卿伟, 朱茂才, 张继权, 易子涵, 胡秀. 连续性肾脏替代治疗护理敏感质量指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(2): 70-74.
[12] 罗铎麟, 杨春清, 高萍, 胡清文, 徐小群. 2型糖尿病心理痛苦量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(19): 24-30.
[13] 张丽, 李付华, 古小改, 郝娜, 王丹丹, 关美琪. 炎症性肠病专科护士培训方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(19): 31-36.
[14] 刘雨溦, 张培莉, 侯晓雅, 高超越. 健康老龄化视角下护理专业学位研究生多层次培养路径构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(19): 37-41.
[15] 管艳, 陈晨, 苏云艳, 金花, 谢晓莉, 胡岳秀, 王哲芸. 基于泰勒模式的心脏外科专科护士培训方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(18): 67-72.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!