以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (1): 1-4.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.01.001

• 研究生园地 •    下一篇

“以人为本”重症护理量表的汉化及信度效度检验

贾媛1, 赵慧敏2, 杨思源1, 郭丽敏1, 孟繁洁3   

  1. 1.天津中医药大学 研究生院,天津 300000;
    2.华中科技大学同济医学院 护理学院,湖北 武汉 430030;
    3.天津中医药大学,天津 300000
  • 收稿日期:2019-08-13 出版日期:2020-01-10 发布日期:2020-07-20
  • 通讯作者: 孟繁洁（1962-）,女,天津人,硕士,教授,硕士研究生导师。E-mail: mfj1127@126.com。
  • 作者简介:贾媛（1994-）,女,山西长治人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读。
  • 基金资助:
    天津中医药大学第九届大学生科技创新基金（CXJJ2019YD09）

Translation of Person-centered Critical Care Nursing Scale and Its Reliability and Validity

JIA Yuan1, ZHAO Hui-min2, YANG Si-yuan1, GUO Li-min1, MENG Fan-jie3   

  1. 1. Graduate School, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 300000, China;
    2. School of Nursing, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China;
    3. Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 300000, China
  • Received:2019-08-13 Online:2020-01-10 Published:2020-07-20

PDF (PC)

317

赞

摘要： 目的 翻译韩文版“以人为本”重症护理量表（Person-centered Critical Care Nursing,PCCN）,形成中文版“以人为本”重症护理量表,并分析其信度效度。方法 按照量表汉化的程序,得到原作者授权后,将韩文版“以人为本”重症护理量表翻译为中文,并接受跨文化调试,对天津市375名重症监护室护士进行调查,完成信度效度检验。结果 中文版“以人为本”重症护理量表表面效度与内容效度较好;共提取出共情、个性、尊重、舒适4个公因子,各因子的条目载荷均≥0.4,累计总变异率的解释率为70.113%,结构效度良好;总体Cronbach α系数为0.897,各维度的Cronbach α系数为0.816、0.766、0.771、0.871。验证性因子模型拟合度良好。结论 中文版“以人为本”重症护理量表具有良好的信度效度,适合中国ICU护士共情、个性、尊重、舒适等方面人文关怀能力的评估。

关键词: 以人为本, 重症护理量表, 人文关怀

Abstract: Objective To translate the Korean version of “Person-centered Critical Care Nursing Scale” (PCCN) to form a Chinese version, and analyze its reliability and validity. Methods According to the translation procedure of the scale, after obtaining the authorization of the author, the Korean version of PCCN was translated into Chinese, then cross-cultural adaptation was conducted. A total of 375 ICU nurses in Tianjin were investigated to complete the reliability and validity test. Results The Chinese version of PCCN has good surface and content validity. Four common factors were extracted, including empathy, personality, respect, and comfort. Item load of each factor was ≥0.4 and the cumulative rate of total variability 70.113%. The structural validity was good; the overall Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.897, and the Cronbach's α coefficient of each dimension 0.816, 0.766, 0.771 and 0.871 respectively. The confirmatory factor model had a good fit. Conclusion With good reliability and validity, the Chinese version of PCCN is suitable for the assessment of humanistic care capability of Chinese nurses such as empathy, personality, respect and comfort.

Key words: person-centered, Critical Care Nursing Scale, humanistic care

中图分类号: 

  • R473
[1] 王艳红,郭玉萍,杨叔禹,等.住院患者对护士关怀行为评价的研究[J].解放军护理杂志,2017, 34(11):13-17.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2017.11.003.
[2] Jakimowicz S, Perry L.A Concept Analysis of Patient-centred Nursing in the Intensive Care Unit[J].J Adv Nurs, 2015,71(7):1499-1517.DOI:10.1111/jan.12644. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
[3] Kang J, Cho YS, Jeong YJ, et al.Development and Validation of a Measurement to Assess Person-centered Critical Care Nursing[J]. J Korean Acad Nurs, 2018,48(3):323-334.DOI:10.4040/jkan. 2018.48.3.323.
[4] Murray A, Hall A, Williams GC, et al.Assessing Physiotherapists' communication Skills for Promoting Patient Autonomy for Self-management: Reliability and Validity of the Communication Evaluation in Rehabilitation Tool[J]. Disabil Rehabil, 2019,41(14).DOI:10.1080/09638288.2018.1443159. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
[5] Vial A, van der Put C, Stams GJJM, et al. The Content Validity and Usability of a Child Safety Assessment Instrument[J]. Child Youth Serv Rev, 2019,107:104538. DOI:10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104538.
[6] 罗明琴,潘世琴,谢建芝,等.护理人员安宁疗护知识问卷的编制及信效度检验[J].护理学报,2019,26(19):35-39.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2019.19.035.
[7] 龚瑾,郑洁.重症监护室尊重氛围量表的汉化及信效度检验[J].护理学报, 2019,26(13):55-58.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2019.13.055.
[8] Mohammadi MR, Akhondzadeh S, Keshavarz SA, et al.The Characteristics, Reliability and Validity of the Persian Version of Simplified Nutritional Appetite Questionnaire (SNAQ)[J]. J Nutr Health Aging,2019,23(9):837-842.DOI:10.1007/s12603-019-1223-9.
[9] 鄢建军,杨建国,江燕,等. 临床护理人员创新能力评价量表的构建及信效度检验[J].中华护理杂志,2018,53(10):1213-1217. DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2018.10.011.
[10] 王竹馨. 冠心病患者自我感受负担与焦虑抑郁关系的结构方程模型构建[D]. 合肥:安徽医科大学, 2019.
[11] 王丝瑶,魏丽丽,张艳,等. 护士道德勇气量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学杂志, 2019,34(21):92-95. DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2019.21.092.
[12] 张伊辉,李黎.马拉加大学糖尿病足部自我护理问卷的汉化及信效度检验[J].护理学杂志, 2019,34(2):31-33. DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2019.02.031.
[13] 王俊红,张振香,杨巧芳,等. 心脏康复量表的汉化及信效度评价[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2019,54(4):632-636. DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2019.04.033.
[1] 陈杰, 赖静, 王城阅, 徐良英, 晏娟, 罗雪. 基于三维质量结构理论的ICU护理人文关怀质量评价指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(9): 54-59.
[2] 何娇, 刘义兰, 官春燕, 韩燕红, 陈睿, 胡德英. 基于泰勒原理的医院护理人文关怀培训课程体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(8): 13-17.
[3] 黄璜, 钟可琪, 钟丽华, 李惠卿, 吴春华, 许梅. 199名实习护生人文关怀能力现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(24): 64-67.
[4] 王丽梅, 李露, 喻鹏, 罗倩, 张翀旎. 237名护理硕士研究生医学叙事能力现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(17): 1-4.
[5] 何富容, 李梅枝, 龚沙, 张紫燕, 蒋小剑. 精神科护士的道德敏感性现状及其影响因素[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(16): 19-23.
[6] 李进俊, 李牧玲, 刘月, 黄思敏, 卢慧琦, 涂锦怡, 贾淼, 周宏珍. 护士共情能力在医学叙事能力与人文关怀能力的中介效应分析[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(24): 1-5.
[7] 卫攀, 李小妹, 蔡春青, 郭晓岚, 尹姣. 人文关怀品质在心内科护士共情能力和医学叙事能力间的中介效应[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(19): 47-51.
[8] 宋慧娟, 廖少娜, 乔惠, 马国珍, 阮舒华, 孔碧华, 刘耐荣, 谭玉玲, 王琳, 周春兰. 护理人文关怀示范病区建设标准的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(16): 63-68.
[9] 李姗姗, 周丹, 赵林, 刘玉涛, 陈秀娟, 单信芝. 情绪智力在本科实习护生感知组织关怀氛围与人文关怀间的中介效应[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(11): 46-50.
[10] 马霏, 李惠玲, 吴燕铭. 居家养老照护员人文关怀实践体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(10): 7-10.
[11] 黄莉莉, 卜梦茹, 翟惠敏, 王映. 护理人文关怀实践困境的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(1): 69-72.
[12] 宋涛, 张冬红. 基于护士人文关怀能力培养的精神科叙事教育网络教学系统的开发[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(2): 11-15.
[13] 蓝静, 陈银娟, 戴利, 蔡文智. 218名ICU护士护理人文关怀氛围与工作投入的相关性分析[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(9): 57-59.
[14] 杨辉霞, 林妙君, 张细顺. 膝关节置换术后专用角度抬高架的制作[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(9): 77-78.
[15] 李芳琳, 史铁英, 吴晗. 本科实习护生人文关怀能力与职业获益感及主观幸福感的相关性分析[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(8): 67-70.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!