Revision of Community of Inquiry Instrument and its reliability and validity testing in nursing undergraduates

ZHANG Xinyu; SUN Xiaoxuan; XU Jinghan; LI Jiawen; XU Longxue; LI Jiacheng; JI Lili

doi:10.16460/j.issn2097-6569.2025.09.047

PDF(978 KB)

Journal of Nursing ›› 2025, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (9) : 47-52. DOI: 10.16460/j.issn2097-6569.2025.09.047

Revision of Community of Inquiry Instrument and its reliability and validity testing in nursing undergraduates

ZHANG Xinyu, SUN Xiaoxuan, XU Jinghan, LI Jiawen, XU Longxue, LI Jiacheng, JI Lili

Author information +

History +

Abstract

Objective To revise the Chinese version of the Community of Inquiry Instrument and test its reliability and validity in nursing undergraduates. Methods The "emotional presence" dimension of the Community of Inquiry Instrument was translated and cross-culturally adapted based on the Brislin model, merging with the three already translated dimensions of the instrument to form a four-dimensional Community of Inquiry Instrument. Convenience sampling was used to select 723 nursing undergraduates from October 2023 to December 2023 to test the reliability and validity of the instrument. Results Item-level content validity of the scale ranged from 0.800 to 1.000, and the scale-level content validity was 0.909. Exploratory factor analysis extracted four common factors with a cumulative variance contribution of 72.277%. Second-order confirmatory factor analysis showed the model fit well. The average extracted variance of the total scale was 0.634, and the composite reliability 0.870. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the total scale was 0.979, and that of each dimension ranged from 0.876 to 0.974. The re-test reliability of the total scale was 0.858, and that of each dimension ranged from 0.799 to 0.840. Conclusion The revised Chinese version of Community of Inquiry Instrument has good reliability and validity, and it can be used to measure blended learning experience of nursing undergraduates in China.

Key words

Community of Inquiry Instrument / nursing undergraduate / reliability / validity

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

ZHANG Xinyu, SUN Xiaoxuan, XU Jinghan, LI Jiawen, XU Longxue, LI Jiacheng, JI Lili. Revision of Community of Inquiry Instrument and its reliability and validity testing in nursing undergraduates[J]. Journal of Nursing. 2025, 32(9): 47-52 https://doi.org/10.16460/j.issn2097-6569.2025.09.047

References

[1] Graham, CR.Blended learning: global perspectives, local designs[M]. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing, 2006: 3-21.
[2] 李芳, 王婷婷, 王丽, 等. 基于BOPPPS教学模式的混合式教学在本科护理教学中的应用[J]. 护理研究, 2023, 37(22):4126-4128.DOI:10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2023.22.029.
[3] 王向荣, 谭玲莉, 贺惠娟, 等. 基于课程思政理念的混合式教学在《护理人文修养与沟通》中的应用研究[J]. 军事护理, 2023,40(3):105-108;116.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.2023.03.026.
[4] Dziuban C, Graham CR, Moskal PD, et al.Blended learning: the new normal and emerging technologies[J]. Int J Educ Technol High Educ, 2018, 15(1): 3. DOI:10.1186/s41239-017-0087-5.
[5] Martin F, Wu T, Wan L, et al.A Meta-analysis of the community of inquiry presences and learning outcomes in online and blended learning environments[J].Online Learning, 2022, 26(1): 325-359. DOI: 10.24059/olj.v26i1.2604.
[6] Arbaugh JB, Cleveland-Innes Martha, Diaz S, et al.Developing a community of inquiry instrument: testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample[J]. Internet High Educ, 2008, 11:133-136. DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.003.
[7] Cleveland-Innes M, Campbell P. Emotional presence, learning,the online learning environment[J]. Int Rev Res Open Dis,2012,13(4):269-292.https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i4.1234.
[8] Dell D.Emotional presence in community of inquiry: a scoping review and delphi study[D]. Athabasca: Athabasca University, 2021.
[9] Sundgren M, Jaldemark, J, Cleveland-Innes M. Disciplinary differences and emotional presence in communities of inquiry: teachers’ expressions of digital technology-enabled teaching[J]. Comput Educ, 2023,4:1-9. DOI:10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100134.
[10] Jiang M, Koo K.Emotional presence in building an online learning community among non-traditional graduate students[J]. Online Learning, 2020, 24(4): 93-111. DOI:10.24059/olj.v24i4.2307.
[11] 兰国帅, 钟秋菊, 吕彩杰, 等. 探究社区量表中文版的编制——基于探索性和验证性因素分析[J].开放教育研究, 2018, 24(3): 68-76. DOI:10.13966/j.cnki.kfjyyj.
[12] 王晓娇, 夏海鸥. 基于Brislin经典回译模型的新型翻译模型的构建及应用[J]. 护理学杂志, 2016, 31(7):61-63. DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.
[13] 单广良. 流行病学与应用多元统计分析[M]. 北京: 中国协和医科大学出版社, 2022: 156-172.
[14] 张颖, 郝燕萍, 罗岚. 安宁疗护护理质量量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(20): 48-53. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.
[15] 王美珠, 邱克冉, 林蓓蕾, 等. 线上课程评价量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学杂志, 2024, 39(20): 83-86, 101. DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.
[16] Schreiber JB.Issues and recommendations for exploratory factor analysis and principal component analysis[J]. Res Social Adm Pharm,2021,17(5):1004-1011.DOI.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.
[17] 简称苹, 张汉卿, 王丽英, 等. 本科护生自我调节学习策略量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(18): 12-15. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.
[18] 付会斌, 潘海燕, 孔丹莉, 等. 二阶验证性因子模型的AMOS实现[J]. 中国卫生统计, 2013, 30(1): 52-56.
[19] 李梦俏, 关倩琳, 武雨晨, 等. 修订版智慧型幸福量表的汉化及信效度检测[J]. 军事护理, 2024, 41(4):15-17, 32. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.
[20] 朱亚晋, 王朝辉, 代明珠, 等. 临床护士文化能力量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(17): 46-50. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2024.17.046.
[21] 杨翠翠, 王玉冰, 徐晶晶, 等. 青少年1型糖尿病病耻感评估量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中国全科医学, 2024, 27(18): 2253-2259. DOI:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.
[22] 李晓彤, 马明玥, 段欣星, 等. 妊娠相关焦虑量表(简化版)的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理研究, 2024, 38(23): 4196-4201. DOI:10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.