以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (24): 1-6.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.24.001

• 研究生园地 •    下一篇

缺血性脑卒中后吞咽障碍患者经口摄食功能发展轨迹及影响因素分析

陈坚1,2, 王园1, 崔艳丽1,2, 罗彦嗣1, 廖琳1,2, 颜明玉1,2, 张晓梅1   

  1. 1.南方医科大学南方医院 神经内科,广东 广州 510515;
    2.南方医科大学 护理学院,广东 广州 510515
  • 收稿日期:2023-08-02 出版日期:2023-12-25 发布日期:2024-01-09
  • 通讯作者: 张晓梅（1980-）,女,广东广州人,硕士,主任护师。E-mail: 2925611568@qq.com
  • 作者简介:陈坚（1997-）,女,广西北海人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读,护师。
  • 基金资助:
    广东省自然科学基金面上项目（2022A1515012184）

Development trajectory of oral intake function in patients with post-stroke dysphagia and its influencing factors

CHEN Jian1,2, WANG Yuan1, CUI Yan-li1,2, LUO Yan-si1, LIAO Lin1,2, YAN Ming-yu1,2, ZHANG Xiao-mei1   

  1. 1. Dept. of Neurosurgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China;
    2. School of Nursing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
  • Received:2023-08-02 Online:2023-12-25 Published:2024-01-09

PDF (PC)

345

赞

摘要： 目的 探讨脑卒中后吞咽障碍患者经口摄食功能的潜在类别,并分析其影响因素,为个性化康复护理措施提供参考。方法 便利选取广东省4所三级医院神经内科的缺血性脑卒中后吞咽障碍患者393例,采用一般资料调查表、经口摄食功能评估量表进行调查。潜类别增长分析模型识别经口摄食功能变化轨迹的潜在类别后,采用无序多分类Logistic回归分析其影响因素。结果 患者的经口摄食功能变化轨迹可分为低风险稳定组（25.6%）、高风险下降组（51.1%）、高风险稳定组（23.3%）。多分类Logistic回归分析结果显示,不同经口摄食功能类别的患者在年龄、美国国立卫生院卒中量表评分、管饲时长、院外照护机构上差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论 脑卒中后吞咽障碍患者经口摄食功能分为3种变化轨迹,存在群体异质性,应根据患者经口摄食功能的变化轨迹采取针对性的康复护理干预。

关键词: 脑卒中, 吞咽障碍, 经口摄食功能, 潜类别增长模型, 纵向研究

Abstract: Objective To explore the latent categories and influencing factors of oral intake function in patients with post-stroke dysphagia, and to provide reference for individualized rehabilitation nursing intervention. Methods Convenience sampling was used to select 393 patients with post-stroke dysphagia in four tertiary grade-A hospitals, and the patients were surveyed by using general information questionnaire and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. The latent category growth analysis model was used to identify the potential categories of oral intake function, and its influencing factors were analyzed by multinomial logistic regression. Results Three distinct trajectories were identified as “low risk of stable group”(25.6%), “high risk of stable group”(51.1%), and “high risk of decreasing group”(23.3%). Multinomial logistic regression analysis showed that there were significant differences in age, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, length of tube feeding, and out-of-hospital care institutions among different categories (P<0.05). Conclusion There are 3 trajectories of oral intake function in patients with post-stroke dysphagia, and there is group heterogeneity in their oral intake function. Individualized rehabilitation nursing intervention should be taken according to the trajectory of patients' oral intake function.

Key words: stroke, dysphagia, oral intake function, Latent Class Growth Model, longitudinal study

中图分类号: 

  • R473.74
[1] 苗姣娜,王元姣,何叶.口腔感觉训练在脑卒中吞咽障碍患者中的应用进展[J].护理学报,2023,30(1):37-40.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.01.037.
[2] D'Netto P, Rumbach A, Dunn K, et al. Clinical predictors of dysphagia recovery after stroke: a systematic review[J]. Dysphagia, 2023, 38(1):1-22. DOI:10.1007/s00455-022-10443-3.
[3] Galovic M, Stauber AJ, Leisi N, et al.Development and validation of a prognostic model of swallowing recovery and enteral tube feeding after ischemic stroke[J].JAMA Neurol, 2019,76(5):561-570. DOI:10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.4858.
[4] 王博,袁永学,张庆苏.非经口进食吞咽障碍脑卒中患者预后的相关因素及预测模型[J].中国康复理论与实践,2022,28(4):453-460.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2022.04.012.
[5] 中华医学会神经病学分会,中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组.中国急性缺血性脑卒中诊治指南2018[J].中华神经科杂志,2018,51(9):666-682. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-7876.2018.09.004.
[6] 万桂芳,张耀文,史静,等. 改良容积粘度测试在吞咽障碍评估中的灵敏性及特异性研究[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2019, 41(12):900-904.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1424.2019.12.004.
[7] Lee WH, Lim MH, Seo HG, et al.Development of a novel prognostic model to predict 6-month swallowing recovery after ischemic stroke[J]. Stroke,2020,51(2):440-448. DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.027439.
[8] Brott T, Adams HP Jr, Olinger CP, et al.Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale[J]. Stroke,1989,20(7):864-870. DOI:10.1161/01.str.20.7.864.
[9] 朱亚芳,张晓梅,张钦缔,等.中文版经口摄食功能评估量表在摄食-吞咽障碍脑卒中患者中的信效度检验[J].实用医学杂志,2017, 33(22):3826-3829.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2017.22.038.
[10] Carnaby-Mann G, Crary MA, Schmalfuss I, et al."Pharyngocise": randomized controlled trial of preventative exercises to maintain muscle structure and swallowing function during head-and-neck chemoradiotherapy[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2012,83(1):210-219. DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.06.1954.
[11] 刘莎,陈玲,李甜甜,等.孕产妇盆底肌训练自我效能发展轨迹及其对产后尿失禁的影响[J].护理学报,2023,30(3):1-5.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.03.001.
[12] 尚彬,罗彩凤,吕妃,等.护理人员资质过剩感潜在类别分析及其与离职意愿的关系[J].护理学报,2023,30(9):18-24.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.09.018.
[13] Wang Z, Shi Y, Zhang L, et al.Nomogram for predicting swallowing recovery in patients after dysphagic stroke[J]. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr,2022,46(2):433-442. DOI:10.1002/jpen.2115.
[14] Leslie P, Smithard DG.Is Dysphagia Under diagnosed or is normal swallowing more variable than we think? Reported swallowing problems in people aged 18-65 years[J]. Dysphagia, 2021, 36(5):910-918. DOI:10.1007/s00455-020-10213-z.
[15] Wang L, Qiao J, Sun F, et al.Demographic and clinical factors associated with recovery of poststroke dysphagia: a Meta-analysis[J]. Brain Behav,2023,13(6):e3033. DOI:10.1002/brb3.3033.
[16] Lin WC, Huang CY, Lee LF, et al.Initial national institute of health stroke scale to early predict the improvement of swallowing in patients with acute ischemic stroke[J]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2019, 28(10):104297.DOI:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.07.013.
[17] De Stefano A, Dispenza F, Kulamarva G, et al.Predictive factors of severity and persistence of oropharyngeal dysphagia in sub-acute stroke[J].Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol,2021,278(3):741-748. DOI:10.1007/s00405-020-06429-2.
[18] Leite KKA, Sassi FC, Medeiros GC, et al.Clinical swallowing prognostic indicators in patients with acute ischemic stroke[J]. Arq Neuropsiquiatr,2019,77(7):501-508. DOI:10.1590/0004-282X20190080.
[19] Nutakki A, Chomba M, Chishimba L, et al.Predictors of in-hospital and 90-day post-discharge stroke mortality in Lusaka, Zambia[J]. J Neurol Sci,2022,437:120249. DOI:10.1016/j.jns.2022.120249.
[20] van Dijk M, Buijck BI. What is desirable care in the opinion of formal and informal caregivers in nursing-home care for patients with dementia?[J]. Nurs Open,2018,5(2):139-148. DOI:10.1002/nop2.122.
[21] Keykha A, Ramezani M, Amini S, et al.Educational challenges of family caregivers of vegetative state patients for home care preparedness: a qualitative content analysis[J]. J Educ Health Promot,2022,11:345.DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_1647_21.
[1] 陈恩琳, 莫丰菱, 庄泽明, 张明哲, 周佳坤, 黄丽芳, 纪龙飞, 张莉芳. 脑卒中单侧空间忽略评估工具的范围综述[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 43-49.
[2] 刘琪, 刘佳丽, 刘玉, 杨丽敏, 范育英, 吕星, 覃惠英. 鼻咽癌患者诱导化疗序贯同期放化疗期间躯体-心理症状负担轨迹及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(1): 1-6.
[3] 李珂, 贺雨琼, 李雨蔚, 常颖. 脑卒中患者跌倒恐惧干预研究的范围综述[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(1): 50-55.
[4] 林丽华, 盖薇, 王语璇, 尹丽丽, 吕郑晗, 陶艳玲. 自我同情在脑卒中患者社会支持与病耻感的中介作用[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(9): 15-19.
[5] 李丁丁, 王帅有, 朱杉杉, 郭鑫, 张会敏, 王宏茹, 潘勤. 脑卒中患者支持性照护需求评估工具的范围综述[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(9): 48-53.
[6] 郑亚楠, 郭惠娟, 张振香, 蔡姝倩. 脑卒中半失能患者自我接纳的潜在剖面分析及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(8): 1-6.
[7] 王冰冰, 马英芝, 孙小卫, 杨琴, 肖江琴. 中青年脑卒中患者与配偶二元应对潜在剖面分析及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(8): 7-12.
[8] 薛荣, 张开利, 陈保云, 马荣慧, 张雨欣. 中老年脑卒中患者多维衰弱发展轨迹及其影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(6): 6-12.
[9] 陈坚, 项丽君, 罗彦嗣, 陈建辉, 崔艳丽, 廖琳, 颜明玉, 张晓梅. 脑卒中后吞咽障碍患者“互联网+”延续性康复管理方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(24): 1-6.
[10] 周春香, 饶媛, 崔梦娇, 商芷颖, 张天岚, 裘奚晨卉, 秦艳萍. 基于传感器技术的智能康复设备在脑卒中患者步态康复应用效果的Meta分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(24): 44-50.
[11] 邓岚心, 张宇, 李敏锐, 高钰琳. 养老机构老年人认知功能与身体衰弱变化的交叉滞后分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(23): 8-12.
[12] 牟晓玲, 陈宇琦, 刘海燕, 李敏, 董敏, 黄佳佳, 李璇, 陈瑜. 肺移植受者术后抑郁调查及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(21): 7-11.
[13] 张煌霞, 李壮苗, 罗文楠, 李秀霞, 黄惠香, 林颖欣. 四子散角针原穴敷贴对脑卒中后偏瘫肩痛患者的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(20): 1-7.
[14] 袁佳琳, 杨玲玲, 刘晓慧, 甘茹, 杜瑄, 高海花, 杨小萍, 王慧娟. 308名脑卒中患者主要照顾者抑郁现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(2): 27-31.
[15] 施杨, 顾志娥, 朱彤, 喻静, 王林. 社会网络和自我忽视在老年缺血性脑卒中患者衰弱与认知功能间的链式中介效应[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(17): 40-45.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!