以质量求发展,以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (8): 1-6.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2024.08.001

• 研究生园地 •    下一篇

脑卒中半失能患者自我接纳的潜在剖面分析及影响因素研究

郑亚楠1, 郭惠娟2, 张振香1, 蔡姝倩3   

  1. 1.郑州大学护理与健康学院,河南 郑州 450001;
    2.郑州大学附属洛阳中心医院,河南 洛阳 471000;
    3.郑州黄河护理职业学院,河南 郑州 450001
  • 收稿日期:2023-09-08 出版日期:2024-04-25 发布日期:2024-05-08
  • 通讯作者: 郭惠娟(1974-),女,河南洛阳人,硕士,主任护师,硕士研究生导师。E-mail:18537919128@163.com
  • 作者简介:郑亚楠(1998-),女,河南鹤壁人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读,护士。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(72174184)

Potential profile analysis of self-acceptance among semi-disabled patients with stroke and its influencing factors

ZHENG Ya-nan1, GUO Hui-juan2, ZHANG Zhen-xiang1, CAI Shu-qian3   

  1. 1. School of Nursing and Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China;
    2. Luoyang Central Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Luoyang 471000, China;
    3. Zhengzhou Yellow River Nursing Vocational College, Zhengzhou 450001, China
  • Received:2023-09-08 Online:2024-04-25 Published:2024-05-08

摘要: 目的 探讨脑卒中半失能患者自我接纳的潜在类别并分析其影响因素。方法 采用便利抽样法,选取河南省郑州市某2所三级甲等医院神经内科及神经康复科的308例脑卒中半失能患者为研究对象,采用一般资料调查表、自我接纳问卷、中文版事件相关性反刍性沉思问卷和慢性病自我效能量表对其进行调查。采用潜在剖面分析法分析患者自我接纳的潜在类别,采用无序多分类Logistic回归分析检验不同类别的影响因素。结果 脑卒中半失能患者自我接纳分为3种类别:低接纳-低自评组(27.9%)、中等接纳-自评中庸组(43.8%)与高接纳-理性自评组(28.3%)。无序多分类Logistic回归分析结果显示,年龄、文化程度、家庭人均月收入、症状数量、侵入性沉思、目的性沉思以及慢性病自我效能是脑卒中半失能患者自我接纳潜在剖面分类的影响因素(P<0.05)。结论 脑卒中半失能患者的自我接纳存在3种潜在类别,医护人员应重视年龄18~45岁、初中及以下文化程度、家庭人均月收入较低以及症状≥3个的脑卒中半失能患者,并通过减少患者的侵入性反刍、增强目的性反刍和自我效能感等干预措施来提升其自我接纳水平。

关键词: 脑卒中, 半失能, 自我接纳, 潜在剖面分析

Abstract: Objective To explore the potential categorization of self-acceptance in semi-disabled patients with stroke and to analyze the influencing factors. Methods Convenience sampling was used to select 308 semi-disabled patients with stroke from the departments of neurology and neurorehabilitation in two tertiary grade-A hospitals in Zhengzhou City, and they were surveyed using the general information questionnaire, the Self-Acceptance Questionnaire, the Chinese version of the Event-Related Rumination Questionnaire, and the Chronic Disease Self-Efficacy Scale. Potential categories of patients' self-acceptance were analyzed using potential profile analysis, and the influencing factors of different categories were analyzed using unordered multicategorical logistic regression analysis. Results Self-acceptance of semi-disabled patients with stroke was categorized into 3 categories: low acceptance-low self-assessment group (27.9%), medium acceptance-moderate self-assessment group (43.8%) & high acceptance-rational self-assessment group (28.3%). Unordered multicategorical logistic regression analysis showed that age, education background, per capita monthly household income, number of symptoms, intrusive contemplation, purposeful contemplation, and chronic disease self-efficacy were influencing factors in the classification of potential profiles of self-acceptance in semi-disabled patients with stroke (P<0.05). Conclusion There are 3 potential categories of self-acceptance in semi-disabled patients with stroke. Medical staff should focus on semi-disabled stroke patients aged 18~45 years, with education background of junior high school or lower, lower per capita monthly household income, and experiencing three or more symptoms. Intervention measures such as reducing patients' invasive rumination, enhancing purposeful rumination and self-efficacy should be considered to improve their level of self-acceptance.

Key words: stroke, semi-disabled, self-acceptance, latent profile analysis

中图分类号: 

  • R473.74
[1] 燕文娟,李壮苗,余梦婷,等.脑卒中患者病耻感影响因素的系统评价[J].护理学报,2022,29(8):46-52. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.08.046.
[2] Yao Y, Yao J, Chen S, et al.Psychological capital and self-acceptance modified the association of depressive tendency with self-rated health of college students in China during the COVID-19 pandemic[J]. Behav Sci (Basel),2023,13(7):552. DOI: 10.3390/bs13070552.
[3] Plexico LW, Erath S, Shores H, et al.Self-acceptance, resilience, coping and satisfaction of life in people who stutter[J].J Fluency Disord, 2019, 59:52-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2018.10.004.
[4] Li C, Lyu S, Yan J, et al.The effect of gender in binge eating behavior in Chinese culture: the serial mediation model of body dissatisfaction and self-acceptance[J]. Front Psychol,2023,14:1285272. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1285272.
[5] 同赟洁,刘艳梅,吕梅芬,等.恢复期脑卒中患者自我接纳现状及影响因素分析[J].护理学报,2021,28(19):13-16. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.19.013.
[6] 蔡伟衫,周洁球,陈瑞娜.脑卒中患者自我接纳水平调查及其影响因素分析[J].中国卫生标准管理,2023,14(1):124-128. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-9316.2023.01.026.
[7] 王孟成,毕向阳.潜变量建模与Mplus应用:进阶篇[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2018:13-15.
[8] 中华医学会神经病学分会,中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组.中国各类主要脑血管病诊断要点2019[J].中华神经科杂志,2019(9):710-715.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-7876.2019.09.003.
[9] 丛中,高文凤.自我接纳问卷的编制与信度效度检验[J].中国行为医学科学, 1999(1):20.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-6554.1999.01.007.
[10] Cann A, Callhoun LG, Tedeschi RG, et al.Assessing posttraumatic cognitive processes: the event related rumination inventory[J].Anxiety, Stress Coping,2011,2(42):137-156.DOI: 10.1080/10615806.2010.529901.
[11] 董超群,巩树梅,刘晓虹.简体中文版事件相关反刍性沉思问卷在意外创伤者中应用的信效度分析[J].中华护理杂志,2013, 48(9):831-834.DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2013.09.021.
[12] Lorig KR, Sobel DS, Ritter PL, et al.Effect of a self-management program on patients with chronic disease[J].Effective clinical practice,2001,4(6):256-262.
[13] 尚刘文心,沈美芳,陈文瑶,等.慢性心力衰竭患者症状管理自我效能及其影响因素的调查研究[J]. 中华护理杂志,2014,49(6):674-679. DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2014.06.008.
[14] 王孟成,邓俏文,毕向阳,等.分类精确性指数Entropy在潜剖面分析中的表现:一项蒙特卡罗模拟研究[J].心理学报,2017,49(11):1473-1482. DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.01473.
[15] 汤丹丹,温忠麟.共同方法偏差检验:问题与建议[J].心理科学,2020,43(1):215-223.DOI:10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20200130.
[16] 张文彤,董伟. SPSS统计分析高级教程[M].2版.北京:高等教育出版社,2013:181-185.
[17] Luong V, Shields C, Petrie A, Neumann K.Does personality matter? Perceptions and experiences of introverts and extraverts as general surgeons[J]. Teach Learn Med,2022,34(3):255-265. DOI:10.1080/10401334.2021.1922284.
[18] Zheng Z, Song R, Zhao Y, et al.An investigation of the level of stigma and the factors influencing it in the rehabilitation of young and middle-aged stroke patients-a cross-sectional study[J]. BMC Neurol, 2023, 23(1):139. DOI:10.1186/s12883-023-03189-4.
[19] 王艳东,查梦培,郭宗海,等.脑出血偏瘫患者病耻感影响因素及其与自尊和希望水平的相关性[J].中国老年学杂志,2021, 41(13):2855-2858. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2021.13.048.
[20] Kim M, Lee YH.Comparison of psychological health problems between families living with stroke survivors and the general population in the community[J]. Chonnam Med J, 2021,57(2):118-125. DOI:10.4068/cmj.2021.57.2.118.
[21] 张晓萌,张延红.缺血性脑卒中患者个人掌控感现状及影响因素分析[J].中风与神经疾病杂志, 2022,39(8):699-703. DOI:10.19845/j.cnki.zfysjjbzz.2022.0176.
[22] Erduran Tekin Ö, Sirin A.Rumination mediates the relationship between childhood traumas with cognitive defusion, acceptance, and emotion regulation:a qualitative and quantitative study[J]. J Ration Emot Cogn Behav Ther,2023,8:1-28. DOI:10.1007/s10942-023-00503-4.
[23] 张格格,刘延锦,郭园丽,等.脑卒中患者反刍性沉思的研究进展[J].护理学杂志,2022,37(20):110-113. DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2022.20.110.
[24] Yehene E, Lichtenstern G, Harel Y, et al.Self-efficacy and acceptance of disability following mild traumatic brain injury: a pilot study[J].Appl Neuropsychol Adult,2020,27(5):468-477. DOI:10.1080/23279095.2019.1569523.
[25] Yang L, Zhang H.The chain mediating effect of network behavior and decision self-efficacy between work skills andperceived employability based on Social Cognitive Theory[J]. Comput Intell Neurosci,2022,2022:5240947. DOI:10.1155/2022/5240947.
[26] Zhang X, Yue H, Sun J, et al.Regulatory emotional self-efficacy and psychological distress among medical students: multiple mediating roles of interpersonal adaptation and self-acceptance[J].BMC Med Educ, 2022, 22(1):283. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03338-2.
[1] 李丹妮, 邱丽燕, 吴隆燕, 谭铮可可, 陈欣, 杨丽. 前交叉韧带损伤日间手术患者恐动症的潜在剖面分析及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 12-17.
[2] 陈恩琳, 莫丰菱, 庄泽明, 张明哲, 周佳坤, 黄丽芳, 纪龙飞, 张莉芳. 脑卒中单侧空间忽略评估工具的范围综述[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 43-49.
[3] 李静依, 梁冠冕, 缪群芳, 赵月琰, 王晓宁, 钱萍萍. 临床护士死亡工作自我应对能力潜在剖面及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(1): 13-18.
[4] 李珂, 贺雨琼, 李雨蔚, 常颖. 脑卒中患者跌倒恐惧干预研究的范围综述[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(1): 50-55.
[5] 林丽华, 盖薇, 王语璇, 尹丽丽, 吕郑晗, 陶艳玲. 自我同情在脑卒中患者社会支持与病耻感的中介作用[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(9): 15-19.
[6] 李丁丁, 王帅有, 朱杉杉, 郭鑫, 张会敏, 王宏茹, 潘勤. 脑卒中患者支持性照护需求评估工具的范围综述[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(9): 48-53.
[7] 王冰冰, 马英芝, 孙小卫, 杨琴, 肖江琴. 中青年脑卒中患者与配偶二元应对潜在剖面分析及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(8): 7-12.
[8] 薛荣, 张开利, 陈保云, 马荣慧, 张雨欣. 中老年脑卒中患者多维衰弱发展轨迹及其影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(6): 6-12.
[9] 张许婷, 罗彩凤, 魏兰芝, 邵校, 尚彬, 卞泽坤, 吕妃, 孙炜怡. 实习护生体面劳动感的潜在剖面分析及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(3): 12-16.
[10] 陈坚, 项丽君, 罗彦嗣, 陈建辉, 崔艳丽, 廖琳, 颜明玉, 张晓梅. 脑卒中后吞咽障碍患者“互联网+”延续性康复管理方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(24): 1-6.
[11] 周春香, 饶媛, 崔梦娇, 商芷颖, 张天岚, 裘奚晨卉, 秦艳萍. 基于传感器技术的智能康复设备在脑卒中患者步态康复应用效果的Meta分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(24): 44-50.
[12] 李思媛, 吴雨泽, 魏雪梅, 罗澜峻, 邓美红, 李梅, 崔丽君. 低年资护士心理弹性的潜在剖面及其对适应性绩效的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(23): 1-7.
[13] 于宛辰, 吴萍, 柳嘉怡, 武贤明, 庞晓丽, 王汕珊. 本科护生个人掌控感的潜在剖面及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(23): 23-27.
[14] 李若雨, 刘鑫, 韦静, 覃艳, 林桦. 312例老年高血压患者跌倒警觉度的潜在剖面及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(22): 1-6.
[15] 张煌霞, 李壮苗, 罗文楠, 李秀霞, 黄惠香, 林颖欣. 四子散角针原穴敷贴对脑卒中后偏瘫肩痛患者的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(20): 1-7.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!