以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (24): 6-10.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.24.006

• 研究生园地 • 上一篇    下一篇

中文完整版灵性需求问卷在慢性心力衰竭患者中的信效度检验

刘丹娜1, 詹艳2, 胡德雄1, 沈婧1, 王劼琼3, 张淇1   

  1. 1.湖北医药学院 护理学院,湖北 十堰 442000;
    2.十堰市太和医院,湖北 十堰 442000;
    3.十堰市中医医院 护理部,湖北 十堰 442000
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-05 出版日期:2020-12-25 发布日期:2021-01-15
  • 通讯作者: 詹艳（1973-）,女,湖北十堰人,硕士,主任护师,硕士研究生导师,院区护理部主任。E-mail:1329848593@qq.com
  • 作者简介:刘丹娜（1996-）,女,四川内江人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读。

Reliability and Validity of Chinese Version of Spiritual Needs Questionnaire in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure

LIU Dan-na1, ZHAN Yan2, HU De-xiong1, SHEN-Jing1, WANG Jie-qiong3, ZHANG Qi1   

  1. 1. School of Nursing, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan 442000,China;
    2. Taihe Hospital,Shiyan 442000,China;
    3. Dept. of Nursing Administration, Shiyan Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Shiyan 442000,China
  • Received:2020-07-05 Online:2020-12-25 Published:2021-01-15

PDF (PC)

512

赞

摘要： 目的 评价中文完整版灵性需求问卷（Spiritual Needs Questionnaire, SPNQ）在慢性心力衰竭患者中应用的信效度,为调查慢性心力衰竭患者灵性需求现状提供严谨测评工具。方法 采用便利抽样,于2019年3—8月选取十堰市太和医院心血管内科168例慢性心力衰竭患者进行问卷调查,对调查结果进行信效度检验。采用Cronbach α系数、重测信度进行评价;效度采用内容效度指数、探索性因子分析进行测评。结果 中文完整版灵性需求问卷各条目的内容效度（item-content validity index,I-CVI）值为0.85~1.00,总量表的内容效度（scale content validity index,S-CVI）值为0.875,探索性因子分析共提取6个因子,方差累计贡献率67.568%,问卷效度较好;总问卷Cronbach α系数分别为0.924,各维度Cronbach α系数0.671~0.939,总问卷重测信度0.903,表明问卷信度甚佳。结论 中文完整版灵性需求量表在慢性心力衰竭患者中应用信效度较好,可作为评估慢性心力衰竭患者灵性需求情况的有效工具。

关键词: 灵性需求问卷, 心力衰竭, 灵性需求, 信效度

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Spiritual Needs Questionnaire (SPNQ) in patients with chronic heart failure, and to provide an scientific assessment tool for the spiritual needs of patients with chronic heart failure. Methods Convenience sampling was used to select 168 patients with chronic heart failure from the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Taihe Hospital of Shiyan City from March to August 2019 to conduct a questionnaire survey with the Chinese version of SPNQ and the reliability and validity of the survey results were tested. Results The item-content validity index (I-CVI) value of each item of the questionnaire ranged from 0.85 to 1.00, and the content validity index (S-CVI) value was 0.875. Exploratory factor analysis extracted 6 factors. Cumulative contribution rate of variance was 67.568%, indicating good validity. Cronbach αcoefficient of the total questionnaire was 0.924, and that of each dimension ranged from 0.671 to 0.939. The total questionnaire was retested, showing good reliability of 0.903. Conclusion With good reliability and validity, the Chinese version of SPNQ can be used as an effective tool to assess the spiritual needs of patients with chronic heart failure.

Key words: spiritual needs questionnaire, heart failure, spiritual need, reliability and validity

中图分类号: 

  • R471
[1] 刘爽,朱路路,王晓云,等.老年慢性心力衰竭患者居家期间灵性照护需求及照护体验的研究[J]. 护理学报, 2019,26(9):6-9.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2019.09.006.
[2] Ross L, Austin J.Spiritual Needs and Spiritual Support Preferences of People with End-stage Heart Failure and Their Carers: Implications for Nurse Managers[J]. J Nurs Manag, 2015,23(1):87-95.DOI:10.1111/jonm.12087.
[3] Ross L, Miles J.Spirituality In Heart Failure: A Review of the Literature from 2014 to 2019 to Identify Spiritual Care Needs and Spiritual Interventions[J]. Curr Opin Support Pa, 2020, 14(1):9-18.DOI:10.1097/SPC.0000000000000475.
[4] 赵越. 肿瘤病人灵性需求的现状及影响因素的研究[D]. 石河子:石河子大学, 2018.
[5] 刘悦晴,黄淑顺. 血清脑钠肽水平与老年慢性心力衰竭患者心功能的相关性[J]. 中国临床保健杂志, 2019,22(6):805-808.DOI:10.3969/J.issn.1672-6790.2019.06.022.
[6] Büssing A,Koenig HG.Spiritual Needs of Patients with Chronic Diseases[J].Religions,2010,1(1):18-27.DOI:10.3390/rel1010018.
[7] Büssing AXZW.Psychosocial and Spiritual Needs of Patients with Chronic Diseases:Validation of the Chinese version of the Spiritual Needs Questionnaire[J]. Integr Med, 2013,11(2):106-115.DOI:10.3736/jintegrmed2013020.
[8] 邓芳丽,张健,李宣霖,等. 中文版护士职业认同量表的信效度分析[J]. 护理学报, 2016,23(17):47-50.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2016.17.047.
[9] 王丽萍,欧阳文展,黄晓晴,等. 中文修订版老年人临终照顾问题态度问卷的信效度研究[J].护理学杂志, 2018,33(22):85-87.DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2018.22.085.
[10] 谢海燕,李梦奇,王颖,等. 中文版患者对护士提供灵性照护的需求量表信效度初步检验[J]. 中国护理管理, 2017,17(5):610-614.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2017.05.010.
[11] 田银娣,王怡恺,李静,等. 焦虑和抑郁量表在肝硬化患者临床应用中的信效度评价[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2019,22(1):105-108.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2019.01.028.
[12] 赵月,梁莉.护士职业价值感量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报,2020,27(16):1-5.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.16.001.
[13] Bekelman DB, Rumsfeld JS, Havranek EP, et al.Symptom Burden,Depression, and Spiritual Well-being: A Comparison of Heart Failure and Advanced Cancer Patients[J]. J Gen Intern Med, 2009, 24(5):592-598.DOI:10.1007/s11606-009-0931-y.
[1] 陈洁, 孟庆童, 刘惊今, 吴艳妮. 基于指南的慢性心力衰竭患者运动康复科普手册研制[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(9): 36-41.
[2] 余璐, 黄晓沁, 刘琳, 袁嘉敏, 邬青. 心力衰竭患者30天非计划性再入院风险预测模型的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(8): 43-48.
[3] 赵洁, 宋雅玲, 畅盼, 郭倩, 王锦华. 慢性心力衰竭患者及其照顾者心理弹性在疾病不确定感与生活质量间的主客体互倚中介模型研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 17-21.
[4] 袁华君, 段功香, 陈路桥, 王慧清. 癌症终末期患者救护意愿量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(6): 73-78.
[5] 简称苹, 张汉卿, 王丽英, 田海艳, 彭向东, 张亚楠, 蔡德芳. 本科护生自我调节学习策略量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(18): 12-15.
[6] . 静脉血栓栓塞症机械预防护理实践评价量表的研制与信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(12): 7-12.
[7] 张新芳, 谢庆, 张燕, 吴敏, 陈寄梅, 陈晓霞, 王玲. 行左心室辅助装置安装的终末期心力衰竭患者运动康复的最佳证据总结[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(10): 43-47.
[8] 孙姝怡, 孙国珍, 高敏, 于甜栖, 刘沈馨雨, 汤志杰, 卢静. 自我效能在慢性心力衰竭患者自我调节疲劳与运动依从性的中介效应[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(22): 63-67.
[9] 苗康康, 陈勤. 儿童环境健康知识和技能问卷的汉化及信效度分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(2): 17-22.
[10] 龙玲, 黄莹, 屠燕. 1例心肌致密化不全患者心脏收缩力调节器治疗术后护理[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(23): 64-66.
[11] 陈华, 孙兴兰, 肖丹, 涂惠, 刘佳文, 徐文君, 宋玉洁, 熊晓云. 心力衰竭患者易损期容量管理的最佳证据总结[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(21): 38-42.
[12] 汪张毅, 赵浩梅, 叶建亚, 张思爱, 王月, 王朝, 庞晓丽. 321例老年慢性心力衰竭患者灵性需求现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(1): 1-6.
[13] 王琦, 李领侠, 和巾杰, 郑华东, 米晓芬, 胡艳粉. 医护人员低血糖症知信行问卷的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(9): 9-13.
[14] 王惠, 仝旭, 李玲. 慢性心力衰竭患者自我管理体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(2): 31-36.
[15] 翟忠昌, 刘玉娥, 杨林杰, 刘兴红, 王慧华, 侯凯. 6例植入连续血流左心室辅助装置患者的术后护理[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(2): 62-64.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!