以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (9): 9-13.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.09.009

• 研究生园地 • 上一篇    下一篇

医护人员低血糖症知信行问卷的编制及信效度检验

王琦1, 李领侠2, 和巾杰1, 郑华东2, 米晓芬1, 胡艳粉2   

  1. 1.西安交通大学医学部 护理学系,陕西 西安 710061;
    2.西安交通大学第二附属医院,陕西 西安 710004
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-26 出版日期:2021-05-10 发布日期:2021-06-09
  • 通讯作者: 李领侠（1969-）,女,陕西西安人,硕士,主任护师,硕士研究生导师。E-mail:1633529972@qq.com
  • 作者简介:王琦（1995-）,女,河北沧州人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读。
  • 基金资助:
    陕西省科技厅社发攻关项目（2018SF-266）

Development and Validation of Questionnaire of Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Hypoglycemia for Medical Staff

WANG Qi1, LI Ling-xia2, HE Jin-jie1, ZHENG Hua-dong2, MI Xiao-fen1, HU Yan-fen2   

  1. 1. Department of Nursing, Health Science Center, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710061, China;
    2. The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710004, China
  • Received:2020-12-26 Online:2021-05-10 Published:2021-06-09

PDF (PC)

318

赞

摘要： 目的 编制医护人员低血糖症知信行问卷并对其进行信效度检验。方法 以知信行理论为框架,通过文献回顾和德尔菲专家函询形成初始问卷,对西安市某三级甲等医院1 215名医护人员进行调查,进一步检验问卷的信效度,形成正式问卷。结果 最终形成的问卷包括知识、态度、行为3个维度共23个条目,探索性因子分析显示3个公因子的累计方差贡献率为61.501%。问卷总内容效度为0.890,总Cronbach α系数为0.882,各维度的Cronbach α系数为0.769~0.934。总问卷折半信度为0.872,各维度的折半信度为0.788~0.916。验证性因子分析显示各适配值良好,提示该问卷拟合度良好。结论 医护人员低血糖症知信行问卷具有良好的信效度,可作为评价医护人员低血糖症知信行现状的研究工具。

关键词: 医护人员, 糖尿病, 低血糖症, 知信行, 信效度

Abstract: Objective To develop a questionnaire of knowledge, attitude and practice of hypoglycemia for medical staff and test its reliability and validity. Methods Based on Knowledge, Attitudes, Beliefs, and Practices (KABP) model, the initial draft of the questionnaire was developed after literature review and expert letter inquiry with Delphi method. Totally 1,215 doctors and nurses of a tertiary grade A hospital in Xi’an were investigated with the questionnaire, and the reliability and validity of the questionnaire were further tested to form a final version. Results The final questionnaire consisted of 23 items in 3 dimensions of knowledge, attitude and practice. Exploratory factor analysis showed that cumulative variance contribution rate was 61.501% and the total content validity 0.890. Cronbach α coefficient of the total scale was 0.882 and that of each dimension ranged from 0.769 to 0.934. The split-half reliability coefficient of the total scale was 0.872 and that of each dimension ranged from 0.788 to 0.916. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that each value fitted well, indicating good fitting of the questionnaire. Conclusion The questionnaire has good reliability and validity. It can be used as a research tool to evaluate the current situation of knowledge, attitude and behavior of hypoglycemia in medical staff.

Key words: medical staff, diabetes, hypoglycemia, knowledge,attitude and practice, reliability and validity

中图分类号: 

  • R471
[1] 葛均波,徐永健,王辰.内科学[M].9版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2018.
[2] Davis SN, Duckworth W, Emanuele N, et al.Effects of Severe Hypoglycemia on Cardiovascular Outcomes and Death in the Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial[J]. Diabetes Care, 2019,42(1):157-163.DOI: 10.2337/dc18-1144.
[3] Heller S, Lingvay I, Marso SP,et al.Risk of Severe Hypoglycemia and Its Impact in Type 2 Diabetes in DEVOTE[J].Diabetes Obes Metab,2020,22(12):2241-2247.DOI:10.1111/dom.14049.
[4] Bhutani G, Kalra S, Lamba S, et al.Effect of Diabetic Education on the Knowledge, Attitude and Practices of Diabetic Patients Towards Prevention of Hypoglycemia[J]. IndianJEndocrinol Metab, 2015,19(3):383-386.DOI:10.4103/2230-8210.152781.
[5] 程康耀,王晓丹,吕伟波.2型糖尿病病人低血糖恐惧影响因素及干预措施研究进展[J].护理研究,2021,35(4):665-668.DOI:10. 12102/j. issn.1009-6493. 2021. 04. 019.
[6] Emral R, Tetiker T, Sahin I, et al.An international Survey on Hypoglycemia among Insulin-treated Type I and Type II Diabetes Patients: Turkey Cohort of the Non-interventional IO HAT Study[J]. BMC Endocr Disord, 2018,18(1):9.DOI: 10.1186/s12902-018-0238-2.
[7] Tiruneh GG,Abebe N, Dessie G.Self-reported Hypoglycemia in Adult Diabetic Patients in East Gojjam,Northwest Ethiopia: Institution Based Cross-sectional Study[J]. BMC Endocr Disord, 2019,19(1):17.DOI:10.1186/s12902-019-0341-z.
[8] 许洪梅. 2型糖尿病患者低血糖恐惧—行为测评工具的研制及临床应用[D]. 天津:天津医科大学, 2017.
[9] Alzghoul BI, Abdullah NA.Pain Management Practices by Nurses:An Application of the Knowledge, Attitude and Practices (KAP) Model[J]. GlobJHealth Sci, 2015,8(6):154-160.DOI:10.5539/gjhs.v8n6p154.
[10] 中华医学会糖尿病学分会.中国2型糖尿病防治指南(2017年版)[J].中华糖尿病杂志,2018, 10(1):4-67.DOI:10.19538/j.nk2018040108.
[11] 沈犁,郭晓蕙.《中国糖尿病护理及教育指南》介绍[J].中国糖尿病杂志,2010, 18(4):310.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6187.2010.04.022.
[12] Houlden RL, Berard L, Cheng A, et al.Diabetes and Driving: 2015 Canadian Diabetes Association Updated Recommendations for Private and Commercial Drivers[J]. CanJDiabetes, 2015,39(5):347-353.DOI:10.1016/j.jcjd.2015.08.011.
[13] 李铮,刘宇.护理学研究方法[M].2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2018.
[14] 胡雁,王志稳. 护理研究[M]. 5 版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2017.
[15] 吴明隆. 结构方程模型[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2010:40-53.
[16] 盛晓娟,陈文月,傅巧美.Groningen 骨科社会支持量表汉化及其应用于髋膝关节置换术后患者中的信效度研究[J].护理学报,2019, 26(14):51-54. DOI:10.16460/j.issn.1008-9969.2019.14.051.
[17] 龚瑾,郑洁.重症监护室尊重氛围量表的汉化及信效度检验[J].护理学报,2019,26(13):55-58.DOI:10.16460/j.issn.1008-9969.2019.13.055.
[18] International Hypoglycemia Study Group.Glucose Concentrations of Less than 3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL) Should Be Reported in Clinical Trials: A Joint Position Statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes[J].Diabetes Care, 2017,40(1):155-157.DOI: 10.2337/dc16-2215.
[19] Hendrieckx C,Ivory N,Singh H, et al.Impact of Severe hypoglycaemia on Psychological Outcomes in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes:a Systematic Review[J].Diabet Med,2019,36(9):1082-1091. DOI: 10.1111/dme.14067.
[20] 左丹,赵锡丽,代旭丽.2型糖尿病患者低血糖风险预测模型的构建与验证[J].护理学杂志,2021,36(1):30-33.DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2021.01.030.
[1] 王小叶, 安俊红, 刘倩, 任琴, 高瑞琴, 范丽红. 共享决策在糖尿病足患者中应用的研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 32-37.
[2] 杨蓓, 叶红芳, 张宁, 相卢伟, 路诗雨. 老年2型糖尿病患者体力活动现状及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 7-12.
[3] 陈赟, 卢雨轩, 祁艳焕, 毛佳慧, 钟印芹. 刺灸法在糖尿病周围神经病变患者中的应用研究文献计量学分析[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 25-30.
[4] 王语, 赵慧杰, 肖梦伟, 范硕宁, 孙佳丽, 王珂心, 苏炫, 杨滢瑞. 糖尿病视网膜病变患者硅油填充期间疾病体验与应对的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(1): 68-72.
[5] 叶香, 黎楷, 黄敏, 张倩, 李际敏, 刘荣珍, 孟敏, 朱少玉, 谢翠华. 对成年2型糖尿病患者基于移动APP+家属共管血糖的研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(9): 60-65.
[6] 朱心悦, 嵇冰聪, 蓝雪芬, 季晓珍. 糖尿病患者电子健康素养研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 36-39.
[7] 牛世莲, 袁丽, 李饶. 糖尿病患者动态血糖监测的结构化教育研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(6): 39-42.
[8] 袁华君, 段功香, 陈路桥, 王慧清. 癌症终末期患者救护意愿量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(6): 73-78.
[9] 杨晓燕, 王静, 杨亚平. 上海市护理院护士失禁相关性皮炎知信行的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(24): 18-22.
[10] 陈丽燕, 任俊, 董辉, 陈慕莹, 罗伟香. 成人糖尿病患者低血糖管理的指南质量评价及内容分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(22): 41-47.
[11] 吴萍, 于宛辰, 柳嘉怡, 王汕珊, 胡燕. 糖尿病前期人群社会支持研究的范围综述[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(21): 49-54.
[12] 张国春, 李海云, 褚梁梁, 程雪, 王君芝. 产科护士围产期姑息照护知信行量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(2): 6-11.
[13] 梁晓珊, 林丽娜, 林娟, 邓玲, 林佳清. 趣味性扑克牌教学法在内分泌科实习护生胰岛素理论知识培训的应用[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(2): 36-39.
[14] 罗铎麟, 杨春清, 高萍, 胡清文, 徐小群. 2型糖尿病心理痛苦量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(19): 24-30.
[15] 简称苹, 张汉卿, 王丽英, 田海艳, 彭向东, 张亚楠, 蔡德芳. 本科护生自我调节学习策略量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(18): 12-15.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!