以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (23): 13-17.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.23.013

• 护理教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

护理本科生导师准入标准及岗位胜任力评价指标体系的构建

蔡立柏a, 刘延锦b, 白井双c, 徐海莉b, 袁媛d, 徐宏蕊d, 崔妙然a   

  1. 郑州大学第一附属医院 a.骨科; b.护理部; c.心血管内科; d.内科医学部,河南 郑州 450003
  • 收稿日期:2022-09-07 出版日期:2022-12-10 发布日期:2023-01-13
  • 通讯作者: 刘延锦（1959-）,女,河南荥阳人,硕士,主任护师,博士研究生导师。E-mail：liu-yanjin@126.com
  • 作者简介:蔡立柏（1989-）,男,黑龙江绥化人,硕士,主管护师。
  • 基金资助:
    河南省医学教育研究项目（Wjlx2021261）; 郑州大学教育教学改革研究与实践重点项目（2021ZZUJGLX063）

Construction of Admission and Competency Evaluation Indicator System for Supervisors of Nursing Undergraduates in Teaching Hospitals

CAI Li-baia, LIU Yan-jinb, BAI Jing-shuangc, XU Hai-lib, YUAN Yuand, XU Hong-ruid, CUI Miao-rana   

  1. a. Dept. of Orthopedics; b. Dept. of Nursing Administration; c. Dept. of Vasculocardiology; d. Dept. of Internal Medicine,the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450003, China
  • Received:2022-09-07 Online:2022-12-10 Published:2023-01-13

PDF (PC)

266

赞

摘要： 目的 构建教学医院护理本科生导师准入标准和岗位胜任力评价指标体系,为教学医院护理本科生导师的遴选及考核提供科学依据。方法 以胜任力冰山理论为理论基础,通过文献回顾、半结构式访谈、课题组讨论拟订评价指标体系初稿,采用德尔菲专家函询对全国15个省市9所三级甲等医院和7所高校的20名专家进行2轮专家函询,采用层次分析法,确定各级指标权重系数。结果 本研究共进行2轮专家函询,问卷有效回收率分别为88%、95%,权威系数分别为0.910和0.918,变异系数为0~0.232,肯德尔协调系数分别为0.296和0.313。最终形成包含4项准入标准、4项一级指标、9项二级指标和44项三级指标的教学医院护理本科生导师准入及岗位胜任力评价指标体系。结论 教学医院护理本科生导师准入及岗位胜任力评价指标体系的构建,方法具有科学性、内容具有实用性和可靠性,对教学医院护理本科生导师的遴选及考核具有重要意义。

关键词: 教学医院, 护理本科生导师, 岗位胜任力

Abstract: Objective To construct an admission and competency evaluation indicator system for supervisors of nursing undergraduates in teaching hospitals, and to provide reference for the selection and assessment of the supervisors. Methods Based on the framework of the iceberg competency model, the draft of evaluation indicator system for supervisors of nursing undergraduates in teaching hospitals was constructed after literature review and semi-structured interviews, then 2 rounds of consultation were conducted in 20 experts from 9 tertiary grade-A hospitals and 7 universities in 15 provinces in China using Delphi method. Analytic hierarchy process was used to analyze the index weight of the final evaluation indicator system. Results Effective response rate of the two rounds of expert consultation was 88% and 95%, authority coefficients 0.910 and 0.918, respectively. Coefficient of variation varied from 0 to 0.232, and Kendall harmony coefficient was 0.296 and 0.313, respectively. The final admission and competency evaluation indicator system for supervisors of nursing undergraduates in teaching hospitals consisted of 4 admission indicators, 4 first-level, 9 second-level, and 44 third-level indicators. Conclusion The admission and competency evaluation indicator system for supervisors of nursing undergraduates in teaching hospitals is scientific and reliable, which provide reference for the selection, evaluation, and management of supervisors of nursing undergraduates in teaching hospitals.

Key words: teaching hospitals, supervisors, competency

中图分类号: 

  • R47
[1] 国务院办公厅. 《关于加快医学教育创新发展的指导意见》[EB/OL].[2020-09-23].http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2020-09/23/content_5546479.html.
[2] McClelland DC. Testing for competence rather than for "intelligence"[J]. Am Psychol, 1973,28(1):1-14.DOI: 10.1037/h0034092.
[3] 蔡立柏,刘延锦,郭玉茹,等.骨科康复护理质量评价指标的构建[J].中华护理杂志,2021,56(4):508-514.DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2021.04.005.
[4] 刘纬华,石志宜,卢颖,等.科研护士岗位胜任力指标体系的构建研究[J].护理学报,2022,29(14):21-25.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.14.021.
[5] 李希琳,张琰,陶艳玲,等.基于决策评价导向模型构建广东省护理学本科毕业实习基地评价指标体系的研究[J]. 护理学报,2020, 27(18):15-20.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.18.015.
[6] Shin S, Kang Y, Hwang EH, et al.Factors Associated with Teaching Efficacy among Nurse Educators in Hospital Settings[J]. J Clin Nurs, 2021,30(7/8):1111-1119.DOI:10.1111/jocn.15656.
[7] Jarvis DH, McCullough KD, McParland TR. Nurse Education and Mathematical Competency: Implementation of an Online, Self-directed, Prerequisite Model[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2021, 18(24):13106.DOI:10.3390/ijerph182413106.
[8] Herron EK, Weeks KA.Development of a Clinical Competency Pedagogy with Senior Nursing Students as Preparation for Transition to Practice[J].Nurse Educ, 2021,46(6):E137-E138.DOI: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000001058.
[9] Carroll K.Advancing Nursing Practice Through Mentoring and Teaching-learning[J]. Nurs Sci Q, 2021,34(4):366-367. DOI:10.1177/08943184211031586.
[10] Marie A, Foucher L, Veiga M, et al.Student Tutoring, An essential Part of Nursing Practice[J]. Rev Infirm, 2022,71(280):49-50.DOI:10.1016/j.revinf.2022.02.018.
[11] 宋杰, 曲桂玉, 张玉珍, 等. 护理学专业骨干教师胜任力评价的量化指标体系构建[J]. 护理学报, 2020,27(14):13-16.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.14.013.
[12] Boso CM, van der Merwe AS, Gross J. Critical Thinking Disposition of Nursing Students: A Quantitative Investigation[J]. Nurse Educ Pract, 2021,55:103167. DOI:10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103167.
[13] 尚希磊. 导师包容性指导风格对硕士研究生科研创力的影响[D]. 广州:华南理工大学教育经济与管理, 2020.
[1] 纪媛媛, 王军, 俞洁, 张娜芹, 欧梦仙. 基于岗位胜任力构建神经外科新入职护士规范化培训指标体系[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(1): 27-30.
[2] 周洋, 王澜, 王项南, 方晓凤, 曲桂玉. 基于冰山理论构建医养结合背景下老年照护岗位胜任力特征模型[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(22): 30-35.
[3] 陈如婷, 卢秀英, 姚倩. 基于岗位胜任力的达芬奇机器人手术室护士培训方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(12): 31-35.
[4] 刘纬华, 石志宜, 卢颖, 赵敬, 邢丽媛, 白文辉, 李晓茜, 张红梅. 科研护士岗位胜任力指标体系的构建研究[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(14): 21-25.
[5] 汪苗, 杨燕, 李远珍, 管慧, 陶秀彬. 互联网+护理服务护士岗位胜任力评价指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(11): 20-24.
[6] 任黎, 赵秀芳. 基于洋葱模型的妇幼专科医院新护士岗位胜任力模型及指标体系构建[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(7): 21-25.
[7] 刘晓黎, 吴晓舟, 李硕, 杨国艺, 王泠, 刘树佳. 基于岗位胜任力的护士长分层培训体系构建[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(2): 10-15.
[8] 丁寒琴, 侯彩兰, 何夏君, 黄秋玲, 王越亚. 综合医院精神科开放式病房新护士岗位胜任力考核评价指标的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(5): 9-13.
[9] 吴超瑜,陈罡,徐蓉,刘尚昆. 麻醉恢复室护士岗位胜任力指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(12): 17-21.
[10] 王婷,周蓉,马玉红,顾玉芳,李国宏. 信息化平台在护士规范化培训中的应用研究[J]. 护理学报, 2017, 24(23): 9-12.
[11] 苏吉儿,夏雅雄,方仕婷,李爱夏. 养老机构护理员岗位胜任现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2016, 23(17): 51-53.
[12] 徐小萍,姚慧娇,王小丽,赵风霞,钱苗红. 应用Delphi法的助产综合实训项目设计[J]. 护理学报, 2016, 23(11): 14-16.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!