以质量求发展,以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (24): 36-41.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.24.036

• 循证护理 • 上一篇    下一篇

脑卒中后重返工作阻碍因素质性研究的Meta 整合

刘蕊, 韩雪娜, 杨富国, 耿文垚, 丁遥遥, 李梦飞   

  1. 青岛大学 护理学院,山东 青岛 266000
  • 收稿日期:2021-08-17 出版日期:2021-12-25 发布日期:2022-01-11
  • 通讯作者: 杨富国(1970-),男,山东青岛人,硕士,副教授,硕士研究生导师,护理学院副院长。E-mail:yfuguo@126.com
  • 作者简介:刘蕊(1995-),女,河北沧州人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读。

Barriers to Returning to Work after Stroke: A Qualitative Meta-synthesis

LIU Rui, HAN Xue-na, YANG Fu-guo, GENG Wen-yao, DING Yao-yao, LI Meng-fei   

  1. School of Nursing, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000,China
  • Received:2021-08-17 Online:2021-12-25 Published:2022-01-11

摘要: 目的 系统评价和整合脑卒中患者重返工作的阻碍因素质性研究。方法 计算机检索PubMed、EMbase、Cochrane Library、CINAHL、PsyINFO、CBM、中国知网及万方数据库,搜集关于脑卒中患者重返工作的质性研究,检索时限为建库至2020年9月。采用澳大利亚JBI循证卫生保健中心质性研究质量评价标准(2016)对文献进行评价,采用Meta整合方法对结果进行整合。结果 共纳入17篇文献,提炼21个结果,归成11个类别,合成3个整合结果。整合结果1:脑卒中后的身体损伤、心理障碍和角色适应不良阻碍幸存者重返工作;整合结果2 :社会支持系统的不完善、不可及阻碍幸存者重返工作;整合结果3:工作场所的不良环境阻碍幸存者重返工作。结论 中风后重返工作是一个复杂的过程,受社会、个人、康复部门多种因素的影响,政府、医疗卫生机构等相关人员需全面关注阻碍脑卒中患者重返工作的因素,及时给与针对性的支持帮助,以促进脑卒中后患者重返工作。

关键词: 脑卒中, 重返工作, 质性研究, 系统评价, Meta整合

Abstract: Objective To systematically evaluate and synthesize the barriers to returning to work in patients with strokes. Methods PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PsycINFO, CBM, CNKI, and Wanfang Data were searched for qualitative studies on strokes’ experience of returning to work from the inception to September, 2020. The results were assessed by a pooled integration approach using the Australian JBI Evidence-Based Health Care Center (2016) Quality Evaluation Standards Evaluation. Results Seventeen studies were included and twenty-one findings were grouped according to similarities into 17 new categories, which resulted in 3 synthesized findings.Integrated results 1: physical impairment, psychological impairment and role maladaptation after stroke prevented survivors from returning to work; Integration results 2: inadequate social support systems prevented survivors from returning to work;Integrated results 3: poor conditions in the workplace prevented survivors from returning to work. Conclusion Returning to work after stroke is a complex process which can be influenced by organizational, social or personal factors. Healthcare workers should pay full attention to the factors that prevent stroke patients from returning to work, and provide timely and targeted support to promote stroke patients to return to work.

Key words: stroke, returning to work, qualitativeresearch, systematic review, Meta-synthesis

中图分类号: 

  • R473.54
[1] 王赞,王慧,吴雯轩,等. 国外脑卒中患者重返工作岗位的干预研究进展[J]. 解放军护理杂志,2020,37(2):65-68.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2020.02.019.
[2] Chang W, Sohn M,Lee J,et al.Return to Work after Stroke: The KOSCO Study[J]. J Rehabil Med,2016,48(3): 273-279. DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028673.
[3] Palstam A,Tornbom M,Sunnerhagen KS.Experiences of Returning to Work and Maintaining Work 7 to 8 Years after a Stroke:A Qualitative Interview Study in Sweden[J].BMJ Open,2018,8(7):e21182.DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021182.
[4] 郭亚雯,王永利,梁莉莉,等.中青年脑卒中后重返工作研究现状及启示[J].护理研究,2020,34(9):1573-1577.
[5] Balasooriya-Smeekens C, Bateman A, Mant J, et al.Barriers and Facilitators to Staying in Work after Stroke:Insight from an Online Forum[J].BMJ Open,2016,6(4):e9974.
[6] 胡雁. 循证护理学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2012:130-140.
[7] Joanna Briggs Institute.The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools for Use in JBI Systematic Reviews Checklist for Qualitative Research[EB/OL].[2019-12-13].https://joannabriggs.org/research/critical-appraisal-tools.html.
[8] 胡雁. 如何开展质性研究的系统评价和Meta整合[J].上海护理, 2020, 20(7):1-5.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-8399.2020.07.001.
[9] Gard G, Pessah-Rasmussen H, Brogardh C,et al.Need for Structured Healthcare Organization and Support for Return to Work after Stroke in Sweden: Experiences of Stroke Survivors[J]. J Rehabil Med,2019, 51(10):741-748.DOI:10.2340/16501977-2591.
[10] Phillips J,Gaffney K,Phillips M,et al.Return to Work after Stroke-feasibility of 6-year follow-up[J]. Br J Occup Ther,2018,82(1):27-37.DOI:10.1177/0308022618791976.
[11] Norstedt M.The (Im)possibilities of Returning to Work after a Stroke[J]. Work,2017,56(4):637-647.DOI:1051-9815, 1051-9815.
[12] Soeker MS,Olaoye OA.Exploring the Experiences of Rehabilitated Stroke Survivors and Stakeholders with Regard to Returning to Work in South-west Nigeria[J]. Work,2017,57(4): 595-609.DOI:10.3233/WOR-172590.
[13] Balasooriya-Smeekens C,Bateman A,Mant J,et al.Barriers and Facilitators to Staying in Work after Stroke:Insight from an Online Forum[J]. BMJ Open,2016,6(4):e9974.DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009974.
[14] Vestling M, Ramel E,Iwarsson S.Thoughts and Experiences from Returning to Work after Stroke[J]. Work,2013,45(2): 201-211.DOI:10.3233/wor-121554.
[15] Gustafsson L,Turpin M.Analysis of One Stroke Survivor’s Transition into Vocational Experiences[J]. Brain Impairment,2012,13(1):99-107.DOI:10.1017/BrImp.2012.8.
[16] Hartke RJ,Trierweiler R,Bode R.Critical Factors Related to Return to Work after Stroke: A Qualitative Study[J]. Top Stroke Rehabil,2011, 18(4):341-351.DOI:10.1310/tsr1804-341.
[17] Culler KH,Wang YC,Byers K,et al.Barriers and Facilitators of Return to Work for Individuals with Strokes:Perspectives of the Stroke Survivor,Vocational Specialist, and Employer[J]. Top Stroke Rehabil,2011,18(4):325-340.DOI:10.1310/tsr1804-325.
[18] Flinn NA,Stube JE.Post-stroke Fatigue: Qualitative Study of Three Focus Groups[J]. Occup Ther Int,2010,17(2): 81-91.DOI:10.1002/oti.286.
[19] Gilworth G, Phil M, Cert A,et al.Personal Experiences of Returning to Work Following Stroke: An Exploratory Study[J].Work,2009,34(1):95-103.DOI:10.3233/wor-2009-0906.
[20] Alaszewski A, Alaszewski H,Potter J,et al.Working after a Stroke: Survivors’ Experiences and Perceptions of Barriers to and Facilitators of the Return to Paid Employment[J]. Disabil Rehabil,2007,29(24):1858-1869.DOI:10.1080/09638280601143356.
[21] Medin J,Barajas J,Ekberg K.Stroke Patients’ Experiences of Return to Work[J]. Disabil Rehabil,2006,28(17): 1051-1060.DOI:10.1080/09638280500494819.
[22] Koch L,Egbert N,Coeling H,et al.Returning to Work after the Onset of Illness: Experiences of Right Hemisphere Stroke Survivors[J]. Rehabil Couns Bull,2005,48(4):209-218.DOI:10.1177/00343552050480040201.
[23] Lock S,Jordan L,Bryan K,et al.Work after Stroke: Focusing on Barriers and Enablers[J]. 2005, 20(1):33-47.DOI:10.1080/0968759042000283629.
[24] Corr S,Wilmer S.Returning to Work after a Stroke: an Important but Neglected Area[J]. Br J Occup Ther,2003, 66(5):186-192.DOI:10.1177/030802260306600502.
[1] 伍丽华, 吴心雨, 赖湘瑜, 邓宝贵, 黄泽青, 赵耀, 廖源, 沈彩萍, 李瑜. 人工关节置换术后患者深静脉血栓风险预测模型的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 12-16.
[2] 吴超瑜, 刘尚昆. 麻醉恢复室护士危机管理能力的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 17-21.
[3] 陈恩琳, 莫丰菱, 庄泽明, 张明哲, 周佳坤, 黄丽芳, 纪龙飞, 张莉芳. 脑卒中单侧空间忽略评估工具的范围综述[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 43-49.
[4] 谭雯渲, 张容, 张立力, 王玮, 邵艳红, 方庆虹, 朱瑾. 心脏移植患者手术决策困境的现象学研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 69-73.
[5] 曹敏, 张培莉, 侯晓雅, 高超越, 郭林芳, 李滢. ABC-X模型下结直肠癌化疗患者照顾者营养照护体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 13-18.
[6] 李嘉琪, 莫文娟, 王一棋, 王洁, 李梦楠, 刘兴, 冯佳. 基于COSMIN方法对慢性疼痛患者恐动症坦帕评分表的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 56-62.
[7] 孙娟, 李亚莉, 马安娜, 王华, 张会敏. 护理研究生对社区护理实践思政教学体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(1): 19-23.
[8] 李珂, 贺雨琼, 李雨蔚, 常颖. 脑卒中患者跌倒恐惧干预研究的范围综述[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(1): 50-55.
[9] 王语, 赵慧杰, 肖梦伟, 范硕宁, 孙佳丽, 王珂心, 苏炫, 杨滢瑞. 糖尿病视网膜病变患者硅油填充期间疾病体验与应对的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(1): 68-72.
[10] 林丽华, 盖薇, 王语璇, 尹丽丽, 吕郑晗, 陶艳玲. 自我同情在脑卒中患者社会支持与病耻感的中介作用[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(9): 15-19.
[11] 李丁丁, 王帅有, 朱杉杉, 郭鑫, 张会敏, 王宏茹, 潘勤. 脑卒中患者支持性照护需求评估工具的范围综述[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(9): 48-53.
[12] 冯春玲, 胡夏晴, 徐琳, 蔡鑫健, 徐琴鸿. 基于社会生态系统理论的电话指导公众实施心肺复苏行为动机及需求的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(9): 66-71.
[13] 郑亚楠, 郭惠娟, 张振香, 蔡姝倩. 脑卒中半失能患者自我接纳的潜在剖面分析及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(8): 1-6.
[14] 王冰冰, 马英芝, 孙小卫, 杨琴, 肖江琴. 中青年脑卒中患者与配偶二元应对潜在剖面分析及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(8): 7-12.
[15] 余璐, 黄晓沁, 刘琳, 袁嘉敏, 邬青. 心力衰竭患者30天非计划性再入院风险预测模型的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(8): 43-48.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!