以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (22): 27-32.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2019.22.027

• 循证护理 • 上一篇    下一篇

低水平激光治疗慢性伤口有效性与安全性的Meta分析

邓波1, 李飞1, 吴秀丽2, 李显蓉2   

  1. 1.西南医科大学 护理学院,四川 泸州646000;
    2.西南医科大学附属医院,四川 泸州 646000
  • 收稿日期:2019-07-22 发布日期:2020-07-27
  • 通讯作者: 李显蓉（1968-）,女,四川泸州人,本科学历,硕士研究生导师,主任护师。E-mail:1204987356@qq.com
  • 作者简介:邓 波（1994-）,男,四川巴中人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读。
  • 基金资助:
    泸州市科技计划项目[2017-S-40（1/18）]

Efficacy and Safety of Low-level Laser Therapy for Chronic Wounds: A Meta-analysis

DENG Bo1, LI Fei1, WU Xiu-li2, LI Xian-rong2   

  1. 1. School of Nursing, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China;
    2. Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China
  • Received:2019-07-22 Published:2020-07-27

PDF (PC)

375

赞

摘要： 目的 评价低水平激光治疗慢性伤口的有效性和安全性。方法 检索PubMed、Medline、EMbase、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、BMJ Best Practice、CBM、中国知网、万方、维普数据库,并检索伤口治疗相关专业网站,搜集关于低水平激光治疗慢性伤口的随机对照试验,检索时间均从建库至2018年12月,使用Cochrane Review Handbook 5.1.0进行质量评价,采用RevMan 5.3进行Meta分析。结果 共纳入16个随机对照研究,509例患者。结果 显示：低水平激光组未愈合伤口面积[MD=-0.63,95%CI（-0.97,-0.29）,P<0.01]、伤口面积平均减少率[MD=22.17,95%CI（19.34, 25.00）,P<0.01]、伤口治愈人数[OR=2.04,95%CI（1.33,3.12）,P<0.01]、伤口疼痛值[MD=-4.34,95%CI（-4.92,-3.75,P<0.01]与对照组比较差异均有统计学意义,而不良事件发生率[OR=0.66,95%CI（0.24,1.81）,P=0.42]与对照组比较差异无统计学意义。结论 低水平激光能加速伤口愈合,有效减轻伤口治疗期间患者疼痛,并且是安全的。受纳入研究数量和质量的限制,上述结论尚待更多高质量研究予以验证。

关键词: 低水平激光, 下肢静脉溃疡, 糖尿病足, 压力性溃疡, Meta分析

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of low-level laser therapy for chronic wounds. Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of low-level laser therapy for chronic wounds were collected from PubMed, Medline, EMbase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, BMJ Best Practice, CBM, China Knowledge Network, Wanfang data and VIP data by computer from the inception to December of 2018. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using Cochrane Review Handbook 5.1.0 and performed using RevMan 5.3 software. Results Sixteen RCTs and 509 patients were included in the study. Meta-analysis showed that the area of non-healing wounds in the low-level laser group [MD=-0.63, 95%CI (-0.97, -0.29), P<0.01], mean reduction in wound area [MD=22.17, 95%CI(19.34, 25.00), P<0.01 ], the number of wounds cured [OR=2.04, 95%CI (1.33, 3.12), P=0.01] and the value of wound pain [MD=-4.34, 95%CI (-4.92, -3.75), P<0.01] in the observation group were significantly different from those of the control group, but the incidence of adverse events [OR=0.66,95%CI（0.24, 1.81）, P=0.42] was not statistically significant. Conclusion Low-level laser can accelerate wound healing, effectively alleviate pain during wound treatment, and it is safe. Subject to the limitations of the number and quality of studies included, the above conclusions are yet to be verified by more high-quality studies.

Key words: low-level laser, varicose ulcer, diabetic foot, pressure ulcer, Meta-analysis

中图分类号: 

  • R473.5
[1] 中华医学会创伤学分会组织修复专业委员会.慢性伤口诊疗指导意见[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2011.
[2] De Moraes J M, Eterno D O, Moura V B, et al. Anti-inflammatory Effect of Low-intensity Laser on the Healing of Third-degree Burn Wounds in Rats[J].Lasers Med Sci, 2013,28(4):1169-1176. DOI:10.1007/s10103-012-1213-1.
[3] Machado R S, Viana S, Sbruzzi G.Low-Level Laser Therapy in the Treatment of Pressure Ulcers: Systematic Review[J]. Lasers Med Sci,2017, 32(4):937-944.DOI:10.1007/s10103-017-2150-9.
[4] Schubert V.Effects of Phototherapy on Pressure Ulcer Healing in Elderly Patients after a Falling Trauma. A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study[J]. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed,2001,17(1):32-38.DOI:10.1034/j.1600-0781.2001.017001032.
[5] Lagan K M, McKenna T A, Witherow, et al. Low-Intensity Laser Therapy/Combined Phototherapy in the Management of Chronic Venous Ulceration: A Placebo-controlled Study[J]. J Clin Laser Med Surg, 2002, 20(3):109-116. DOI:10.1089/104454702760090173.
[6] Lucas C, Van M J, Gemert R J.Efficacy of Low-level Laser Therapy in the Management of Stage III Decubitus Ulcers: A Prospective, Observer-blinded Multicentre Randomised Clinical Trial[J]. Lasers Med Sci,2003, 18(2):72-77. DOI:10.1007/s10103-003-0259-5.
[7] Kopera D, Kokol R, Berger C, et al.Does the Use of Low-level Laser Influence Wound Healing in Chronic Venous Leg Ulcers?[J]. J Wound Care,2005,14(8):391-394. DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2005.14.8.26825.
[8] Caetano K S, Frade M A, Minatel D G, et al.Phototherapy Improves Healing of Chronic Venous Ulcers[J]. Photomed Laser Surg,2009,27(1):111-118.DOI:10.1089/pho.2008.2398.
[9] Barreto J G, Salgado C G.Clinic-Epidemiological Evaluation of Ulcers in Patients with Leprosy Sequelae and the Effect of Low-level Laser Therapy on Wound Healing: A Randomized Clinical Trial[J]. BMC Infect Dis,2010,10(1):237. DOI:10.1186/1471-2334-10-237.DOI10.1186/1471-2334-10-237.
[10] Leclère F M, Puechguiral I R, Rotteleur G, et al.A Prospective Randomized Study of 980 Nm Diode Laser-assisted Venous Ulcer Healing on 34 Patients[J]. Wound Repair Regen,2010, 18(6):580-585.DOI:10.1111/j.1524-475X.2010.00637.
[11] Kaviani A, Djavid G E, Ataie F L, et al.A Randomized Clinical Trial on the Effect of Low-level Laser Therapy on Chronic Diabetic Foot Wound Healing: A Preliminary Report[J]. Photomed Laser Surg,2011,29(2):109-114. DOI: 10.1089/pho.2009.2680.
[12] Erchonia Corporation. Efficacy Study of the Application of Low-level Laser Light to Treat Venous Stasis Ulcers[EB/OL].(2011-06-20)[2019-05-22].http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/nct01376050.
[13] Sandoval O, Herrera V E, Camargo L, et al.Effects of Low-level Laser Therapy and High Voltage Stimulation on Diabetic Wound Healing[J]. Revista Salud UIS, 2014,46(2):107-117.
[14] Feitosa M, Carvalho A, Feitosa V C, et al.Effects of The Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) in the Process of Healing Diabetic Foot Ulcers[J]. Acta Cirurgica Brasileira,2015,30(12):852-857. DOI:10.1590/S0102-865020150120000010.
[15] Carvalho A F, Feitosa M C, Coelho N P, et al.Low-level Laser Therapy and Calendula Officinalis in Repairing Diabetic Foot Ulcers[J]. Rev Esc Enferm USP, 2016, 50(4):628-634. DOI:10.1590/S0080-623420160000500013.
[16] Mathur R K, Sahu K, Saraf S, et al.Low-level Laser Therapy as an Adjunct to Conventional Therapy in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers[J]. Lasers Med Sci,2017,32(2):275-282. DOI:10.1007/s10103-016-2109-2.
[17] Vitse J, Bekara F, Byun S, et al.A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Randomized Evaluation of the Effect of Low-Level Laser Therapy on Venous Leg Ulcers[J]. Int J Low Extrem Wounds, 2017,16(1):29-35.DOI:10.1177/1534734617690948.
[18] De Alencar Fonseca Santos J, Campelo M B, de Oliveira R A, et al. Effects of Low-power Light Therapy on the Tissue Repair Process of Chronic Wounds in Diabetic Feet[J]. Photomed Laser Surg,2018,36(6):298-304.DOI:10.1089/pho.2018.4455.
[19] Tantawy S A, Abdelbasset W K, Kamel D, et al.A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Helium-neon Laser Therapy and Infrared Laser Therapy in Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcer[J]. Lasers Med Sci, 2018,33(9):1901-1906. DOI:10.1007/s10103-018-2553-2.
[20] 赵敏,冯金法,杨娜娜,等.氦氖激光联合阿托伐他汀钙治疗糖尿病足的疗效观察[J].影像研究与医学应用, 2017,1(11):173-174. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2096-3807.2017.11.114.
[21] 夏飞飞,王利君,王军辉.半导体激光照射治疗下肢静脉性溃疡临床观察及护理[J].中国激光医学杂志,2016,25(1):47-49. DOI:10.13480/jissn1003-9430.2016.0047.
[22] Houreld N N, Ayuk S M, Abrahamse H.Expression of Genes in Normal Fibroblast Cells (WS1) in Response to Irradiation at 660nm[J]. J Photochem Photobiol B,2014,130:146-152. DOI:10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2013.11.018.
[23] Steven L, Percival, Katja E.A Review of the Scientific Evidence for Biofilms in Wounds[J].Wound Repair Regen.2012.20.647-657. DOI:10.1111/j.1524-475X.2012.00836.
[24] 李彦红,张继刚,徐艳峰,等.发光二极管630 nm红光和460 nm蓝光照射对日本大耳白兔皮肤创面愈合的影响[J].中国医学科学院学报, 2017,39(3):301-306. DOI:10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.2017.03.001.
[25] 毛和水,姚敏,俞为荣,等.630~650 nm光照射对糖尿病小鼠创面愈合的影响[J].上海交通大学学报, 2013,33(9):1209-1214.
[26] Wu X, Alberico S, Saidu E, et al.Organic Light Emitting Diode Improves Diabetic Cutaneous Wound Healing in Rats[J]. Wound Repair Regen, 2015,23(1):104-114. DOI:10.1111/wrr.12258.
[27] Myakishev R, Stadler M I, Brondon P, et al.A Preliminary Study of the Safety of Red Light Phototherapy of Tissues Harboring Cancer[J].Photomed Laser Surg,2012,30(9):551-558. DOI:10.1089/pho.2011.3186.
[1] 王小叶, 安俊红, 刘倩, 任琴, 高瑞琴, 范丽红. 共享决策在糖尿病足患者中应用的研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 32-37.
[2] 姚婉晴, 杨立状, 陈旦旦, 张晚秋, 卢薇, 管翠红, 李海. 不同非药物干预措施改善乳腺癌患者疲乏效果的网状Meta分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(24): 37-43.
[3] 周春香, 饶媛, 崔梦娇, 商芷颖, 张天岚, 裘奚晨卉, 秦艳萍. 基于传感器技术的智能康复设备在脑卒中患者步态康复应用效果的Meta分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(24): 44-50.
[4] 章明阳, 刘京辉, 金雁, 徐文琪, 李斌飞, 黄珊, 杜李百合, 侯亚甜, 李小寒. 围手术期低体温风险预测模型的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(22): 54-60.
[5] 罗海琴, 谢日华, 梁绰意. 正念干预对不孕症女性心理健康和生活质量影响的Meta分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(17): 28-34.
[6] 黄丽华, 翟巾帼, 田金徽, 孔淦霞, 王雪岩, 陈莉瑾, 袁心愿, 耿薪茜, 陈昭桐. 妊娠期生活方式干预对妊娠期高血压疾病进展及母婴结局影响的Meta分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(24): 38-42.
[7] 孙菲, 刘敏, 胡珊珊, 吴蕾, 刘君, 李萍. 基于Meta分析构建早产儿母亲泌乳建立风险预测评分模型[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(23): 1-5.
[8] 牛雨楠, 晋溶辰, 何娅娜, 黄金. 糖尿病足就诊延迟障碍因素及时间界定的研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(20): 16-18.
[9] 钱怡, 周清平, 梁振宁, 王晨曦, 刘涵月, 于瑶, 玉素扑江·图尔荪, 王冬. 慢性病患者参与医患共同决策影响因素的Meta分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(20): 19-23.
[10] 余小燕, 刘于, 黄毅. 小丑照护对患儿焦虑疼痛干预效果的Meta分析[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(4): 21-26.
[11] 李婧雯, 梅紧紧, 王艺莹, 郭健, 任彬彬, 冯晓东, 李瑞青. 不同针刺方法治疗脑卒中后患者肢体痉挛总有效率的贝叶斯网状Meta分析[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(3): 1-6.
[12] 胡正中, 廖园园, 周毅峰, 彭瑨, 秦月兰. 结直肠癌患者手术切口感染危险因素的Meta分析[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(8): 23-27.
[13] 陆涵, 赵媛, 朱晓丽, 林惠仙, 史婷婷. 基于改良早期预警评分护送方案在急危重症患者院内转运中应用效果的Meta分析[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(4): 19-25.
[14] 从维莲, 周春兰, 胡明钰, 刘丽萍. 延迟自体乳房重建术对上肢淋巴水肿治疗效果的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(4): 26-30.
[15] 徐思英, 黄莹, 刘丽华, 胡雅. 基于互联网认知行为疗法对产妇负性情绪干预效果的Meta分析[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(4): 36-42.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!