以质量求发展,以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (4): 26-30.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.04.026

• 循证护理 • 上一篇    下一篇

延迟自体乳房重建术对上肢淋巴水肿治疗效果的系统评价

从维莲1,2, 周春兰2,3, 胡明钰2, 刘丽萍2   

  1. 1.中国科学院大学附属肿瘤医院(浙江省肿瘤医院),浙江 杭州 310022;
    2.南方医科大学南方医院,广东 广州 510515;
    3.南方医院JBI循证护理合作中心,广东 广州 510515
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-20 出版日期:2021-02-25 发布日期:2021-03-12
  • 通讯作者: 周春兰(1962-),女,湖南益阳人,硕士,主任护师,博士研究生导师,护理部主任。E-mail:lanchun200488@126.com
  • 作者简介:从维莲(1995-),女,安徽六安人,硕士学历,护师。
  • 基金资助:
    2019年度南方医院护理创优-循证实践专项项目(2019EBNc002)

Effect of Delayed Autologous Breast Reconstruction on Patients with Upper Extremity Lymphedema: A systematic Review

CONG Wei-lian1,2, ZHOU Chun-lan2,3, HU Ming-yu2, LIU Li-ping2   

  1. 1.Cancer Hospital of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310022, China;
    2.Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China;
    3.PR China Nanfang Nursing Centre for Evidence-based Practice: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Guangzhou 510515, China
  • Received:2020-07-20 Online:2021-02-25 Published:2021-03-12

摘要: 目的 系统评价延迟自体乳房重建术治疗上肢淋巴水肿的效果。方法 检索Cochrane Library、PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science数据库,搜集关于延迟自体乳房重建术对上肢淋巴水肿治疗效果的研究,检索时间为建库至2020年6月。由2名研究员独立筛选符合标准的文献并进行数据提取,采用澳大利亚JBI循证卫生保健中心的文献质量评价工具对纳入文献质量进行评价,采用RevMan 5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果 纳入11篇文献,其中6篇纳入定量合成分析,Meta分析结果显示,64.8%(95%CI,0.32~0.88)的患者无论是否接受淋巴结移植,进行乳房重建术后淋巴水肿均有所改善。亚组分析结果显示,84.4%(95%CI,0.72~0.92)的患者在接受乳房重建术和淋巴结移植后淋巴水肿有所改善,而仅有21.9%(95%CI,0.14~0.33)的患者在只接受乳房重建术后淋巴水肿有所改善。结论 延迟自体乳房重建术可以改善乳腺癌患者术后上肢淋巴水肿,其中淋巴结移植可能是促进淋巴水肿改善的因素。

关键词: 乳房重建, 乳腺癌, 淋巴水肿, Meta分析

Abstract: Objective To systematically evaluate the effect of delayed autologous breast reconstruction in the treatment of upper limb lymphedema. Methods The databases of Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science were searched to collect studies on therapeutic effect of delayed autologous breast reconstruction on upper limb lymphedema from the inception to June 2020. The eligible articles were independently screened by two researchers and the data were extracted. The quality of the included literature was evaluated by the literature quality evaluation tool of the JBI, and the RevMan5.3 software was used for Meta analysis. Results Eleven articles were included, of which six were quantitative synthetic analysis. Meta analysis showed that 64.8%(95% confidence interval, 0.32~0.88) of the patients reduced lymphedema after breast reconstruction whether they received lymph node transplantation or not. Subgroup analysis showed that 84.4% (95% confidence interval, 0.72~0.92) of patients reduced lymphedema after breast reconstruction and lymph node transplantation,while only 21.9%(95% confidence interval,0.14~0.33) reduced lymphedema after breast reconstruction. Conclusion Delayed autologous breast reconstruction can improve upper limb lymphedema in patients with breast cancer, and lymph node transplantation may be the largest contributing factor leading to lymphedema improvement.

Key words: breast reconstruction, breast cancer, lymphedema, Meta analysis

中图分类号: 

  • R473.73
[1] Taghian NR, Miller CL, Jammallo LS, et al.Lymphedema Following Breast Cancer Treatment and Impact on Quality of Life: A Review[J]. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol,2014,92(3):227-234. DOI:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2014.06.004.
[2] 杨伊兰,龙笑.继发性淋巴水肿的治疗进展[J].医学研究杂志,2020,49(3):170-174.
[3] Chang DW, Kim S.Breast Reconstruction and Lymphedema[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg,2010,125(1):19-23. DOI:10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181c49477.
[4] Ciudad P, Manrique OJ,Bustos SS,et al.Combined Microvascular Breast and Lymphatic Reconstruction with Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap and Gastroepiploic Vascularized Lymph Node Transfer for Postmastectomy Lymphedema Patients[J]. Gland Surg,2020,9(2):512-520. DOI:10.21037/gs.2020.01.14.
[5] Sinelnikov MY, Chen K,Sukorceva NS,et al.A Clinical Case of Breast Reconstruction with Greater Omentum Flap for Treatment of Upper Extremity Lymphedema[J].Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open,2019,7(9):e2402.DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000002402 .
[6] 守丹,梁欣,黄金丹,等.抗阻运动对血液透析患者血压控制及运动耐量恢复效果Meta分析[J].护理学报,2020,27(15):44-49.
[7] 陈月红,杜亮,耿兴远,等. 无对照二分类数据的Meta分析在RevMan软件中的实现[J].中国循证医学杂志,2014, 14(7):889-896.
[8] Yang Z, Huang S, Wang J, et al.A Retrospective Study of Lymphatic Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous/Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flaps for Breast Cancer Treatment-induced Upper-limb Lymphoedema[J].Sci Rep,2017,7(1):80. DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-00164-1.
[9] De Brucker B, Zeltzer A, Seidenstuecker K, et al.Breast Cancer-related Lymphedema:Quality of Life after Lymph Node Transfer[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2016,137(6):1673-1680. DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000002169.
[10] Inbal A, Teven CM, Chang DW.Latissimus Dorsi Flap with Vascularized Lymph Node Transfer for Lymphedema Treatment: Technique, Outcomes, Indications and Review of Literature[J]. J Surg Oncol,2017,115(1):72-77.DOI:10.1002/jso.24347.
[11] Chen R, Mu L, Zhang H, et al.Simultaneous Breast Reconstruction and Treatment of Breast Cancer-related Upper Arm Lymphedema with Lymphatic Lower Abdominal Flap[J]. Ann Plast Surg,2014,73(Suppl):S12-17. DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000000322.
[12] Saaristo AM, Niemi TS, Viitanen TP, et al.Microvascular Breast Reconstruction and Lymph Node Transfer for Postmastectomy Lymphedema Patients[J]. Ann Surg, 2012,255(3):468-473. DOI:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182426757.
[13] Lee KT, Lim SY, Pyun JK, et al.Improvement of Upper Extremity Lymphedema after Delayed Breast Reconstruction with an Extended Latissimus Dorsi Myocutaneous Flap[J]. Arch Plast Surg, 2012,39(2):154-157. DOI:10.5999/aps.2012.39.2.154.
[14] Abbas Khan MA, Mohan A, Hardwicke J, et al.Objective Improvement in Upper Limb Lymphoedema Following Ipsilateral Latissimus Dorsi Pedicled Flap Breast reconstruction-a Case Series and Review of Literature[J].J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 2011,64(5):680-684. DOI:10.1016/j.bjps.2010.06.014.
[15] Blanchard M, Arrault M, Vignes S.Positive Impact of Delayed Breast Reconstruction on Breast-cancer Treatment-related Arm Lymphoedema[J].J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg,2012,65(8):1060-1063. DOI:10.1016/j.bjps.2012.03.019.
[16] Fosnot J, Fischer JP, Wu LC, et al.The Patient’s Perspective on the Effect of Autologous Breast Reconstruction on Lymphedema[J]. Ann Plast Surg, 2015,75(2):149-152. DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000000115.
[17] Siotos C, Hassanein AH, Bello RJ,et al.Delayed Breast Reconstruction on Patients with Upper Extremity Lymphedema: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Pooled Analysis[J]. Ann Plast Surg,2018,81(6):730-735.DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000001542.
[18] Parrett BM, Sepic J, Pribaz JJ.The Contralateral Rectus Abdominis Musculocutaneous Flap for Treatment of Lower Extremity Lymphedema[J]. Ann Plast Surg, 2009,62(1):75-79. DOI:10.1097/SAP.0b013e31817439de.
[19] Siotos C, Sebai ME, Wan EL, et al.Breast Reconstruction and Risk of Arm Lymphedema Development: A Meta-analysis[J]. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 2018,71(6):807-818.DOI:10.1016/j.bjps.2018.01.012.
[20] Forte AJ, Cinotto G, Boczar D, et al.Lymph Node Transfer Combined with Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforators and Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Procedures: A Systematic Review[J]. Gland Surg, 2020,9(2):521-527.DOI:10.21037/gs.2020.02.11.
[21] Raju A, Chang DW.Vascularized Lymph Node Transfer for Treatment of Lymphedema:A Comprehensive Literature Review[J]. Ann Surg, 2015,261(5):1013-1023.DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000000763.
[1] 华晶, 张青月, 王燕, 程畅, 张秀丽, 张爱爱. 问题提示清单在乳腺癌手术患者中的应用研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(8): 18-22.
[2] 李佳萍, 朱云霞, 朱宇. 乳腺癌化疗患者症状群的范围综述[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(4): 60-64.
[3] 赵国瑞, 刘高明, 张凤, 周颖. 宫颈癌患者术后下肢淋巴水肿风险预测模型的构建及验证[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(24): 7-12.
[4] 姚婉晴, 杨立状, 陈旦旦, 张晚秋, 卢薇, 管翠红, 李海. 不同非药物干预措施改善乳腺癌患者疲乏效果的网状Meta分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(24): 37-43.
[5] 周春香, 饶媛, 崔梦娇, 商芷颖, 张天岚, 裘奚晨卉, 秦艳萍. 基于传感器技术的智能康复设备在脑卒中患者步态康复应用效果的Meta分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(24): 44-50.
[6] 王婷婷, 沈文彬, 李温荣, 陈滢滢, 时佳静, 张睿, 魏亚培. 淋巴康复护理工作室的构建与运行效果评价[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(23): 45-48.
[7] 章明阳, 刘京辉, 金雁, 徐文琪, 李斌飞, 黄珊, 杜李百合, 侯亚甜, 李小寒. 围手术期低体温风险预测模型的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(22): 54-60.
[8] 李苗, 李红梅, 张俊, 李盼盼, 张宇彤, 王茜, 李沁瑶. 乳腺癌化疗患者自我倡权潜在类别及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(20): 19-23.
[9] 罗海琴, 谢日华, 梁绰意. 正念干预对不孕症女性心理健康和生活质量影响的Meta分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(17): 28-34.
[10] 戴美芬, 梁钰贞, 杨静, 尤燕燕, 杨清, 昌广婷, 区幸莹, 黄传蔷, 陈智星, 区洁芬. 基于循证和中医理念的乳腺癌化疗患者癌因性疲乏护理干预方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(15): 34-38.
[11] . 徒手淋巴引流技术临床应用研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(12): 32-35.
[12] 陈茜, 胡露红, 孙玲, 高娉婷, 王璐, 祝贤惠. 多学科协作背景下乳腺癌化疗外周神经毒性症状护理方案的构建与应用[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(8): 34-38.
[13] 马珠月, 姚珊珊, 史妍妍, 陆宁宁, 邾萍, 程芳. 女性乳腺癌患者淋巴水肿风险感知评估问卷的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(4): 1-5.
[14] 柴春燕, 陆亚青, 杨雪芳, 王冬梅, 李丹. 5例阴茎癌术后下肢合并阴囊重度淋巴水肿患者的护理体会[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(4): 72-74.
[15] 高杰, 李惠萍, 宋江艳, 李嘉欣, 周梦珂, 张珊珊, 庞自云. 以应对为焦点的乳腺癌患者家庭韧性干预方案构建[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(3): 6-10.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!