以质量求发展,以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (5): 30-33.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2024.05.030

• 护理管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

体检护士能力绩效考核方案的构建

罗霞, 刘玉萍, 帅平, 关华, 杨华, 姚晓琴   

  1. 四川省医学科学院 四川省人民医院 健康管理中心,四川 成都 610000
  • 收稿日期:2023-07-20 出版日期:2024-03-10 发布日期:2024-04-08
  • 通讯作者: 刘玉萍(1960-),女,四川泸州人,硕士,主任医师,硕士研究生导师。E-mail:18981838972@163.com
  • 作者简介:罗霞(1989-),女,四川内江人,本科学历,护师。

Construction of competence performance appraisal scheme for nurses in physical examination center

LUO Xia, LIU Yu-ping, SHUAI Ping, GUAN Hua, YANG Hua, YAO Xiao-qin   

  1. Health Management Center, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu 610000, China
  • Received:2023-07-20 Online:2024-03-10 Published:2024-04-08

摘要: 目的 通过分析体检护士现行绩效方案的优劣势,探索能力绩效方案的可行性,构建适用于体检中心的护理绩效考核方案。方法 引入能力绩效概念,通过查阅文献、调查、访谈等方法拟定指标体系初稿,通过德尔菲法对专家组进行2轮函询,运用层次分析法确定指标权重并进行一致性检验。结果 指标权重确认2轮函询专家均发出问卷15份,回收15份,积极率100%;2轮权威系数Cr分别为0.703、0.712,整体指标协调系数W为0.415、0.423。方案最终确定由4个一级指标和17个二级指标组成。通过满意度调查发现,能力绩效考核方案的满意度得分(7.20±1.25)分,明显高于现行绩效管理方案(6.29±1.40)(P<0.05)。结论 能力绩效考核方案更适合岗位多、灵活性强的体检护理工作,能力绩效考核方案更能体现公平、多劳多得、优劳优得的管理理念与原则,有助于稳定体检护理队伍,促进体检护理事业良性发展。

关键词: 体检护士, 绩效管理, 能力绩效, 胜任力

Abstract: Objective To explore the feasibility of the competence performance appraisal scheme by analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of the current performance scheme for nurses in physical examination center, and to construct a nursing performance management scheme suitable for physical examination center. Methods The concept of competence performance was introduced, and the draft of the competence performance scheme was developed after literature review, investigation and interview. The expert group was consulted by Delphi method for two rounds of correspondence, and the weight of indicators was determined by analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and consistency test was carried out. Results For confirming the indicator weights, questionnaires were sent out to 15 experts through two rounds of expert consultation, with 15 questionnaires recovered and a recovery rate of 100%. The expert authority coefficients of the two rounds of consultation was 0.703 and 0.712, respectively. The overall indicator coordination coefficient was 0.415 and 0.423, respectively. The final scheme consisted of 4 first-level and 17 secondary-level indicators. A satisfaction survey found that the satisfaction score 7.20±1.25 for the competence performance appraisal scheme was significantly higher than that for the current performance management scheme 6.29±1.40(P<0.05). Conclusion The competence performance appraisal scheme is more suitable for nursing work with multiple positions and strong flexibility in physical examination center. It can better reflect the management principles of fairness; more effort, more gain, and better effort, better gain. It is conducive to stabilizing the nursing team and promoting the healthy development of the nursing cause in physical examination center.

Key words: nurse in physical examination center, performance management, competence performance, competence

中图分类号: 

  • R47
[1] 蒋晓燕. 护士多元化角色定位管理在健康体检中的应用[J].中医药管理杂志,2021,29(19):251-252.DOI:10.16690/j.cnki.1007-9203.2021.19.122.
[2] 杨静. 健康管理中心护士多元化角色定位在健康体检过程中的应用[J].承德医学院学报,2020,37(1):59-60.DOI:10.15921/j.cnki.cyxb.2020.01.020.
[3] 华德品. 能力绩效模式创新研究[J].管理观察,2013,13(7):4-5.
[4] 叶璇. 基于平衡记分卡的Z中医院临床科室绩效管理优化研究[D].南京:南京邮电大学,2022.DOI:10.27251/d.cnki.gnjdc.2022.000564.
[5] 刘玉萍,关华,唐怀蓉.健康管理专业护士规范化培训教材[M].成都:四川省人民医院,2022:108-119.
[6] 刘源. 公立医院临床护士绩效考核指标体系研究[D].天津:天津大学,2018.
[7] 李红,陈晓欢,金爽,等.三级综合医院专科护理岗位设置及绩效管理[J].中国护理管理,2018,18(4):441-445.
[8] 李希琳,张琰,陶艳玲,等.基于决策评价导向模型构建广东省护理学本科毕业实习基地评价指标体系的研究[J]. 护理学报,2020,27(18):15-20.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.18.015.
[9] 陈晓敏,彭旺,郑颖.低年资护士职业获益感现状及影响因素分析[J].中国医院,2019,23(1):58-61.DOI:10.19660/j.issn.1671-0592.2019.01.20.
[10] 陈登宏. 护士职业获益感在职业生涯成功感与职业承诺的中介效应[J].护理学报,2019,26(2):71-75.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2019.02.071.
[11] 朱文君. 临床护士激励性薪酬研究[D].上海:上海交通大学,2017.DOI:10.27307/d.cnki.gsjtu.2017.002090.
[1] 陈燕华, 冯梅, 胡佩欣. 粤港联合个案管理师临床实践培训体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(1): 24-28.
[2] 全伊萍, 陈霞, 胡琼丹. 脑心健康管理师核心胜任力评价指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(9): 5-9.
[3] 刘慧敏, 姜蕾. 深圳市助产士核心胜任力培训优化策略的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(2): 40-43.
[4] 于丰, 孙丽, 胡德英, 胡洁, 王佳庆, 吕楚风. 基于行为事件访谈法和专家咨询法的肿瘤科护士自杀守门人胜任力模型研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(17): 73-78.
[5] 张瑛, 施学芝, 何欢. 信息专职护士培训方案的设计与实践[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(14): 28-32.
[6] 张威, 徐月华, 张丽敏. 384名肿瘤医院护士“互联网+护理服务”职业认同感现状及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(11): 53-57.
[7] 纪媛媛, 王军, 俞洁, 张娜芹, 欧梦仙. 基于岗位胜任力构建神经外科新入职护士规范化培训指标体系[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(1): 27-30.
[8] 陈玉平, 彭刚艺, 张莉, 何瑾云, 郑静, 林群燕, 王灵晓, 杨艳. 临床感控专科护士胜任力评价指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(6): 15-21.
[9] 高芸芸, 刘芳, 刘维维. 公共卫生护士胜任力特征的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(4): 23-28.
[10] 张力川, 王玉洁, 庞冬, 路潜. 全国1 865名临床护理教师核心胜任力及教学培训需求现况调查[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(4): 61-65.
[11] 陈青青, 孔玲, 蒋珊, 朱求丽, 王燕, 苏明霞, 高丽芳, 陈晶梅. 新入职护士置信职业行为指标的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(23): 18-22.
[12] 周洋, 王澜, 王项南, 方晓凤, 曲桂玉. 基于冰山理论构建医养结合背景下老年照护岗位胜任力特征模型[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(22): 30-35.
[13] 王冲, 梁灿, 刘俐惠. 护理夜班绩效管理系统的构建与实施[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(2): 31-34.
[14] 伦冰, 杨晓宇, 孙丹丹, 任丽杰, 马硕. 助产专科护士原位模拟培训模式的构建及应用[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(19): 24-27.
[15] 张翠翠, 钟亚丽, 朱丽丽, 陈琳, 王瑶, 钟英, 龚喜燕, 廖常菊. 四川省1 320名三级甲等医院护士安全胜任力现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(14): 7-12.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!