以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (12): 1-6.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2024.12.001

• 研究生园地 •    下一篇

老年人社会参与能力的潜在剖面分析及其对衰弱的影响

王佩1, 高慧2, 张立华1, 张蓝方1, 杨豪爽1, 张银玲1   

  1. 1.空军军医大学 护理系,陕西 西安 710032;
    2.西安国际医学中心医院 门诊部,陕西 西安 710119
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-20 出版日期:2024-06-25 发布日期:2024-07-10
  • 通讯作者: 张银玲（1964-）,女,河北沙河人,博士,教授,博士研究生导师。E-mail:zyl-ylz@163.com
  • 作者简介:王佩（1994-）,女,陕西渭南人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读。
  • 基金资助:
    陕西省重点研发计划项目（2024SF-YBXM-3BB）

Potential profile analysis of social participation ability of elderly people and its influence on frailty

WANG Pei1, GAO Hui2, ZHANG Li-hua1, ZHANG Lan-fang1, YANG Hao-shuang1, ZHANG Yin-ling1   

  1. 1. Department of Nursing, Air Force Military Medical University, Xi’an 710032, China;
    2. Outpatient Department, Xi’an International Medical Center Hospital, Xi’an 710119,China
  • Received:2024-01-20 Online:2024-06-25 Published:2024-07-10

PDF (PC)

324

赞

摘要： 目的 了解老年人社会参与能力的潜在剖面特征,分析老年人社会参与能力不同剖面间的特征差异,并探讨不同社会参与能力剖面对老年人衰弱的影响,为制定相应措施以促进积极老龄化提供参考。方法 采用一般资料调查表、老年人能力评估（MZ/T039-2013）、Tilburg衰弱问卷、社会支持评定量表对陕西省3所社区卫生服务中心接受义务健康体检的308名老年人进行调查。应用Mplus 8.3进行潜在剖面分析,并采用二元Logistic回归分析探讨不同剖面的影响因素。结果 308名老年人中,44.8%社会参与能力受损。通过潜在剖面分析,老年人社会参与能力可分为高社会参与能力组（91.6%）和低社会参与能力组（8.4%）2个类别,其中年龄、疾病数量和社会支持水平是老年人社会参与能力潜在剖面的影响因素。低社会参与能力组老年人衰弱得分更高。结论 老年人社会参与能力存在明显的分类特征,可针对不同类别特征实施个体化干预,应重点关注高龄、患病、低社会支持的老年人,提升此类老年人社会参与能力,且低社会参与能力与老年人衰弱显著相关,可考虑将提高社会参与能力作为新的切入点来改善老年人衰弱情况。

关键词: 老年人, 社会参与能力, 潜在剖面分析, 衰弱

Abstract: Objective To understand the potential profile characteristics of social participation ability of elderly people, to analyze the characteristics differences between different profiles of social participation ability, and explore the influence of different social participation ability profiles on the elderly’s frailty, so as to provide reference for formulating corresponding measures to promote active aging. Method A total of 308 elderly people who received physical examination in three community health service centers in Shaanxi Province were investigated by using a General Information Questionnaire, Capacity Assessment of the Elderly (MZ/T039-2013), Tilburg Debility Questionnaire and Social Support Rating Scale. Mplus 8.3 was used to analyze the potential profile, and the influencing factors of different profiles were analyzed using binary Logistic regression analysis. Results Among 308 elderly people, 44.8% had impaired social participation. Through the analysis of the potential profile, social participation ability of the elderly can be divided into high social participation ability group (91.6%) and low social participation ability group (8.4%). Age, the number of diseases and the level of social support were the influencing factors of the potential profile of social participation ability of the elderly. The elderly with low social participation ability scored higher in frailty. Conclusion Social participation ability of the elderly has obvious classification characteristics, so individual intervention can be carried out according to different categories. We should focus on the elderly with advanced age, being sick or having low social support, and improve their social participation ability. Moreover, low social participation ability is significantly related to the frailty of the elderly, so improving social participation ability should be considered as a new starting point to improve the frailty of the elderly.

Key words: aged people, social participation ability, latent profile analysis, frailty

中图分类号: 

  • R473.2
[1] 国家统计局印发《第七次全国人口普查公报解读》[EB/OL]. (2021-05-12)[2023-07-26]. http://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/sjjd/202302/t20230202_1896484.html.
[2] 中华人民共和国中央人民政府印发《中共中央国务院关于加强新时代老龄工作的意见》[EB/OL].(2021-11-25)[2023-07-26]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2021-11/25/content_5653252.htm.
[3] 中华人民共和国民政部.老年人能力评估标准:MZ/T039-2013[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社, 2014.
[4] Andrew C, John Y, Steve I, et al.Frailty in elderly people[J].The Lancet,2013,381(9868):752-762. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62167-9.
[5] Mai S, Cai J, Zheng W, et al.Path analysis of social engagement, loneliness and cognitive function among Chinese older adults[J]. Psychol Health Med,2023,28(4):1087-1099. DOI:10.1080/13548506.2022.2151635.
[6] 尹奎,彭坚,张君. 潜在剖面分析在组织行为领域中的应用[J]. 心理科学进展,2020,28(7):1056-1070. DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2020.01056.
[7] 李峥,刘宇.护理学研究方法[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2018.
[8] 曹蒙. 老年人常见慢性病共病及其对社会参与能力影响研究[D]. 郑州:郑州大学,2022.
[9] 王孟成. 潜变量建模与Mplus应用-进阶篇[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2018.
[10] Gobbens RJ, van Assen MA, Luijkx KG, et al.The Tilburg Frailty Indicator: psychometric properties[J].J Am Med Dir Assoc,2010,11(5):344-355. DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2009.11.003.
[11] 奚兴,郭桂芳,孙静. 中文版Tilburg衰弱评估量表的信效度研究[J]. 护理学报,2013,20(16):1-5. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9969.2013.
[12] 夏玮涛,吴佳其,阙家雯,等. 浙江省城乡老年人衰弱比较[J].护理学杂志,2023,38(12):111-116.DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2023.12.111.
[13] 肖水源. 《社会支持评定量表》的理论基础与研究应用[J].临床精神医学杂志,1994,4(2):98-101.
[14] 师小勤, 朱春燕, 郑鹏远,等. 河南农村老年人社会参与能力现状及影响因素[J]. 郑州大学学报(医学版),2021,56(4):568-572. DOI:10.13705/j.issn.1671-6825.2021.01.099.
[15] 李琳杰, 许明慧, 程明慧,等. 甘肃省少数民族地区农村老年人社会参与能力及影响因素分析[J]. 中国社会医学杂志,2023,40(4):399-402.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-5625.2023.04.006.
[16] 赵迪, 赵梦璐, 王娜,等. 青岛市592名社区老年人社会隔离现状及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报,2020,27(11):6-10. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.11.006.
[17] Ren P, Emiliussen J, Christiansen R, et al.Filial piety, generativity and Older Adults’ wellbeing and loneliness in Denmark and China[J]. Appl Res Qual Life, 2022,17(5): 3069-3090.DOI:10.1007/s11482-022-10053-z.
[18] 胡佳惠. 脑卒中患者社会支持、心理弹性与社会参与的相关性研究[D]. 长春:长春中医药大学,2022.
[19] Rhubart D, Kowalkowski J.Perceived mental health impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic: The roles of social support and social engagement for working age adults in the United States[J]. Prev Med, 2022, 162:107171. DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107171.
[20] Jing T, Zhao X, Xing H, et al.The influence of strong social ties on the choice of long-term care model for middle-aged and older adults in China[J]. Front Public Health, 2023,11:1112422. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1112422.
[21] Gallardo-Peralta LP, Sanchez-Moreno E, Herrera S.Aging and family relationships among Aymara,Mapuche and Non-Indigenous People: exploring how social support, family functioning, and self-perceived health are related to quality of life[J]. Int[J] Environ Res Public Health. 2022,19(15):9247. DOI:10.3390/ijerph19159247.
[22] Bernabé E, de Oliveira C, de Oliveira Duarte YA,et al. Social participation and tooth loss, vision, and hearing impairments among older Brazilian adults[J]. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2023,71(10):3152-3162. DOI:10.1111/jgs.18423.
[23] Seifert A, Cotten SR, Xie B.A double burden of exclusion? Digital and social exclusion of older adults in times of COVID-19[J]. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci, 2021,76(3):e99-e103. DOI:10.1093/geronb/gbaa098.
[24] Jiang H, Liu Z.Community home elderly care services, multidimensional health and social participation of chronically ill elderly-empirical analysis based on propensity score matching and multiple mediation analysis[J]. Front Public Health, 2023,11:1121909. DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2023.11 21909.
[25] Zhao F, Tang B, Hu C, et al.The impact of frailty on posttraumatic outcomes in older trauma patients: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2020,88(4):546-554.DOI:10.1097/TA.0000000000002583.
[26] Ensrud KE, Schousboe JT, Kats AM, et al.Incremental health care costs of self-reported functional impairments and phenotypic frailty in community-dwelling older adults: a prospective cohort study[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2023,176(4):463-471. DOI:10.7326/M22-2626.
[27] Larsen RT, Turcotte LA, Westendorp R, et al.Frailty index status of Canadian home care clients improves with exercise therapy and declines in the presence of polypharmacy[J]. J Am Med Dir Assoc, 2020,21(6):766-771. DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2020.01.004.
[28] Dury S, Dierckx E, Van Der Vorst A, et al. Detecting frail, older adults and identifying their strengths: results of a mixed-methods study[J]. BMC Public Health,2018,18(1):191. DOI:10.1186/s12889-018-5088-3.
[29] Lozupone M, La Montagna M, Di Gioia I, et al.Social frailty in the COVID-19 pandemic era[J]. Front Psychiatry,2020,11:577113.DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2020.577113.eCollection2020.
[1] 李丹妮, 邱丽燕, 吴隆燕, 谭铮可可, 陈欣, 杨丽. 前交叉韧带损伤日间手术患者恐动症的潜在剖面分析及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 12-17.
[2] 李垚, 陈小敏, 夏敏, 吴茜, 张琳, 陈叡喆, 葛莉丽, 吴逸梅. 肿瘤患者衰弱评估工具应用的范围综述[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 48-52.
[3] 焦雪萍, 王志稳, 韩舒羽. ICU老年患者躁动行为的干预研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 38-42.
[4] 陈玉英, 王海彦, 陈思颖, 杨雪娟. 老年人自立支援照护模式的照护技巧及启示[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 31-36.
[5] 刘硕怡, 熊莉娟, 李凌, 王玉梅, 何嘉, 李鑫, 袁淑蕾, 郭雪琴, 王暘婧, 张慧娟. 老年住院患者衰弱预防及管理临床实践指南的质量评价及内容分析[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 50-55.
[6] 闫亚铃, 乐美妮, 姚桃琴, 王雪莲, 姜建玲, 辛艺. 老年胃肠肿瘤患者围手术期衰弱管理方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 74-78.
[7] 李静依, 梁冠冕, 缪群芳, 赵月琰, 王晓宁, 钱萍萍. 临床护士死亡工作自我应对能力潜在剖面及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(1): 13-18.
[8] 谭丘羽, 邓一芯, 冀婉倩, 王冬华. 农村老年人自我刻板化与主观记忆抱怨在自我感知老化与痴呆恐惧间的链式中介效应[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(1): 56-61.
[9] 郑亚楠, 郭惠娟, 张振香, 蔡姝倩. 脑卒中半失能患者自我接纳的潜在剖面分析及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(8): 1-6.
[10] 王冰冰, 马英芝, 孙小卫, 杨琴, 肖江琴. 中青年脑卒中患者与配偶二元应对潜在剖面分析及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(8): 7-12.
[11] 丁心舒, 孙乐菲, 高伟, 鲁琦, 闫畅, 刘德山. 矛盾年龄歧视量表在社区老年人中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 12-16.
[12] 姚晨晨, 陈娟, 杨雷. 老年衰弱患者基于埃德蒙顿衰弱量表评估分层抗阻运动的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 73-78.
[13] 薛荣, 张开利, 陈保云, 马荣慧, 张雨欣. 中老年脑卒中患者多维衰弱发展轨迹及其影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(6): 6-12.
[14] 周越, 张杰, 潘宇帆, 戴雨, 孙羽健, 肖益, 余雨枫. 机械通气患者衰弱风险预测模型的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(6): 56-61.
[15] 王薇, 周演铃, 薛文萍, 张淋淋, 林书球. 老年髋部骨折患者衰弱评估工具的范围综述[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(4): 42-47.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!