以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (4): 42-47.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2024.04.042

• 循证护理 • 上一篇    下一篇

老年髋部骨折患者衰弱评估工具的范围综述

王薇1, 周演铃1, 薛文萍2, 张淋淋2, 林书球2   

  1. 1.苏州大学附属第二医院 手术室,江苏 苏州 215000;
    2.苏州大学 护理学院,江苏 苏州 215006
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-10 出版日期:2024-02-25 发布日期:2024-03-07
  • 通讯作者: 周演铃（1974-）,女,江苏苏州人,硕士,主任护师,硕士研究生导师。E-mail:sdfeyzyl@163.com
  • 作者简介:王薇（1999-）,女,河南济源人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读。

Frailty assessment tools for elderly patients with hip fracture

WANG Wei1, ZHOU Yan-ling1, XUE Wen-ping2, ZHANG Lin-lin2, LIN Shu-qiu2   

  1. 1. Operating Room, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215000, China;
    2. School of Nursing, Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China
  • Received:2023-10-10 Online:2024-02-25 Published:2024-03-07

PDF (PC)

344

赞

摘要： 目的 总结国内外已应用于老年髋部骨折患者的衰弱评估工具,了解目前工具选择及使用现状,为老年髋部骨折患者衰弱评估工具的选择提供参考依据。方法 计算机检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、中国知网、万方数据知识服务平台共 6 个中英文数据库,时间为自建库至2023年5月,由 2 名研究者独立筛选文献并提取文献的基本特征（第一作者、发表年份、国家、样本量、研究目的、研究类型和结局指标）及涉及的衰弱评估工具基本特点（名称、研究类型、量表维度、量表条目、评估时间等）。结果 初步检索到1 769篇文献,最终纳入 16篇,包含9种衰弱评价工具。分析结果显示,衰弱评估工具的种类繁多,涵盖内容各异。在不同的研究中,研究者使用工具种类不同。结论 对于老年髋部骨折患者而言,虽然大多数衰弱评估工具在预测一系列不良结局方面表现优异,但迄今为止,尚无全球公认的术后不良事件风险识别的金标准。

关键词: 衰弱, 评估工具, 老年人, 髋部骨折

Abstract: Objective To summarize the frailty assessment tools for elderly patients with hip fracture at home and abroad, understand the current status of tool selection and application, and provide reference for choosing frailty assessment tools for elderly patients with hip fracture. Methods Computer retrieval was conducted in 6 English and Chinese databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and WanFang Data from the inception to May 2023. Two researchers independently screened the literature and extracted the basic characteristics of literature (first author, publication time, country, sample size, research type and outcome indicators) and basic features of involved frailty assessment tools (name, research objectives, research type, scale dimensions, scale items, assessment time, etc.). Results A total of 1,769 articles were initially retrieved, and 16 articles were finally included, involving 9 frailty assessment tools. The analysis showed that there were various frailty assessment tools covering different contents. Different tools were used in different studies. Conclusion For elderly patients with hip fracture, although most frailty assessment tools perform well in predicting a series of adverse outcomes, so far there is no globally recognized golden standard for identifying the risk of postoperative adverse events.

Key words: frailty, assessment tool, elderly, hip fracture

中图分类号: 

  • R473.6
[1] Ambrose AF, Cruz L, Paul G.Falls and fractures: a systematic approach to screening and prevention[J].Maturitas, 2015, 82(1): 85-93.DOI:10.1016/j.maturitas.2015.06.035.
[2] 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会医政司. 老年髋部骨折诊疗与管理指南(2022年版)[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2023, 25(4):277-283.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115530-20230110-00016.
[3] 宋咪, 孔丹, 高远, 等. 老年髋部骨折围术期护理临床实践专家共识(2023版)[J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2023, 39(3):214-222.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn501098-20221109-00744.
[4] Ogawa T, Schermann H, Kobayashi H, et al.Age and clinical outcomes after hip fracture surgery: do octogenarian, nonagenarian and centenarian classifications matter?[J]. Age Ageing,2021,50(6):1952-1960.DOI:10.1093/ageing/afab137.
[5] Song Y, Wu Z, Huo H, et al.The impact of frailty on adverse outcomes in geriatric hip fracture patients: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Front Public Health, 2022(10): 890652.DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2022.890652.
[6] 袁弯, 张玉莲, 张慧瑛, 等. 2020版ICFSR老年衰弱指南解读[J]. 中华现代护理杂志 2021, 27(35):4770-4773.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20210324-01287.
[7] 陈雨朦, 刘青青, 钱媛. 衰弱评估工具在不同老年人群中的应用现状[J]. 护理学杂志, 2022, 37(24):89-94.DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2022.24.089.
[8] 倪璇, 胡琴, 朱燕. 老年髋部骨折患者术后衰弱的发生现状及其影响因素分析[J]. 中西医结合护理(中英文), 2022, 8(6):136-138.
[9] Ma Y, Wang A, Lou Y, et al.Effects of frailty on outcomes following surgery among patients with hip fractures: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J].Front Med (Lausanne), 2022(9): 829762.DOI:10.3389/fmed.2022.829762.
[10] 邓海波, 孙群群, 吴美潮, 等. 老年髋部骨折患者衰弱状态评估及其与术后并发症发生的关系[J].广东医学, 2023, 44(7): 882-887.DOI:10.13820/j.cnki.gdyx.20231037.
[11] Checa-López M, Oviedo-Briones M, Pardo-Gómez A, et al.FRAILTOOLS study protocol: a comprehensive validation of frailty assessment tools to screen and diagnose frailty in different clinical and social settings and to provide instruments for integrated care in older adults[J]. BMC Geriatr, 2019, 19(1): 86.DOI:10.1186/s12877-019-1042-1.
[12] Oviedo-Briones M, Rodríguez-Laso á, Carnicero JA, et al.The ability of eight frailty instr-uments to identify adverse outcomes across different settings: the FRAILTOOLS project[J]. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle, 2022, 13(3):1487-1501.DOI:10.1002/jcsm.12990.
[13] 王喜益, 叶志弘, 汤磊雯. 范围综述在护理领域的应用进展[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2019, 54(8):1259-1263.DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2019.08.030.
[14] Winters AM, Hartog LC, Roijen H, et al.Relationship between clinical outcomes and Dutch frailty score among elderly patients who underwent surgery for hip fracture[J]. Clin Interv Aging,2018(13):2481-2486.DOI:10.2147/cia.S181497.
[15] Van De Ree M, Landers M, Kruithof N, et al. The effect of frailty on quality of life in elderly patients after hip fracture:a longitudinal study[J].Quality of Life Research, 2019, 28(SUPPL 1): S46.DOI:10.1007/s11136-019-02257-y.
[16] Chan S, Wong EKC, Ward SE, et al.The predictive value of the Clinical Frailty Scale on discharge destination and complications in older hip fracture patients[J].J Orthop Trauma, 2019, 33(10):497-502.DOI:10.1097/bot.0000000000001518.
[17] Traven SA, Reeves RA, Althoff AD, et al.New Five-Factor Modified Frailty Index predicts morbidity and mortality in geriatric hip fractures[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2019, 33(7): 319-323.DOI:10.1097/bot.0000000000001455.
[18] Inoue T, Misu S, Tanaka T, et al.Frailty defined by 19 items as a predictor of short-term functional recovery in patients with hip fracture[J]. Injury, 2019, 50(12):2272-2276.DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2019.10.011.
[19] Calişkan E, Doğan Ö. Synergistic effect of frailty and malnutrition on postoperative first-month mortality and delirium status among geriatric age group patients with hip fractures[J]. Turk Geriatri Dergisi, 2019, 22(2): 140-149.DOI:10.31086/tjgeri.2019.87.
[20] Jorissen RN, Lang C, Visvanathan R, et al.The effect of frailty on outcomes of surgically treated hip fractures in older people[J]. Bone, 2020(136):115327.DOI:10.1016/j.bone.2020.115327.
[21] Choi JY, Kim JK, Kim KI, et al.How does the multidimensional frailty score compare with grip strength for predicting outcomes after hip fracture surgery in older patients? A retrospective cohort study[J]. BMC Geriatr, 2021, 21(1): 234.DOI:10.1186/s12877-021-02150-9.
[22] Pizzonia M, Giannotti C, Carmisciano L, et al.Frailty assessment, hip fracture and long-term clinical outcomes in older adults[J]. Eur J Clin Invest, 2021, 51(4):e13445.DOI:10.1111/eci.13445.
[23] Thorne G, Hodgson L.Performance of the Nottingham Hip Fracture Score and Clinical Frailty Scale as predictors of short and long-term outcomes: a dual-centre 3-year observation-al study of hip fracture patients[J]. J Bone Miner Metab,2021,39(3):494-500.DOI:10.1007/s00774-020-01187-x.
[24] Kwak MJ, Digbeu BD, Des Bordes J, et al.The association of frailty with clinical and ec-onomic outcomes among hospitalized older adults with hip fracture surgery[J].Osteoporos Int,2022,33(7):1477-1484.DOI:10.1007/s00198-021-06215-8.
[25] Ikram A, Norrish AR, Marson BA, et al. Can the Clinical Frailty Scale on admission predict 30-day survival,postoperative complications,institutionalization in patients with fragility hip fracture?: a cohort study of 1,255 patients[J]. Bone Joint J, 2022, 104-b(8):980-986.DOI:10.1302/0301-620x.104b8.Bjj-2020-1835.R2.
[26] Zhao H, Wei PY, Feng Y.Association between frailty and clinical outcomes and quality of Life in dlder adults following hip fracture surgery: a retrospective cohort study[J]. Anesth Analg, 2022,134(5):1035-1042.DOI:10.1213/ANE.0000000000005841.
[27] Wong BLL, Chan YH, O’neill GK, et al.Frailty, length of stay and cost in hip fracture pa-tients[J]. Osteoporos Int, 2023, 34(1): 59-68.DOI:10.1007/s00198-022-06553-1.
[28] 谢云, 罗典清, 颜雪, 等. 脆性髋部骨折患者的衰弱发生情况及其对关节功能和术后并发症的影响[J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2019, 25(2):189-192.DOI:10.13795/j.cnki.sgkz.2019.02.026.
[29] 李斌, 黄承, 张丛笑, 等. 老年衰弱和髋部骨折术后短期预后的相关研究[J]. 中国医科大学学报, 2017, 46(5): 457-459.DOI:10.12007/j.issn.0258-4646.2017.05.018.
[30] Gobbens RJ, Luijkx KG, Wijnen-Sponselee MT, et al.Toward a conceptual definition of frail community dwelling older people[J]. Nurs Outlook, 2010, 58(2):76-86.DOI:10.1016/j.outlook.2009.09.005.
[31] 张印恩, 王键龙, 于欢欢, 等. 衰弱筛查工具和评估工具的研究进展[J]. 中国临床研究, 2023, 36(8):1243-1246.DOI:10.13429/j.cnki.cjcr.2023.08.027.
[32] Gilbert T, Neuburger J, Kraindler J, et al.Development and validation of a Hospital Frailty Risk Score focusing on older people in acute care settings using electronic hospital records: an observational study[J]. Lancet, 2018, 391(10132):1775-1782.DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30668-8.
[33] 李悦, 李晓玲. 老年髋部脆性骨折患者衰弱评估与干预研究进展[J]. 医学综述, 2021, 27(20):4081-4085.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-2084.2021.20.022.
[34] 朱守强, 邢雅会, 张雷, 等. 衰弱量表与衰弱表型评估对老年髋部骨折患者术后转归的预测作用[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志,2020,36(10):962-965.DOI:10.12089/jca.2020.10.006.
[35] 毛欣楠, 徐林燕, 赵磊, 等. 医院衰弱风险评分在老年住院患者不良结局预测中的应用进展[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(24):18-21.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.24.018.
[1] 杜易梅, 刘莉, 郭立丽, 卢吉, 付苗苗, 刘杰. 妇科恶性肿瘤患者性健康研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 28-33.
[2] 李垚, 陈小敏, 夏敏, 吴茜, 张琳, 陈叡喆, 葛莉丽, 吴逸梅. 肿瘤患者衰弱评估工具应用的范围综述[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 48-52.
[3] 焦雪萍, 王志稳, 韩舒羽. ICU老年患者躁动行为的干预研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 38-42.
[4] 陈恩琳, 莫丰菱, 庄泽明, 张明哲, 周佳坤, 黄丽芳, 纪龙飞, 张莉芳. 脑卒中单侧空间忽略评估工具的范围综述[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 43-49.
[5] 陈玉英, 王海彦, 陈思颖, 杨雪娟. 老年人自立支援照护模式的照护技巧及启示[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 31-36.
[6] 刘硕怡, 熊莉娟, 李凌, 王玉梅, 何嘉, 李鑫, 袁淑蕾, 郭雪琴, 王暘婧, 张慧娟. 老年住院患者衰弱预防及管理临床实践指南的质量评价及内容分析[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 50-55.
[7] 闫亚铃, 乐美妮, 姚桃琴, 王雪莲, 姜建玲, 辛艺. 老年胃肠肿瘤患者围手术期衰弱管理方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 74-78.
[8] 谭丘羽, 邓一芯, 冀婉倩, 王冬华. 农村老年人自我刻板化与主观记忆抱怨在自我感知老化与痴呆恐惧间的链式中介效应[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(1): 56-61.
[9] 李丁丁, 王帅有, 朱杉杉, 郭鑫, 张会敏, 王宏茹, 潘勤. 脑卒中患者支持性照护需求评估工具的范围综述[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(9): 48-53.
[10] 丁心舒, 孙乐菲, 高伟, 鲁琦, 闫畅, 刘德山. 矛盾年龄歧视量表在社区老年人中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 12-16.
[11] 姚晨晨, 陈娟, 杨雷. 老年衰弱患者基于埃德蒙顿衰弱量表评估分层抗阻运动的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 73-78.
[12] 薛荣, 张开利, 陈保云, 马荣慧, 张雨欣. 中老年脑卒中患者多维衰弱发展轨迹及其影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(6): 6-12.
[13] 周越, 张杰, 潘宇帆, 戴雨, 孙羽健, 肖益, 余雨枫. 机械通气患者衰弱风险预测模型的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(6): 56-61.
[14] 李佳萍, 朱云霞, 朱宇. 乳腺癌化疗患者症状群的范围综述[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(4): 60-64.
[15] 蔡佳佳, 施忠英, 黄楚贤. 进食障碍患者情绪调节评估工具的研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(3): 41-45.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!