以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (12): 6-9.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.12.006

• 护理管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

翻转课堂教学模式下本科护生学业形成性评价指标体系的构建

杨丽峰   

  1. 河西学院 护理学院,甘肃 张掖 734000
  • 收稿日期:2021-02-04 出版日期:2021-06-25 发布日期:2021-07-06
  • 作者简介:杨丽峰（1982-）,女,甘肃庆阳人,硕士,讲师。E-mail：174607369@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    甘肃省高等学校创新能力提升项目 （2020A-112）; 河西学院教学评估督导研究项目（19PGDDXM010）

Construction of Formative Assessment Index System of Academic Performance of Nursing Undergraduates in Flipped Classroom Teaching Mode

YANG Li-feng   

  1. School of Nursing, Hexi University, Zhangye 734000, China
  • Received:2021-02-04 Online:2021-06-25 Published:2021-07-06

PDF (PC)

176

赞

摘要： 目的 构建翻转课堂教学模式下本科护生学业形成性评价指标体系,为评估翻转课堂教学效果提供依据。方法 基于发展性评价理念,通过文献分析法、德尔菲法、优序图法及比例分配法,构建翻转课堂教学模式下本科护生学业形成性评价指标体系及确定各指标权重。结果 2轮专家函询的有效问卷回收率分别为94%和100%,专家权威系数为0.800。构建的翻转课堂教学模式下本科护生学业形成性评价指标体系包括4个一级指标、9个二级指标和33个三级指标。结论 本研究构建的翻转课堂教学模式下本科护生学业形成性评价指标体系能为有效进行翻转课堂教学评价提供依据。

关键词: 翻转课堂, 学业评价, 指标体系, 德尔菲法, 本科护生, 发展性评价理念

Abstract: Objective To develop a formative assessment index system of academic performance of nursing undergraduates in flipped classroom teaching mode, and to provide reference for evaluating the effects of flipped classroom teaching. Methods Guided by developmental evaluation, with literature review, Delphi method, superiority chart and proportionate allocation, the framework of formative assessment index system of academic performance of nursing undergraduates in flipped classroom teaching mode was constructed and the weight value of each index was identified. Results The recovery rate in two rounds of expert consultation was 94.00% and 100.00%, respectively and degree of expert authority 0.800. The final index system consisted of 4 first-level, 9 second-level, and 33 third-level indicators. Conclusion The constructed formative assessment index system of academic performance of nursing undergraduates in flipped classroom teaching mode provides reference for conducting efficient teaching assessment of flipped classroom teaching.

Key words: flipped classroom, academic achievement, index system, Delphi technique, undergraduate nursing, concept of developmental evaluation

中图分类号: 

  • R47
[1] Vanka A, Vanka S, Wali O.Flipped Classroom in Dental Education: A Scoping Review[J]. Eur J Dent Educ, 2020,24(2):213-226. DOI:10.1111/eje.12487.
[2] Singh K, Mahajan R, Gupta P, et al.Flipped Classroom: A Concept for Engaging Medical Students in Learning[J]. Indian Pediatr, 2018,55(6):507-512.
[3] Huang HM, Cheng SF.Application of Flipped Classroom Teaching Strategy in Nursing Education[J]. Hu Li Za Zhi, 2018,65(6):5-12. DOI:10.6224/JN.201812_65(6).02.
[4] Fatima SS, Hashmi S, Rehman R, et al.Teaching “Shock Pathophysiology” by Flipped Classroom[J]. Pak J Med Sci, 2019,35(6):1631-1635. DOI:10.12669/pjms.35.6.1211.
[5] Isherwood G, Taylor K, Burnside G, et al.Teaching Orthodontic Emergencies Using the “Flipped Classroom” Method of Teaching-A Mixed Methods RCT[J]. Eur J Dent Educ, 2020,24(1):53-62. DOI:10.1111/eje.12467.
[6] Erbil DG.A Review of Flipped Classroom and Cooperative Learning Method within the Context of Vygotsky Theory[J]. Front Psychol, 2020, 11(6):1157. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01157.
[7] Røe Y, Rowe M, Ødegaard NB, et al.Learning with Technology in Physiotherapy Education: Design, Implementation and Evaluation of a Flipped Classroom Teaching Approach[J]. BMC Med Educ,2019,19(1):291. DOI:10.1186/s12909-019-1728-2.
[8] 邹昆仑. 基于发展性评价理论的翻转课堂教学评价指标体系构建研究[J].中国成人教育,2020(15):53-55.
[9] Laycock A, Bailie J, Matthews V, et al.Using Developmental Evaluation to Support Knowledge Translation: Reflections from a Large-scale Quality Improvement Project in Indigenous Primary Healthcare[J]. Health Res Policy Syst, 2019,17(1):70. DOI:10.1186/s12961-019-0474-6.
[10] 蒋文春,温贤秀,顾凤娇.应用德尔菲法和层次分析法构建血液透析室护理管理质量评价标准体系[J]. 护理学报,2018, 25(18):16-21. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2018.18.016.
[11] 杨永华,丁玎,张慧,等.基于形成性评价的儿科实践教学评价体系的构建与实施[J].医学教育研究与实践,2020,28(5):903-907. DOI:10.13555/j.cnki.c.m.e.2020.05.043.
[12] Formative Assessment and Its Impact on Student Success[J].Formative Assessment and Its Impact on Student Success[J]. Nurse Educ,2019,44(1):4.DOI:10.1097/NNE.0000000000000530.
[13] Prashanti E, Ramnarayan K.Ten Maxims of Formative Assessment[J]. Adv Physiol Educ, 2019,43(2):99-102. DOI: 10.1152/advan.00173.2018.
[14] 张树芳,李珏锦,胡晓林.护理本科生职业精神现状及影响因素分析[J].护理学报,2020, 27(23):10-13.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.23.010.
[15] Graham KL, Cohen A, Reynolds EE, et al.Effect of a Flipped Classroom on Knowledge Acquisition and Retention in an Internal Medicine Residency Program[J]. J Grad Med Educ, 2019,11(1):92-97. DOI:10.4300/JGME-D-18-00536.1.
[1] 郭林芳, 张培莉, 侯晓雅, 李滢, 曹敏, 高超越. 肝癌化疗患者线上线下结合营养干预方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 1-5.
[2] 田美雨, 王翠玲, 高若男, 田佳, 刘怡. 妇科肿瘤科护士性健康照护培训方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 18-23.
[3] 牛青梅, 喻英, 张倩, 贾雅甜, 田宇. 基于“三维质量结构”模型构建下肢动脉硬化闭塞症患者随访管理评价指标体系[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 70-73.
[4] 全伊萍, 陈霞, 胡琼丹. 脑心健康管理师核心胜任力评价指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(9): 5-9.
[5] 陈芮, 王梅, 唐晓霞, 朱傲雪, 毛惠娜. 基于ERG理论的免疫检查点抑制剂治疗癌症患者护理需求方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 1-5.
[6] 彭静, 李金秀, 谭江红, 王晓庆. 动漫短视频联合翻转课堂教学对急诊科护生自主学习能力的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(6): 22-25.
[7] 陈坚, 项丽君, 罗彦嗣, 陈建辉, 崔艳丽, 廖琳, 颜明玉, 张晓梅. 脑卒中后吞咽障碍患者“互联网+”延续性康复管理方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(24): 1-6.
[8] 于宛辰, 吴萍, 柳嘉怡, 武贤明, 庞晓丽, 王汕珊. 本科护生个人掌控感的潜在剖面及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(23): 23-27.
[9] 李小梅, 陶明, 李茜茜, 李琳琳, 李春. 基于症状管理理论神经源性膀胱患者自我管理干预方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(22): 61-66.
[10] 关亚萍, 郑薇亮, 孙丽军, 陈媛, 丁洁莹, 许佳佳. 护士主导的心脏直视术后患者早期四级活动方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(22): 67-72.
[11] 张国春, 李海云, 褚梁梁, 程雪, 王君芝. 产科护士围产期姑息照护知信行量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(2): 6-11.
[12] 邹兆华, 卿伟, 朱茂才, 张继权, 易子涵, 胡秀. 连续性肾脏替代治疗护理敏感质量指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(2): 70-74.
[13] 罗铎麟, 杨春清, 高萍, 胡清文, 徐小群. 2型糖尿病心理痛苦量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(19): 24-30.
[14] 张丽, 李付华, 古小改, 郝娜, 王丹丹, 关美琪. 炎症性肠病专科护士培训方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(19): 31-36.
[15] 刘雨溦, 张培莉, 侯晓雅, 高超越. 健康老龄化视角下护理专业学位研究生多层次培养路径构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(19): 37-41.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!