以质量求发展,以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (20): 1-6.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.20.001

• 研究生园地 •    下一篇

产后尿潴留发病危险因素Meta分析

庞艳1, 林芳初1, 李嫒1, 宁佳惠1, 周荣1, 涂素华2   

  1. 1.西南医科大学护理学院,四川 泸州 646000;
    2.西南医科大学附属医院,四川 泸州 646000
  • 收稿日期:2020-02-24 出版日期:2020-10-25 发布日期:2020-11-12
  • 通讯作者: 涂素华(1954-),女,四川泸州人,本科学历,主任护师,硕士研究生导师。E-mail:273891711@qq.com
  • 作者简介:庞艳(1996-),女,四川绵阳人,本科学历,护师,硕士研究生在读。
  • 基金资助:
    泸州市人民政府-西南医科大学科技战略合作项目(2018LZXNYD-SK14)

Meta-analysis of Risk Factors for Postpartum Urinary Retention

PANG Yan1, LIN Fang-chu1, LI Ai1, Ning Jia-hui1, ZHOU Rong1, TU Su-hua2   

  1. 1. School of Nursing, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000,China;
    2. The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000,China
  • Received:2020-02-24 Online:2020-10-25 Published:2020-11-12

摘要: 目的 通过Meta分析明确产妇发生尿潴留的危险因素,为其防治提供科学依据。方法 计算机检索中国知网、维普、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、万方、PubMed、Embase、EBSCO、Web of Science、Cochrane Library,收集关于产妇产后并发尿潴留危险因素的病例对照研究或队列研究,检索时限为自建库至2019年6月。研究者按照标准进行文献筛选、资料提取和质量评价,采用RevMan 5.3软件进行定量综合Meta分析。结果 最终纳入14篇文献,累计病例组产妇1 818例,对照组人群5 194例,共10项危险因素。Meta分析结果显示,产钳助产(OR=5.40,95%CI:4.48~6.52)、手转胎头(OR=5.12,95%CI:3.05~8.60)、存在不良情绪(OR=4.84,95%CI:3.84~6.10)、会阴撕裂伤(OR=2.80,95%CI:1.25~4.24)、会阴切开术(OR=1.95,95%CI:1.23~3.09)、产程延长(OR=1.68,95%CI:1.59~1.77)、分娩镇痛(OR=1.48,95%CI:1.32~2.45)是产后尿潴留的危险因素,而胎头吸引(OR=2.95,95%CI:0.85~10.23)、初产妇(OR=1.33,95%CI:0.96~1.83)、产前排空膀胱(OR=1.10,95%CI:0.28~4.28)与产后尿潴留发病无关。敏感性分析与发表偏倚结果显示各因素合并结果较稳定,发表偏倚不明显。结论 产后尿潴留的发生与多种暴露因素有关,其危险强度由高到低依次为产钳助产、手转胎头、存在不良情绪、会阴撕裂伤、会阴切开术、产程延长、分娩镇痛。

关键词: 产后尿潴留, 危险因素, Meta分析

Abstract: Objective To explore the main factors related to the incidence of postpartum urinary retention(PUR) by meta analysis and to provide evidence for PUR prevention and control. Methods We retrieved China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI), Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), Chinese Biomedical Literature Data- base (CBM), Wanfang Database, PubMed, Embase, BSCO, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from the inception to June 2019 to collect studies on factors related to the incidence of PUR. A meta-analysis on the included literatures was performed by using RevMan 5.3. Results Totally 14 articles were included,involving 1,818 cases and 5,194 controls. Meta-analysis showed that risk factors of PUR were forceps delivery (OR=5.40,95%CI:4.48~6.52),manual rotation of fetal head (OR=5.12,95%CI:3.05~8.60), maternal presence of adverse emotions (OR=4.84,95%CI:3.84~6.10), laceration of perineum (OR=2.80,95%CI:1.25~4.24),episiotomy(OR=1.95,95%CI:1.23~3.09),prolonged labor (OR=1.68,95%CI:1.59~1.77), and peridural anesthesia (OR=1.48,95%CI:1.32~2.45),. There was no correlation with vacuum extractor of fetal head (OR=2.95,95%CI:0.85~10.23), primiparous (OR=1.33,95%CI:0.96~1.83), prepartum bladder catheterization (OR=1.10,95%CI:0.28~4.28). Sensitivity analysis and publication bias test indicated that there was no publication bias for case-control studies and the results of the meta-analysis were stable. Conclusion The occurrence of PUR are related to various risk factors, and factors with risk intensity ranging from high to low are forceps, hand rotation of fetal head, maternal adverse emotions, laceration of perineum, episiotomy, prolonged labor process, and labor analgesia.

Key words: postpartum urinary retention, risk factor, Meta-analysis

中图分类号: 

  • R473.71
[1] Mulder FEM,Hakvoort RA,Schoffelmeer MA,et al.Postpartum Urinary Retention:A Systematic Review of Adverse Effects and Management[J].Int Urogynecol J,2014,25(12):1605-1612.DOI:10.1007/s00192-014-2418-6.
[2] 李飞,邓波,朱世琴,等.住院患者导尿管相关尿路感染危险因素的Meta分析[J].中国感染控制杂志,2018,17(9):770-776.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-9638.2018.09.00.
[3] Deffieux X,Vieillefosse S,Billecocq S,et al.Postpartum Pelvic Floor Muscle Training and Abdominal Rehabilitation:Guidelines[J].J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris),2015,44(10):1141-1146.DOI:10.1016/j.jgyn.2015.09.023.
[4] Stang A.Critical Evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for the Assessment of the Quality of Nonrandomized Studies in Meta-analyses[J].Eur J Epidemiol,2010,25(9):603-605.DOI:10.1007/s10654-010-9491-z.
[5] 何左,尤凤凤,周舟.成人麻疹发病危险因素病例对照研究meta分析[J].现代预防医学,2019,46(7):1171-1175.
[6] 吴涛,王忠民,李海英.产后尿潴留高危因素及盆底康复技术对其疗效的分析[J].现代妇产科进展,2013,22(10):807-811.
[7] 范小燕,彭冰洁,梁桂英.产后尿潴留的高危因素及盆底肌训练的防治效果分析[J].海南医学,2015,26(23):3545-3547.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-6350.2015.23.1282.
[8] 张娟歌,赵荣.顺产后尿潴留发生的风险因素对照分析与探讨[J].临床医学研究与实践,2017,2(7):84-85.DOI:10.19347/j.cnki.2096-1413.201707042.
[9] 杨彩霞,唐淑稳,兰淑海,等.阴道分娩97例初产妇产后尿潴留危险因素临床分析[J].国际妇产科学杂志,2018,45(6):700-703.
[10] 郭学齐,兰晓红,吕清媛.产后尿潴留风险评分系统的建立及验证[J].预防医学,2018,30(10):1064-1067.DOI:10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2018.10.024.
[11] 周素芬,黄爱武,蒋啸波.阴道分娩后尿潴留发生的相关危险因素分析[J].现代实用医学,2018,30(8):1070-1072.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-0800.2018.08.048.
[12] 石翠霞.产后尿潴留的危险因素分析[D].北京:首都医科大学,2017.
[13] Rosenberg M,Many A,Shinar S.Risk Factors for Overt Postpartum Urinary Retention-the Effect of the Number of Catheterizations During Labor[J].Int Urogynecol J,2020,31(3):529-533.DOI:10.1007/s00192-019-04010-y.
[14] Polat M,Sentürk MB,Pulato lu C,et al.Postpartum Urinary Retention:Evaluation of Risk Factors[J].Turk J Obstet Gynecol,2018,15(2):70-74.DOI:10.4274/tjod.43931.
[15] Teo R,Punter J,Abrams K,et al.Clinically Overt Postpartum Urinary Retention after Vaginal Delivery:A Retrospective Case-control Study[J].Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct,2007,18(5):521-524.DOI:10.1007/s00192-006-0183-x.
[16] Pifarotti P,Gargasole C,Folcini C,et al.Acute Post-partum Urinary Retention:Analysis of Risk Factors,a Case-control Study[J].Arch Gynecol Obstet,2014,289(6):1249-1253.DOI:10.1007/s00404-014-3144-5.
[17] Suzuki S,Kakizaki E,Kobayashi R,et al.Risk Factors for Postpartum Urinary Retention after Vaginal Delivery at Term Without Epidural Anesthesia[J].J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med,2019,32(20):3470-3472.DOI:10.1080/14767058.2018.1465559.
[18] Oh JJ,Kim SH,Shin JS,et al.Risk Factors for Acute Postpartum Urinary Retention after Vaginal Delivery:Focus on Episiotomy Direction[J].J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med,2016.29(3):408-411.DOI:10.3109/14767058.2014.1002395.
[19] Cavkaytar S,Kokanalı MK,Baylas A,et al.Postpartum Urinary Retention after Vaginal Delivery:Assessment of Risk Factors in a Case-control Study[J].J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc,2014,15(3):140-143.DOI:10.5152/jtgga.2014.13102.
[20] 程时磊,张发斌,李斌.中国人群胃癌发病影响因素meta分析[J].中国公共卫生,2017,33(12):1775-1780.DOI:10.11847/zgggws2017-33-12-26.
[21] Johanson R,Menon V.WITHDRAWN:Soft Versus Rigid Vacuum Extractor Cups for Assisted Vaginal Delivery[J].Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2010,(11):CD000446.DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD000446.pub2.
[22] Biru S,Addisu D,Kassa S,et al.Maternal Complication Related to Instrumental Delivery at Felege Hiwot Specialized Hospital,Northwest Ethiopia:a Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study[J].BMC Res Notes,2019,12(1):482.DOI:10.1186/s13104-019-4530-7.
[23] Mulder FE,Schoffelmeer MA,Hakvoort RA,et al.Risk Factors for Postpartum Urinary Retention:a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis[J].BJOG,2012,119(12):1440-1446.DOI:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03459.x.
[24] Lurie S,Steinberg N,Tannus S,et al.Mode of Delivery in a Subsequent Pregnancy Following Previous Instrumental Delivery[J].[J] Perinat Med.2013,41(3):283-286.DOI:10.1515/jpm-2012-0104.
[25] 易翠兰,种翠宁,郭剑影.手转胎头适宜时机的临床观察[J].实用妇产科杂志,2011,27(11):863-865.
[26] 朱桐梅,刘嘉.5例初产妇会阴严重撕裂伤探讨[J].护理研究,2013,27(21):2254-2255.DOI:1009-6493(2013)07C-2254-02.
[27] Ma DM,Hu W,Wang YH,et al.A Multicentre Study on the Effect of Moderate Perineal Protection Technique:A New Technique for Perineal Management in Labour[J].J Obstet Gynaecol,2020,40(1):25-29.DOI:10.1080/01443615.2019.1587605.
[28] Yip SK,Sahota D,Pang MW,et al.Postpartum Urinary Retention[J].Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand,2004,83(10):881-891.DOI:10.1111/j.0001-6349.2004.00460.x.
[29] 李永英.阴道分娩产后尿潴留风险预测模型的构建与应用[D].广州:南方医科大学,2019.
[30] Mulder Femke EM,van der Velde Sytske,Pol Fraukje,et al.Accuracy of Postvoid Residual Volumes after Vaginal Delivery:A Prospective Equivalence Study to Compare An Automatic Scanning Device with Transurethral Catheterization[J].Int Urogynecol J,2019,30(5):773-778.DOI:10.1007/s00192-018-3700-9.
[1] 邢春凤, 李国新, 张广清, 刘雅鑫, 孙晓伟. 产妇产褥期乳房胀痛危险因素分析及风险预测模型构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(3): 6-11.
[2] 赵国瑞, 刘高明, 张凤, 周颖. 宫颈癌患者术后下肢淋巴水肿风险预测模型的构建及验证[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(24): 7-12.
[3] 姚婉晴, 杨立状, 陈旦旦, 张晚秋, 卢薇, 管翠红, 李海. 不同非药物干预措施改善乳腺癌患者疲乏效果的网状Meta分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(24): 37-43.
[4] 周春香, 饶媛, 崔梦娇, 商芷颖, 张天岚, 裘奚晨卉, 秦艳萍. 基于传感器技术的智能康复设备在脑卒中患者步态康复应用效果的Meta分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(24): 44-50.
[5] 章明阳, 刘京辉, 金雁, 徐文琪, 李斌飞, 黄珊, 杜李百合, 侯亚甜, 李小寒. 围手术期低体温风险预测模型的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(22): 54-60.
[6] 胡宁宁, 李玉凤, 王仁媛, 李婉君, 林素兰. 学龄前儿童超重肥胖现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(2): 16-21.
[7] 罗海琴, 谢日华, 梁绰意. 正念干预对不孕症女性心理健康和生活质量影响的Meta分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(17): 28-34.
[8] 邬馨益, 徐林燕, 陈卓琦, 朱徐乐, 赵磊. 老年人运动认知功能减退综合征风险预测模型的构建与验证[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(10): 73-78.
[9] 黄丽华, 翟巾帼, 田金徽, 孔淦霞, 王雪岩, 陈莉瑾, 袁心愿, 耿薪茜, 陈昭桐. 妊娠期生活方式干预对妊娠期高血压疾病进展及母婴结局影响的Meta分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(24): 38-42.
[10] 孙菲, 刘敏, 胡珊珊, 吴蕾, 刘君, 李萍. 基于Meta分析构建早产儿母亲泌乳建立风险预测评分模型[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(23): 1-5.
[11] 张海燕, 于卫华, 张利, 任影, 郑俊俊. 2型糖尿病老年患者生活空间移动性受限风险预测模型研究[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(22): 13-19.
[12] 钱怡, 周清平, 梁振宁, 王晨曦, 刘涵月, 于瑶, 玉素扑江·图尔荪, 王冬. 慢性病患者参与医患共同决策影响因素的Meta分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(20): 19-23.
[13] 罗玉勤, 李孟璇, 程秋, 王婷, 郑晶予, 方进博, 龚玉萍. 血液肿瘤患者化疗后肛周感染危险因素病例对照研究[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(7): 7-11.
[14] 杨洁, 谢小华, 连万成, 杨梅, 邓丽萍, 潘璐. 急性缺血性脑卒中静脉溶栓后出血预测模型的构建与验证[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(5): 10-14.
[15] 余小燕, 刘于, 黄毅. 小丑照护对患儿焦虑疼痛干预效果的Meta分析[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(4): 21-26.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!