接纳与承诺疗法对慢性疼痛干预效果的Meta分析

doi:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.05.022

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的系统评价接纳与承诺疗法对慢性疼痛患者的干预效果。方法计算机检索PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、EBSCO、中国知网、中国生物医学文献数据库、万方数据库及维普全文数据库中接纳与承诺疗法对慢性疼痛患者干预效果的随机对照试验,检索时限均为建库至2019年4月。对符合质量标准的随机对照试验采用Rev Man 5.3进行Meta分析。结果共纳入13篇文献,1 136例患者。Meta分析结果显示,接纳与承诺疗法组与对照组干预后当天的疼痛强度[SMD=-0.44,95%CI（-0.80,-0.09）,P=0.01]、干预后当天及干预后3个月、6个月的慢性疼痛接受度[WMD=11.97,95%CI（8.39,15.55）,P<0.01]、[WMD=7.28,95%CI（2.53,12.03）,P<0.01]、[WMD=8.89,95%CI（2.48,15.31）,P<0.01]、干预后当天及干预后3个月疼痛功能障碍[SMD=-0.50,95%CI（-0.74,-0.25）,P<0.01]、[SMD=-0.49,95%CI（-0.72,-0.26）,P<0.01]的改善具有统计学意义,但对于疼痛强度（>3个月）的长期疗效2组差异无统计学意义。结论接纳与承诺疗法能有效缓解患者疼痛强度、增加慢性疼痛接受度,减少相关疼痛功能障碍,但对于疼痛强度的远期疗效仍需开展更多研究予以验证。

中图分类号:

R471

陈雯, 尹朱丹, 王赛男, 厉姝岑, 张雪芳. 接纳与承诺疗法对慢性疼痛干预效果的Meta分析[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(5): 22-27.

参考文献

[1] Breivik H.International Association for the Study of Pain: Update on WHO-IASP Activities[J]. J Pain Symptom Manage,2002,24(2):97-101.DOI:10.1016/s0885-3924(02)00465-7.
[2] Hayes SC.Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, Relational Frame Theory, and the Third Wave of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies[J]. Behav Ther, 2005, 35(4):639-665.DOI:10.1016/S0005-7894(04)80013-3.
[3] Dindo L, Zimmerman MB, Hadlandsmyth K, et al.Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Prevention of Chronic Post-surgical Pain and Opioid Use in At-risk Veterans: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Study[J]. J Pain, 2018, 19(10).DOI:10.1016/j.jpain.2018.04.016.
[4] Simister HD, Tkachuk GA, Shay BL, et al.Randomized Controlled Trial of Online Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Fibromyalgia[J]. J Pain, 2018, 9(7):741-753.DOI:10.1016/j.jpain.2018.02.004.
[5] Scott W, Chilcot J, Guildford B, et al.Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial of Online Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Patients with Complex Chronic Pain in the United Kingdom[J]. Eur J Pain, 2018, 22(8):1473-1484.DOI:10.1002/ejp.1236.
[6] Trompetter HR, Bohlmeijer ET, Veehof MM, et al.Internet-based Guided Self-help Intervention for Chronic Pain Based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial[J]. J Behav Med, 2015, 38(1):66-80.DOI:10.1007/s10865-014-9579-0.
[7] Kemani MK, Olsson GL, Lekander M, et al.Efficacy and Cost-effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Applied Relaxation for Longstanding Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial[J]. Clin J Pain, 2015, 31(11):1004.DOI:10.1097/AJP.0000000000000203.
[8] Luciano JV, Guallar, José A, Aguado J, et al. Effectiveness of Group Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Fibromyalgia: A 6-Month Randomized Controlled Trial (EFFIGACT Study)[J]. Pain, 2014, 155(4):693-702.DOI:10.1016/j.pain.2013.12.029.
[9] Buhrman M, Skoglund A, Husell J, et al.Guided Internet-delivered Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Chronic Pain Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial[J]. Behav Res Ther, 2013, 51(6):307-315.DOI:10.1016/j.brat.2013.02.010.
[10] Mccracken LM, Sato A,Taylor GJ.A Trial of a Brief Group-Based Form of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) for Chronic Pain in General Practice: Pilot Outcome and Process Results[J]. J Pain, 2013, 14(11):1398-1406.DOI:10.1016/j.jpain.2013.06.011.
[11] Wicksell RK, Kemani M, Jensen K, et al.Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Fibromyalgia: A Randomized Controlled Trial[J]. Eur J Pain, 2013, 17(4):599-611.DOI:10.1002/j.1532-2149.2012.00224.x.
[12] Thorsell, Jenny, Finnes, et al. A Comparative Study of 2 Manual-based Self-help Interventions, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Applied Relaxation, for Persons with Chronic Pain[J]. Clin J Pain, 2011, 27(8):716-723.DOI:10.1097/AJP.0b013e31829261d6.
[13] Wetherell JL, Afari N, Rutledge T, et al.A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Cognitive-behavioral Therapy for Chronic Pain[J]. Pain, 2011, 152(9):2098-2107.DOI:10.1016/j.pain.2011.05.016.
[14] Wicksell RK, Ahlqvist J, Bring A, et al.Can Exposure and Acceptance Strategies Improve Functioning and Life Satisfac-tion in People with Chronic Pain and Whiplash-associated Disorders (WAD)? A Randomized Controlled Trial[J]. Cogn Behav Ther,2008,37(3):169-182.DOI:10.1080/16506070802078970.
[15] Dahl JA, Wilson KG, Nilsson A.Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and the Treatment of Persons at Risk for Long-term Disability Resulting from Stress and Pain Symptoms: A Preliminary Randomized Trial[J].Behav Ther, 2004, 35(4):785-801.DOI:10.1016/s0005-7894(04)80020-0.
[16] 谢婵娟,许湘华,欧美军,等. 慢性疼痛患者心理灵活性的研究进展[J]. 中国全科医学, 2019,22(8):973-977.DOI:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2018.00.357.
[17] 李梦诗,顾申,周玲君. 慢性疼痛患者疼痛功能障碍和生活满意度的影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2014,21(24):5-8.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2014.24.004.

相关文章 15

[1]	李嘉琪, 莫文娟, 王一棋, 王洁, 李梦楠, 刘兴, 冯佳. 基于COSMIN方法对慢性疼痛患者恐动症坦帕评分表的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 56-62.
[2]	姚婉晴, 杨立状, 陈旦旦, 张晚秋, 卢薇, 管翠红, 李海. 不同非药物干预措施改善乳腺癌患者疲乏效果的网状Meta分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(24): 37-43.
[3]	周春香, 饶媛, 崔梦娇, 商芷颖, 张天岚, 裘奚晨卉, 秦艳萍. 基于传感器技术的智能康复设备在脑卒中患者步态康复应用效果的Meta分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(24): 44-50.
[4]	章明阳, 刘京辉, 金雁, 徐文琪, 李斌飞, 黄珊, 杜李百合, 侯亚甜, 李小寒. 围手术期低体温风险预测模型的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(22): 54-60.
[5]	罗海琴, 谢日华, 梁绰意. 正念干预对不孕症女性心理健康和生活质量影响的Meta分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(17): 28-34.
[6]	黄丽华, 翟巾帼, 田金徽, 孔淦霞, 王雪岩, 陈莉瑾, 袁心愿, 耿薪茜, 陈昭桐. 妊娠期生活方式干预对妊娠期高血压疾病进展及母婴结局影响的Meta分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(24): 38-42.
[7]	孙菲, 刘敏, 胡珊珊, 吴蕾, 刘君, 李萍. 基于Meta分析构建早产儿母亲泌乳建立风险预测评分模型[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(23): 1-5.
[8]	李文雪, 包园, 陈翠, 王硕, 周芳. 成人ICU转出患者慢性疼痛发展轨迹的潜在类别及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(21): 65-70.
[9]	钱怡, 周清平, 梁振宁, 王晨曦, 刘涵月, 于瑶, 玉素扑江·图尔荪, 王冬. 慢性病患者参与医患共同决策影响因素的Meta分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(20): 19-23.
[10]	余小燕, 刘于, 黄毅. 小丑照护对患儿焦虑疼痛干预效果的Meta分析[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(4): 21-26.
[11]	李婧雯, 梅紧紧, 王艺莹, 郭健, 任彬彬, 冯晓东, 李瑞青. 不同针刺方法治疗脑卒中后患者肢体痉挛总有效率的贝叶斯网状Meta分析[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(3): 1-6.
[12]	胡正中, 廖园园, 周毅峰, 彭瑨, 秦月兰. 结直肠癌患者手术切口感染危险因素的Meta分析[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(8): 23-27.
[13]	陆涵, 赵媛, 朱晓丽, 林惠仙, 史婷婷. 基于改良早期预警评分护送方案在急危重症患者院内转运中应用效果的Meta分析[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(4): 19-25.
[14]	从维莲, 周春兰, 胡明钰, 刘丽萍. 延迟自体乳房重建术对上肢淋巴水肿治疗效果的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(4): 26-30.
[15]	徐思英, 黄莹, 刘丽华, 胡雅. 基于互联网认知行为疗法对产妇负性情绪干预效果的Meta分析[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(4): 36-42.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared