以质量求发展,以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (3): 40-45.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.03.040

• 循证护理 • 上一篇    下一篇

体外循环心脏手术中体温管理循证实践

周毅峰a, 杨继平a, 彭瑶丽a, 袁浩b, 石泽亚c   

  1. 湖南省人民医院(湖南师范大学附属第一医院) a.手术一部; b.检验科; c.院办,湖南 长沙 410005
  • 收稿日期:2021-08-10 发布日期:2022-03-04
  • 通讯作者: 杨继平(1990-),女,湖南长沙人,硕士,主管护师。 E-mail:1293488432@qq.com
  • 作者简介:周毅峰(1981-),女,湖南长沙人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读,副主任护师,护士长。
  • 基金资助:
    湖南省自然科学基金项目(2019JJ80009)

Evidence-based Body Temperature Management in Cardiopulmonary Bypass Surgery

ZHOU Yi-fenga, YANG Ji-pinga, PENG Yao-lia, YUAN Haob, SHI Ze-yac   

  1. a. Operating Room I; b. Laboratory Medicine; c. Headquarter Office, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, the First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410005, China
  • Received:2021-08-10 Published:2022-03-04

摘要: 目的 通过应用前期研究制定的体外循环心脏手术中体温管理证据,以规范术中体温管理操作行为保障患者安全。方法 采用JBI循证实践证据应用程序,按照基线审查、临床实践变革、证据应用后质量审查3个阶段实施循证实践。根据前期研究获得的证据制订临床审查指标进行基线审查,分析障碍因素,制订行动策略将证据在临床应用,然后实施证据应用后审查。结果 证据应用前后,术中鼻咽温、氧合器动脉出口温度、氧合器静脉入口温度比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),术中膀胱温比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);不同时间点的鼻咽温、氧合器动脉出口温度、氧合器静脉入口温度比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),膀胱温比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);不同时间点的鼻咽温、膀胱温、氧合器动脉出口温度、氧合器静脉入口温度与证据应用前后交互无统计学意义(P>0.05)。证据应用后低体温、寒颤、躁动发生率分别为16.7%、6.7%、13.3%,对比基线审查时分别为36.7%、26.7%、40.0%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。培训前后心脏专科小组护士及体外循环师相关知识考核成绩分别为(76.25±9.62)分,(91.25±6.35)分,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。基线审查时手术室护士对审查指标1、2、3的执行率分别为63%、27%、100%,其余审查指标执行率均在20%以下,证据应用后,审查指标2、4-15的执行率均有明显提高,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 基于证据的体温管理策略在体外循环心脏手术中应用,可规范临床操作行为,提高护士术中体温管理的科学性与执行依从性,有效保护术中心肌、大脑细胞及神经组织,降低相关并发症,确保体外循环手术患者术中安全。

关键词: 心脏外科手术, 体外循环技术, 低温治疗, 体温管理, 循证实践

Abstract: Objective To To formulate body temperature management plan in cardiopulmonary bypass surgery based on evidence-based practice and to standardize clinical practice and promote continuous quality improvement of body temperature management. Methods With the JBI model of evidence-based healthcare (baseline data review, clinical reform and evidence audit), according to the evidence obtained in the preliminary research, corresponding clinical review indicators and review methods were developed, obstacles were reviewed and analyzed, then the strategies were formulated and the evidence was audited after the application. Results There was no significant difference in the intraoperative nasopharyngeal temperature, oxygenator artery outlet temperature and oxygenator venous inlet temperature before and after the application of the evidence (P>0.05), and the difference in intraoperative bladder temperature was statistically significant (P<0.05). There were statistically significant differences in nasopharyngeal temperature, oxygenator arterial outlet temperature and oxygenator venous inlet temperature at different time points (P<0.05), and the difference in bladder temperature was not statistically significant (P>0.05); at different time points the nasopharyngeal temperature, bladder temperature, oxygenator artery outlet temperature and the oxygenator vein inlet temperature were not statistically significant (P>0.05) before and after the application of the evidence .The incidences of hypothermia, chills, and restlessness after the application of the best evidence were 16.7%, 6.7%, and 13.3% respectively. The difference before the application of the evidence was statistically significant (P<0.001). After the evidence was applied, the intraoperative nasopharyngeal temperature and bladder temperature, oxygenator artery outlet and venous inlet temperature were uniformly lower, and the cooling and rewarming rates were both <0.5℃/min. Before and after the training, the score of intraoperative temperature management related knowledge of the nurses in cardiology specialist team and cardiopulmonary bypass specialists was 76.25±9.62 and 91.25±6.35 respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). Before the application of the best evidence, the operating room nurses' implementation rate of the review indicators 1, 2 and 3 was 63%, 27%, and 100%, respectively. The implementation rate of the remaining review indicators was all below 20%. After the best evidence was applied, the implementation rate of 2, 4-15 had been significantly improved, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Evidence-based temperature management strategies in cardiopulmonary bypass surgery are beneficial for standardizing clinical practice, improving the compliance of nurses in intraoperative temperature management for effective protection of intraoperative myocardium, brain cells and nerve tissue, and reducing related complications to ensure the safety of patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery.

Key words: cardiac surgery, extracorporeal circulation, therapeutic hypothermia, temperature management, evidence-based practice

中图分类号: 

  • R472.3
[1] 冯旭林,陈晓霞,韩盖宇,等.113例冠状动脉血管病变患者行胸腔镜辅助冠状动脉旁路移植术的护理[J].护理学报,2020,27(24):60-62.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.24.060.
[2] 张娜,刘金东.体外循环心脏手术脑损伤及脑保护的研究进展[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2020,40(1):120-124.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1403.2010.02.018.
[3] Engelman R, Baker RA, Likosky DS, et al.The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists,and the American Society of Extra Corporeal Technology:Clinical Practice Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Bypass—temperature Management during Cardiopulmonary Bypass[J]. J Extra Corpor Technol,2015,47(3):145-154. DOI:doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.03.126.
[4] 周毅峰,杨继平,袁浩,等.肝癌加速康复外科术中保温技术的循证实践[J].护理学杂志,2019, 34(10):12-16.DOI:10.3870,/j.issn.1001—41j2.2019.10.012.
[5] Dicenso A, Bayley L, Haynes RB.Accessing Pre-appralsed evidenee:Fine-tuning the 5S Model into a 6S Model[J].Evid Based Nuts,2009,12(4):99-101.DOI:10.1136/ebn.12.4.99-b.
[6] 周毅峰,杨继平,袁浩,等.体外循环心脏手术中体温管理证据汇总[J].护理学报, 2021, 28(5):26-31.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.05.026.
[7] Gupta P, Harky A, Jahangeer S, et al.Varying Evidence on Deep Hypothermic Circulatory Arrest in Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Surgery[J]. Tex Heart Inst J, 2018, 45(2):70-75.DOI:org/10.14503/THIJ-17-6364.
[8] Reed H, Berg KB, Janelle GM.Aortic Surgery and Deep-hypothermic Circulatory Arrest: Anesthetic Update[J].Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth,2014,18(2):137-145.DOI:10.1177/1089253214525278.
[9] 陈彧,刘锋,江朝光,等.深低温体外循环温度管理[J].中国体外循环杂志,2006, 4(3):156-159.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1403.2006.03.009.
[10] 张挺杰,杭燕南.体外循环心脏手术后患者精神障碍的发生机制[J].中国临床康复,2006,10(6):133-135.DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1673-8225.2006.06.059.
[1] 刘璐, 朱钰, 曹义, 张华, 彭玉娜. 腹腔热灌注化疗患者术中实施不同目标体温管理的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 59-63.
[2] 夏碧芸, 陈瑜, 吴彦妍, 胡雁. 降低经桡动脉冠状动脉介入术后老年患者桡动脉闭塞发生的循证实践[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 37-43.
[3] 李春萍, 张兰萍, 王晓辉, 钟乐欣, 杨薇, 赵青, 吕森森, 李嘉琪, 谢昀筠, 黄婉晴, 陈晓珊, 徐东. 实施理论—常态化过程理论的解读[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(5): 39-43.
[4] 张淑珍, 余文汝, 张俊峰, 江佳瑶, 罗美, 林碧玉, 麦敏雯, 杨梦婷. 肿瘤放疗患者放射性皮炎预防与管理的循证护理实践[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(16): 62-66.
[5] 刘瑶, 詹欣, 谢亭平, 陈炜, 胡依阳, 杨翠娜, 张国忠. 脑血管造影术后使用股动脉压迫止血器患者早期活动的循证实践[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(15): 29-33.
[6] 邓颖一, 程露颖, 龚喜燕, 王敏, 廖冬霞, 张翠翠, 丁娟, 古清鹭, 廖常菊. 临床护理交接班循证实践的范围综述[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(14): 57-62.
[7] 黄宇星, 刘宁, 黄婷. 基于核心能力构建适宜中低资源地区护理本科循证实践教学指标体系[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(13): 24-28.
[8] 张兰萍, 吕森森, 何文俊, 陈江芸, 蔡毅媛, 李春萍, 刘思源, 钟冬梅, 李嘉琪, 谢昀筠, 黄婉晴, 陈晓珊, 徐东. 实施性研究综合框架(CFIR)更新版的解析和应用[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(11): 47-52.
[9] 魏大琼, 龙春花, 吴丝丝, 胡雁. 急性心肌梗死患者早期运动康复的循证护理实践[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(11): 53-58.
[10] 姚晶晶, 刘颖, 许汇娟, 孙思敏, 陈敏, 江雪杰. 急性白血病患者化疗相关便秘预防和管理的循证护理实践[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(8): 40-45.
[11] 付艳芬, 王春青, 胡雁. 证据临床转化中障碍因素和促进因素的内容分析[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(5): 64-68.
[12] 林俏, 刘梅娟, 张广清, 赵芯梅, 夏燕飞, 施燕, 曾依婷, 赖女珍, 周丽华, 李秀梅. 成人炎症性肠病患者饮食与营养方案的循证实践[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(4): 27-33.
[13] 侯香传, 伍艳婷, 周凯琪, 莫怡坚, 黄丽香, 刘伊莎. 提高呼吸系统疾病患者痰标本采集合格率的循证实践[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(24): 43-48.
[14] 张俊峰, 陈妙婷, 黄雪玲, 李美连, 蔡莹莹, 吴艳妮, 全守波, 刘兴玲. 胃肠肿瘤根治术后患者自控镇痛管理的循证实践[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(23): 50-55.
[15] 黎紫艳, 温秀兰, 黄海英, 张立力, 张智英, 张晓红, 何梦雪, 沈南平, 吴玮哲. 肿瘤患儿化疗相关性恶心呕吐症状管理的循证实践[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(14): 43-47.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!