以质量求发展,以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (11): 26-32.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.11.026

• 循证护理 • 上一篇    下一篇

ICU患者谵妄非药物管理相关指南的系统评价

张爱琴1, 陈俊杉2, 余金甜2   

  1. 1.中国人民解放军东部战区总医院 临床护理重点专科,江苏 南京 210002;
    2.南京大学医学院附属金陵医院 重症医学科,江苏 南京 210002
  • 收稿日期:2019-11-21 出版日期:2020-06-10 发布日期:2020-07-07
  • 作者简介:张爱琴(1966-),女,江苏如皋人,本科学历,主任护师,E-mail:aq09z@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    2016国家临床护理重点专科项目(2016ZDZK001)

Guidelines on Non-pharmacological Management of Delirium in ICU Patients:A Systematic Review

ZHANG Ai-qin1, CHEN Jun-shan2, YU Jin-tian2   

  1. 1. Dept. of Professional Training of Clinical Nursing, General Hospital of Eastern Theatre Command, Nanjing 210002, China;
    2. Dept. of Intensive Care Unit, Jinling Hospital Affiliated to Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210002, China
  • Received:2019-11-21 Online:2020-06-10 Published:2020-07-07

摘要: 目的 系统评价ICU患者谵妄非药物管理相关指南。方法 计算机检索国内外指南网、相关学会网站和数据库,搜集ICU患者谵妄非药物管理相关指南,检索时限均为建库至2019年9月30日。由2名研究者独立筛选文献、提取资料后,采用指南研究与评价工具AGREE II对纳入的指南进行质量评价,汇总各指南的推荐意见并比较其异同。结果 最终纳入10部指南,9部来源于国外,10部指南AGREE II 各领域的平均得分为:范围和目的83%、参与人员55%、严谨性61%、清晰性82%、应用性65%和独立性38%,4部指南总体质量评价为A级,6部指南总体质量评价为B级。推荐意见涉及危险因素辨识和风险预测;评估与诊断;非药物预防;非药物治疗及(会)转诊与随访5个方面。结论 纳入的指南质量处于中等至较高水平,但在指南的参与人员、严谨性、应用性和独立性领域仍有待完善。目前,我国ICU患者谵妄非药物管理指南的开发尚处于起步阶段,应尽快制定适用于我国ICU患者的谵妄非药物管理指南。

关键词: ICU, 谵妄, 非药物管理, 指南, 系统评价

Abstract: Objective To systematically review the guidelines on non-pharmacological management of delirium in ICU patients. Methods The guideline networks, association websites and databases were electronically searched to collect guidelines on non-pharmacological management of delirium in ICU patients from the inception to 30 September 2019. Two reviewers worked independently to screen literature, extract data, and evaluate the included guidelines according to the standard quality appraisal tool AGREE II, and then summarized and compared the recommendations related to non-pharmacological management of delirium in ICU patients. Results Ten guidelines were included and nine of them were foreign ones. The average score of each AGREE II domain was 83% for scope and purpose, 55% for stakeholder involvement, 61% for rigor of development, 82% for clarity of presentation, 65% for applicability, and 38% for editorial independence. Four guidelines rated as Grade A and the remaining six as Grade B. Five aspects were involved in recommendations, including identification of risk factors and risk prediction; assessment and diagnosis; non-pharmacological prevention; non-pharmacological treatment and (Consultation) Referral and follow-up. Conclusion The overall quality of included guidelines is in a moderate to high level. More efforts are needed to improve the stakeholder involvement, rigor of development, applicability and independence domain of guidelines. At present, the development of guidelines on non-pharmacological management of delirium in ICU patients in China is still at initial stage. It is suggested to formulate localized guidelines that are suitable for China as soon as possible.

Key words: ICU, delirium, non-pharmacological management, guideline, systematic review

中图分类号: 

  • R473
[1] American Psychiatric Association.Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders[M].4th Edition.Washington, D.C: American Psychiatric Association, 2000:124-127.
[2] Brummel NE, Girard TD.Preventing Delirium in the Intensive Care Unit[J].Crit Care Clin,2013,29(1):51-65. DOI:10.1016/j.ccc.2012.10.007.
[3] Cavallazzi R, Saad M, Marik PE.Delirium in the ICU: An Overview[J]. Ann Intensive Care,2012,2(1):49.DOI:10.1186/2110-5820-2-49.
[4] Barr J, Fraser GL, Puntillo K, et al.Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Pain, Agitation, and Delirium in Adult Patients in the Intensive Care Unit[J]. Crit Care Med, 2013, 41(1):263-306. DOI:10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182783b72.
[5] AGREE Enterprise. AGREE II Instrument[EB/OL]. (2017-12-15)[2018-11-10]. https://www.agreetrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/AGREE-II-Users-Manual-and-23-item-Instrument-2009-Update-2017.pdf.
[6] 胡雁,郝玉芳.循证护理学[M].2版.北京:人民卫生出版社, 2018:157-174.
[7] 武杰,王轶,王志稳.痴呆老人精神行为问题非药物管理指南的系统评价[J].中国循证医学杂志,2016,16(11):1338-1344. DOI:10.7507/1672-2531.20160202.
[8] 余红梅,罗艳虹,萨建,等. 组内相关系数及其软件实现[J].中国卫生统计,2011, 28(5):497-500.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-3674.2011.05.006.
[9] American Psychiatric Association.Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Patients with Delirium[J]. Am [J] Psychiatry.1999,156(5):1-20.
[10] United Kingdom Clinical Pharmacy Association. Detection, Prevention and Treatment of Delirium in Critically Ill Patients[EB/OL].[2006-06-25]. http://icmwk.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/ukcpa_delirium_2006.pdf.
[11] Michaud L, Büla C, Berney A, et al.Delirium:Guidelines for General Hospitals[J]. J Psychosom Res, 2007, 62(3):371-383.DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.10.004
[12] Guy's and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust. Clinical Guideline: The Prevention,Recognition and Management of Delirium in Adult In-Patients[EB/OL].[2011-05-25].https://www.guysandstthomas.nhs.uk/resources/our-services/acute-medicine-gi-surgery/elderly-care/delirium-adult-inpatients.pdf.
[13] Celis-Rodríguez E, Birchenall C, de la Cal MÁ, et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Evidence-based Management of Sedoanalgesia in Critically Ill Adult Patients[J]. Med Intensiva, 2013,37(8):519-574.DOI:10.1016/j.medin.2013.04.001.
[14] Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften. Evidence and Consensus Based Guideline for the Management of Delirium, Analgesia, and Sedation in Intensive Care Medicine[EB/OL].[2015-08-31].https://www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/ll/001-012.html.
[15] 中华医学会重症医学分会.中国成人ICU镇痛和镇静治疗指南[J].中华重症医学电子杂志(网络版),2018,4(2):90-113.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2018.06.001.
[16] Devlin JW, Skrobik Y, Gelinas C, et al.Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility, and Sleep Disruption in Adult Patients in the ICU[J]. Crit Care Med, 2018, 46(9):e825-e873.DOI:10.1097/CCM.0000000000003299.
[17] Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Risk Reduction and Management of Delirium[EB/OL].[2019-03-01]. https://www.sign.ac.uk/sign-157-delirium.html.
[18] National Clinical Guideline Centre. Delirium: Diagnosis, Prevention and Management[EB/OL].[2019-03-01].http://www.nice.org.uk/CG103.
[19] Bush SH, Marchington KL, Agar M, et al.Quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines in Delirium:A Systematic Appraisal[J]. BMJ Open.2017,7(3):e013809. DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013809.
[20] 王明辉,张菁,曾宪涛,等.临床实践指南制订方法-患者的价值观和意愿[J].中国循证心血管医学杂志, 2018,10(10):1153-1156.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-4055.2018.10.01.
[21] Zhan SY, Yin DX, Tang JL.Clinical Guidelines in China: Tackling Conflict of Interests and Engaging Patients[EB/OL].[2018-11-06].https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2018/11/06/clinical-guidelines-in-china-tackling-conflict-of-interests-and-engaging-patients.
[22] 谢胜,李建锋,李娟,等.难治性胃食管反流病临床指南的系统评价[J].中国全科医学,2019,22(8):901-908.DOI:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2018.00.397.
[23] 陈俊杉,余金甜,赵思雨,等.ICU患者谵妄风险预测模型研究进展[J].护理学报,2019,26(5):15-19.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2019.05.015.
[24] 丁泓帆,杨楠,邓围,等. WHO指南制定的基本原则和方法[J].中国循证医学杂志,2016,16(4):471-477.DOI:10.7507/1672-2531.20160072.
[1] 蔡莹莹, 凌晨, 刘绵珠, 周杰, 张俊峰, 陈连华, 田潇飞, 罗斌, 陈梦云. 成人癌痛评估与管理指南的方法学质量评价[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 34-40.
[2] 伍丽华, 吴心雨, 赖湘瑜, 邓宝贵, 黄泽青, 赵耀, 廖源, 沈彩萍, 李瑜. 人工关节置换术后患者深静脉血栓风险预测模型的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 12-16.
[3] 焦雪萍, 王志稳, 韩舒羽. ICU老年患者躁动行为的干预研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 38-42.
[4] 刘硕怡, 熊莉娟, 李凌, 王玉梅, 何嘉, 李鑫, 袁淑蕾, 郭雪琴, 王暘婧, 张慧娟. 老年住院患者衰弱预防及管理临床实践指南的质量评价及内容分析[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 50-55.
[5] 李嘉琪, 莫文娟, 王一棋, 王洁, 李梦楠, 刘兴, 冯佳. 基于COSMIN方法对慢性疼痛患者恐动症坦帕评分表的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 56-62.
[6] 李雪, 廖常菊, 张健, 丁娟, 陈晓丽, 胡玉庭. 三级甲等医院ICU护士睡眠障碍的风险预测模型构建及验证[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 63-69.
[7] 刘畅, 张维, 王翠雪, 岳鹏. ICU实施非限制性探视制度的影响因素研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(1): 34-38.
[8] 陈莹莹, 丁红, 张根生. 患儿术后谵妄影响因素的研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(9): 32-35.
[9] 陈杰, 赖静, 王城阅, 徐良英, 晏娟, 罗雪. 基于三维质量结构理论的ICU护理人文关怀质量评价指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(9): 54-59.
[10] 余璐, 黄晓沁, 刘琳, 袁嘉敏, 邬青. 心力衰竭患者30天非计划性再入院风险预测模型的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(8): 43-48.
[11] 倪乐凤, 刘林, 沈春华, 乔瑶, 周亮, 朱强, 龚卫娟. 输血护理时限管理相关指南的质量评价及内容分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 51-56.
[12] 李莹, 周志欢. ICU护理缺失的研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(6): 43-46.
[13] 周越, 张杰, 潘宇帆, 戴雨, 孙羽健, 肖益, 余雨枫. 机械通气患者衰弱风险预测模型的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(6): 56-61.
[14] 吴林梅, 梁志金, 刘瑞杰, 钟静静, 邱予骅. COPD患者运动康复促进和阻碍因素的系统评价-基于CFIR多层次理论[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(5): 44-49.
[15] 祁水林, 林桦, 邓锐颖, 李荣杰, 李若雨, 王凤廷. 老年皮肤瘙痒症患者非药物管理的最佳证据总结[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(3): 46-50.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!