以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 1-6.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2025.05.001

• 研究生园地 •    下一篇

医学生移动学习意愿量表的汉化及信效度检验

郑晓英1, 李德越2, 吕学丽2   

  1. 1.黑龙江中医药大学附属第一医院 护理部,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150040;
    2.黑龙江中医药大学 护理学院,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150040
  • 收稿日期:2024-10-30 出版日期:2025-03-10 发布日期:2025-04-10
  • 通讯作者: 李德越（1999-）,女,黑龙江大庆人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读,护师。E-mail:396175197@qq.com
  • 作者简介:郑晓英（1982-）,女,黑龙江伊春人,硕士,副主任护师,护理部副主任。
  • 基金资助:
    2024年黑龙江省教育科学规划重点课题（GJB1424174）

Localization of Mobile Learning Intention Scale for medical students and its reliability and validity

ZHENG Xiaoying1, LI Deyue2, LV Xueli2   

  1. 1. Dept. of Nursing Administration, the First Affiliated Hospital of Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin 150040, China;
    2. School of Nursing, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin 150040, China
  • Received:2024-10-30 Online:2025-03-10 Published:2025-04-10

PDF (PC)

0

赞

摘要： 目的 汉化医学生移动学习意愿量表并进行信效度检验。方法 参照Brislin翻译模式对英文版医学生移动学习意愿量表进行翻译、回译及文化调适,并于2023年7月采用便利取样法,选取黑龙江省哈尔滨市某医学院校520名护理本科生为研究对象检验量表信效度。结果 中文版医学生移动学习意愿量表包含9个维度38个条目。总量表Cronbachα系数为0.953,各维度Cronbach α系数为0.694~0.883,重测信度为0.672~0.875。量表I-CVI为0.873~1.000,S-CVI为0.921;结构模型的拟合指标均符合标准。结论 中文版医学生移动学习意愿量表具有良好的信效度,可作为评估医学相关专业学生移动学习意愿情况的工具。

关键词: 医学生, 移动学习, 移动学习意愿, 量表汉化

Abstract: Objective To translate the Mobile Learning Intention Scale for medical students (MLWS-MS) and test its reliability and validity. Methods With Brislin translation model, the MLWS-MS was translated into Chinese and in July 2023, 520 nursing undergraduates from a medical college in Harbin, Heilongjiang Province were selected by convenience sampling as research objects to test its reliability and validity. Results The MLWS-MS contained 9 dimensions and 38 items. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the total scale was 0.953, and that of each dimension ranged from 0.694 to 0.883. Retest reliability ranged from 0.672 to 0.875. Item level content validity index ranged from 0.873 to 1.000, and scale level content validity index was 0.921; the fitting indexes of the structural model all met the standard. Conclusion The Chinese version of MLWS-MS has good reliability and validity, and can be used as a tool for accessing the mobile learning willingness in medical-related students.

Key words: medical student, mobile learning, mobile learning willingness, scale translation

中图分类号: 

  • R192.6
[1] Baghcheghi N, Koohestani HR.The relationship between the willingness to mobile learning and educational achievements in health-care professional students[J]. JEduc Health Promot,2021,10(1):378.DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_1491_20.
[2] 张桥溪,刘童玮,周炜琛.移动学习意愿的影响因素研究:基于自我效能感的中介效应检验[J].高等继续教育学报,2021,34(3):74-80.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7353.2021.03.014.
[3] Baghcheghi N,Koohestani HR,Karimy M.Design and psychometric properties of willingness to Mobile Learning Scale for Medical Sciences Students:a mixed-methods study[J].JEduc Health Promot,2020,9(1):141.DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_153_20.
[4] 孙振球. 医学统计学[M].5版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2020:507-509.
[5] Sousa VD,Rojjanasrirat W.Translation,adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research:a clear and user-friendly guideline[J]. JEval Clin Pract, 2011, 17(2):268-274.DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x.
[6] 李铮,刘宇.护理学研究方法[M].2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2018.
[7] 李琛,郑福雪,陈飞,等.护理人际关系量表的汉化及信效度检验[J].中华护理杂志, 2023, 58(16):2043-2048.DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2023.16.021.
[8] 张珊珊,李惠萍,宋江艳,等.乳腺癌患者家庭韧性评估量表的汉化及信效度研究[J].护理学报,2021,28(24):1-5.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.24.001.
[9] 朱红兵. 问卷调査及统计分析方法:基于SPSS[M].北京:电子工业出版社,2019.
[10] 张晨,周云仙.我国护理测量工具文献中内容效度指数应用误区分析[J].护理学杂志,2020,35(4):86-88;92.DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2020.04.086.
[11] 侯艳,张云,高蓉,等.恶性肿瘤患者疼痛认知量表的汉化和信效度检验[J].护理学报,2021,28(4):62-66.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.04.062.
[12] 胡鹏,路红,马子程.验证性因子分析中允许误差相关的可行性与条件性[J].统计与决策,2018,34(19):37-41.DOI:10.13546/j.cnki.tjyjc.2018.19.008.
[13] 张佳惠,庞书勤,洪雪珮,等.老年前期人群退休规划过程量表的汉化及信效度检验[J].护理学报,2023,30(10):1-6.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.10.001.
[14] 宋彩妮,郑尧,宋英,等.癌症照顾者信息隐瞒量表的汉化及在肺癌患者照顾者中的信效度检验[J].护理学报,2024,31(3):17-20.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2024.03.017.
[15] 张颖,郝燕萍,罗岚.安宁疗护护理质量量表的汉化及信效度检验[J].护理学报,2023,30(20):48-53. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.20.048.
[16] Izquierdo I, Olea J, Abad FJ.Exploratory factor analysis in validation studies:uses and recommendations[J]. Psicothema,2014,26(3):395-400.DOI:10.7334/psicothema2013.349.
[17] 胡鹏,路红,马子程.验证性因子分析中允许误差相关的可行性与条件性[J].统计与决策,2018,34(19):37-41.DOI:10.13546/j.cnki.tjyjc.2018.19.008.
[18] 张佳. 基于计划行为理论的乡村中小学教师移动学习意愿研究[J]. 中国教育信息化(高教职教),2022,28(1):46-55.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-8454.2022.01.006.
[19] Baghcheghi N, Koohestani HR.The predictive role of tendency towardmobile learning and emotional intelligence in internet addiction in healthcare professional students[J].JAdv Med Educ Prof,2022,10(2):113-119.DOI:10.30476/JAMP.2022.91971.1465.
[20] Arzani-Birgani A, Zarei J,Favaregh L,Ghanaatiyan E.Internet addiction,mental health,and sleep quality in students of medical sciences, Iran: a cross-sectional study[J]. J Educ Health Promot,2021,10(1):409.DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_1506_20.
[1] 朱亚晋, 王朝辉, 代明珠, 王琳, 孙莹莹. 临床护士文化能力量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(17): 46-50.
[2] 张佳惠, 庞书勤, 洪雪珮, 郑智慧, 李绵利, 黄钰峰, 王炜骏. 老年前期人群退休规划过程量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(10): 1-6.
[3] 王佩, 陈俊春, 张茵. 基于即刻学堂和微信整合移动学习平台对老年科护士培训的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(9): 6-9.
[4] 曹丹阳,汪玉婷,于莉,王伟杰,崔静. 上海市某医学高校1488名本科生对死亡教育态度与需求现状调查[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(7): 32-35.
[5] 李程, 孙志岭, 何静, 陈斌, 焦文娟, 张华. 105名成人教育护生移动学习现状调查[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(22): 52-54.
[6] 艾婷,肖泽梅,曹莹(综述),王冬华(审校). 医学生适应的现状及干预研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2016, (2): 26-30.
[7] 张开利,王霞,唐四元,谭迎春,徐继承,李丽,韩静,王立红. 376名本科医学生生命意义感现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2015, (15): 36-39.
[8] 康丽,杨希,程思,王美娟,张仲琴,肖一凡,史瑞芬. 医学院校毕业生求职问题行为及相关因素调查分析[J]. 护理学报, 2012, (22): 13-16.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!