以质量求发展,以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (21): 39-45.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.21.039

• 循证护理 • 上一篇    下一篇

持续血糖监测在糖尿病患者中应用的系统评价再评价

王窈1, 管玉香2, 郑静3, 许娟4, 王超1   

  1. 1.安徽中医药大学 护理学院,安徽 合肥 230012;
    2.安徽中医药大学第一附属医院 护理部,安徽 合肥 230031;
    3.合江县人民医院,四川 泸州 646200;
    4.安庆医药高等专科学校 护理学院,安徽 安庆 246052
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-31 出版日期:2023-11-10 发布日期:2023-12-07
  • 通讯作者: 管玉香(1976-),女,安徽天长人,本科学历,主任护师,硕士研究生导师。E-mail:897213643@qq.com
  • 作者简介:王窈(1999-),女,安徽芜湖人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读,护士。
  • 基金资助:
    安徽省卫生健康科研项目(AHWJ2021b068)

Systematic reviews of continuous glucose monitoring in patients with diabetes: an overview

WANG Yao1, GUAN Yu-xiang2, ZHENG Jing3, XU Juan4, WANG Chao1   

  1. 1. School of Nursing, Anhui University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hefei 230012, China;
    2. Dept. of Nursing Administration, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hefei 230031, China;
    3. Hejiang County People's Hospital, Luzhou 646200, China;
    4. School of Nursing, Anqing Medical College, Anqing 246052, China
  • Received:2023-05-31 Online:2023-11-10 Published:2023-12-07

摘要: 目的 评价持续血糖监测应用于糖尿病患者相关系统评价的方法学质量和结论的可靠程度。方法 计算机检索中国知网、PubMed等数据库,检索时限为建库至2023年4月1日,收集持续血糖监测应用于糖尿病患者的系统评价。由2名研究人员对文献进行纳入和信息提取,并以多维系统评价评估工具(Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews, AMSTAR)和推荐分级的评价、制定与评估标准(Grade of Recommendation,Assessment, Development, and Evaluation, GRADE)对纳入文献的方法学质量和结局指标进行质量评价。结果 共有14篇系统评价被纳入。AMSTAR工具评价结果显示,5篇为高质量文献,9篇为中等质量文献。GRADE系统评价结果显示,44条证据中仅有10条证据等级为中等,低等证据和极低证据分别有20条和14条。结论 持续血糖监测有利于糖尿病患者有关血糖指标的改善,但仍缺乏高质量的证据支撑,纳入研究的方法学研究质量和证据等级不高。未来有待于开展更多的高质量研究证实结论的可靠性。

关键词: 持续血糖监测, 糖尿病, 系统评价再评价, GRADE

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the methodological quality and reliability of the systematic reviews on continuous blood glucose monitoring in diabetic patients. Methods We collected systematic reviews of continuous glucose monitoring in patients with diabetes from China National Knowledge Network, PubMed and other databases by computer. The retrieval period was from the inception to April 1, 2023. Two researchers extracted the information and evaluated the methodological quality and outcome indicators of the included literature by using Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) and Grade of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation(GRADE). Results Fourteen systematic reviews were collected. AMSTAR showed that 5 pieces of literature were of high quality and 9 of medium quality. The evaluation with GRADE system showed that only 10 of the 44 pieces of evidences were with medium grade, while 20 with low grade and 14 with extremely low grade. Conclusion Continuous blood glucose monitoring is conducive to the improvement of relevant blood glucose indicators in diabetic patients, but there is still a lack of high-quality evidence support, and the quality of methodological research and evidence quality of included studies is not high. In the future, more high-quality studies are needed to confirm the reliability of the conclusions.

Key words: continuous blood glucose monitoring, diabetes mellitus, overview of systematic review, GRADE

中图分类号: 

  • R473.58
[1] Harreiter J, Roden M.Diabetes mellitus - definition, klassifikation, diagnose, screening und prävention (Update 2019)[J]. Wien Klin Wochenschr, 2019, 131(1_suppl): 6-15. DOI:10.1007/s00508-019-1450-4.
[2] Sun H, Saeedi P, Karuranga S, et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global, regional and country-level diabetes prevalence estimates for2021 and projections for 2045[J]. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2022(183): 109119. DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.
[3] Li Y, Teng D, Shi X, et al. Prevalence of diabetes recorded in mainland China using2018 diagnostic criteria from the American Diabetes Association: national cross sectional study[J]. BMJ, 2020(369): m997. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m997.
[4] 卢舒颖,刘宁,廉民学. 糖尿病患者急性卒中后血糖监测及管理的最佳证据总结[J]. 护理学报,2021,28(15):42-47. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.15.042.
[5] Charleer S, Mathieu C, Nobels F, et al.Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on glycemic control, acute admissions, and quality of life:a real-world study[J]. J Clin Endocr Metab, 2018, 103(3): 1224-1232. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2017-02498.
[6] 卜凡莉,梁枫,王珂,等. 对ICU行肠内营养支持患者胃残留量监测相关系统评价的再评价[J]. 护理学报,2019,26(5):25-29. DOI: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2019.05.025.
[7] 张金苹,陈晓平.《2022年美国糖尿病学会糖尿病医学诊疗标准》解读[J]. 临床内科杂志,2022,39(5):293-298. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-9057.2022.05.002.
[8] Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, et al.Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews[J]. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2007, 15(7):10. DOI:10.1186/1471-2288-7-10.
[9] 曾宪涛,冷卫东,李胜,等. 如何正确理解及使用GRADE系统[J].中国循证医学杂志,2011,11(9):985-990. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2531.2011.09.002.
[10] 魏美林,王倩倩,韩峻峰,等. CGM与SMBG改善1型糖尿病患者血糖控制及减少低血糖事件发生的Meta分析[J]. 同济大学学报(医学版),2015,36(5):79-84. DOI: 10.16118/j.1008-0392.2015.05.017.
[11] Janapala RN, Jayaraj JS, Fathima N, et al.Continuous glucose monitoring versus self-monitoring of blood glucose in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review with Meta-analysis[J]. Cureus, 2019, 11(9): e5634. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.5634.
[12] Teo E, Hassan N, Tam W, et al.Effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring in maintaining glycaemic control among people with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials and Meta-analysis[J]. Diabetologia, 2022, 65(4): 604-619.DOI: 10.1007/s00125-021-05648-4.
[13] Wojciechowski P, Ryś P, Lipowska A, et al.Efficacy and safety comparison of continuous glucose monitoring and self-monitoring of blood glucose in type 1 diabetes: systematicreview and Meta-analysis[J]. Pol Arch Med Wewn, 2011, 121(10): 333-343.
[14] Ida S, Kaneko R, Murata K.Utility of real-time and retrospective continuous glucose monitoring in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. J Diabetes Res, 2019(2019): 4684815. DOI: 10.1155/2019/4684815.
[15] Kłak A, Mańczak M, Owoc J, et al.Impact of continuous glucose monitoring on improving emotional well-being among adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Pol Arch Intern Med, 2021, 131(9): 808-818. DOI: 10.20452/pamw.16047.
[16] Elbalshy M, Haszard J, Smith H, et al.Effect of divergent continuous glucose monitoring technologies on glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials[J]. Diabet Med, 2022, 39(8): e14854. DOI: 10.1111/dme.14854.
[17] Park C, Le QA.The Effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of literature and Meta-analysis[J]. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2018, 20(9):613-621.DOI:10.1089/dia.2018.0177.
[18] Golicki DT, Golicka D, Groele L, et al.Continuous glucose monitoring system in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Diabetologia,2008, 51(2): 233-240. DOI: 10.1007/s00125-007-0884-9.
[19] Gandhi GY, Kovalaske M, Kudva Y, et al.Efficacy of continuous glucose monitoring in improving glycemic control and reducing hypoglycemia: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of randomized trials[J]. J Diabetes Sci Technol, 2011, 5(4): 952-965. DOI: 10.1177/193229681100500419.
[20] Szypowska A, Ramotowska A, Dzygalo K, et al.Beneficial effect of real-time continuous glucose monitoring system on glycemic control in type 1 diabetic patients: systematic review and Meta-analysis of randomized trials[J]. Eur J Endocrinol,2012,166(4):567-574.DOI:10.1530/EJE-11-0642.
[21] Poolsup N, Suksomboon N, Kyaw AM.Systematic review and Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) on glucose control in diabetes[J]. Diabetol Metab Syndr,2013(5):39.DOI:10.1186/1758-5996-5-39.
[22] Di Molfetta S, Caruso I, Cignarelli A, et al.Professional continuous glucose monitoring in patients with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Diabetes Obes Metab, 2023, 25(5): 1301-1310. DOI: 10.1111/dom.14981.
[23] Wang Y, Zou C, Na H, et al.Effect of different glucose monitoring methods on bold glucose control: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Comput Math Methods Med, 2022(2022): 2851572. DOI: 10.1155/2022/2851572.
[24] 郑辛甜,何小军,邵菊芳,等.《中华急诊医学杂志》发表的系统评价/Meta分析的质量评价[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2016,25(9):1216-1218.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2016.09.029.
[25] Charleer S, Mathieu C, Nobels F, et al.Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on glycemic control, acute admissions, and quality of life: a real-world study[J]. J Clin Endocr Metab,2018,103(3):1224-1232.DOI:10.1210/jc.2017-02498.
[26] Bailey T, Bode BW, Christiansen MP, et al.The performance and usability of a factory-calibrated flash glucose monitoring system[J]. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2015, 17(11):787-794. DOI: 10.1089/dia.2014.0378.
[27] Parums DV.Editorial: review articles, systematic reviews, metaanalysis, and the updated preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and Meta-analyses(PRISMA)2020 guidelines[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2021(27):e934475. DOI:10.12659/MSM.934475.
[1] 王小叶, 安俊红, 刘倩, 任琴, 高瑞琴, 范丽红. 共享决策在糖尿病足患者中应用的研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 32-37.
[2] 杨蓓, 叶红芳, 张宁, 相卢伟, 路诗雨. 老年2型糖尿病患者体力活动现状及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 7-12.
[3] 陈赟, 卢雨轩, 祁艳焕, 毛佳慧, 钟印芹. 刺灸法在糖尿病周围神经病变患者中的应用研究文献计量学分析[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 25-30.
[4] 王语, 赵慧杰, 肖梦伟, 范硕宁, 孙佳丽, 王珂心, 苏炫, 杨滢瑞. 糖尿病视网膜病变患者硅油填充期间疾病体验与应对的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(1): 68-72.
[5] 叶香, 黎楷, 黄敏, 张倩, 李际敏, 刘荣珍, 孟敏, 朱少玉, 谢翠华. 对成年2型糖尿病患者基于移动APP+家属共管血糖的研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(9): 60-65.
[6] 朱心悦, 嵇冰聪, 蓝雪芬, 季晓珍. 糖尿病患者电子健康素养研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 36-39.
[7] 牛世莲, 袁丽, 李饶. 糖尿病患者动态血糖监测的结构化教育研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(6): 39-42.
[8] 陈丽燕, 任俊, 董辉, 陈慕莹, 罗伟香. 成人糖尿病患者低血糖管理的指南质量评价及内容分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(22): 41-47.
[9] 吴萍, 于宛辰, 柳嘉怡, 王汕珊, 胡燕. 糖尿病前期人群社会支持研究的范围综述[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(21): 49-54.
[10] 梁晓珊, 林丽娜, 林娟, 邓玲, 林佳清. 趣味性扑克牌教学法在内分泌科实习护生胰岛素理论知识培训的应用[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(2): 36-39.
[11] 罗铎麟, 杨春清, 高萍, 胡清文, 徐小群. 2型糖尿病心理痛苦量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(19): 24-30.
[12] 杨蓓, 叶红芳, 相卢伟, 路诗雨. 中老年2型糖尿病患者轻度认知障碍风险预测模型的构建与验证[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(13): 18-23.
[13] 吴元虹, 王晓辉, 王宇宇, 高歌, 王哲, 吴善玉. 基于主客体互倚模型的老年糖尿病患者胰岛素用药依从性影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(13): 24-29.
[14] . 基于COM-B模型妊娠期糖尿病妇女产后自我管理促进与阻碍因素的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(12): 41-46.
[15] 史婷婷, 李婷, 黄友鹏, 赵媛, 朱晓丽, 周梦娟, 陈云梅. 2型糖尿病患者合并骨质疏松风险预测模型的范围综述[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(1): 52-57.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!