以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (6): 52-56.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.06.052

• 临床护理※内科护理 • 上一篇    下一篇

替代部位血糖监测的可行性与准确性研究

何首谊1,2, 余慧琴1,2, 张迪1,2, 李敏1   

  1. 1.中国医科大学附属第一医院 内分泌与代谢病科室,辽宁 沈阳 110000;
    2.中国医科大学 护理学院,辽宁 沈阳 110121
  • 收稿日期:2022-09-29 出版日期:2023-03-25 发布日期:2023-04-12
  • 通讯作者: 李敏（1978-）,女,辽宁沈阳人,硕士,副主任护师,护士长。Email：nancy_li_822@163.com
  • 作者简介:何首谊（1998-）,女,四川广元人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读。
  • 基金资助:
    2021年度辽宁省自然科学基金项目（2021-MS-178）

Feasibility and accuracy of blood glucose monitoring in alternative sites

HE Shou-yi1,2, YU Hui-qin1,2, ZHANG Di1,2, LI Min1   

  1. 1. Dept. of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110000, China;
    2. School of Nursing, China Medical University, Shenyang 110121, China
  • Received:2022-09-29 Online:2023-03-25 Published:2023-04-12

PDF (PC)

303

赞

摘要： 目的 探讨其他身体部位作为血糖监测替代部位的可行性、实用性及准确性。方法 采用自身对照方法,于2021年12月—2022年6月在沈阳市某三级甲等医院纳入志愿者100例为研究对象,同时（间隔<5 min）穿刺不同部位（包括耳垂、指尖、大鱼际、小鱼际、手臂、脚趾）获得随机血糖值,并抽取静脉生化血糖。比较6个部位的取样情况、准确性、疼痛得分等指标。结果 6个部位的穿刺取样差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）;耳垂、大鱼际、小鱼际、手臂、脚趾5个替代部位的血糖值均与指尖血糖值呈高相关性和一致性,具有统计学意义（P<0.05）;耳垂、指尖、手臂、脚趾的血糖值和静脉生化血糖的差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）;6个部位疼痛评分比较差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论 耳垂的血糖值呈现较高的准确性和一致性,且穿刺操作方便、疼痛感低,可能是最佳的血糖监测替代部位。

关键词: 毛细血管血糖监测, 替代部位血糖监测, 疼痛, 护理

Abstract: Objective To explore the feasibility, practicability and accuracy of other body parts as alternative parts for blood glucose monitoring. Methods With self-control method, 100 volunteers were enrolled in a tertiary grade-A hospital in Shenyang from December 2021 to June 2022. Random blood glucose values were obtained by puncture (interval <5 min) in different parts (including earlobe, fingertip, maisar, minnoir, arm and toe), and venous biochemical blood glucose was collected. The sampling, accuracy and pain scores of the six sites were compared. Results The difference in puncture sampling at six sites was statistically significant (P<0.05). Blood glucose value of other 5 sites was highly correlated and consistent with that of the fingertip, showing statistical significance (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in blood glucose and venous biochemical blood glucose in earlobe, fingertip, arm and toe (P>0.05). NRS pain score of the 6 sites was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion The blood glucose value of the earlobe shows high accuracy and consistency, and the puncture is convenient and with less pain, so it may be the best alternative site for blood glucose monitoring.

Key words: capillary blood glucose monitoring, blood glucose monitoring in alternative sites, pain, nursing

中图分类号: 

  • R473.5
[1] Zhang L, Gu C, Ma H, et al.Portable glucose meter: trends in techniques and its potential application in analysis[J].Anal Bioanal Chem,2019,411(1):21-36.DOI:10.1007/s00216-018-1361-7 (2019).
[2] Draznin B, Aroda VR, Bakris G, et al.16. Diabetes care in the hospital: standards of medical care in diabetes-2022[J].Diabetes Care, 2022, 45(Suppl 1):S244-s253. DOI:10.2337/dc22-S016 (2022).
[3] Tang L, Chang SJ, Chen CJ, et al.Non-invasive blood glucose monitoring technology: a review[J]. Sensors (Basel),2020,20(23). DOI:10.3390/s20236925 (2020).
[4] Le Floch JP, Bauduceau B, Lévy M, et al.Self-monitoring of blood glucose, cutaneous finger injury, and sensory loss in diabetic patients[J].Diabetes Care,2008,31(10):e73. DOI:10.2337/dc08-1174 (2008).
[5] Bruen D, Delaney C, Florea L, et al.Glucose sensing for diabetes monitoring: recent developments[J].Sensors (Basel),2017,17(8):1866. DOI:10.3390/s17081866 (2017).
[6] Jeon SY, Shi Y, Lee AK, et al.Fingerstick glucose monitoring in veterans affairs nursing home residents with diabetes mellitus[J]. J Am Geriatr Soc,2021, 69(2):424-431. DOI:10.1111/jgs.16880 (2021)
[7] Lee KT, Abadir PM.Failure of glucose monitoring in an individual with pseudohypoglycemia[J]. J Am Geriatr Soc,2015,63(8):1706-1708. DOI:10.1111/jgs.13572 (2015).
[8] Fedele D, Corsi A, Noacco C, et al.Alternative site blood glucose testing: a multicenter study[J]. Diabetes Technol Ther,2003,5(6):983-989.DOI:10.1089/152091503322641033 (2003).
[9] Knapp PE, Showers KM, Phipps JC, et al.Self-monitoring of blood glucose with finger tip versus alternative site sampling: effect on glycemic control in insulin-using patients with type 2 diabetes[J]. Diabetes Technol Ther,2009,11(4):219-225. DOI:10.1089/dia.2008.0060 (2009).
[10] 黄燕,李卉,高金平,等.合肥地区健康成年人群皮肤微循环的观察[J].安徽医科大学学报,2017,52(10):1572-1574.DOI: 10.19405/j.cnki.issn1000-1492.2017.10.035.
[11] Peled N, Wong D, Gwalani SL. Comparison of glucose levels in capillary blood samples obtained from a variety of body sites[J]. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2002, 4(1):35-44; discussion 5-7.DOI: 10.1089/15209150252924067.
[12] Greenhalgh S, Bradshaw S, Hall CM, et al.Forearm blood glucose testing in diabetes mellitus[J]. Arch Dis Child,2004,89(6):516-518.DOI:10.1136/adc.2002.019307 (2004).
[13] Harris DL, Weston PJ, Gamble GD, et al.Glucose profiles in healthy term infants in the first 5 days: the glucose in well babies (GLOW) study[J].J Pediatr,2020,223:34-41.e4. DOI:10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.02.079 (2020).
[14] Everett E, Mathioudakis N.Update on management of diabetic foot ulcers[J]. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2018, 1411(1): 153-165.DOI: 10.1111/nyas.13569.
[15] Association AD.11. Microvascular complications and foot care: standards of medical care in diabetes-2021[J].Diabetes Care,2021, 44(Suppl 1):S151-s167.DOI:10.2337/dc21-S011 (2021).
[16] Chan HY, Lau TS, Ho SY, et al.The accuracy and acceptability of performing capillary blood glucose measurements at the earlobe[J].J Adv Nurs,2016,72(8):1766-1773. DOI:10.1111/jan.12944 (2016).
[17] Fedele D, Corsi A, Noacco C, et al.Alternative site blood glucose testing: a multicenter study[J]. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2003,5(6):983-989.DOI:10.1089/152091503322641033.
[18] Wei CH, Peng TC, Wang PY, et al.Clinical evaluation and alternative site blood glucose testing of the EasyPlus mini R2N blood glucose monitoring system[J]. Clin Chim Acta,2009, 403(1-2):167-172. DOI:10.1016/j.cca.2009.02.011 (2009).
[19] Kempe KC, Budd D, Stern M, et al.Palm glucose readings compared with fingertip readings under steady and dynamic glycemic conditions, using the OneTouch Ultra Blood Glucose Monitoring System[J]. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2005, 7(6):916-926. DOI:10.1089/dia.2005.7.916.
[20] Ellison JM, Stegmann JM, Colner SL, et al.Rapid changes in postprandial blood glucose produce concentration differences at finger, forearm, and thigh sampling sites[J].Diabetes Care,2002, 25(6):961-964. DOI:10.2337/diacare.25.6.961 (2002).
[21] Bina DM, Anderson RL, Johnson ML, et al.Clinical impact of prandial state, exercise, and site preparation on the equivalence of alternative-site blood glucose testing[J].Diabetes Care,2003,26(4):981-985. DOI:10.2337/diacare.26.4.981 (2003).
[22] 谢琪林,康芳.疼痛敏感性的评估及相关影响因素研究进展[J].国际麻醉学与复苏杂志,2021,42(6):659-663. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn321761-20200514-00315.
[23] Porro CA, Baraldi P, Pagnoni G, et al.Does anticipation of pain affect cortical nociceptive systems?[J]. J Neurosci, 2002, 22(8):3206-3214.DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-08-03206.2002.
[24] Kempe KC, Budd D, Stern M, et al.Palm glucose readings compared with fingertip readings under steady and dynamic glycemic conditions, using the One Touch Ultra Blood Glucose Monitoring System[J].Diabetes Technol Ther,2005,7(6):916-926. DOI:10.1089/dia.2005.7.916 (2005).
[1] 蔡莹莹, 凌晨, 刘绵珠, 周杰, 张俊峰, 陈连华, 田潇飞, 罗斌, 陈梦云. 成人癌痛评估与管理指南的方法学质量评价[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 34-40.
[2] 张静, 彭焕椽, 陈佳, 鲁永锦, 刘克玄, 侯晓敏. 成人体外循环心脏手术患者预防手术部位感染的最佳证据总结[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 41-47.
[3] 刘璐, 朱钰, 曹义, 张华, 彭玉娜. 腹腔热灌注化疗患者术中实施不同目标体温管理的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 59-63.
[4] 李疆伟, 王树君, 李长仔, 胡宝山, 焦桂梅, 张卫红. 基于压力应对理论的护理干预对结直肠癌术后永久性肠造口患者心理压力、负性情绪及自我管理的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 64-69.
[5] 龚祖华, 孙丽, 谭璇, 张悦, 施丹, 程娟娟. 肝胆外科术后患者基础体征采集-比对-识别隐匿型病情变化的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 74-78.
[6] 李亚可, 苏晴晴, 吕静, 李琪, 娄琳彤, 李海燕. 全膝关节置换患者疼痛与睡眠质量纵向关联的组基础模型双轨迹分析[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 6-11.
[7] 李苗苗, 熊莉娟, 齐磊, 李敏, 向御婷. 基于Ridit分析法和秩和比法的疾病诊断相关分组在护理绩效管理中的应用[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 22-26.
[8] 焦雪萍, 王志稳, 韩舒羽. ICU老年患者躁动行为的干预研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 38-42.
[9] 李若雨, 刘鑫, 林萍, 陈丹, 林桦. 出院患者用药安全管理的最佳证据总结[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 50-55.
[10] 杨小娟, 毛孝容, 王静, 江华, 李蓉, 樊宇, 文青, 李林章, 陈晓容. 成人重度烧伤患者早期肠内营养管理的最佳证据总结[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 56-61.
[11] 朱天顺, 朱可可, 薛会元, 焦聪聪, 魏长慧, 王贺. 信息框架效应理论在健康管理领域应用的范围综述[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 44-49.
[12] 刘硕怡, 熊莉娟, 李凌, 王玉梅, 何嘉, 李鑫, 袁淑蕾, 郭雪琴, 王暘婧, 张慧娟. 老年住院患者衰弱预防及管理临床实践指南的质量评价及内容分析[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 50-55.
[13] 李嘉琪, 莫文娟, 王一棋, 王洁, 李梦楠, 刘兴, 冯佳. 基于COSMIN方法对慢性疼痛患者恐动症坦帕评分表的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 56-62.
[14] 闫亚铃, 乐美妮, 姚桃琴, 王雪莲, 姜建玲, 辛艺. 老年胃肠肿瘤患者围手术期衰弱管理方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 74-78.
[15] 顾妍鑫, 刘丽, 胡惠惠, 周芳, 杨怡, 高锐, 王培双. 以核心能力为导向的麻醉护理硕士专业学位研究生临床实践培养方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(1): 7-12.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!