以质量求发展,以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (4): 74-78.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2025.04.074

• 临床护理※外科护理 • 上一篇    

肝胆外科术后患者基础体征采集-比对-识别隐匿型病情变化的效果观察

龚祖华a, 孙丽b, 谭璇b, 张悦a, 施丹a, 程娟娟a   

  1. 华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院金银湖院区 a.肝胆外科; b.护理部,湖北 武汉 430000
  • 收稿日期:2024-09-14 出版日期:2025-02-25 发布日期:2025-03-06
  • 通讯作者: 孙丽(1986-),女,湖北武汉人,硕士,主任护师。E-mail:765472507@qq.com
  • 作者简介:龚祖华(1986-),男,湖北恩施人,土家族,本科学历,主管护师。

Effect of basic sign collection-comparison-recognition model for occult change after hepatobiliary surgery

GONG Zu-huaa, SUN Lib, TAN Xuanb, ZHANG Yuea, SHI Dana, CHENG Juan-juana   

  1. a. Dept. of Hepatobiliary Surgery; b. Dept. of Nursing Administration, Jinyinhu Campus, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430000, China
  • Received:2024-09-14 Online:2025-02-25 Published:2025-03-06

摘要: 目的 探讨基础体征采集-比对-识别模式在肝胆外科术后心电监护期患者隐匿型病情变化早期识别的效果。方法 选取2024年2—5月符合纳入排除标准的患者269例,按随机数字表法分为对照组136例,给予常规护理;观察组133例,构建基础体征采集-比对-识别模式进行干预。比较2组患者在术后疼痛、发热、恶心呕吐、输液速率异常、腹胀、胸闷气促、出血倾向等病情变化时的差异。结果 观察组患者在术后隐匿型并发症、显性症状识别率方面均优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者在术后疼痛评分、恶心呕吐、腹胀、呼吸不畅、输液速率异常评分、出血倾向、呼吸困难等症状程度方面均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 结构化基础体征采集-比对-识别系统根据新指南要求进行术前基线体征值监测,通过标准化处理后形成基础血压比对值,作为术后心电监护期患者体征值波动时的参考值,能较好地早期识别隐匿型的病情变化,能有效防控术后患者并发症的发生和发展,对于临床有较好的推荐价值。

关键词: 隐匿型病情变化, 基础体征, 术后护理, 肝胆外科

Abstract: Objective To observe the effect of basic sign collection-comparison-recognition model for early identification of occult change in patients with postoperative?electrocardiogram monitoring after hepatobiliary surgery. Methods A total of 269 patients who met the criteria from February 2024 to May 2024 were selected, with 136 cases in control group given conventional nursing care, and 133 cases in observation group given nursing care with basic sign collection-comparison-recognition model. Preoperative baseline indexes such as heart rate, blood pressure, etc. were recorded as references for postoperative signs. WPS form calculator with assignment operation was used to identify fluctuations. Once the fluctuations exceeded the range of early warning, structured assessment manual constructed by the evidence-based nursing was used to identify the hazards. The difference between the two groups of patients in terms of the incidence of postoperative pain, fever, nausea and vomiting, abnormal infusion rate, abdominal distension, chest tightness and shortness of breath, and bleeding tendency was compared. Results The identification rate of occult complications and overt symptoms in the observation group was higher than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Patients in the observation group performed better in terms of postoperative pain score, nausea and vomiting, abdominal distension, dyspnea, infusion rate abnormality, bleeding tendency and difficulty in breathing (P<0.05), showing statistical significance. Conclusion Basic sign collection-comparison-recognition mode is effective for recognizing the occult changes of vital signs after hepatobiliary surgery, and can effectively prevent and control the occurrence and development of complications in postoperative patients.

Key words: occult change, basal signs, postoperative nursing, hepatobiliary surgery

中图分类号: 

  • R473.6
[1] 王熔,周海琴,蔡英华,等. 肺移植患者术后早期症状评估量表的编制及信度、效度检验[J]. 现代临床护理,2024,23(5):1-9. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-8283.2024.05.001.
[2] 葛均波,王辰.内科学[M].10版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2024∶169-354.
[3] 《成人非心脏手术围术期血压监测与管理指南》撰写组,中国老年医学学会医疗照护分会.成人非心脏手术围术期血压评估与管理指南[J].中华保健医学杂志,2023,25(2):121-128. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-3245.2023.02.001.
[4] 董双国. CT引导下放射介入栓塞联合岩黄连注射液治疗中晚期肝癌对患者血清IL-2、IFN-γ、TNF-α表达水平影响[J].CT理论与应用研究,2024,33(S1):47-50.
[5] 高血压心率管理多学科共识组. 中国高血压患者心率管理多学科专家共识(2021年版)[J].中国全科医学,2021,24(20):2501-2507;2519. DOI:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2021.00.595.
[6] 欧敏行,薛亚男,张秀杰. 《ESH高血压管理指南2023》解读[J]. 护理研究,2024,38(15):2633-2640. DOI:10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2024.15.001.
[7] Mancia Chairperson G, Brunström M, Burnier M, et al.2023 ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension Endorsed by the European Renal Association (ERA) and the International Society of Hypertension (ISH)[J]. J Hypertens,2023,41(12):1874-2071. DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003480.
[8] Nohra E, Appelbaum RD, Farrell MS, et al.Fever and infections in surgical intensive care: an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Critical Care Committee clinical consensus document[J]. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open, 2024,9(1):e001303. DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2023-001303.
[9] 高血压精准化诊疗专家共识组,老年心脑血管病教育部重点实验室,曾春雨,等. 高血压精准化诊疗中国专家共识(2024)[J]. 中华高血压杂志,2024,32(6):505-519. DOI:10.16439/j.issn.1673-7245.2024.06.002.
[10] 王惠琴,雷建国,蔡炜,等. 3、4级非心脏手术患者围手术期发生主要心脏并发症的危险因素分析[J]. 现代临床医学,2023, 49(4):241-245. DOI:10.11851/j.issn.1673-1557.2023.04.001.
[11] 黄雯,宗敏,关晓楠,等. 非心脏外科手术患者围手术期心房颤动的临床特点及危险因素分析[J]. 中国临床医生杂志,2022, 50(7):810-812.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-8552.2022.07.016.
[12] Alonso-Coello P,Cook D,Xu S C,et al.Predictors, prognosis, and management of new clinically important atrial fibrillation after noncardiac surgery: a prospective cohort study[J]. Anesth Analg, 2017,125(1):162-169.DOI:10.1213/ANE.0000000000002111.
[13] 孙宁玲. 《中国高血压患者心率管理多学科专家共识(2021年版)》解读[J]. 中华高血压杂志,2021,29(10):908-913. DOI:10.16439/j.issn.1673-7245.2021.10.003.
[14] 中国高血压联盟《夜间高血压管理中国专家共识》委员会. 夜间高血压管理中国专家共识[J]. 中华高血压杂志,2023,31(7):610-618. DOI:10.16439/j.issn.1673-7245.2023.07.003.
[15] 付同,侯宇,韩明明,等. 围术期经皮穴位电刺激对妇科腹腔镜手术患者术后恢复质量的影响[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2023,39(8):789-794. DOI:10.12089/jca.2023.08.001.
[16] 张炜,徐珉杰,潘龙,等.术前Glasgow-Blatchford和AIMS65评分对介入治疗非静脉曲张性上消化道出血患者的预后评估[J]. 介入放射学杂志,2024,33(9):1005-1008. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-794X.2024.09.015.
[17] 付洁,邱红丽.基于程序的整体干预在胸腔镜手术治疗老年肺癌中的运用效果[J].医药论坛杂志, 2024, 45(21):2293-2297.DOI:10.20159/j.cnki.jmf.2024.21.012.
[18] 郑璇,李贵,陈舒玲,等. 心悸人群分布特点及动态心电图分析[J]. 实用心电学杂志,2018, 27(1):49-52. DOI:10.13308/j.issn.2095-9354.2018.01.011.
[19] 刘宝伟. 右美托咪定预处理对肝癌射频消融患者应激反应的影响[D].新乡:新乡医学院, 2019.DOI:10.27434/d.cnki.gxxyc.2019.000270.
[1] 陈雪玲, 柯俊, 李天宝. 9例Stanford A型主动脉夹层术后迟发型脊髓损伤患者的护理[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(5): 76-78.
[2] 刘红英, 龚祖华, 谭璇. “智慧肝胆”APP医护手机端在肝胆外科病房的应用[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(5): 65-69.
[3] 宋素娜, 宋亚敏, 谢雪均. 55例肥厚型梗阻性心肌病患者全胸腔镜下扩大心肌切除术后护理[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(6): 71-72.
[4] 郭跃华, 党雁, 章朋, 刘姝. 6例高位小肠坏死早产儿Bishop-Koop肠造口术后护理[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(5): 59-61.
[5] 翟忠昌, 刘玉娥, 杨林杰, 刘兴红, 王慧华, 侯凯. 6例植入连续血流左心室辅助装置患者的术后护理[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(2): 62-64.
[6] 郑霞, 胡雅, 周洁, 尚攀婷, 韩辉, 卢惠明. 封闭负压引流术治疗阴茎癌腹股沟淋巴结清扫术后伤口二期愈合患者的护理[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(13): 62-64.
[7] 王晶, 胡玉婷, 孙婷婷, 刘兴红, 邓永鸿, 程芬. 21例先天性心脏病心脏移植患者的术后护理[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(14): 66-67.
[8] 张莉萍,袁慧. 一种可调节式颈部活动角度测量器的研制和应用[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(15): 77-78.
[9] 黄燕,史雯嘉,邬伟华. 小儿肛肠术后病员裤研制与应用[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(14): 72-73.
[10] 刘霞,田小娟. 55例生物补片法人工阴道成形术患者的术后护理[J]. 护理学报, 2017, 24(21): 45-47.
[11] 曾丽若,陈丽芳. 42例先天性心脏病成人患者行双向上腔静脉肺动脉吻合术后护理[J]. 护理学报, 2017, 24(10): 59-61.
[12] 农玉梅,宁余音,李莉,谭柳纯. 高位多间隙肛周脓肿患者行负压封闭引流及苦劳汤灌洗的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2016, 23(8): 61-63.
[13] 孙君辉,谷静媛,郑帅,焦玉清,孟旭. 5例新型自体心包主动脉瓣重建手术患者的护理[J]. 护理学报, 2016, 23(16): 58-59,60.
[14] 刘一秀,刘逸文,董静思. 32例患者开胸肿瘤并/或上腔静脉无名静脉切除及重建术后护理[J]. 护理学报, 2016, 23(14): 48-50.
[15] 钟笑媚,崔彦芹,陈秀春. 102例体质量3 kg以下患儿复杂型先天性心脏病术后护理[J]. 护理学报, 2015, (21): 61-63.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!