以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (13): 1-5.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.13.001

• 研究生园地 •    下一篇

护生人格画像的潜在剖面与专业认同的关系研究

吴晓娜1, 杨舒涵1, 孙晓明1, 魏宁2, 韩慧3, 张嘉鹏4, 叶增杰1   

  1. 1.广州中医药大学 护理学院,广东 广州 510000;
    2.广州新华学院 护理学院,广东 广州 510000;
    3.青岛工程职业学院 海洋财经学院,山东 青岛 266112;
    4.嘉应学院 医学院,广东 梅州 514000
  • 收稿日期:2022-01-26 出版日期:2022-07-10 发布日期:2022-08-02
  • 通讯作者: 叶增杰（1990-）,男,浙江宁波人,博士,教授,博士研究生导师。E-mail：zengjieye@qq.com
  • 作者简介:吴晓娜（1996-）,女,广东汕头人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年项目（71904033）; 中华中医药学会青年人才托举工程项目（2021-QNRC2-B08）; 广州市哲学社会科学规划项目（2021GZGJ57）

Relationship between Personality Portraits and Professional Identity: A Latent Profile Analysis

WU Xiao-na1, YANG Shu-han1, SUN Xiao-ming1, WEI Ning2, HAN Hui3, ZHANG Jia-peng4, YE Zeng-jie1   

  1. 1. School of Nursing, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510000, China;
    2. School of Nursing, Guangzhou Xinhua University, Guangzhou 510000, China;
    3. School of Marine finance and economics, Qingdao Engineering Vocational College, Qingdao 266112, China;
    4. Medical College of Jiaying University, Meizhou 514000, China
  • Received:2022-01-26 Online:2022-07-10 Published:2022-08-02

PDF (PC)

512

赞

摘要： 目的 基于个体为中心的视角探究护理专业学生的人格画像,分析其与专业认同的关系及专业认同的影响因素。方法 采用一般资料问卷、大五人格特质量表和大学生专业认同量表对广东省、山东省某4所大学的1 167名护生进行问卷调查。运用潜在剖面分析识别人格特质的潜在类别。结果 护生的人格特质被识别为三个潜在类别的模型,分别定义为过度敏感型（15.34%）、普通型（63.41%）和灵活适应型（21.25%）。在专业认同得分上,灵活适应型>普通型>过度敏感型。性别、护理榜样、转专业意愿和人格画像在专业认同水平上存在差异（P<0.05）。结论 护生的人格特质呈现类别分布,即过度敏感型、普通型和灵活适应型;过度敏感型者专业认同感最低,需重点关注;性别、护理榜样、转专业意愿和人格画像是护生专业认同感的重要影响因素。

关键词: 护生, 人格特质, 专业认同, 潜在剖面分析

Abstract: Objective To explore the personality portrait of nursing students from an individual-centered perspective and analyze its relationship with professional identity and the influencing factors of professional identity. Methods In this study, 1,167 nursing students from four universities in Guangdong Province and Shandong Province were investigated by general information questionnaire, Neuroticism Extraversion Openness Five-Factor Inventory and Professional Identity Questionnaire for Undergraduates. Latent profile analysis was used to identify the potential categories of personality traits. Results The personality traits of nursing students were identified as three potential models: oversensitive type (15.34%), generic type (63.41%) and flexible adaptive type (21.25%). In terms of professional identity score, students of flexible adaptive type scored highest, followed by those of generic type and those of oversensitive type. Gender, nursing role model, willingness to change major and personality portrait were influencing factors of professional identity (P<0.05). Conclusion Personality traits of nursing students are divided into different types, namely oversensitive, generic, and flexible adaptive types. Among them, students of oversensitive type have the lowest professional identity, requiring more attention. Gender, nursing role model, willingness to change major and personality portraits are important influencing factors of nursing students’ professional identity.

Key words: nursing student, personality trait, professional identity, latent profile analysis

中图分类号: 

  • G642
[1] Kantek F, Kaya A, Gezer N.The Effects of Nursing Education on Professional Values: A Longitudinal Study[J]. Nurse Educ Today,2017,58:43-46.DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2017.08.004.
[2] 程超,宋瑰琦,程恩荷. 职业使命感与职业延迟满足在主动性人格和护士自我职业生涯规划间的链式中介效应分析[J].护理学报,2019,26(4):37-42.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2019.04.037.
[3] 张丹宁. 兴趣与职业:约翰·霍兰德职业指导思想研究[D]. 上海:华东师范大学,2020.DOI:10.27149/d.cnki.ghdsu.2020.000823.
[4] Borracci RA, Ciambrone G, Arribalzaga EB.Tolerance for Uncertainty, Personality Traits and Specialty Choice Among Medical Students[J]. J Surg Educ, 2021,78(6):1885-1895. DOI:10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.03.018.
[5] 张斌, 王叶飞, 邱致燕, 等. 护理本科生大五人格与专业认同的关系研究[J]. 中国高等医学教育, 2016(7):9-10. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-1701.2016.07.005.
[6] Brusco MJ, Shireman E, Steinley D.A Comparison of Latent Class, K-means, and K-median Methods for Clustering Dichotomous Data[J]. Psychol Methods, 2017,22(3):563-580. DOI:10.1037/met0000095.
[7] McCrae RR, Costa Jr PT. A Contemplated Revision of the NEO Five-factor Inventory[J]. Pers Individ Dif, 2004,36(3):587-596. DOI:10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00118-1.
[8] 秦攀博. 大学生专业认同的特点及其相关研究[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2009. DOI:10.7666/d.y1460394.
[9] Borzou A, Yousefi R, Sadygov RG.Another Look at Matrix Correlations[J]. Bioinformatics, 2019,35(22):4748-4753. DOI:10.1093/bioinformatics/btz281.
[10] Campbell-Sills L, Sun X, Choi KW, et al.Dissecting the Heterogeneity of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Differences in Polygenic Risk, Stress Exposures, and Course of PTSD Subtypes[J]. Psychol Med, 2021, 51(4):1-9. DOI:10.1017/S0033291721000428.
[11] Stankovi N, Kosti I, Jovanovi B, et al.Can Phytoplankton Blooming Be Harmful to Benthic Organisms? The Toxic Influence of Anabaena Sp. and Chlorella Sp. on Chironomus Riparius Larvae[J]. Sci Total Environ,2020,729:138666. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138666.
[12] Guo JH, Luh WM.Testing Two Variances for Superiority/non-inferiority and Equivalence: Using the Exhaustion Algorithm for Sample Size Allocation with Cost[J]. Br J Math Stat Psychol,2020,73(2):316-332.DOI:10.1111/bmsp.12172.
[13] Beasley TM.Tests of Mediation: Paradoxical Decline in Statistical Power as a Function of Mediator Collinearity[J]. J Exp Educ, 2014,82(3):283-306. DOI:10.1080/00220973.2013.813360.
[14] Udayar S, Urbanaviciute I, Massoudi K, et al.The Role of Personality Profiles in the Longitudinal Relationship Between Work-related Well-being and Life Satisfaction Among Working Adults in Switzerland[J].Eur J Pers, 2020,34(1):77-92. DOI: 10.1002/per.2225.
[15] Min H, Su S.Examining Relationships Between Personality Profiles and Organizational Health Outcomes[J]. Pers Individ Dif,2020,164:110118.DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2020.110118.
[16] Axelsson M, Jakobsson J,Carlson E.Which Nursing Students are More Ready for Interprofessional Learning? A Cross-Sectional Study[J]. Nurse Educ Today, 2019,79:117-123. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.05.019.
[17] Avrech BM, Katz LM, Warshawski S, et al.The Role of Personal Resilience and Personality Traits of Healthcare Students on Their Attitudes Towards Interprofessional Collaboration[J]. Nurse Educ Today, 2018,61:36-42. DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2017.11.005.
[18] 蓝晓燕, 刘紫一, 程雅琴, 等. 男护士职业性别刻板印象与职业认同及职业生涯规划的相关性[J].中国护理管理, 2020,20(4):553-557. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2020.04.016.
[19] 马勤, 余华, 吴青, 等. 基于IAT测验的男护生职业性别刻板印象的调查研究[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2017,23(20):2679-2682. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2017.20.027.
[20] 孙雪芹, 王春梅, 许华山, 等. 392名本科男护生主观幸福感影响因素探讨[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2017,25(4):551-555. DOI:10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2017.04.020.
[21] Morgenroth T, Ryan MK, Peters K.The Motivational Theory of Role Modeling: How Role Models Influence Role Aspirants’ Goals[J]. Rev Gen Psychol, 2015,19(4):465-483. DOI: 10.1037/gpr0000059.
[22] Mei XX, Wang HY, Wu XN, et al.Self-efficacy and Professional Identity Among Freshmen Nursing Students: A Latent Profile and Moderated Mediation Analysis[J]. Front Psychol, 2022,13:779986. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.779986.
[23] 梁燕, 许佳敏, 王君俏. 临床导师榜样角色对护理本科生专业认同的作用分析[J]. 中华护理教育,2020,17(2):108-112. DOI:10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2020.02.002.
[24] 马莉萍, 张心悦. 自由转专业政策如何影响学生的转专业行为——基于院系间学生流动的视角[J]. 湖南师范大学教育科学学报, 2021,20(4):93-103.DOI:10.19503/j.cnki.1671-6124.2021.04.012.
[25] 严诗玉. 护理专业学生学习倦怠现状及影响因素研究[D]. 广州:广州医科大学,2019.DOI:10.27043/d.cnki.ggzyc.2019.000001.
[26] 杨慧雅, 张建伟, 金海萍. 助产护理本科生专业认同现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2017,24(6):36-39. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2017.06.036.
[1] 李丹妮, 邱丽燕, 吴隆燕, 谭铮可可, 陈欣, 杨丽. 前交叉韧带损伤日间手术患者恐动症的潜在剖面分析及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 12-17.
[2] 李静依, 梁冠冕, 缪群芳, 赵月琰, 王晓宁, 钱萍萍. 临床护士死亡工作自我应对能力潜在剖面及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(1): 13-18.
[3] 郑亚楠, 郭惠娟, 张振香, 蔡姝倩. 脑卒中半失能患者自我接纳的潜在剖面分析及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(8): 1-6.
[4] 王冰冰, 马英芝, 孙小卫, 杨琴, 肖江琴. 中青年脑卒中患者与配偶二元应对潜在剖面分析及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(8): 7-12.
[5] 彭静, 李金秀, 谭江红, 王晓庆. 动漫短视频联合翻转课堂教学对急诊科护生自主学习能力的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(6): 22-25.
[6] 张许婷, 罗彩凤, 魏兰芝, 邵校, 尚彬, 卞泽坤, 吕妃, 孙炜怡. 实习护生体面劳动感的潜在剖面分析及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(3): 12-16.
[7] 黄璜, 钟可琪, 钟丽华, 李惠卿, 吴春华, 许梅. 199名实习护生人文关怀能力现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(24): 64-67.
[8] 李思媛, 吴雨泽, 魏雪梅, 罗澜峻, 邓美红, 李梅, 崔丽君. 低年资护士心理弹性的潜在剖面及其对适应性绩效的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(23): 1-7.
[9] 于宛辰, 吴萍, 柳嘉怡, 武贤明, 庞晓丽, 王汕珊. 本科护生个人掌控感的潜在剖面及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(23): 23-27.
[10] 李若雨, 刘鑫, 韦静, 覃艳, 林桦. 312例老年高血压患者跌倒警觉度的潜在剖面及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(22): 1-6.
[11] 李苗, 李红梅, 张俊, 李盼盼, 张宇彤, 王茜, 李沁瑶. 乳腺癌化疗患者自我倡权潜在类别及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(20): 19-23.
[12] 张丽莉, 薛菲, 郑雅梅, 郝芳. 急腹症案例视频剧在护理本科生普外科见习中的实践[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(2): 32-35.
[13] 梁晓珊, 林丽娜, 林娟, 邓玲, 林佳清. 趣味性扑克牌教学法在内分泌科实习护生胰岛素理论知识培训的应用[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(2): 36-39.
[14] 韩双嵘, 李秋芳, 罗浩月, 杨佳音, 刘腊梅, 汪晓凯. 肺癌化疗患者自我同情的潜在剖面分析及其与失志的关系[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(2): 65-69.
[15] 王丽宁, 齐娜, 白凤新, 李超楠, 房婷, 李杨, 张慧. 婴儿期父亲参与养育的潜在剖面及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(19): 73-78.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!