以质量求发展,以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (11): 47-52.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.11.047

• 循证护理 • 上一篇    下一篇

实施性研究的方法学综述

郑萍, 刘宁   

  1. 遵义医科大学珠海校区 护理学系,广东 珠海 519041
  • 收稿日期:2021-11-10 出版日期:2022-06-10 发布日期:2022-07-07
  • 通讯作者: 刘宁(1981-),女,陕西西安人,博士,教授,硕士研究生导师。E-mail:761066906@qq.com
  • 作者简介:郑萍(1998-),女,福建福州人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读,护师。
  • 基金资助:
    珠海市2021-2022年度哲学社会科学规划立项(2021YBA037); 珠海人文医学研究基地“十四五”规划2021-2022年立项(2021RWJD03HL); 遵义医科大学大创训练计划(ZXCX202126、202137、202123)

  • Received:2021-11-10 Online:2022-06-10 Published:2022-07-07

摘要: 目的 实施科学为循证护理证据的转化和常态化开展提供了新思路和研究方法。护理领域尚缺乏系统的方法学文献探讨如何开展实施科学。方法 系统综述医疗健康领域中IS的相关方法学,各研究设计的优缺点、局限性及应用现状。结果 相关方法学主要包括效果-实施混合设计(Effectiveness Implementation Hybrid Designs,EIHD)、多阶段优化策略(Multiphase Optimization Strategy, MOST)、多重方案随机序贯试验(Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial, SMART)、阶梯设计(Stepped-Wedge Design, SWD)、阶梯设计集群随机试验(Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial, SWCRT)、中断时间序列(Interrupted Time Series Design, ITS)、断点回归设计(Regression Discontinuity Design, RDD)、质性研究设计和混合研究设计。结论 近些年有护理研究人员开始运用IS开展相关研究,建议在开展IS时应注意选择与研究问题相匹配的实施研究方法和设计,并采用合适的实施结局指标对实施情况进行概念化和评估,遵循实施性研究的报告规范(standards forreporting implementation studies,StaRI)进行全面报告。

关键词: 实施性研究, 研究设计, 循证护理, 综述

中图分类号: 

  • R197.323.6
[1] Williams LS,Vickrey BG.Implementation Science[J]. Stroke, 2021,52(12):4054-4056.DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.033971.
[2] Theobald S, Brandes N, Gyapong M, et al.Implementation Research: New Imperatives and Opportunities in Global Health[J]. Lancet, 2018,392(10160):2214-2228.DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32205-0.
[3] Boehm LM, Stolldorf DP, Jeffery AD.Implementation Science Training and Resources for Nurses and Nurse Scientists[J]. J Nurs Scholarsh, 2020, 52(1):47-54.DOI:10.1111/jnu.12510.
[4] Bisken SA, Powell BJ, Shea CM, et al.Criteria for Selecting Implementation Science Theories and Frameworks: Results from an International Survey[J]. Implement Sci,2017,12(1): 124.DOI: 10.1186/s13012-017-0656-y.
[5] 陶芳标,Shahirose Premji,伍晓艳,等.推进实施性研究在中国公共卫生领域的应用[J].中华预防医学杂志, 2020, 54(1):8-12.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2020.01.004.
[6] 谢润生,徐东,李慧. 医疗卫生领域中实施科学的研究方法[J].中国循证医学杂志, 2020, 20(9):1104-1110.DOI:10.7507/1672-2531.202003234.
[7] Jabbour M, Newton AS, Johnson D,et al.Defining Barriers and Enablers for Clinical Pathway Implementation in Complex Clinical Settings[J]. Implement Sci, 2018, 13(1):139.DOI: 10.1186/s13012-018-0832-8.
[8] McNulty M, Smith JD, Villamar J, et al. Implementation Research Methodologies for Achieving Scientific Equity and Health Equity[J]. Ethn Dis,2019,29(Suppl 1):83-92.DOI: 10.18865/ed.29.S1.83.
[9] Lewis CC, Boyd MR, Walsh-Bailey C, et al.A Systematic Review of Empirical Studies Examining Mechanisms of Implementation in Health[J]. Implement Sci, 2020,15(1):21.DOI: 10.1186/s13012-020-00983-3.
[10] Banerjee S, Taylor RS, Hellier J.Randomized Controlled Trials[J]. Chest, 2020, 158(1):S79-S87. DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.013.
[11] Curran GM, Bauer M, Mittman B, et al.Effectiveness-implementation Hybrid Designs: Combining Elements of Clinical Effectiveness and Implementation Research to Enhance Public Health Impact[J]. Med Care, 2012, 50(3):217-226. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182408812.
[12] Chirwa E, Kapito E, Jere DL, et al.An Effectiveness-implementation Hybrid Type 1 Trial Assessing the Impact of Group Versus Individual Antenatal Care on Maternal and Infant Outcomes in Malawi[J]. BMC Public Health, 2020, 20(1): 205.DOI:10.1186/s12889-020-8276-x.
[13] Smith JD, Berkel C, Jordan N, et al.An Individually Tailored Family-centered Intervention for Pediatric Obesity in Primary Care: Study Protocol of A Randomized Type II Hybrid Effectiveness-implementation Trial (Raising Healthy Children study)[J]. Implement Sci, 2018, 13(1):11.DOI: 10.1186/s13012-017-0697-2.
[14] Vaughn AE, Studts CR, Powell BJ, et al.The impact of Basic vs. Enhanced Go NAPSACC on Child Care Centers' HealthyEating and Physical Activity Practices: Protocol for A Type 3 Hybrid Effectiveness-implementation Cluster-randomized Trial[J]. Implement Sci, 2019, 14(1):101.DOI:10.1186/s13012-019-0949-4.
[15] Landes SJ, Mcbain SA, Curran GM.Reprint of: An Introduction to Effectiveness-implementation Hybrid Designs[J]. Psychiatry Res, 2020, 283:112630.DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112513.
[16] Collins LM, Murphy SA, Nair VN, et al.A Strategy for Optimizing and Evaluating Behavioral Interventions[J]. Ann Behav Med,2005,30(1):65-73.DOI:10.1207/s15324796abm3001_8.
[17] Gwadz MV, Collins LM, Cleland CM, et al.Using the Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST) to Optimize an HIV Care Continuum Intervention for Vulnerable Populations: A Study Protocol[J]. BMC Public Health, 2017, 17(1):383.DOI: 10.1186/s12889-017-4279-7.
[18] Gallis JA, Bennett GG, Steinberg DM, et al.Randomization Procedures for Multicomponent Behavioral Intervention Factorial Trials in the Multiphase Optimization Strategy Framework: Challenges and Recommendations[J]. Transl Behav Med,2019,9(6):1047-1056.DOI:10.1093/tbm/iby131.
[19] Murphy SA.An Experimental Design for the Development of Adaptive Treatment Strategies[J]. Stat Med, 2005,24(10):1455-1481. DOI:10.1002/sim.2022.
[20] Doorenbos AZ, Haozous EA, Jang MK, et al.Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomization Trial Designs for Nursing Research[J]. Res Nurs Health, 2019, 42(6):429-435.DOI: 10.1002/nur.21988.
[21] Meurer WJ, Seewald NJ, Kidwell K.Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trials: An Opportunity for Improved Design of Stroke Reperfusion Trials[J]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2017, 26(4):717-724. DOI:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.09.010.
[22] Candlish J, Teare MD, Cohen J, et al.Statistical Design and Analysis in Trials of Proportionate Interventions: A Systematic Review[J]. Trials,2019, 20(1):151.DOI:10.1186/s13063-019-3206-x.
[23] The Gambia Hepatitis Intervention Study. The Gambia Hepatitis Study Group[J]. Cancer Res, 1987,47(21):5782-7.
[24] Van Den Heuvel ER, Zwanenburg RJ, Van Ravenswaaij-Arts CM. A Stepped Wedge Design for Testing an Effect of Intranasal Insulin on Cognitive Development of Children with Phelan-McDermid Syndrome: A Comparison of Different Designs[J]. Stat Methods Med Res, 2017, 26(2): 766-775.DOI: 10.1177/0962280214558864
[25] Hemming K, Taljaard M, Marshall T, et al.Stepped-wedge Trials Should be Classified as Research for the Purpose of Ethical Review[J]. Clinical Trials,2019,16(6):580-588.DOI:10.1177//1740774519873322.
[26] Hussey MA, Hughes JP.Design and Analysis of Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Trials[J]. Contemp Clin Trials, 2007, 28(2):182-191. DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2006.05.007.
[27] Ndejjo R, Wanyenze RK, Nuwaha F, et al.Barriers and Facilitators of Implementation of a Community Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Programme in Mukono and Buikwe Districts in Uganda Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research[J]. Implement Sci, 2020, 15(1): 106.DOI:10.1186/s13012-020-01065-0.
[28] Hartmann DP, Gottman JM, Jones RR, et al.Interrupted Time-series Analysis and Its Application to Behavioral Data[J]. J Appl Behav Anal, 1980, 13(4):543-559.DOI:10.1901/jaba.1980.13-543.
[29] Liu B, Moore JE, Almaawiy U, et al.Outcomes of Mobilisation of Vulnerable Elders in Ontario (MOVE ON): A Multisite Interrupted Time Series Evaluation of an Implementation Intervention to Increase Patient Mobilisation[J]. Age Ageing, 2018, 47(1): 112-119.DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afx128.
[30] Thistlethwaite DL, Campbell DT.Regression-discontinuity Analysis: An Alternative to the Ex Post Facto Experiment[J]. J Educa Psychol, 1960,51(6):309-317.DOI:10.1037/h0044319.
[31] Anderson ML, Dobkin C, Gorry D.The Effect of Influenza Vaccination for the Elderly on Hospitalization and Mortality: An Observational Study with A Regression Discontinuity Design[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2020, 172(7):445-452. DOI: 10.7326/M19-3075.
[32] 张小艳,李学靖,周雅静,等.实施科学视角下最佳实践证据推广的范围综述[J].中国护理管理,2021, 21(10):1594-1600.
[33] Hooley C, Winters AM, Pisciotta C, et al.Caregiver-relevant perspectives from A Multi-stakeholder Collaborative Advisory Board on Adapting A Child Mental Health Intervention to Be Delivered in Child-welfare Settings[J]. J Public Child Welf,2021,15(3):318-340.DOI:10.1080/15548732.2020.1724238.
[34] 张秋雯,庞冬,胡嘉乐,等.实施性研究综合框架的发展及其应用[J].中国护理管理,2021,21(2):257-260. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2021.02.020.
[35] 翁瑛丽,赵博伦,周璇,等.实施性研究中保真度测评的研究进展[J].护理学报,2020,27(19):23-28. DOI:10.16460/j. issn1008-9969.2020.19.023.
[1] 杜易梅, 刘莉, 郭立丽, 卢吉, 付苗苗, 刘杰. 妇科恶性肿瘤患者性健康研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 28-33.
[2] 张静, 彭焕椽, 陈佳, 鲁永锦, 刘克玄, 侯晓敏. 成人体外循环心脏手术患者预防手术部位感染的最佳证据总结[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 41-47.
[3] 李垚, 陈小敏, 夏敏, 吴茜, 张琳, 陈叡喆, 葛莉丽, 吴逸梅. 肿瘤患者衰弱评估工具应用的范围综述[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 48-52.
[4] 王小叶, 安俊红, 刘倩, 任琴, 高瑞琴, 范丽红. 共享决策在糖尿病足患者中应用的研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 32-37.
[5] 焦雪萍, 王志稳, 韩舒羽. ICU老年患者躁动行为的干预研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 38-42.
[6] 陈恩琳, 莫丰菱, 庄泽明, 张明哲, 周佳坤, 黄丽芳, 纪龙飞, 张莉芳. 脑卒中单侧空间忽略评估工具的范围综述[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 43-49.
[7] 李若雨, 刘鑫, 林萍, 陈丹, 林桦. 出院患者用药安全管理的最佳证据总结[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 50-55.
[8] 杨小娟, 毛孝容, 王静, 江华, 李蓉, 樊宇, 文青, 李林章, 陈晓容. 成人重度烧伤患者早期肠内营养管理的最佳证据总结[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 56-61.
[9] 朱天顺, 朱可可, 薛会元, 焦聪聪, 魏长慧, 王贺. 信息框架效应理论在健康管理领域应用的范围综述[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 44-49.
[10] 刘硕怡, 熊莉娟, 李凌, 王玉梅, 何嘉, 李鑫, 袁淑蕾, 郭雪琴, 王暘婧, 张慧娟. 老年住院患者衰弱预防及管理临床实践指南的质量评价及内容分析[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 50-55.
[11] 闫亚铃, 乐美妮, 姚桃琴, 王雪莲, 姜建玲, 辛艺. 老年胃肠肿瘤患者围手术期衰弱管理方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 74-78.
[12] 刘畅, 张维, 王翠雪, 岳鹏. ICU实施非限制性探视制度的影响因素研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(1): 34-38.
[13] 李珂, 贺雨琼, 李雨蔚, 常颖. 脑卒中患者跌倒恐惧干预研究的范围综述[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(1): 50-55.
[14] 方雅婷, 王岩, 王哲芸, 余云, 徐婷婷. 经口气管插管患者口腔功能减退的研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(9): 28-31.
[15] 陈洁, 孟庆童, 刘惊今, 吴艳妮. 基于指南的慢性心力衰竭患者运动康复科普手册研制[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(9): 36-41.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!