以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (10): 19-24.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.10.019

• 研究生园地 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于心理复原模型的动机性访谈对原发性肝癌患者创伤后成长的影响

蒋维a, 罗玲b, 张运芝a, 张函a, 王晓昊a, 李静c   

  1. 重庆医科大学附属第二医院 a.感染科; b.护理部; c.心理科,重庆 400010
  • 收稿日期:2021-10-20 出版日期:2022-05-25 发布日期:2022-06-09
  • 通讯作者: 罗玲（1973-）,女,四川达州人,本科学历,主任护师,教授,护理部副主任,硕士研究生导师。E-mail：LL7765@cqmu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:蒋维（1995-）,女,四川广安人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读。
  • 基金资助:
    重庆市自然科学基金面上项目（cstc2020jcyj-msxmX0646）; 重庆医科大学附属第二医院护理骨干科研资助计划项目（202006）

Effect of Motivational Interviewing based on Psychological Recovery Model on Post-traumatic Growth in Patients with Primary Liver Cancer

JIANG Weia, LUO Lingb, ZHANG Yun-zhia, Zhang Hana, Wang Xiao-haoa, Li Jingc   

  1. a. Dept. of Infectious Diseases;
    b. Dept. of Nursing Administration;
    c. Dept. of Psychology, the Second Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China
  • Received:2021-10-20 Online:2022-05-25 Published:2022-06-09

PDF (PC)

184

赞

摘要： 目的 探讨基于心理复原模型的动机性访谈对原发性肝癌患者创伤后成长和焦虑、抑郁的影响。方法 便利抽样法选取2020年9月—2021年5月的100例原发性肝癌患者,采用Excel Rand函数生成随机数字的方法分为对照组50例和观察组50例。对照组给予常规心理护理,观察组在对照组基础上给予基于心理复原模型的动机性访谈干预,评估2组患者在干预前、干预后1个月末、干预后3个月末的创伤后成长和焦虑、抑郁得分情况。结果 干预前,2组患者创伤后成长各维度得分及总分、焦虑、抑郁得分比较,差异均无统计学意义（P>0.05）;出院后1个月末及出院后3个月末,2 组患者创伤后成长各维度得分及总分、焦虑、抑郁得分比较,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）;观察组的创伤后成长各维度得分及总分均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）;观察组的焦虑、抑郁得分均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）;不同时间点创伤后成长各维度得分及总分、焦虑、抑郁得分比较,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）,组别与时间存在交互效应（P<0.05）。结论 基于心理复原模型的动机性访谈干预可有效提升肝癌患者创伤后成长水平、改善焦虑和抑郁情绪,从而提高其心理适应水平和生活质量。

关键词: 原发性肝癌, 心理复原模型, 动机性访谈, 创伤后成长, 焦虑, 抑郁

Abstract: Objective To explore the effects of motivational interviewing based on psychological recovery model on anxiety, depression and post-traumatic growth (PTG) in patients with primary liver cancer. Methods Convenient sampling method was used to select 100 patients with primary liver cancer from September 2020 to May 2021. And they were divided into control group (n=50) and observation group (n=50). The control group was given conventional psychological care and the observation group an additional motivational interviewing based on psychological recovery model. The score of PTG, anxiety and depression in the 2 groups before intervention, 1 month and 3 months after discharge was compared. Results There was no statistically significant difference between the total score and the score of each dimension of PTG, and the score of anxiety and depression of the two groups before the intervention (P>0.05). There was statistically significant difference between the total score and the score of each dimension of PTG, and the score of anxiety and depression of the two groups 1 month and 3 months after intervention (P<0.05). The total score and the score of each dimension of PTG of the observation group were higher than those of the control group, indicating statistical significance (P<0.05). The score of anxiety and depression in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05) in terms of the total score, the score of each dimension of PTG and, anxiety and depression at different time points, and there was an interaction effect between group and time (P<0.05). Conclusion The motivational interviewing based on psychological recovery model can effectively enhance the level of PTG, improve the anxiety and depression in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, and thus improve the level of psychological adaptation and quality of life.

Key words: primary liver cancer, psychological resilience model, motivational interviewing, post-traumatic growth, anxiety, depression

中图分类号: 

  • R471
[1] 秦如梦,周利华,陆彩云,等.癌症患者创伤后成长心理干预的研究进展[J].护理学报,2020, 27(1):19-22.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.01.019.
[2] 刘恋蕊,周利华,乔晓斐.原发性肝癌术后患者创伤后成长现状及影响因素分析[J].护理学报,2021, 28(24):6-11.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.24.006.
[3] 约瑟夫. 杀不死我的必使我强大:创伤后成长心理学[M].青涂,译.北京:北京联合出版公司,2016:170-204.
[4] 罗尔尼克. 医务工作者动机访谈:促进健康行为的改变[M].洪霞,魏镜,译.北京:中国轻工业出版社,2015:4-15.
[5] Berman A, Beckman M, Lindqvist H.The Handbook of Behavior Change[M].Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,2020:661-676.DOI:10.1017/9781108677318.045.
[6] 唐浪娟,彭雨燕,岳丽春.老年人首发脑卒中创伤后成长现状及影响因素[J].中国老年学志,2018,38(10):2527-2529.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2018.10.088.
[7] Graf J, Stengel A.Psychological Burden and Psycho-oncological Interventions for Patients with Hepatobiliary Cancers-A Systematic Review[J/OL]. Front Psychol, 2021,12:662777.[2021-07-25].https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.662777.
[8] 韩梅梅,范苗苗,李小峰.基于跨理论模型的动机性访谈对直肠癌结肠造口患者自我护理能力及自尊水平的影响[J].安徽医学,2021,42(11):1306-1309.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-0399.2021.11.024.
[1] 李疆伟, 王树君, 李长仔, 胡宝山, 焦桂梅, 张卫红. 基于压力应对理论的护理干预对结直肠癌术后永久性肠造口患者心理压力、负性情绪及自我管理的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 64-69.
[2] 肖霄, 张煊丽, 张云漪, 谢梓洋. 代际共同养育关系对0~3岁婴幼儿母亲抑郁的影响机制研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(24): 57-63.
[3] 刘仲全, 杨秀, 傅忠华. 头颈癌患者女性配偶照顾者创伤后成长体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(22): 73-78.
[4] 牟晓玲, 陈宇琦, 刘海燕, 李敏, 董敏, 黄佳佳, 李璇, 陈瑜. 肺移植受者术后抑郁调查及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(21): 7-11.
[5] 祁丽萍, 王文煊, 侯敏, 郑粤豪, 冯惠霞, 李济宾. 首诊鼻咽癌患者焦虑抑郁现状及其与恐惧疾病进展的关系[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(20): 67-72.
[6] 袁佳琳, 杨玲玲, 刘晓慧, 甘茹, 杜瑄, 高海花, 杨小萍, 王慧娟. 308名脑卒中患者主要照顾者抑郁现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(2): 27-31.
[7] 耿玉芳, 秦如梦, 王慧, 张珊珊, 周利华. 基于诠释性现象学研究的卵巢癌患者创伤后成长经历模型的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(18): 73-78.
[8] 吴双赢, 谢子恒, 庄严. 2 888名老年人抑郁症状发展轨迹及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(14): 6-12.
[9] 李梦帆, 张侠, 李晓媛. 抑郁在妊娠晚期孕妇身体不满与母胎依恋间的中介效应[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(6): 68-71.
[10] 王柳月, 李君丽, 黄春兰, 刘芳印. 住院患者PICC置管后恐动症发生现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(5): 23-27.
[11] 郑思琪, 陈璐, 马晴, 王钰涵, 成杰, 王云龙. 双耳节拍音乐疗法对脑卒中偏瘫患者焦虑抑郁及疲劳的效果研究[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(5): 72-78.
[12] 张鹏博, 梅永霞, 张振香, 林蓓蕾, 薛利红, 刘志薇. 脑卒中患者焦虑症状潜在剖面影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(23): 12-17.
[13] 蒋新艳, 孟海兵, 邓飞娜, 蒋玉婷, 章晓玲. 多元化环境干预对学龄前阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征患儿术前焦虑及麻醉诱导依从性的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(20): 68-71.
[14] 崔静萍, 蒋燕, 赵姗姗. 衰弱和抑郁在肺癌化疗患者恐惧疾病进展与生活质量间的链式中介作用[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(18): 65-70.
[15] 蒋新艳, 来伟, 章晓玲, 蒋玉婷, 邓飞娜. 手术室环境对膝关节镜检查术患者等待期应激反应的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(14): 65-69.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!