以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (18): 73-78.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2024.18.073

• 心理卫生 • 上一篇    

基于诠释性现象学研究的卵巢癌患者创伤后成长经历模型的构建

耿玉芳1a, 秦如梦1b, 王慧1c, 张珊珊2, 周利华3   

  1. 1.安徽医科大学第一附属医院 a.重症医学科;b.泌尿外科;c.护理部,安徽 合肥 230022;
    2.安徽中医药大学第一附属医院 手术室,安徽 合肥 230031;
    3.安徽医科大学 护理学院,安徽 合肥 230601
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-08 出版日期:2024-09-25 发布日期:2024-10-08
  • 通讯作者: 周利华(1977-),女,安徽阜阳人,博士,教授,硕士研究生导师。E-mail:531879548@qq.com
  • 作者简介:耿玉芳(1993-),女,安徽阜阳人,硕士,护师。
  • 基金资助:
    安徽省教育厅示范基层教学组织（215）

Construction of post-traumatic growth model of ovarian cancer patients based on interpretative phenomenological analysis

GENG Yu-fang1a, QIN Ru-meng1b, WANG Hui1c, ZHANG Shan-shan2, ZHOU Li-hua3   

  1. 1a. Dept. of Critical Care Medicine; 1b. Dept. of Urology; 1c. Dept. of Nursing Administration, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefeii 230022, China;
    2. Operating Room, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Hefei 230031, China;
    3. School of Nursing, Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230601, China
  • Received:2024-03-08 Online:2024-09-25 Published:2024-10-08

PDF (PC)

163

赞

摘要： 目的 深入探索卵巢癌患者与疾病抗争过程中产生的创伤后成长体验,以期构建概念模型描述创伤后成长这一复杂经历。方法 采用诠释性现象学方法,2021年2—12月,通过便利抽样法选取13例卵巢癌患者进行半结构式深度访谈。访谈数据采用Smith方法进行分析。结果 卵巢癌患者创伤后成长经历共归纳为6个主题（谎言世界、现实世界、化疗世界、低谷耗竭、绝处逢生和自我成长）和18个副主题。寻找不同主题、副主题之间的关系和纽带,进一步诠释分析构建出卵巢癌患者创伤后成长经历的概念模型。结论 创伤后成长经历的概念模型提供了一个更系统、全面的考虑,揭示了患有卵巢癌的女性如何一步一步应对疾病走向成长的全面图景。提示医护人员密切关注卵巢癌人群的心理变化需求,提供情感-信息-经济早期支持,重塑心态防线,加强心态-情绪-行为联动管理,降低或消除疾病等原因引起的负面情绪,激发患者复原力,促使其积极治疗,早日实现自我成长。

关键词: 诠释性现象学, 卵巢癌, 创伤后成长, 模型

Abstract: Objective To explore the post-traumatic growth (PTG) of ovarian cancer patients during their struggle with the disease, and to construct a conceptual model to describe the PTG. Methods From February 2021 to December 2021, by convenience sampling, 13 ovarian cancer patients were selected for semi-structured in-depth interviews using interpretive phenomenology method. The interview data were analyzed by Smith method. Results The PTG of ovarian cancer patients were grouped into six themes (the world of lies, the real world, the world of chemotherapy, depression and exhaustion, survival and self-growth) and 18 sub-themes. The relationship and ties between different themes and sub-themes were explored to further interpret and analyze the conceptual model of PTG of ovarian patients. Conclusion The conceptual model of PTG is more systematic and holistic, revealing a comprehensive picture of how women with ovarian cancer cope step by step with the disease toward growth. It is suggested that medical staff should pay close attention to the psychological change needs of ovarian cancer population. Early emotional-information-economic support is conducive to remodeling the mental defense line. The mental-emotion-behavior linkage management helps to reduce or eliminate negative emotions caused by the disease and other reasons, stimulate the resilience of patients, promote their active treatment, and realize self-growth as soon as possible.

Key words: interpretive phenomenology, ovarian cancer, post-traumatic growth, model

中图分类号: 

  • R473.73
[1] Webb PM, Jordan SJ.Epidemiology of epithelial ovarian cancer[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol,2017,41:3-14.DOI:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2016.08.006.
[2] Kuroki L, Guntupalli SR.Treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer[J]. BMJ, 2020,371:3773.DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32552-2.
[3] Kanbergs AN, Manning-Geist BL, Pelletier A, et al.Neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not disproportionately influence post-operative complication rates or time to chemotherapy in obese patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer[J]. Gynecol Oncol,2020, 159(3):687-691.DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.09.011.
[4] Logue CA, Pugh J,Jayson G.Psychosexual morbidity in women with ovarian cancer[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2020,30(12):1983-1989.DOI:10.1136/ijgc-2020-002001.
[5] White AJ, Sandler DP, Gaston SA, et al.Use of hair products in relation to ovarian cancer risk[J]. Carcinogenesis,2021,42(9):1189-1195.DOI:10.1093/carcin/bgab056.
[6] Whicker M, Black J, Altwerger G, et al.Management of sexuality, intimacy, and menopause symptoms in patients with ovarian cancer[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol,017,217(4):395-403.DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2017.04.012.
[7] Tedeschi RG, Shakespeare-Finch J, Taku K, et al.Posttraumatic growth: theory, research, and applications[M]. New York: Routledge,2018:1-10.
[8] Magne H, Jaafari N, Voyer M.Post-traumatic growth: some conceptual considerations[J]. Encephale,2021,47(2):143-150.DOI:10.1016/j.encep.2020.05.021.
[9] Oh JM, Kim Y, Kwak Y.Factors influencing posttraumatic growth in ovarian cancer survivors[J]. Support Care Cancer,2021,29(4):2037-2045.DOI:10.1007/s00520-020-05704-6.
[10] 耿玉芳. 化疗期卵巢癌患者创伤后成长的质性研究[D].合肥:安徽医科大学,2021.DOI:10.26921/d.cnki.ganyu.2021.001118.
[11] Smith JA, Osborn M.Interpretative phenomenological analysis as a useful methodology for research on the lived experience of pain[J]. Br J Pain,2015, 9(1):41-42.DOI:10.1177/2049463714541642.
[12] Dossett LA, Kaji AH, Cochran A.SRQR and COREQ reporting guidelines for qualitative studies[J]. JAMA Surg,2021,156(9):875-876.DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2021.0525
[13] de la Fuente J, Kauffman DF, Boruchovitch E. Editorial: Past, present and future contributions from the social cognitive theory (Albert Bandura)[J].Front Psychol,2023,14:1258249.DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1258249.
[14] Davis LZ, Cuneo M, Thaker PH, et al.Changes in spiritual well-being and psychological outcomes in ovarian cancer survivors[J].Psychooncology,2018,27(2):477-483.DOI:10.1002/pon.4485.
[15] Rafiei S, Pashazadeh KF, Raoofi S, et al.Global prevalence of suicide in patients with cancer: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J].Arch Suicide Res,2023, 14:1-14.DOI:10.1080/13811118.2023.2240870.
[16] Spoletini I, Gianni W, Caltagirone C, et al.Suicide and cancer: where do we go from here?[J].Crit Rev Oncol Hematol, 2011, 78(3):206-219.DOI:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2010.05.005.
[17] 赵海艳,张远波,马玉芬,等.同伴支持对提高乳腺癌术后患者益处发现的实施体会[J].护理学报,2017,24(14):76-78.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2017.14.076.
[18] Budhwani S, Wodchis WP, Zimmermann C, et al.Self-management, self-management support needs and interventions in advanced cancer: a scoping review[J].BMJ Support Palliat Care, 2019, 9(1):12-25.DOI:10.1007/s13187-020-01861-8.
[19] 朱茜茜,杨惠云.聚焦解决模式在慢性病自我管理中的应用研究进展[J].护理学杂志,2024,39(3):126-129.
[20] He R, He X, Su Y, et al.Effect of ABC Theory model on negative emotion of young patients with breast cancer during treatment[J].J Multidiscip Healthc,2023,16:1883-1888.DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S405564.
[1] 郑小静, 严红虹, 李慧景, 陈思涓, 陈秀梅. 肝细胞癌伴低血糖症风险预测模型的构建与验证[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 53-58.
[2] 李亚可, 苏晴晴, 吕静, 李琪, 娄琳彤, 李海燕. 全膝关节置换患者疼痛与睡眠质量纵向关联的组基础模型双轨迹分析[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 6-11.
[3] 伍丽华, 吴心雨, 赖湘瑜, 邓宝贵, 黄泽青, 赵耀, 廖源, 沈彩萍, 李瑜. 人工关节置换术后患者深静脉血栓风险预测模型的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 12-16.
[4] 李雪, 廖常菊, 张健, 丁娟, 陈晓丽, 胡玉庭. 三级甲等医院ICU护士睡眠障碍的风险预测模型构建及验证[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 63-69.
[5] 刘琪, 刘佳丽, 刘玉, 杨丽敏, 范育英, 吕星, 覃惠英. 鼻咽癌患者诱导化疗序贯同期放化疗期间躯体-心理症状负担轨迹及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(1): 1-6.
[6] 余璐, 黄晓沁, 刘琳, 袁嘉敏, 邬青. 心力衰竭患者30天非计划性再入院风险预测模型的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(8): 43-48.
[7] 赵洁, 宋雅玲, 畅盼, 郭倩, 王锦华. 慢性心力衰竭患者及其照顾者心理弹性在疾病不确定感与生活质量间的主客体互倚中介模型研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 17-21.
[8] 薛荣, 张开利, 陈保云, 马荣慧, 张雨欣. 中老年脑卒中患者多维衰弱发展轨迹及其影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(6): 6-12.
[9] 周越, 张杰, 潘宇帆, 戴雨, 孙羽健, 肖益, 余雨枫. 机械通气患者衰弱风险预测模型的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(6): 56-61.
[10] 方天露, 刘俐惠. 基于SWOT-CLPV 分析模型的管理策略在互联网+护理服务中的实践[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(4): 29-32.
[11] 邢春凤, 李国新, 张广清, 刘雅鑫, 孙晓伟. 产妇产褥期乳房胀痛危险因素分析及风险预测模型构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(3): 6-11.
[12] 王丽云, 张明慧, 张新月, 沙凯辉. 产后压力性尿失禁风险预测模型的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(3): 57-62.
[13] 赵国瑞, 刘高明, 张凤, 周颖. 宫颈癌患者术后下肢淋巴水肿风险预测模型的构建及验证[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(24): 7-12.
[14] 王月, 刘国庆, 牛聪影, 张振伟, 孙建, 褚友艾, 秦寒枝. 髋部骨折患者术后30天死亡风险预测模型的范围综述[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(24): 51-56.
[15] 邓岚心, 张宇, 李敏锐, 高钰琳. 养老机构老年人认知功能与身体衰弱变化的交叉滞后分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(23): 8-12.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!