以质量求发展,以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (6): 60-64.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.06.060

• 调查研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

癌症患者及其配偶二元应对与心理弹性的主体-客体互倚模型研究

孙海燕, 秦阳, 徐益荣, 陈文艳   

  1. 江苏医药职业学院 护理学院,江苏 盐城 224005
  • 收稿日期:2021-11-08 出版日期:2022-03-25 发布日期:2022-04-08
  • 作者简介:孙海燕(1983-),女,江苏盐城人,硕士,副教授。E-mail:15951551901@139.com
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究项目(2021SJA1944); 江苏省高职院校教师专业带头人高端研修项目(苏高职培函[2020]10号)

Relationship between Dyadic Coping and Psychological Resilience in Cancer Survivor Couples: An Actor-partner Interdependence Model-based Analysis

SUN Hai-yan, QIN Yang, XU Yi-rong, CHEN Wen-yan   

  1. School of Nursing, Jiangsu Vocational College of Medicine, Yancheng 224005, China
  • Received:2021-11-08 Online:2022-03-25 Published:2022-04-08

摘要: 目的 探讨癌症患者和配偶的二元应对与心理弹性的关系,为临床干预提供理论依据。方法 采取便利抽样法,选取盐城4所三级医院的371对癌症患者及其配偶为研究对象,采用二元应对量表、心理弹性量表进对其行调查。基于主体-客体互倚模型分析癌症患者和配偶间二元应对与心理弹性的关系。结果 癌症患者二元应对总分为(62.40±14.08)分,癌症患者配偶总分为(61.83±15.10)分。癌症患者心理弹性总分为(62.36±13.11)分,癌症患者配偶总分为(60.47±12.80)分。癌症患者及其配偶的二元应对与自身及对方的心理弹性得分均呈正相关(r=0.312~0.739, 均P<0.001)。癌症患者及其配偶的二元应对都能够正向影响自身的心理弹性(β=0.616,0.700;均P<0.001),即主体效应显著。癌症患者及其配偶的二元应对都能够正向影响对方的心理弹性(β=0.330,0.651;均P<0.001),即客体效应显著。结论 癌症患者及其配偶的心理弹性受自身和对方支持应对行为的交互影响。医护人员应将癌症夫妻视为一个共同体,有助于制订以夫妻为中心的相互支持应对策略,从而减少应对癌症时的心理压力。

关键词: 癌症, 配偶, 二元应对, 心理弹性, 主体-客体互倚模型

Abstract: Objective To examine the relationship between dyadic coping and psychological resilience in cancer survivors and their spouses, and to provide theoretical basis for clinical intervention. Methods With convenience sampling, a total of 371 cancer survivors and their spouses were recruited from four tertiary hospitals in Yancheng City. Dyadic Coping Inventory and Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale were used to assess dyadic coping style and psychological resilience. The actor-Partner interdependence model was used to explore the association between dyadic coping and psychological resilience. Results The total score of dyadic coping of cancer patients was 62.40±14.08, and that in their spouses 61.83±15.10. The total score of psychological resilience of cancer patients and their spouses was 62.36±13.11, and 60.47±12.80 respectively. The total score of dyadic coping in cancer patients and their spouses was positively correlated with psychological resilience (r=0.312~0.739, all P<0.001). In terms of actor-effect, the score of dyadic coping in cancer patients and their spouses was positively correlated with their own psychological resilience score respectively (β=0.616, β=0.700, all P<0.001). In terms of partner-effect, the score of dyadic coping in cancer patients and their spouses was positively correlated with the counterparts' score of psychological resilience respectively (β=0.330, β=0.651, all P<0.001). Conclusion The psychological resilience of cancer survivors and their couples is affected by individual and the dyadic supportive coping. Patients and their caregivers should be viewed as a unit, and couple-centered positive coping strategies to reduce their psychological distress with cancer should be implemented.

Key words: cancer, spouse, dyadic coping, psychological resilience, actor-partner interdependence model

中图分类号: 

  • R473.73
[1] Bodenmann G, Hilpert P, Nussbeck FW, et al.Effects of Stress on the Social Support Provided by Men and Women in Intimate Relationships[J]. Psychol Sci,2015,26(10):1584-1594. DOI:10.1177/0956797615594616.
[2] 于歌,崔金金.二元应对模式对慢性心力衰竭患者生活质量及其配偶间亲密关系的影响[J].护理学报,2019,26(16):63-67. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2019.16.063.
[3] Traa MJ, De Vries J, Bodenmann G, et al.Dyadic Coping and Relationship Functioning in Couples Coping with Cancer: A Systematic Review[J]. Br J Health Psychol,2015,20(1):85-114. DOI:10.1111/bjhp.12094.
[4] Sinclair RR, Britt TW.Building Psychological Resilience in Military Personnel: Theory and Practice[M]. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2013.
[5] Lim J, Shon E, Paek M, et al.The Dyadic Effects of Coping and Resilience on Psychological Distress for Cancer Survivor Couples[J]. Support Care Cancer,2014,22(12):3209-3217. DOI:10.1007/s00520-014-2334-9.
[6] Kenny DA, Kashy DA, Cook WL.Dyadic Data Analysis[M]. New York: Guilford Publications,2020:145-148.
[7] Wang H, Yue H, Ren M, et al.Dyadic Effects of Family-functioning and Resilience on Quality of Life in Advanced Lung Cancer Patients and Caregivers: An Actor-partner Interdependence Mediation Model[J]. Eur J Oncol Nurs,2021,52:101963. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2021.101963.
[8] 罗群,周利华,王维利,等.妇科癌症患者和配偶夫妻支持应对与亲密关系的关系[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2017,31(12):964-970. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2017.12.006.
[9] Falconier MK, Nussbeck F, Bodenmann G.Dyadic Coping in Latino Couples:Validity of the Spanish Version of the Dyadic Coping Inventory[J]. Anxiety Stress Coping,2013,26(4):447-466. DOI: 10.1080/10615806.2012.699045.
[10] Xu F, Hilpert P, Randall AK, et al.Validation of the Dyadic Coping Inventory with Chinese Couples: Factorial Structure, Measurement Invariance, and Construct Validity[J]. Psychol Assess,2016,28(8): e127. DOI:10.1037/pas0000329.
[11] Connor KM,Davidson JR.Development of a New Resilience Scale: The Connor-davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC)[J]. Depress Anxiety,2003, 18(2):76-82.DOI:10.1002/da.10113.
[12] Yu X, Zhang J.Factor Analysis and Psychometric Evaluation of the Connor-davidson Resilience Scale(CD-RISC) with Chinese People[J].Soc Behav Personal,2007,35(1):19-30. DOI:10.2224/sbp.2007.35.1.19.
[13] 佟阳,金咏梅,王恬,等.心理弹性在女性乳腺癌术后上肢淋巴水肿患者正念水平与生活质量间的中介效应[J].护理学报,2019,26(10):7-10.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2019.10.007.
[14] Kenny DA, Ledermann T. Detecting, Measuring,Testing Dyadic Patterns in the Actor-partner Interdependence Model[J].J Fam Psychol,2010,24(3):359-366.DOI:10.1037/a0019651.
[15] 汤丹丹,温忠麟. 共同方法偏差检验:问题与建议[J]. 心理科学,2020,43(1):215-223.DOI:10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20200130.
[16] Kim Y,Carver CS, Spillers RL, et al.Individual and Dyadic Relations Between Spiritual Well‐being and Quality of Life among Cancer Survivors and Their Spousal Caregivers[J]. Psycho-oncology,2011,20(7):762-770.DOI:10.1002/pon.1778.
[17] Aydogan D, Kara E, Kalkan E.Understanding Relational Resilience of Married Adults in Quarantine Days[J]. Curr Psychol,2021,3:1-11. DOI: 10.1007/s12144-021-02224-2.
[18] 王孟成. 潜变量建模与Mplus应用(基础篇)[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2014:98-104.
[19] 刘畅,伍新春.主客体互倚性的成对模式及其检验[J].心理发展与教育,2017, 33(1):105-112. DOI:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2017.01.12.
[20] Ernst J, Hinz A, Niederwieser D, et al.Dyadic Coping of Patients with Hematologic Malignancies and Their Partners and Its Relation to Quality of Life: A Longitudinal Study[J]. Leuk Lymphoma, 2017,58(3):655-665.DOI:10.1080/10428194.2016.1194983.
[21] Rottmann N, Hansen DG, Larsen PV, et al.Dyadic Coping within Couples Dealing with Breast Cancer: A Longitudinal, Population-based Study[J]. Health Psychol, 2015,34(5):486-495. DOI: 10.1037/hea0000218.
[22] Conner KM, Davidson JR. Conner-davidson Resilience Scale Manual. User Guide [EB/OL]. (2009-04-02)[2021-08-20]. http://www.cd-risc.com/user-guide.
[23] 王慧. 晚期肺癌患者及其照顾者心理弹性、社会支持对生活质量影响的机制研究[D].济南:山东大学,2021. DOI:10.27272/d.cnki.gshdu.2021.001253.
[24] Seiler A, Jenewein J.Resilience in Cancer Patients[J]. Front Psychiatry,2019,10:208.DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00208.
[25] Aydogan D, Ozbay Y.Mediation Role of Dyadic Coping on Parenting Stress and Relational Resilience in Couples[J]. Marriage Fam Rev,2018,54(2):128-147.DOI:10.1080/01494929.2017.1302900.
[26] 王晓旭,张清. 家庭弹性对血液透析患者及其照顾者创伤后成长的交互影响[J]. 解放军护理杂志,2021,38(5):45-47. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.05.012.
[27] Meyers E, Lin A, Lester E, et al.Baseline Resilience and Depression Symptoms Predict Trajectory of Depression in Dyads of Patients and Their Informal Caregivers Following Discharge from the Neuro-ICU[J]. Gen Hosp Psychiatry,2020,62:87-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2019.12.003.
[28] Cook KS, Cheshire C, Rice ER, et al.Social Exchange Theory: Handbook of Social Psychology (2nd Ed)[M]. New York: Springer,2013: 61-88.
[1] 王冰冰, 马英芝, 孙小卫, 杨琴, 肖江琴. 中青年脑卒中患者与配偶二元应对潜在剖面分析及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(8): 7-12.
[2] 张小莉, 杨鑫玉, 肖宇, 刘春燕, 张璐, 伍晓琴, 黄月霖, 傅静. 晚期癌症患者代理决策者安宁疗护决策后悔研究的范围综述[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(8): 49-54.
[3] 黄佳颖, 张静, 梁丽婵, 孟江南, 叶红雨, 王为杰, 史蕾. 简版儿科症状筛查工具的汉化及在4~7岁癌症患儿中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(8): 55-59.
[4] 陈芮, 王梅, 唐晓霞, 朱傲雪, 毛惠娜. 基于ERG理论的免疫检查点抑制剂治疗癌症患者护理需求方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 1-5.
[5] 赵洁, 宋雅玲, 畅盼, 郭倩, 王锦华. 慢性心力衰竭患者及其照顾者心理弹性在疾病不确定感与生活质量间的主客体互倚中介模型研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 17-21.
[6] 袁华君, 段功香, 陈路桥, 王慧清. 癌症终末期患者救护意愿量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(6): 73-78.
[7] 段乃娟, 孙丽, 李凤侠, 张会. 基于二元应对的宫颈癌患者夫妻参与式绘画疗法干预方案构建研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(5): 7-11.
[8] 宋彩妮, 郑尧, 宋英, 刘丽华. 癌症照顾者信息隐瞒量表的汉化及在肺癌患者照顾者中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(3): 17-20.
[9] 李思媛, 吴雨泽, 魏雪梅, 罗澜峻, 邓美红, 李梅, 崔丽君. 低年资护士心理弹性的潜在剖面及其对适应性绩效的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(23): 1-7.
[10] 刘仲全, 杨秀, 傅忠华. 头颈癌患者女性配偶照顾者创伤后成长体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(22): 73-78.
[11] 栗跃歌, 孔涵, 曹鼎, 李佳欣, 尚娅萌, 常淑莹. 228例中青年宫颈癌术后患者癌症复发恐惧现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(20): 8-12.
[12] 潘婷, 陈艳, 孔方, 张爱玲, 陈丹蕾, 丁成亮. 克罗恩病患者及其配偶主观幸福感与婚姻调适的主客体效应分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(2): 1-5.
[13] 郭红涛, 张静, 李颖, 甄艺婉. 白血病患儿父母决策冲突现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(2): 22-26.
[14] 杨侠, 于卫华, 张雨溪, 邓曼, 任影, 张利, 张海燕. 377例社区老年多重慢病患者心理困扰现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(18): 50-55.
[15] 康俊贤, 崔玉, 张小丽, 邢凤梅, 汪凤兰. 共病老年人及其配偶内在力量、赋权水平与生存质量的关系研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(17): 8-12.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!