以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (18): 1-6.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.18.001

• 研究生园地 •    下一篇

天津市2 057名护生灵性照护认知现状及影响因素分析

汪张毅1a, 赵浩梅2, 王月1a, 王朝1a, 庞晓丽1b   

  1. 1.天津中医药大学 a.研究生院;b.护理学院,天津 301617;
    2.河北中医学院 护理学院,河北 石家庄 050000
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-20 出版日期:2021-09-25 发布日期:2021-10-12
  • 通讯作者: 庞晓丽（1976-）,女,天津人,博士,教授。E-mail：403033115@qq.com
  • 作者简介:汪张毅（1998-）,男,湖南湘西人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目（81603565）; 全国中医药高等教育“十四五”规划2021年度教育科研课题（DZ-20-07）; 天津市普通高等学校本科教学质量与教学改革研究计划项目（171006303D）

Status Quo of Cognition on Spiritual Care and Its Influence Factors in Nursing Students in Tianjin: A 2, 057-case Study

WANG Zhang-yi1a, ZHAO Hao-mei2, WANG Yue1a, WANG Zhao1a, PANG Xiao-li1b   

  1. 1a. Graduate School; 1b. School of Nursing, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 301617, China;
    2. School of Nursing, Hebei University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shijiazhuang 050000, China
  • Received:2021-03-20 Online:2021-09-25 Published:2021-10-12

PDF (PC)

451

赞

摘要： 目的 调查护生灵性照护认知现状,并分析其影响因素。方法 采用便利抽样法,于2020年11月—2021年4月抽取天津市5所院校共2 057名护生作为研究对象。采用一般资料调查表、中文版灵性照护认知量表、灵性健康简化量表及杰弗逊护生共情量表对其进行调查。采用多元线性回归分析护生灵性照护认知的影响因素。结果 2 057名护生灵性照护认知总分为（171.22±25.11）分,所有条目均分为（5.04±0.74）分;多元线性回归分析结果显示民族、学历、生源地、是否需要学校开设灵性照护培训或课程、灵性健康及共情能力是护生灵性照护认知的主要影响因素（P<0.05）,共解释总变异的43.4%。结论 天津市2 057名护生灵性照护认知处于中等水平,有待进一步提升。相关院校领导应根据护生个体化特征和差异实施灵性照护教育,如健全灵性照护教育体系和课程考核标准,定期邀请临床老师或专家开展相关讲座或培训,创新理论和临床实践教学模式等,多层次地提高护生灵性照护认知水平。

关键词: 护生, 灵性照护认知, 灵性健康, 共情能力, 影响因素

Abstract: Objective To investigate the status quo of cognition on spiritual care among nursing students, and analyze its influence factors. Methods A total of 2,057 nursing students from 5 universities and colleges in Tianjin were selected by using convenience sampling method from November 2020 to April 2021. And the survey was conducted by using general information questionnaire, the Chinese Version of the Spiritual Care-giving Scale, the Spiritual Health Scale Short Form, the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy-nursing Student for questionnaire survey. Multiple linear regression was used to analyze the influence factors of spiritual care cognition. Results The total score of spiritual care cognition was 171.22±25.11 and the average score for all entries was 5.04±0.74. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that nationality, education background, birth place, needs for spiritual care training or courses, spiritual health and empathy ability were main influencing factors of spiritual care cognition (P<0.05), explaining 43.4% of the total variation. Conclusion The cognition on spiritual care of 2,057 nursing students in Tianjin is at a medium level and needs to be further improved. It is suggested that spiritual care education according to the individualized characteristics and differences of nursing students is significant, such as improving the spiritual care education system and curriculum assessment standards, regularly inviting clinical teachers or experts to deliver lectures or training, and innovating the theory and clinical practice teaching mode, so as to improve the level of spiritual care cognition among nursing students in multiple ways.

Key words: nursing student, spiritual care cognition, spiritual health, empathy ability, influencing factor

中图分类号: 

  • R471
[1] Musa AS.Attitudes Toward Spiritual Care and the Provision of Spiritual Care Interventions among Jordanian Baccalaureate Nursing Students: Prevalence and Correlates[J]. Nurs Educ Perspect, 2020, 41(6):349-354. DOI:10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000637.
[2] Damiano RF, Dilalla LF, Lucchetti G, et al.Empathy in Medical Students Is Moderated by Openness to Spirituality[J]. Teach Learn Med, 2017, 29(2):188-195. DOI:10.1080/10401334.2016.1241714.
[3] Daghan S.Nursing Students'Perceptions of Spirituality and Spiritual Care: An Example of Turkey[J]. J Relig Health, 2018, 57(1):420-430. DOI:10.1007/s10943-017-0416-y.
[4] Tiew LH, Creedy DK.Development and Preliminary Validation of a Composite Spiritual Care-giving Scale[J]. Int J Nurs Stud, 2012, 49(6):682-690. DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.11.014.
[5] Hu Y, Tiew LH, Li F.Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Spiritual Care-giving Scale (C-SCGS) in Nursing Practice[J]. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2019, 19(1):21. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-019-0662-7.
[6] Hsiao YC, Chiang YC, Lee HC, et al.Psychometric Testing of the Properties of the Spiritual Health Scale Short Form[J]. J Clin Nurs, 2013, 22(21/22):2981-2990. DOI:10.1111/jocn.12410.
[7] 邱志军,刘可,姜娜. 湖南省高职护生共情现状的调查研究[J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2011, 27(1):68-71. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088.2011.01.034.
[8] 李宁,田冰洁,赵丹,等. 护理人员灵性照护教育研究进展[J]. 中国护理管理, 2017, 17(2):188-192. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2017.02.011.
[9] 史岩,赵怡婷,胡艳丽,等. 肿瘤科护士灵性照护认知与灵性照顾能力的相关性研究[J]. 医学与哲学, 2020, 41(7): 55-58. DOI:10.12014/j.issn.1002-0772.2020.07.14.
[10] Cooper KL, Chang E, Sheehan A, et al.The Impact of Spiritual Care Education upon Preparing Undergraduate Nursing Students to Provide Spiritual Care[J]. Nurse Educ Today, 2013,33(9):1057-1061.DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2012.04.005.
[11] Deluga A, Dobrowolska B, Jurek K, et al.Nurses'Spiritual Attitudes and Involvement-validation of the Polish Version of the Spiritual Attitude and Involvement List[J]. PLoS One,2020,15(9):e239068.DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0239068.
[12] 岳宗德. 大学生宗教信仰状况调查分析及教育对策——基于河南省地方高校大学生的调查[J]. 学校党建与思想教育, 2017(5):50-53.
[13] Pipkins CM, Rinker MA, Curl E.Spiritual Care Perceptions of Baccalaureate Nursing Students[J]. J Holist Nurs, 2020, 38(1):131-138. DOI:10.1177/0898010119887595.
[14] Donesky D, Sprague E, Joseph D.A New Perspective on Spiritual Care: Collaborative Chaplaincy and Nursing Practice[J]. ANS Adv Nurs Sci, 2020, 43(2):147-158. DOI:10.1097/ANS.0000000000000298.
[15] 焦妙蕊,胡艳丽,张琳,等. 灵性关怀培训对护士灵性健康和灵性照护能力的影响[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2020(4): 435-441.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2020.04.003.
[16] Tuzer H, Kirca K, Ozveren H.Investigation of Nursing Students'Attitudes Towards Death and Their Perceptions of Spirituality and Spiritual Care[J]. J Relig Health, 2020, 59(4):2177-2190. DOI:10.1007/s10943-020-01004-9.
[17] Chen CS, Chan SW, Chan MF, et al.Nurses'Perceptions of Psychosocial Care and Barriers to Its Provision: A Qualitative Study[J]. J Nurs Res, 2017, 25(6):411-418. DOI:10.1097/JNR.0000000000000185.
[18] Green C.Nurses and Patients'Perspectives on Spiritual Health Assessment[J]. J Relig Health, 2021, 60(1):122-133. DOI:10.1007/s10943-020-01113-5.
[1] 李丹妮, 邱丽燕, 吴隆燕, 谭铮可可, 陈欣, 杨丽. 前交叉韧带损伤日间手术患者恐动症的潜在剖面分析及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 12-17.
[2] 杜易梅, 刘莉, 郭立丽, 卢吉, 付苗苗, 刘杰. 妇科恶性肿瘤患者性健康研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 28-33.
[3] 李长娥, 徐真真, 张文忠, 吴燕, 季红. 新生儿父母脐带血储存决策影响因素的定性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 74-78.
[4] 魏利, 赵兴颖, 刘佳, 何雨璇, 陈晓梅, 杨雪, 鲜继淑, 杨燕妮. 神经外科重症住院患者家庭照顾者照顾负担及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 1-6.
[5] 杨蓓, 叶红芳, 张宁, 相卢伟, 路诗雨. 老年2型糖尿病患者体力活动现状及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 7-12.
[6] 刘畅, 张维, 王翠雪, 岳鹏. ICU实施非限制性探视制度的影响因素研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(1): 34-38.
[7] 王进波, 吴姗, 黄蓉蓉, 陈代凤, 洪梅, 李审绥. 头颈癌患者自杀影响因素及干预的研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(1): 39-43.
[8] 陈莹莹, 丁红, 张根生. 患儿术后谵妄影响因素的研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(9): 32-35.
[9] 曹娟, 李方, 于跃, 戴丽, 杨丹丹, 李志华, 徐欣怡, 戴琪, 陈柯宇. 食管癌术后静脉血栓栓塞症风险预测模型的构建及验证[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(8): 63-68.
[10] 朱心悦, 嵇冰聪, 蓝雪芬, 季晓珍. 糖尿病患者电子健康素养研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 36-39.
[11] 彭静, 李金秀, 谭江红, 王晓庆. 动漫短视频联合翻转课堂教学对急诊科护生自主学习能力的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(6): 22-25.
[12] 李莹, 周志欢. ICU护理缺失的研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(6): 43-46.
[13] 黄鑫, 余丽君, 张二明, 哈丽娜. 稳定期COPD患者的能量摄入现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(5): 12-16.
[14] 张思爱, 赖翠薇, 李佳佳, 张亚军, 汪张毅, 张正涛, 法天锷. 护士专业态度的影响因素研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(4): 38-41.
[15] 张许婷, 罗彩凤, 魏兰芝, 邵校, 尚彬, 卞泽坤, 吕妃, 孙炜怡. 实习护生体面劳动感的潜在剖面分析及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(3): 12-16.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!