以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (19): 41-46.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.19.041

• 循证护理 • 上一篇    下一篇

神经外科患者规范化身体约束管理的循证护理实践

许妮娜1, 杨中善1, 刘宁2, 乐格芬1, 詹昱新1, 吴艳妮3, 汪欢1   

  1. 1.华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院,湖北 武汉 430022;
    2.遵义医科大学珠海校区,广东 珠海 519041;
    3.南方医科大学南方医院,广东 广州 510515
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-22 出版日期:2020-10-10 发布日期:2020-11-11
  • 通讯作者: 刘宁（1981-）,女,陕西西安人,博士,副教授。
  • 作者简介:许妮娜（1977-）,女,湖北武汉人,硕士,主管护师,护士长。

Evidence-based Nursing Practice of Physical Restraint Standardized Management in Neurosurgery Department

XU Ni-na1, YANG Zhong-shan1, LIU Ning2, LE Ge-fen1, ZHAN Yu-xin1, WU Yan-ni3, WANG Huan1   

  1. 1. Union Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China;
    2. Zhuhai Campus, Zunyi Medical University, Zhuhai 519041, China;
    3. Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University,Guangzhou 510515, China
  • Received:2020-05-22 Online:2020-10-10 Published:2020-11-11

PDF (PC)

517

赞

摘要： 目的 制定神经外科患者规范化身体约束策略并应用于我院神经外科,以规范身体约束策略,提高身体约束护理质量。方法 遵循JBI临床证据实践应用模式,包括证据应用前基线审查、证据应用实践变革及证据应用后效果再审查3个阶段。将最佳证据转化为12条审查指标,应用于神经外科病房。比较证据应用前后患者身体约束率、非计划性拔管率、患者身体约束体验、护士对患者身体约束知信行水平及最佳证据执行率。结果 证据应用后,神经外科患者身体约束率从证据应用前的7.69%下降至2.91%;证据应用前后患者非计划性拔管发生率比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）;证据应用后患者约束体验优于证据应用前,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）;证据应用后神经外科护士对患者身体约束知信行水平高于证据应用前（P<0.05）。12项审查标准执行情况,除审查指标10证据应用前后差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）外,其余各项审查标准证据应用后执行情况均优于证据应用前（P<0.05）。结论 基于最佳证据的规范化身体约束管理策略应用于神经外科患者后,可降低患者身体约束率,同时不增加患者非计划性拔管发生,改善患者约束体验,提高护士对患者身体约束知识信念行为水平,从而改善患者结局,提高护理质量。

关键词: 身体约束, 管理, 神经外科, 循证实践

Abstract: Objective To develop the standardized physical restraint strategy for neurosurgery department, to promote the application of the best evidence of physical restraint and improve the quality of physical restraint nursing.Methods We conducted the study based on JBI clinical evidence practice application model and there were three stages: baseline review before evidence application, change of evidence application, and effect review after evidence application. The best evidence was converted into 12 audit criteria through structural discussion then the criteria were applied in neurosurgical ward. Physical restraint rate, complication rate, nurses’ KAP (knowledge, attitude, practice) regarding physical restraint and audit criteria execution rate were compared before and after evidence application.Results After the application of evidence, the physical restraint rate decreased from 7.69% to 2.91%. The incidence of unplanned extubation showed no statistical significance (P>0.05).Patients’ experience on physical restraint was improved, which was statistically significantly (P<0.05) nurses’ KAP regarding physical restraint was enhanced (P<0.05). Of the audit criteria execution rate of the 12 audit criteria,the execution rate of all the criteria except that of NO.10 was improved(P<0.05).Conclusion Evidence-based standardized physical restraint management strategy can lower the rate of physical constraint in neurosurgery, improve the level of physical restraint knowledge of nurses and regulate their behaviors, so as to improve the outcome of patients and improve the quality of nursing.

Key words: physical restraint, management, neurosurgery, evidence-based practice

中图分类号: 

  • R47
[1] 国家卫生计生委医院管理研究所护理中心.护理敏感质量指标实用手册(2016版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2016:138-139.
[2] 李静逸,洪洋,宋春梅, 等.ICU护士对患者身体约束体验的Meta整合[J].中华护理杂志,2018,53(10):1249-1255.
[3] Wilson C, Rouse L, Rae S, et al.Is Restraint A ‘Necessary Evil’ in Mental Health Care? Mental Health Inpatients’ and Staff Members’ Experience of Physical Restraint[J].Int J Ment Health Nurs, 2017, 26(5):500-512.DOI:10.1111/inm.12382.
[4] Bellenger E, Ibrahim JE, Bugeja L, et al.Physical Restraint Deaths in a 13-year National Cohort of Nursing Home Residents[J].Age Ageing,2017,46(4):688-693.DOI:10.1093/ageing/afw246.
[5] 丁艳.自制约束手套在神经外科躁动患者中的应用[J].现代临床护理,2012,11(3):82-83.
[6] 吴孟航,刘帆,王琼.神经ICU意外拔管护理风险防范策略[J].现代预防医学,2014, 41(11):2110-2112.
[7] Eskandari F, Abdullah KL, Zainal NZ, et al.Incidence Rate and Patterns of Physical Restraint Use Among Adult Patients in Malaysia[J].Clin Nurs Res,2018, 27(3):278-295.DOI:10.1177/1054773816677807.
[8] 庄晓艳,许勤,朱妹芹,等.神经外科ICU患者身体约束相关非计划拔管影响因素研究[J].护理学杂志,2014, 29(2):15-17.DOI:10.3870/hlxzz.2014.02.015.
[9] Lach HW, Leach KM, Butcher HK.Evidence-based Practice Guideline: Changing the Practice of Physical Restraint Use in Acute Care[J].J Gerontol Nurs,2016, 42(2):17-26.DOI:10.3928/00989134-20160113-04.
[10] 杨中善,许妮娜,詹昱新,等.住院患者规范化身体约束管理最佳证据总结[J].护理学报,2019, 26(4):31-36.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2019.04.031.
[11] 王季芳,洪怡莉,周行涛,等.眼科日间手术术前管理的循证实践[J].中华护理杂志,2018, 53(3):276-271.DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2018.03.002.
[12] 张晓静,张会芝,李葆华.非计划性拔管信息化管理系统的建立及应用研究[J].中华护理杂志,2018, 53(11):1360-1362.DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2018.11.016.
[13] 谭媛,白建萍,王海英.神经外科患者留置管道的风险分级管理体会[J].护理学报, 2014, 21(3):28-30.
[14] Scheepmans K, Dierckx de Casterlé, Bernadette, Paquay L, et al.Restraint Use in Older Adults in Home Care: A Systematic Review[J].Int J Nurs Stud,2018, 79(3):122-136.DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.11.008.
[15] Dikiciyan J, Sabangan B, Katz B,et al.Australian and New Zealand Society for Geriatric Medicine Position Statement -physical Restraint Use in Older People[J].Australas J Ageing, 2016, 35(3):225.DOI:10.1111/ajag.12224.
[16] 李佳星,任之珺,张紫君,等.缩减约束方案对预ICU气管插管非计划性拔管的效果研究[J].中华护理杂志,2017,52(5):549-553.DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2017.05.008.
[17] 潘燕彬,郝巍巍,张晶晶,等.住院患者身体约束真实体验研究的系统评价[J].中国护理管理,2016,16(8):1033-1040.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2016.08.007.
[18] Ertugrul B, Ozden D.The Effect of Physical Restraint on Neurovascular Complications in Intensive Care Units[J].Aust Crit Care,2019,9(5):98-101.DOI:10.1016/j.aucc.2019.03.002.
[19] 邹丽燕,曹梅娟.国内外灵性健康测评工具的研究进展[J].护理学杂志,2017, 32(9):98-101.DOI:10.3870/1.issn.1001-4152.2017.09.098.
[20] Fariña-López E, Estévez-Guerra GJ, Polo-Luque ML, et al.Physical Restraint Use with Elderly Patients: Perceptions of Nurses and Nursing Assistants in Spanish Acute Care Hospitals[J].Nurs Res,2018, 67(1):55-59.DOI:10.1097/NNR.0000000000000252.
[21] 孙龙凤,周冬洁,王爱平.身体约束规范化培训在内科重症监护病房中的应用与效果[J].中华护理教育, 2014,11(9):694-696.DOI:10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2014.09.015.
[1] 刘璐, 朱钰, 曹义, 张华, 彭玉娜. 腹腔热灌注化疗患者术中实施不同目标体温管理的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 59-63.
[2] 李疆伟, 王树君, 李长仔, 胡宝山, 焦桂梅, 张卫红. 基于压力应对理论的护理干预对结直肠癌术后永久性肠造口患者心理压力、负性情绪及自我管理的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 64-69.
[3] 马小兰, 徐维昉. 基于症状管理理论的冰水喷雾对胸腔镜下肺叶切除术口渴患者的应用效果[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 70-73.
[4] 吴超瑜, 刘尚昆. 麻醉恢复室护士危机管理能力的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 17-21.
[5] 李若雨, 刘鑫, 林萍, 陈丹, 林桦. 出院患者用药安全管理的最佳证据总结[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 50-55.
[6] 魏利, 赵兴颖, 刘佳, 何雨璇, 陈晓梅, 杨雪, 鲜继淑, 杨燕妮. 神经外科重症住院患者家庭照顾者照顾负担及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 1-6.
[7] 杨蓓, 叶红芳, 张宁, 相卢伟, 路诗雨. 老年2型糖尿病患者体力活动现状及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 7-12.
[8] 夏碧芸, 陈瑜, 吴彦妍, 胡雁. 降低经桡动脉冠状动脉介入术后老年患者桡动脉闭塞发生的循证实践[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 37-43.
[9] 朱天顺, 朱可可, 薛会元, 焦聪聪, 魏长慧, 王贺. 信息框架效应理论在健康管理领域应用的范围综述[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 44-49.
[10] 陈燕华, 冯梅, 胡佩欣. 粤港联合个案管理师临床实践培训体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(1): 24-28.
[11] 全伊萍, 陈霞, 胡琼丹. 脑心健康管理师核心胜任力评价指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(9): 5-9.
[12] 叶香, 黎楷, 黄敏, 张倩, 李际敏, 刘荣珍, 孟敏, 朱少玉, 谢翠华. 对成年2型糖尿病患者基于移动APP+家属共管血糖的研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(9): 60-65.
[13] 郑桃花, 高翔, 康梅, 魏海霞, 柳笑, 张丽. 4R危机管理理论在结肠镜围检查期低血糖风险管理中的应用[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 22-26.
[14] 倪乐凤, 刘林, 沈春华, 乔瑶, 周亮, 朱强, 龚卫娟. 输血护理时限管理相关指南的质量评价及内容分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 51-56.
[15] 李爱群, 李利花, 王芳, 蒋源元, 蔡益民. 慢性病资源利用在冠心病PCI术后患者自我超越与自我管理行为间的中介效应[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(6): 13-17.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!