以质量求发展,以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (2): 43-47.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.02.043

• 循证护理 • 上一篇    下一篇

痔疮患者术后快速康复护理循证实践

郭素云1, 代莹2, 施兰来1, 奚润1, 颜景颖1, 叶秀娟1   

  1. 1.北京中医药大学深圳医院,广东 深圳 518172;
    2.广州市妇女儿童医疗中心,广东 广州 510623
  • 收稿日期:2019-10-18 发布日期:2020-07-21
  • 作者简介:郭素云(1977-),女,广东深圳人,硕士,副主任护师,科护士长,南方医院JBI循证护理合作中心临床循证护理师。
  • 基金资助:
    广东省中医药局面上科研项目(20180404082652)

Evidence-based Practice of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery for Patients with Hemorrhoids

GUO Su-yun1, DAI Ying2, SHI Lan-lai1, XI Run1, YAN Jing-ying1, YE Xiu-juan1   

  1. 1. Shenzhen Hospital of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen 518172, China;
    2. Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou 510623, China
  • Received:2019-10-18 Published:2020-07-21

摘要: 目的 探讨基于最佳证据的痔疮患者术后快速康复干预应用于临床实践并评价其效果。方法 采用JBI临床证据实践应用模式,检索快速康复中有关痔疮术后康复指导的相关证据,利用JBI证据推荐级别系统(2014版)进行证据质量评价,对审查指标运用FAME结构从可行性、适宜性、临床意义和有效性4个方面对审查指标进行评价。将采纳的证据转化为临床审查指标,通过查看护理记录、现场审查和问卷法的方式收集资料。比较证据应用前后痔疮术后患者治疗效果、肛门疼痛、并发症发生率。结果 证据应用后痔疮术后患者治疗效果高于证据应用前(P<0.05);证据应用后痔疮术后患者在术后1 d和5 d肛门疼痛评分低于证据应用前(P<0.05);证据应用后痔疮术后患者并发症发生率低于证据应用前(P<0.05);11项指标中,指标11证据应用前已是100%,其余10项指标证据应用后执行率高于证据应用前,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001)。结论 基于快速康复外科的循证护理实践可优化痔疮患者的术后管理,可提高患者治疗效果,减轻患者术后肛门疼痛,降低术后并发症的发生率,促进痔疮术后患者的快速康复。

关键词: 痔疮, 术后, 快速康复, 护理, 循证实践

Abstract: Objective To explore and assess the effect of evidence-based enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) practice on postoperative rehabilitation of patients with hemorrhoids. Methods The standard procedure supported by the JBI-PACES program was used to retrieve relevant evidence of ERAS practice for postoperative rehabilitation of patients with hemorrhoids. JBI evidence pre-classification and evidence rank system (2014 edition) was used to evaluate the quality of evidence. FAME structure was used to evaluate the evidence from the respect of feasibility,appropriateness, clinical meaningfulness and effectiveness. The included evidence was translated into clinical audit indicators, and data were collected through reviewing nursing records, on-site examination and questionnaires. Comparisons were made in the effectiveness of treatment, anal pain, and incidence of complications before and after the implementation of the evidence-based ERAS practice. Results After the application of evidence, the effectiveness of treatment was improved (P<0.05) and patients' anal pain score on the first and fifth day after surgery was lower than that before the application of evidence (P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications after evidence application was lower than that before (P<0.05). Regarding the 11 indicators, the execution rate of all the indicators, except indicator 11, the execution rate of which had already been 100%, was higher after the application of evidence, indicating statistical significance(P<0.001). Conclusion Evidence-based nursing practice based on rapid rehabilitation surgery can optimize postoperative management of patients with hemorrhoids, improve therapeutic effect, reduce postoperative anal pain and the incidence of postoperative complications, and promote the rapid recovery of patients with hemorrhoids.

Key words: hemorrhoids, postoperative, rapid postoperative rehabilitation, nursing, evidence-based practice

中图分类号: 

  • R473.6
[1] Wren AA, Ross AC, D’Souza G, et al. Multidisciplinary Pain Management for Pediatric Patients with Acute and Chronic Pain: A Foundational Treatment Approach When Prescribing Opioids[J]. Children(Basel),2019,6(2):E33.DOI:10.3390/children 6020033.
[2] 肖景双. 肛肠病术后疼痛的机理及治疗[J].临床医药文献电子杂志,2018,5(52):68-69.DOI:10.3877/j.issn.2095-8242.2018.52.035.
[3] 沈洪明. 自拟痔篓熏洗剂坐浴治疗肛肠病术后疼痛水肿的观察[J].中医临床研究,2018,10(5):110-111.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-7860.2018.05.051.
[4] 曾树宏,申璐,高月,等. 中医综合护理缓解肛肠疾病术后疼痛的系统评价[J]. 现代医药卫生,2018,34(1):27-28. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009?5519.2018.01.009.
[5] 张俊平,周英凤,周敏,等.提高与母乳喂养相关的乳头疼痛或损伤管理的循证实践[J].中华护理杂志, 2014, 49(9):1062-1066. DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2014.09.008.
[6] Davis BR, Lee-Kong SA, Migaly J, et al.The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hemorrhoids[J].Dis Colon Rectum,2018,61(3):284-292.DOI:10.1097/DCR.0000000000001030.
[7] 中华医学会外科学分会、中华医学会麻醉学分会.加速康复外科中国专家共识及路径管理指南(2018版)[J].中国实用外科指南,2018, 38(1):1-20.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.2018.06.002.
[8] Higuero T, Abramowitz L, Castinel A, et al.Guidelines for the Treatment of Hemorrhoids[J]. J Visc Surg, 2016, 153(3):213-218. DOI:10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2016.03.004.
[9] Glick DB, Holt NF, Nussmeier NA. Overview of Post-anesthetic Care Fore Adult Patients[EB/OL].(2018-10-22)[2019-05-24].https://www.uptodate.com/contents/overview-of-post-anesthetic-care-for-adult-patients?search=overview%20of%20postanesthetic%20care%20for%20adult%20patients&source=search_result&selectedTitle=1~150&usage_type= default&display_rank=1.
[10] Montgomery R, McNamara SA.Multimodal Pain Management for Enhanced Recovery:Reinforcing the Shift from Traditional Pathways Through Nurse-led Interventions[J]. AORN J, 2016,104(6S):S9-S16.DOI:10.1016/j.aorn.2016.10.012.
[11] 王春青,胡雁. JBI证据分级及证据推荐级别系统(2014版)[J].护士进修杂志,2015,30(11):964-967.DOI:10.16821/j.cnki.hsjx.2015.11.002.
[12] The Joanna Briggs Institute Levels of Evidence and Grades of Recommendation Working Party. Supporting Document for the Jonna Briggs Institute levels of Evidence and Grades of Recommendation[EB/OL]. (2014-03-01)[2018-08-29].http://joannabriggs.org/jbi-approach.html#tabbed-nav=Levels-of-Evidence
[13] 国家中医药管理局.中医病证诊断疗效标准(2012版)[S].北京:中国医药科技出版社,2012:112-124.
[14] 邓宝贵,全小明,谭彩霞,等. 电针配合耳穴压豆治疗人工髋置换患者术后疼痛效果观察[J].护理学报,2013,20(6B):58-59. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9969.2013.12.023.
[15] 邓颖辉,马冬花,姚秋琼,等. 激光坐浴对混合痔Milligan-Morgan术后患者伤口愈合的疗效观察[J].护理学报,2014,21(12):35-36.
[16] 梁健,谈燕飞,范元,等. 混合痔术后患者局部应用清热消炎洗剂湿热敷的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2011,18(4A):69-70. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9969.2011.07.023.
[1] 张静, 彭焕椽, 陈佳, 鲁永锦, 刘克玄, 侯晓敏. 成人体外循环心脏手术患者预防手术部位感染的最佳证据总结[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 41-47.
[2] 刘璐, 朱钰, 曹义, 张华, 彭玉娜. 腹腔热灌注化疗患者术中实施不同目标体温管理的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 59-63.
[3] 李疆伟, 王树君, 李长仔, 胡宝山, 焦桂梅, 张卫红. 基于压力应对理论的护理干预对结直肠癌术后永久性肠造口患者心理压力、负性情绪及自我管理的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 64-69.
[4] 龚祖华, 孙丽, 谭璇, 张悦, 施丹, 程娟娟. 肝胆外科术后患者基础体征采集-比对-识别隐匿型病情变化的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 74-78.
[5] 李苗苗, 熊莉娟, 齐磊, 李敏, 向御婷. 基于Ridit分析法和秩和比法的疾病诊断相关分组在护理绩效管理中的应用[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 22-26.
[6] 焦雪萍, 王志稳, 韩舒羽. ICU老年患者躁动行为的干预研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 38-42.
[7] 李若雨, 刘鑫, 林萍, 陈丹, 林桦. 出院患者用药安全管理的最佳证据总结[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 50-55.
[8] 杨小娟, 毛孝容, 王静, 江华, 李蓉, 樊宇, 文青, 李林章, 陈晓容. 成人重度烧伤患者早期肠内营养管理的最佳证据总结[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 56-61.
[9] 夏碧芸, 陈瑜, 吴彦妍, 胡雁. 降低经桡动脉冠状动脉介入术后老年患者桡动脉闭塞发生的循证实践[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 37-43.
[10] 朱天顺, 朱可可, 薛会元, 焦聪聪, 魏长慧, 王贺. 信息框架效应理论在健康管理领域应用的范围综述[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 44-49.
[11] 刘硕怡, 熊莉娟, 李凌, 王玉梅, 何嘉, 李鑫, 袁淑蕾, 郭雪琴, 王暘婧, 张慧娟. 老年住院患者衰弱预防及管理临床实践指南的质量评价及内容分析[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 50-55.
[12] 闫亚铃, 乐美妮, 姚桃琴, 王雪莲, 姜建玲, 辛艺. 老年胃肠肿瘤患者围手术期衰弱管理方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 74-78.
[13] 顾妍鑫, 刘丽, 胡惠惠, 周芳, 杨怡, 高锐, 王培双. 以核心能力为导向的麻醉护理硕士专业学位研究生临床实践培养方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(1): 7-12.
[14] 孙娟, 李亚莉, 马安娜, 王华, 张会敏. 护理研究生对社区护理实践思政教学体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(1): 19-23.
[15] 李格格, 王婉儿, 蒲江锋, 谢章浩, 杨妞, 黄惠根. 基于熵权-TOPSIS结合RSR法广东省护理人力资源配置评价研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(1): 29-33.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!